All preclinical trials should be registered in advance in an online registry

European Journal of Clinical Investigation

Volumn 44, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 891-892

  Jansen, Sanne J ^a   Doevendans, Pieter A ^a   Chamuleau, Steven A J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; ONLINE SYSTEM; PRECLINICAL TRIAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLISHING; REGISTER; DRUG SCREENING; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERNET; PROCEDURES;

DRUG EVALUATION, PRECLINICAL; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERNET; PUBLICATION BIAS; PUBLISHING; REGISTRIES;

EID: 84929130722     PISSN: 00142972     EISSN: 13652362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/eci.12299     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki, ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Eur J Emerg Med 2008;8:221-3.
2. Ross JS, Mulvey GK, Hines EM, Nissen SE, Krumholz HM. Trial publication after registration in ClinicalTrials.Gov: a cross-sectional analysis. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000144.
3. Gibson LM, Brazzelli M, Thomas BM, Sandercock PAG. A systematic review of clinical trials of pharmacological interventions for acute ischaemic stroke (1955-2008) that were completed, but not published in full. Trials 2010;11:43.
4. Chalmers I, Glasziou P, Godlee F. All trials must be registered and the results published. BMJ 2013;105:14-6.
5. Dwan K, Gamble C, Williamson PR, Kirkham JJ. Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias - an updated review. PLoS ONE 2013;8:e66844.
6. Wager E, Williams P. 'Hardly worth the effort'? Medical journals 'policies and their editors 'and publishers 'views on trial registration and publication bias?: quantitative and qualitative study. BMJ 2013; 5248, 1-9.
7. Chalmers I, Dickersin K. Biased under-reporting of research reflects biased under-submission more than biased editorial rejection. F1000Res 2013;2:1.
8. Chan A-W, Fujian V, Andrew J, Tom D, Kay G, Peter C et al. Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing in accessible research. Lancet 2014;383:257-66.
9. The European parliament and the council. Directive 2010/63/EU of the European parliament and of the council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. Off J Eur Union 2010;L276:33-79.
10. Kirkham JJ, Dawn KM, Altman DG, Gamble C, Dodd S, Smyth R et al. The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews. BMJ 2013;340:c365.
11. Sena E, van der Worp HB, Howells D, Macleod M. How can we improve the preclinical development of drugs for stroke? Trends Neurosci 2007;30:433-9.
12. Sena ES, van der Worp HB, Bath PMW, Howells DW, Macleod MR. Publication bias in reports of animal stroke studies leads to major overstatement of efficacy. PLoS Biol 2010;8:e1000344.
13. Macleod MR, O'Collins T, Howells DW, Donnan GA. Pooling of animal experimental data reveals influence of study design and publication bias. Stroke 2004;35:1203-8.