The air-Q® intubating laryngeal airway vs the LMA-ProSeal TM: A prospective, randomised trial of airway seal pressure

Anaesthesia

Volumn 66, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 1093-1100

  Galgon, R E ^a   Schroeder, K M ^a   Han, S ^a   Andrei, A ^a   Joffe, A M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AIRWAY PRESSURE; AIRWAY SEAL PRESSURE; AMBULATORY SURGERY; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICE REMOVAL; ELECTIVE SURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HUMAN; LARYNGEAL AIRWAY INTUBATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBIDITY; OPEN STUDY; PAIN; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESPIRATORY TRACT INTUBATION; SORE THROAT;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; LARYNGEAL MASKS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRESSURE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84860414551     PISSN: 00032409     EISSN: 13652044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06863.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Asai T, Latto IP, Vaughan RS,. The distance between the grille of the laryngeal mask airway and the vocal cords-is conventional intubation through the laryngeal mask airway safe? Anaesthesia 1993; 48: 667-9. (Pubitemid 23240725)
2. Cook TM, Lee G, Nolan JP,. The Proseal™ laryngeal mask airway-a review of the literature. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 2005; 52: 739-60. (Pubitemid 41644171)
3. Pandit JJ, MacLachlan K, Dravid RM, Popat MT,. Comparison of times to achieve tracheal intubation with three techniques using the laryngeal or intubating laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia 2002; 57: 128-32. (Pubitemid 34149949)
4. Danha RF, Thompson JL, Popat MT, Pandit JJ,. Comparison of fibreoptic-guided orotracheal intubation through classic and single-use laryngeal mask airways. Anaesthesia 2005; 60: 184-8. (Pubitemid 40220688)
5. Hodzovic I, Petterson J, Wilkes AR, Latto IP,. Fibreoptic intubation using three airway conduits in a mannequin-the effect of operator experience. Anaesthesia 2007; 62: 591-97.
6. Blair EJ, Mihai R, Cook TM,. Tracheal intubation via the Classic™ and Proseal™ laryngeal mask airways-a manikin study using the Aintree Intubating Catheter. Anaesthesia 2007; 62: 385-7. (Pubitemid 46487250)
7. Jagannathan N, Roth AG, Sohn LE, Pak TY, Amin S, Suresh S,. The new air-Q™ intubating laryngeal airway for tracheal intubation in children with anticipated difficult airway: a case series. Pediatric Anesthesia 2009; 19: 618-22.
8. Yang D, Deng XM, Tong SY, Luo MP, Xu KL, Wei YK,. Fibreoptic intubation through Cookgas intubating laryngeal airway in two children. Anaesthesia 2009; 64: 1141-51.
9. Bakker EJ, Valkenburg M, Galvin EM,. Pilot study of the air-Q intubating laryngeal airway in clinical use. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 2010; 38: 346-48.
10. Erlacher W, Tiefenbrunner H, Kästenbauer T, Schwarz S, Fitzgerald RD,. CobraPLUS and Cookgas air-Q versus Fastrach for blind endotracheal intubation: a randomised controlled trial. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 2011; 28: 181-6.
11. Karim YM, Swanson DE,. Comparison of blind tracheal intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask airway (LMA Fastrach™) and the Air-Q™. Anaesthesia 2011; 66: 185-90.
12. Joffe AM, Liew EC, Galgon RE, Viernes D, Treggiari MM,. The second-generation air-Q® intubating laryngeal mask for airway maintenance during anaesthesia in adults: a report of the first 70 uses. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 2011; 39: 40-5.
13. Matioc AA, Arndt GA,. Unassisted Gum elastic bougie-guided insertion of the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway. Anesthesiology 2004; 101: 1240-1. (Pubitemid 39430812)
14. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Vosoba D,. Gum elastic bougie-guided insertion of the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway is superior to the digital and introducer tool techniques. Anesthesiology 2004; 100: 25-9. (Pubitemid 38031650)
15. Altman DG,. Statistics and ethics in medical research-III how large a sample? British Medical Journal 1980; 281: 1336-8. (Pubitemid 10029868)
16. Keller C, Pühringer F, Brimacombe JR,. Influence of cuff volume on oropharyngeal leak pressure and fibreoptic position with the laryngeal mask airway. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1998; 81: 186-7. (Pubitemid 28379360)
17. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Morris R, Mecklem D,. A comparison of the disposable versus the reusable laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed adult patients. Anesthesia and Analgesia 1998; 87: 921-4. (Pubitemid 28455495)
18. Brimacombe JR, Brimacombe JC, Berry AM, et al., A comparison of the laryngeal mask airway and cuffed oropharyngeal airway in anesthetized adult patients. Anesthesia and Analgesia 1998; 87: 147-52. (Pubitemid 28311629)
19. Brimacombe J, von Goedecke A, Keller C, Brimacombe L, Brimacombe M,. The laryngeal mask airway Unique™ versus the Soft Seal™ laryngeal mask: a randomized, crossover study in paralyzed, anesthetized patients. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2004; 99: 1560-3. (Pubitemid 39407315)
20. Brimacombe J, Keller C,. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway. Anesthesiology 2000; 93: 104-9.
21. Van Zundert AAJ, Fonck K, Al-Shaikh B, Mortier E,. Comparison of the LMA-Classic™ with the new disposable Soft Seal laryngeal mask in spontaneously breathing adult patients. Anesthesiology 2003; 99: 1066-71. (Pubitemid 37339450)
22. Cook TM, Trümpelmann P, Beringer R, Stedeford J,. A randomised comparison of the Portex Softseal™ laryngeal mask airway with the LMA-Unique™ during anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 2005; 60: 1218-25. (Pubitemid 41762844)
23. Francksen H, Bein B, Cavus E, et al., Comparison of LMA Unique, Ambu laryngeal mask and Soft Seal laryngeal mask during routine surgical procedures. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 2007; 24: 134-40. (Pubitemid 46058450)
24. Greenberg RS, Brimacombe J, Berry A, Gouze V, Piantadosi S, Dake EM,. A randomized controlled trial comparing the cuff oropharyngeal airway and the laryngeal mask airway in spontaneously breathing anesthetized adults. Anesthesiology 1998; 88: 970-77. (Pubitemid 28193324)
25. Paech MJ, Tweedie O, Stannard K, et al., Randomized, crossover comparison of the single-use SoftSeal™ and the LMA Unique™ laryngeal mask airways. Anaesthesia 2005; 60: 354-9. (Pubitemid 40450524)
26. Shafik MT, Bahlman BU, Hall JE, Ali MS,. A comparison of the Soft Seal™ disposable and the Classic re-usable laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia 2006; 61: 178-81. (Pubitemid 43337408)
27. Cao MM, Webb T, Bjorksten AR,. Comparison of disposable and reusable laryngeal mask airways in spontaneously ventilating adult patients. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 2004; 32: 530-4. (Pubitemid 39172458)
28. Sudhir G, Redfern D, Hall JE, Wilkes AR, Cann C,. A comparison of the disposable Ambu® AuraOnce™ laryngeal mask with the reusable LMA Classic™ laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia 2007; 62: 719-22. (Pubitemid 46929967)
29. Brimacombe J, Holyoake L, Keller C, et al., Emergence characteristics and postoperative laryngopharyngeal morbidity with the laryngeal mask airway: a comparison of high versus low initial cuff volume. Anaesthesia 2000; 55: 338-43. (Pubitemid 30209452)
30. Seet E, Yousaf F, Gupta S, Subramanyam R, Wong DT, Chung F,. Use of manometry for laryngeal mask airway reduces postoperative pharyngolaryngeal adverse events. Anesthesiology 2010; 112: 652-7.
31. Asai T, Howell TK, Koga K, Morris S,. Appropriate size and inflation of the laryngeal mask airway. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1998; 80: 470-4. (Pubitemid 28171374)
32. Voyagis GS, Batzioulis PG, Secha-Doussaitou PN,. Selection of the proper size of laryngeal mask airway in adults. Anesthesia and Analgesia 1996; 83: 663-4. (Pubitemid 26296400)
33. Berry AM, Brimacombe JR, McManus KF, Goldblatt M,. An evaluation of the factors influencing selection of the optimal size of laryngeal mask airway in normal adults. Anaesthesia 1998; 53: 565-70. (Pubitemid 28306307)