Live birth and cumulative live birth rates in expected poor ovarian responders defined by the Bologna criteria following IVF/ICSI treatment

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2015, Pages

  Chai, Joyce ^a   Lee, Vivian Chi Yan ^a   Yeung, Tracy Wing Yee ^a   Li, Raymond Wun Hang ^a   Ho, Pak Chung ^a   Ng, Ernest Hung Yu ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIRTH RATE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMALE SUBFERTILITY; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMAN; ITALY; LIVE BIRTH; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MISCELLANEOUS NAMED GROUPS; OOCYTE RETRIEVAL; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POOR OVARIAN RESPONDER; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TREATMENT RESPONSE; CLINICAL TRIAL; HONG KONG; IN VITRO FERTILIZATION; PREGNANCY;

ADULT; BIRTH RATE; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HONG KONG; HUMANS; LIVE BIRTH; PREGNANCY;

EID: 84929120389     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119149     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Ubaldi FM, Rienzi L, Ferrero S, Baroni E, Sapienza F, Cobellis L, et al. Management of poor responders in IVF. Reprod Biomed Online 2005; 10:235-246. PMID: 15823231
2. Venetis CA, Kolibianakis EM, Tarlatzi TB, Tarlatzis BC. Evidence-based management of poor ovarian response. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2010; 1205:199-206. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05665.x PMID: 20840273
3. Kryou D, Kolibianakis EM, Venetis CA, Papanikolaou EG, Bontis J, Tarlatzis BC. How to improve the probability of pregnancy in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 91:749-766. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.12.077 PMID: 18639875
4. Polyzos NP, Devroey P. A systematic review of randomized trials for the treatment of poor ovarian responders: is there any light at the end of the tunnel? Fertil Steril 2011; 96:1058-1061. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.09.048 PMID: 22036048
5. Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser BC, Tarlatzis B, Nargund G, Gianaroli L, et al. ESHRE consensus on the definition of "poor response" to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod 2011; 26:1616-1624. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der092 PMID: 21505041
6. Polyzos NP, Nwoye M, Corona R, Blockeel C, Stoop D, Haentjens P, et al. Live birth rates in Bologna poor responders treated with ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI. Reprod Biomed Online 2014; 28:469-474. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.11.010 PMID: 24581984
7. Broer SL, Mol BW, Hendriks D, Broekmans FJ. The role of anti-Mullerian hormone in prediction of outcome after IVF: comparison with the antral follicle count. Fertil Steril 2009; 91:705-714. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.12.013 PMID: 18321493
8. La Marca A, Signinolfi G, Radi D, Argento C, Baraldi E, Artenisio AC, et al. Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) as a predictive marker in assisted reproductive technology (ART). Hum Reprod Update 2010; 16:113-130. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmp036 PMID: 19793843
9. Broekmans J, Kwee J, Hendriks DJ, Mol BW, Lambalk CB. A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome. Hum Reprod Update 2006; 12:685-718. PMID: 16891297
10. Li HW, Lee VC, Lau EY, Yeung WS, Ho PC, Ng EH. Role of baseline antral follicle count and anti-mullerian hormone in prediction of cumulative live birth in the first in vitro fertilization cycle: a retrospective cohort analysis. PLoS One. 2013; 8:e61095. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061095 PMID: 23637787
11. Yeung WS, Li RH, Cheung TM, Ng EH, Lau EY, Ho PC. Frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. Hong Kong Med J 2009; 15:420-426. PMID: 19966345
12. Oudendijk JF, Yarde F, Eijkemans MJ, Broekmans FJ, Broer SL. The poor responder in IVF: is the prognosis always poor?: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2012; 18:1-11. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmr037 PMID: 21987525
13. El-Toukhy T, Khalaf Y, Hart R, Taylor A, Braude P. Young age does not protect against the adverse effects of reduced ovarian reserve - an eight year study. Hum Reprod 2002; 17:1519-1524. PMID: 12042271
14. Polyzos NP, Blockeel C, Verpoest W, De Vos M, Stoop D, Vloeberghs V, et al. Live birth rates following natural cycle IVF in women with poor ovarian response according to the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod 2012; 12:3481-3486. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des318 PMID: 22940767
15. Ke H, Chen X, Liu YD, Ye DS, He YX, Chen SL. Cumulative live birth rate after three ovarian stimulation IVF cycles for poor ovarian responders according to the bologna criteria. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci 2013; 33:418-422. doi: 10.1007/s11596-013-1134-7 PMID: 23771670
16. Klinker ER, Broekmans FJ, Looman CW, Te Velde ER. A poor response in the first cycle is not necessarily related to a poor prognosis in subsequent cycles. Fertil Steril 2004; 81:1247-1253. PMID: 15136085
17. Garcia-Velasco JA, Somigliana E. Management of endometriomas in women requiring IVF: to touch or not to touch. Hum Reprod 2009; 24:496-501. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den398 PMID: 19056774
18. van der Gaast MH, Eijkemans MJ, van der Net JB, de Boer EJ, Burger CW, van Leeuwen FE, et al. Optimum number of oocytes for a successful first IVF treatment cycle. Reprod Biomed Online 2006; 13:476-480. PMID: 17007663
19. Hendriks DJ, te Velde ER, Looman CW, Bansci LF, Broekmans FJ. Expected poor ovarian response in predicting cumulative pregnancy rates: a powerful tool. Reprod Biomed Online 2008; 17:727-736. PMID: 18983760
20. Reichman DE, Goldschlag D, Rosenwaks Z. Value of antimullerian hormone as a prognostic indicator of in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril 2014; 101:1012-1018. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.12.039 PMID: 24491452
21. Younis JS. The Bologna criteria for poor ovarian response; has the job been accomplished? Hum Reprod 2012; 27:1874-1875. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des118 PMID: 22473398
22. Tarlatzis BC, Zepiridis L, Grimbizis G, Bontis J. Clinical management of low ovarian response to stimulation for IVF: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2003; 9:61-76. PMID: 12638782