Cumulative live birth rate after three ovarian stimulation IVF cycles for poor ovarian responders according to the bologna criteria

Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology - Medical Science

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 418-422

  Ke, Hui ^a   Chen, Xin ^a   Liu, Yu Dong ^a   Ye, De Sheng ^a   He, Yu Xia ^a   Chen, Shi Ling ^a  

^a SOUTHERN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Bologna criteria; cumulative live birth; in vitro fertilization; ovarian stimulation; poor responders

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHINA; CLINICAL TRIAL; FEMALE; FEMALE INFERTILITY; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMAN; LIVE BIRTH; MIDDLE AGED; OVULATION INDUCTION; PREGNANCY; STATISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; CHINA; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMANS; INFERTILITY, FEMALE; LIVE BIRTH; MIDDLE AGED; OVULATION INDUCTION; PREGNANCY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84879300521     PISSN: 16720733     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11596-013-1134-7     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Healy DL, Okamato S, Morrow L, et al. Contributions of in vitro fertilization to knowledge of the reproductive endocrinology of the menstrual cycle. Baillieres Clin Endocrinol Metab, 1987,1(1):133-152
2. Jennings JC, Moreland K, Peterson CM. In vitro fertilisation. A review of drug therapy and clinical management. Drugs, 1996,52(3):313-343
3. Ulug U, Ben-Shlomo I, Turan E, et al. Conception rates following assisted reproduction in poor responder patients: a retrospective study in 300 consecutive cycles. Reprod Biomed Online, 2003,6(4):439-443
4. Biljan MM, Buckett WM, Dean N, et al. The outcome of IVF-embryo transfer treatment in patients who develop three follicles or less. Hum Reprod, 2000,15(10): 2140-2144
5. De Sutter P, Dhont M. Poor response after hormonal stimulation for in vitro fertilization is not related to ovarian aging. Fertil Steril, 2003,79(6):1294-1298
6. Inge GB, Brinsden PR, Elder KT. Oocyte number per live birth in IVF: were Steptoe and Edwards less wasteful? Hum Reprod, 2005,20(3):588-592
7. Veleva Z, Jarvela IY, Nuojua-Huttunen S, et al. An initial low response predicts poor outcome in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection despite improved ovarian response in consecutive cycles. Fertil Steril, 2005,83(5):1384-1390
8. Hendriks DJ, te Velde ER, Looman CW, et al. Expected poor ovarian response in predicting cumulative pregnancy rates: a powerful tool. Reprod Biomed Online, 2008,17(5):727-736
9. Orvieto R, Meltcer S, Nahum R, et al. The influence of body mass index on in vitro fertilization outcome. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2009,104(1):53-55
10. Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser BC, et al. ESHRE consensus on the definition of' poor response' to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod, 2011,26(7):1616-1624
11. Polyzos NP, Devroey P. A systematic review of randomized trials for the treatment of poor ovarian responders: is there any light at the end of the tunnel? Fertil Steril, 2011,96(5):1058-1061
12. Polyzos NP, Blockeel C, Verpoest W, et al. Live birth rates following natural cycle IVF in women with poor ovarian response according to the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod, 2012,27(12):3481-3486
13. Lainas TG, Sfontouris IA, Zorzovilis IZ, et al. Flexible GnRH antagonist protocol versus GnRH agonist long protocol in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome treated for IVF: a prospective randomised controlled trial (RCT). Hum Reprod, 2010,25(3):683-689
14. Stolwijk AM, Hamilton CJ, Hollanders JM, et al. A more realistic approach to the cumulative pregnancy rate after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod, 1996,11(3):660-663
15. Olivius K, Friden B, Lundin K, et al. Cumulative probability of live birth after three in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Fertil Steril, 2002,77(3):505-510
16. Saldeen P, Kallen K, Sundstrom P. The probability of successful IVF outcome after poor ovarian response. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2007,86(4):457-461
17. Timeva T, Milachich T, Antonova I, et al. Correlation between number of retrieved oocytes and pregnancy rate after in vitro fertilization/ intracytoplasmic sperm infection. Sci World J, 2006,6:686-690
18. Zhen XM, Qiao J, Li R, et al. The clinical analysis of poor ovarian response in in-vitro-fertilization embryo-transfer among Chinese couples. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2008,25(1):17-22
19. Maman E, Geva LL, Yerushalmi G, et al. ICSI increases ongoing pregnancy rates in patients with poor response cycle: multivariate analysis of 2819 cycles. Reprod Biomed Online, 2012,25(6):635-641
20. Hanoch J, Lavy Y, Holzer H, et al. Young low responders protected from untoward effects of reduced ovarian response. Fertil Steril, 1998,69(6):1001-1004
21. Galey-Fontaine J, Cedrin-Durnerin I, Chaibi R, et al. Age and ovarian reserve are distinct predictive factors of cycle outcome in low responders. Reprod Biomed Online, 2005,10(1):94-99