Safety of MR imaging at 1.5 T in fetuses: A retrospective case-control study of birth weights and the effects of acoustic noise

Radiology

Volumn 275, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 530-537

  Strizek, Brigitte ^a   Jani, Jacques C ^a   Mucyo, Eugène ^a   De Keyzer, Frederik ^b   Pauwels, Inge ^c   Ziane, Samir ^a   Mansbach, Anne Laure ^c   Deltenre, Paul ^a   Cos, Teresa ^a   Cannie, Mieke M ^a,d  

^a BRUGMANN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^c HOP UNIV DES ENFANTS REINE FABIOLA   (Belgium)

^d UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BRUSSELS   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSENCE OF COMPLICATIONS; ARTICLE; BIRTH WEIGHT; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CONGENITAL DEAFNESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; FETUS GROWTH; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; NEWBORN; NOISE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION SAFETY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ADVERSE EFFECTS; EVALUATION STUDY; FETUS; GESTATIONAL AGE; PREGNANCY; PROCEDURES; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION RESPONSE;

BIRTH WEIGHT; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; FETUS; GESTATIONAL AGE; HEARING; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NOISE; PREGNANCY; RADIATION DOSAGE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84929008720     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14141382     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Rapp EJ, Naim F, Kadivar K, Davarpanah A, Cornfeld D. Integrating MR imaging into the clinical workup of pregnant patients suspected of having appendicitis is associated with a lower negative laparotomy rate: single-institution study. Radiology 2013;267(1):137-144.
2. Spalluto LB, Woodfield CA, DeBenedectis CM, Lazarus E. MR imaging evaluation of abdominal pain during pregnancy: appendicitis and other nonobstetric causes. RadioGraphics 2012;32(2):317-334.
3. American College of Radiology. ACR-SPR Practice Guideline for the Safe and Optimal Performance o5f Fetal Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) 2010. http://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Documents/PGTS/guidelines/MRI-Fetal.pdf. Published September 4, 2013. Accessed August 9, 2013.
4. Wang PI, Chong ST, Kielar AZ, et al. Imaging of pregnant and lactating patients: part 1, evidence-based review and recommendations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;198(4):778-784.
5. Gerhardt KJ, Pierson LL, Huang X, Abrams RM, Rarey KE. Effects of intense noise exposure on fetal sheep auditory brain stem response and inner ear histology. Ear Hear 1999;20(1):21-32.
6. Rocha EB, Frasson de Azevedo M, Ximenes Filho JA. Study of the hearing in children born from pregnant women exposed to occupational noise: assessment by distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2007;73(3):359-369.
7. Gerhardt KJ, Abrams RM. Fetal exposures to sound and vibroacoustic stimulation. J Perinatol 2000;20(8 Pt 2):S21-S30.
8. Reeves MJ, Brandreth M, Whitby EH, et al. Neonatal cochlear function: measurement after exposure to acoustic noise during in utero MR imaging. Radiology 2010;257(3):802-809.
9. American Academy of Pediatrics, Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. Year 2007 position statement: Principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Pediatrics 2007;120(4):898-921.
10. Yudkin PL, Aboualfa M, Eyre JA, Redman CW, Wilkinson AR. New birthweight and head circumference centiles for gestational ages 24 to 42 weeks. Early Hum Dev 1987;15(1):45-52.
11. Holden-Pitt L, Albertorio J. Thirty years of the Annual Survey of Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Children & Youth: a glance over the decades. Am Ann Deaf 1998;143(2):72-76.
12. NCHAM National Centerfor Hearing Assessment and Management Utah State University. What is the prevalence of congenital hearing loss? http://infanthearing. org/faq/PrevalenceOfCongentialHearing- Loss-2003-09.pdf. Published September, 2003. Accessed April 9, 2013.
13. Ari-Even Roth D, Hildesheimer M, Maayan- Metzger A, et al. Low prevalence of hearing impairment among very low birthweight infants as detected by universal neonatal hearing screening. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2006;91(4):F257-F262.
14. Shellock FG, Ziarati M, Atkinson D, Chen DY. Determination of gradient magnetic field-induced acoustic noise associated with the use of echo planar and three-dimensional, fast spin echo techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998;8(5):1154-1157.
15. Miyati T, Banno T, Fujita H, et al. Characteristics of acoustic noise in echo-planar imaging. Front Med Biol Eng 2001;10(4):345-356.
16. Foster JR, Hall DA, Summerfield AQ, Palmer AR, Bowtell RW. Sound-level measurements and calculations of safe noise dosage during EPI at 3 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12(1):157-163.
17. Hattori Y, Fukatsu H, Ishigaki T. Measurement and evaluation of the acoustic noise of a 3 Tesla MR scanner. Nagoya J Med Sci 2007;69(1-2):23-28.
18. McJury M, Shellock FG. Auditory noise associated with MR procedures: a review.J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12(1):37-45.
19. US Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Regulations (Standards-29 CFR). Occupational Safety and Health Standards Part 1910.95: Occupational noise exposure. http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp. show-document?p-table=STANDARDS&p- id=9735. Revised December 12, 2008. Accessed November 15, 2013.
20. Hepper PG, Shahidullah BS. Development of fetal hearing. Arch Dis Child 1994;71(2):F81-F87.
21. Glover P, Hykin J, Gowland P, Wright J, Johnson I, Mansfield P. An assessment of the intrauterine sound intensity level during obstetric echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Radiol 1995;68(814):1090-1094.
22. Gerhardt KJ, Abrams RM, Kovaz BM, Gomez KJ, Conlon M. Intrauterine noise levels produced in pregnant ewes by sound applied to the abdomen. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988;159(1):228-232.
23. Richards DS, Frentzen B, Gerhardt KJ, McCann ME, Abrams RM. Sound levels in the human uterus. Obstet Gynecol 1992;80(2):186-190.
24. Lin HW, Furman AC, Kujawa SG, Liberman MC. Primary neural degeneration in the Guinea pig cochlea after reversible noiseinduced threshold shift. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2011;12(5):605-616.
25. Bharadwaj HM, Verhulst S, Shaheen L, Liberman MC, Shinn-Cunningham BG. Cochlear neuropathy and the coding of supra-threshold sound. Front Syst Neurosci 2014;8:26.
26. Clements H, Duncan KR, Fielding K, Gowland PA, Johnson IR, Baker PN. Infants exposed to MRI in utero have a normal paediatric assessment at 9 months of age. Br J Radiol 2000;73(866):190-194.
27. Kok RD, de Vries MM, Heerschap A, van den Berg PP. Absence of harmful effects of magnetic resonance exposure at 1.5 T in utero during the third trimester of pregnancy: a follow-up study. Magn Reson Imaging 2004;22(6):851-854.
28. Myers C, Duncan KR, Gowland PA, Johnson IR, Baker PN. Failure to detect intrauterine growth restriction following in utero exposure to MRI. Br J Radiol 1998;71(845):549-551.
29. Baker PN, Johnson IR, Harvey PR, Gowland PA, Mansfield P. A three-year follow-up of children imaged in utero with echo-planar magnetic resonance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170(1 Pt 1):32-33.