Social categorization

The SAGE Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping and Discrimination

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 526-543

  Gaertner, Samuel L ^a   Dovidio, John F ^b   Houlette, Melissa A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c College of Mount St Joseph in Cincinnati ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84929009691     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781446200919.n32     Document Type: Chapter

References (94)

1. Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., &Sanford, R. N.(1950). The authoritarian personality. New York:Harper.
2. Allport, G. W.(1954/1979). The nature of prejudice. New York:Addison-Wesley.
3. Aron, A., McLaughlin-Volpe, T., Mashek, D., Lewandowski, G., Wright, S. C., &Aron, E. N.(2005). Including others in the self. In W.Stroebe & M.Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 15, pp. 101-132).Hove, E. Sussex, U.K.:Psychology Press.
4. Bachman, B. A.(1993). An intergroup model of organizational mergers. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Psychology, University of Delaware, Newark.
5. Banker, B. S., &Gaertner, S. L. Achieving step-family harmony: An intergroup relations approach. Journal of Family Psychology, 12,310-325. (1998).
6. Boldry, J. G. Gaertner, L., &Quinn, J. Measuring the measures: A meta-analytic investigation of the measures of outgroup homogeneity. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 10,147-178. (2007).
7. Brewer, M. B. Ingroup bias in the minimal inter-group situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. PsychologicalBulletin, 86,307-324. (1979).
8. Brewer, M. B.(1988). A dual process model of impression formation. In T.Srull & R.Wyer (Eds.). Advances in social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 1-36).Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
9. Brewer, M. B. The many faces of social identity: Implications for political psychology. Political Psychology, 22,115-125. (2001).
10. Brewer, M. B., &Miller, N.(1984). Beyond the contact hypothesis: Theoretical perspectives on desegregation. In N.Miller & M. B.Brewer (Eds.), Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation (pp. 281-302).Orlando, FL:Academic Press.
11. Brown, R Eller, A. Leeds, S., &Stace, K. Intergroup contact and intergroup attitudes: A longitudinal study. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37,692-703. (2007).
12. Brown, R., &Hewstone, M.(2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. In M. P.Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 37, pp. 255-343).San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
13. Brown, R. J., &Turner, J. C. The criss-cross categorization effect in intergroup discrimination. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18,371-383. (1979).
14. Brown, R. J., &Turner, J. C.(1981). Interpersonal and intergroup behavior. In J. C.Turner & H.Giles (Eds.), Intergroup behavior (pp. 33-64).Chicago, IL:The University of Chicago Press.
15. Brown, R. J. Vivian, J., &Hewstone, M. Changing attitudes through intergroup contact: The effects of group membership salience. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29,741-764. (1999).
16. Brown, R. J., &Wade, G. Superordinate goals and intergroup behavior: The effect of role ambiguity and status on intergroup attitudes and task performance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17,131-142. (1987).
17. Campbell, D. T. Common fate, similarity and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Science, 3,14-25. (1958).
18. Campbell, D. T.(1965). Ethnocentric and other altruistic motives. In D.Levine (Eds.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 13, pp. 283-311).Lincoln, NE:University of Nebraska Press.
19. Crisp, R. J. Stone, C. H., &Hall, N. R. Recategorization and subgroup identification: Predicting and preventing threats from common ingroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 32,230-243. (2006).
20. Correll, J., &Park, B. A model of the ingroup as a social resource. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9,341-359. (2005).
21. Deschamps, J. C., &Brown, R. Superordinate goals and intergroup conflict. British Journal of Social Psychology, 22,189-195. (1983).
22. Dovidio, J. F. Gaertner, S. L., &Validzic, A. Intergroup bias: Status, differentiation, and a common ingroup identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75,109-120. (1998).
23. Dovidio, J. F. Gaertner, S. L. Validzic, A. Matoka, K. Johnson, B., &Frazier, S. Extending the benefits of re-categorization: Evaluations, self-disclosure and helping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33,401-420. (1997).
24. Ferguson, C. K., &Kelley, H. H. Significant factors in over-evaluation of own groups' products. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69,223-228. (1964).
25. Fiske, S. T., Lin, M., &Neuberg, S. L.(1999). The continuum model: Ten years later. In S.Chaiken & Y.Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 211-254).New York:Guilford.
26. Fiske, S. T., &Taylor, S. E.(1991). Social cognition (2nd ed). New York:McGraw-Hill.
27. Gaertner, S. L. Dovidio, J. F. Rust, M. C. Nier, J. Mottola, G. R. Banker, B. Nier, J. Ward, C. M. &Houlette, M. Reducing intergroup Bias: Elements of Cooperation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 76,388-402. (1999).
28. Gaertner, S. L., &Dovidio, J. F.(2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The Common Ingroup Identity Model. Philadelphia, PA:Psychology Press.
29. Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Anastasio, P. A., Bachman, B. A., &Rust, M. C.(1993). The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. In W.Stroebe & M.Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 4. pp. 1-26).NewYork:John Wiley & Sons.
30. Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Banker, B., Rust, M., Nier, J., Mottola, G., &Ward, C.(1997). Does racism necessarily mean anti-Blackness? Aversive racism and pro-Whiteness. In M.Fine, L.Powell, L.Weis, & M.Wong (Eds.), Off white (pp. 167-178).London:Routledge.
31. Gaertner, S. L. Mann, J. Murrell, A., &Dovidio, J. F. Reducing intergroup bias: The benefits of recategorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57,239-249. (1989).
32. Gaertner, S. L., Rust, M. C., Dovidio, J. F., Bachman, B. A., &Anastasio, P. A.(1996). The Contact Hypothesis: The role of a common ingroup identity on reducing intergroup bias among majority and minority group members. In J. L.Nye & A. M.Brower (Eds.), What's social about social cognition? (pp. 230-360).Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
33. Gómez, A. Dovidio, J. F. Huici, C. Gaertner, S. L. &Cuardrado, I. The other side of We: When outgroup members express common identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34,1613-1626. (2008).
34. González, R., &Brown, R. Generalization of positive attitude as a function of subgroup and superordinate group identification in intergroup contact. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33,195-214. (2003).
35. González, R., &Brown, R. Dual identities and intergroup contact: Group status and size moderate the generalization of positive attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42,753-767. (2006).
36. Guerra, R., Rebelo, M., &Monteiro, M. B.(2004, June). Changing intergroup relations: Effects of recategorization, decategorization and dual identity in the reduction of intergroup discrimination. Paper presented at Change in Intergroup Relations: 7th Jena Workshop on Intergroup Processes, Friedricht Schiller University, Jena.
37. Guerra, R., Rebelo, M. M. B., Riek, B. M., Mania, E. W., Gaertner, S. L. &Dovidio, J. F. (in press). How should intergroup contact be structured to reduce bias among majority and minority group children? Group Processes and Intergroup Behavior.
38. Hall, N. R., &Crisp, R. J. Considering multiple criteria for social categorization can reduce intergroup bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31,1435-1444. (2005).
39. Hamilton, D. L., &Sherman, J. W.(1994). Stereotypes. In R. S.Wyer & T. K.Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 1-68).Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
40. Hewstone, M. The 'ultimate attribution error'? A review of the literature on intergroup causal attribution. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20,311-335. (1990).
41. Hewstone, M., &Brown, R. J.(1986). Contact is not enough: An intergroup perspective on the "Contact Hypothesis." In M.Hewstone & R.Brown (Eds.), Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters (pp. 1-44).Oxford:Basil Blackwell.
42. Hewstone, M. Hassebrauck, M. Wirth, A., &Waenke, M. Pattern of disconfirming information and processing instructions as determinants of stereotype change. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39,399-411. (2000).
43. Hogg, M. A.(2001). Self-category and subjective uncertainty resolution: Cognitive and motivational facets of social identity and group membership. In J. P.Forgas, K. D.Williams, & L.Wheeler (Eds.), The social mind: Cognitive and motivational aspects of interpersonal behavior (pp. 323-349).New York:Cambridge University Press.
44. Hogg, M. A., &Reid, S. A. Social identity, self-categorization, and the communication of group norms. Communication Theory, 16,7-30. (2006).
45. Hornsey, M. J., &Hogg, M. A. Subgroup relations: A comparison of mutual intergroup differentiation and common ingroup identity models of prejudice reduction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26,242-256. (2000).
46. Hornstein, H. A.(1976). Cruelty and kindness: A new look at aggression and altruism. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
47. Houlette, M. Gaertner, S. L. Johnson, K. M. Banker, B. S. Riek, B. M., &Dovidio, J. F. Developing a more inclusive social identity: An elementary school intervention. Journal of Social Issues, 60,35-56. (2004).
48. Howard, J. M., &Rothbart, M. Social categorization for in-group and out-group behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38,301-310. (1980).
49. Huo, Y. J. Procedural justice and social regulation across group boundaries: Does subgroup identity undermine relationship-based governance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29,336-348. (2003).
50. Huo, Y. J. Smith, H. H. Tyler, T. R., &Lind, A. E. Superordinate identification, subgroup identification, and justice concerns: Is separatism the problem. Is assimilation the answer? Psychological Science, 7,40-45. (1996).
51. Jetten, J. Spears, R., &Postmes, T. Intergroup distinctiveness and differentiation: A meta-analytic integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86,862-879. (2004).
52. Kane, A. A. Argote, L., &Levine, J. M. Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96,56-71. (2005).
53. Kenworthy, J. B., Turner, R. N., Hewstone, M., &Voci, A.(2005). Intergroup contact: When does it work, and why? In J. F.Dovidio, P.Glick & L. A.Rudman (Eds.), On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport (pp. 278-292).Malden, MA:Blackwell.
54. Karpinski, A., &Von Hippel, W. The role of the linguistic intergroup bias in expectancy maintenance. Social Cognition, 14,141-163. (1996).
55. Klandermans, B. Sabucedo, J. M., &Rodriguez, M. Inclusiveness of identification among farmers in the Netherlands and Galicia. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34,279-295. (2004).
56. Kramer, R. M., &Brewer, M. B. Effects of group identity on resource utilization in a simulated commons dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46,1044-1057. (1984).
57. Lamoureaux, M. J.(2008). Reducing intergroup bias: When intergroup contact is instrumental for achieving group goals. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Psychology, University of Delaware, Newark.
58. Levine, M. Prosser, A. Evans, D., &Reicher, S. Identity and emergency intervention: How social group membership and inclusiveness of group boundaries shape helping behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31,443-453. (2005).
59. Maass, A. Salvi, D. Arcuri, L., &Semin, G. R. Language use in intergroup contexts: The linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57,981-993. (1989).
60. Miller, N. Personalization and the promise of contact theory. Journal of Social Issues, 58,29-44. (2002).
61. Miller, N., &Brewer, M. B.(1984). The social psychology of desegregation: An introduction. In N.Miller & M. B.Brewer (Eds.), Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation (pp. 1-10).Orlando, FL:Academic Press.
62. Miller, N. Brewer, M. B., &Edwards, K. Cooperative interaction in desegregated settings: A laboratory analog. Journal of Social Issues, 41,63-79. (1985).
63. Monteiro, M. B., Guerra, R., &Rebelo, M.(2009). Reducing prejudice: Common Ingroup and Dual Identity in unequal status intergroup encounters. In S.Demoulin, J.-P.Leyens, & J. F.Dovidio (Eds.), Intergroup misunderstandings: Impact of divergent social realities (pp. 273-290).NewYork:Psychology Press.
64. Mummendey, A., &Wenzel, M. Social discrimination and tolerance in intergroup relations: Reactions to intergroup difference. Personality and Social Psychology Review 3,158-174. (1999).
65. Nier, J. A. Gaertner, S. L. Dovidio, J. F. Banker, B. S., &Ward, C. M. Changing interracial evaluations and behavior: The effects of a common group identity. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 4,299-316. (2001).
66. Otten, S., &Moskowitz, G. B. Evidence for implicit evaluative in-group bias: Affect-based spontaneous trait inference in a minimal group paradigm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36,77-89. (2000).
67. Park, B., &Rothbart, M. Perception of out-group homogeneity and levels of social categorization: Memory for the subordinate attributes of in-group and out-group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42,1051-1068. (1982).
68. Perdue, C. W. Dovidio, J. F. Gurtman, M. B., &Tyler, R. B. "Us" and "Them": Social categorization and the process of intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59,475-486. (1990).
69. Pettigrew, T. F. Intergroup Contact Theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49,65-85. (1998).
70. Pfeifer, J. H. Ruble, D. N. Bachman, M. A. Alvarez, J. M. Cameron, J. A., &Fuligni, A. J. Social identities and intergroup bias om immigrant and nonimmigrant children. Developmental Psychology, 43,496-507. (2007).
71. Piliavin, J. A., Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., &Clark, R. D., III(1981). Emergency intervention. NewYork:Academic Press.
72. Rabbie, J. M.(1982). The effects of intergroup competition and cooperation on intragroup and intergroup relationships. In V. J.Derlega & J.Grzelak (Eds.), Cooperation and helping behavior: Theories and research (pp. 128-151).New York:Academic Press.
73. Rebelo, M., Guerra, R., &Monteiro, M. B.(2004, June). Reducing prejudice: Comparative effects of three theoretical models. Paper presented at the Fifth Biennial Convention of the Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues, Washington, DC.
74. Robbins, J. M., &Krueger, J. I. Social projection to ingroups and outgroups: A review and meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9,32-47. (2005).
75. Rothbart, M., &John, O. P. Social categorization and behavioral episodes: A cognitive analysis of the effects of intergroup contact. Journal of Social Issues, 41,81-104. (1985).
76. Schino, G. Grooming and agonistic support: A meta-analysis of primate reciprocal altruism. Behavioral Ecology, 18,115-120. (2007).
77. Sherif, M., Harvey, O. J., White, B. J., Hood, W. R., &Sherif, C. W.(1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The Robbers Cave experiment. Norman, OK:University of Oklahoma Book Exchange.
78. Smith, E. R., &Henry, S. An ingroup becomes part of the self: Response time evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22,635-642. (1996).
79. Stürmer, S. Snyder, M., &Omoto, A. M. Prosocial emotions and helping: The moderating role of group membership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88,532-546. (2005).
80. Smith, H. J., &Tyler, T. R. Justice and power: When will justice concerns encourage the advantaged to support policies which redistribute economic resources and the disadvantaged to willingly obey the law? European Journal of Social Psychology, 26,171-200. (1996).
81. Tajfel, H. Cognitive aspects of prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 25,79-97. (1969).
82. Tajfel, H. Billig, M. G. Bundy, R. P., &Flament, C. Social categorisation and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1,149-177. (1971).
83. Tajfel, H., &Turner, J. C.(1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G.Austin & S.Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-48).Monterey, CA:Brooks/Cole.
84. Trivers, R. L. The evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 46,35-57. (1971).
85. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., &Wetherell, M. S.(1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, England:Basil Blackwell.
86. Van Bavel, J. J. Packer, D. J., &Cunningham, W. A. The neural substrates of in-group bias. Psychological Science, 19,1131-1139. (2008).
87. Waldzus, S. Mummendey, A. Wenzel, M., &Boettcher, F. Of bikers, teachers, and Germans: Groups' diverging views about their prototypicality. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43,385-400. (2004).
88. Weber, R., &Crocker, J. Cognitive processes in the revision of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45,961-977. (1983).
89. Wilder, D. A. Reducing intergroup discrimination through individuation of the outgroup. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36,1361-1374. (1978).
90. Wilder, D. A.(1981). Perceiving persons as a group: Categorization and intergroup relations. In D. L.Hamilton (Ed.), Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior (pp. 213-257).Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
91. Wilder, D. A.(1986). Social categorization: Implications for creation and reduction of intergroup bias. In L.Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 291-355).Orlando, FL:Academic Press.
92. Wilder, D. A. Simon, A. F., &Faith, M. Enhancing the impact of counterstereotypic information. Dispositional attributions for deviance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71,276-287. (1996).
93. Wohl, M. J. A., &Branscombe, N. Forgiveness and collective guilt assignment to historical perpetrator groups depend on level of social category inclusiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88,288-303. (2005).
94. Williams, R. M.Jr.(1947). The reduction of intergroup tensions. New York:Social Science Research Council.