Comparisons of clinical performance of guardian laryngeal mask with laryngeal mask airway ProSeal

BMC Anesthesiology

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Pajiyar, Ajay Kumar ^a   Wen, Zhiting ^b   Wang, Haiyun ^a   Ma, Lin ^a   Miao, Lumin ^a   Wang, Guolin ^a  

^a TIANJIN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b TIANJIN CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (China)

Author keywords

Ambu cuff pressure gauge; Guardian laryngeal mask airway; ProSeal laryngeal mask airway

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE SAFETY; DYSPHAGIA; ELECTIVE SURGERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRAVENOUS ANESTHESIA; LARYNGEAL MASK; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PNEUMATIC CUFF; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SORE THROAT; STOMACH TUBE; SUPINE POSITION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; PRESSURE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; STANDARDS;

EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; LARYNGEAL MASKS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRESSURE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84929158348     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712253     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12871-015-0039-3     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Tiefenthaler W, Eschertzhuber S, Brimacombe J, Fricke E, Keller C, Kaufmann M. A randomised, non-crossover study of the GuardianCPV laryngeal Mask versus the LMA Supreme in paralysed, anaesthetised female patients. Anaesthesia. 2013;68(6):600-4.
2. Brimacombe J, Keller C. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology. 2000;93(1):104-9.
3. Cook TM, Nolan JP, Verghese C, Strube PJ, Lees M, Millar JM, et al. Randomized crossover comparison of the proseal with the classic laryngeal mask airway in unparalysed anaesthetized patients. Br J Anaesth. 2002;88(4):527-33.
4. Galgon RE, Schroeder KM, Han S, Andrei A, Joffe AM. The air-Q((R)) intubating laryngeal airway vs the LMA-ProSeal(TM): a prospective, randomised trial of airway seal pressure. Anaesthesia. 2011;66(12):1093-100.
5. Williams DL, Zeng JM, Alexander KD, Andrews DT. Randomised Comparison of the AMBU AuraOnce Laryngeal Mask and the LMA Unique Laryngeal Mask Airway in Spontaneously Breathing Adults. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2012;2012:405812.
6. Russo SG, Cremer S, Eich C, Jipp M, Cohnen J, Strack M, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging study of the in vivo position of the extraglottic airway devices i-gel and LMA-Supreme in anaesthetized human volunteers. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109(6):996-1004.
7. Chauhan G, Nayar P, Seth A, Gupta K, Panwar M, Agrawal N. Comparison of clinical performance of the I-gel with LMA proseal. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2013;29(1):56-60.
8. Keller C, Brimacombe JR, Keller K, Morris R. Comparison of four methods for assessing airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in adult patients. Br J Anaesth. 1999;82(2):286-7.
9. Brimacomb J, Keller C, Kurian S, Myles J. Reliability of epigastric auscultation to detect gastric insufflation. Br J Anaesth. 2002;88(1):127-9.
10. Brimacombe J, Holyoake L, Keller C, Brimacombe N, Scully M, Barry J, et al. Pharyngolaryngeal, neck, and jaw discomfort after anesthesia with the face mask and laryngeal mask airway at high and low cuff volumes in males and females. Anesthesiology. 2000;93(1):26-31.
11. Verghese C, Ramaswamy B. LMA-SupremeTM-a new single-use LMATM with gastric access: a report on its clinical efficacy. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101(3):405-10.
12. Hosten T, Gurkan Y, Ozdamar D, Tekin M, Toker K, Solak M. A new supraglottic airway device: LMA-supreme, comparison with LMA-Proseal. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009;53(7):852-7.
13. Seet E, Rajeev S, Firoz T, Yousaf F, Wong J, Wong DT, et al. Safety and efficacy of laryngeal mask airway Supreme versus laryngeal mask airway ProSeal: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010;27(7):602-7.
14. Eschertzhuber S, Brimacombe J, Hohlrieder M, Keller C. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme--a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients. Anaesthesia. 2009;64(1):79-83.
15. Hosten T, Yildiz TS, Kus A, Solak M, Toker K. Comparison of Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway and ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway during Cholecystectomy. Balkan Med J. 2012;29(3):314-9.
16. Brain AI, Verghese C, Strube PJ. The LMA 'ProSeal'-a laryngeal mask with an oesophageal vent. Br J Anaesth. 2000;84(5):650-4.
17. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Puhringer F. Pharyngeal mucosal pressure and perfusion: a fiberoptic evaluation of the posterior pharynx in anesthetized adult patients with a modified cuffed oropharyngeal airway. Anesthesiology. 1999;91(6):1661-5.
18. Wong JG, Heaney M, Chambers NA, Erb TO, von Ungern-Sternberg BS. Impact of laryngeal mask airway cuff pressures on the incidence of sore throat in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2009;19(5):464-9.
19. van Zundert A, Brimacombe J. The LMA Supreme-a pilot study. Anaesthesia. 2008;63(2):209-10.
20. Nott MR, Noble PD, Parmar M. Reducing the incidence of sore throat with the laryngeal mask airway. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1998;15(2):153-7.
21. Seet E, Yousaf F, Gupta S, Subramanyam R, Wong DT, Chung F. Use of manometry for laryngeal mask airway reduces postoperative pharyngolaryngeal adverse events: a prospective, randomized trial. Anesthesiology. 2010;112(3):652-7.