A facile synthesis of versatile Cu2-xS nanoprobe for enhanced MRI and infrared thermal/photoacoustic multimodal imaging

Biomaterials

Volumn 57, Issue , 2015, Pages 12-21

  Mou, Juan ^a   Liu, Chengbo ^b   Li, Pei ^c   Chen, Yu ^a   Xu, Huixiong ^c   Wei, Chenyang ^a   Song, Liang ^b   Shi, Jianlin ^a   Chen, Hangrong ^a  

^a SHANGHAI INSTITUTE OF CERAMICS   (China)

^b SHENZHEN INSTITUTES OF ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^c TENTH PEOPLE S HOSPITAL OF TONGJI UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Contrast agent; Cu2 xS nanoprobe; Infrared thermal imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; Photoacoustic imaging

Indexed keywords

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIOMIMETICS; COPPER COMPOUNDS; DECOMPOSITION; DIAGNOSIS; DISEASES; IMAGE PROCESSING; INFRARED DEVICES; INFRARED IMAGING; LIGHT ABSORPTION; MOLECULAR IMAGING; NANOPROBES; PHOSPHOLIPIDS; SYNTHESIS (CHEMICAL);

COMPREHENSIVE INFORMATION; CONTRAST AGENT; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; INFRARED THERMAL IMAGING; PHOSPHATE BUFFER SALINES; PHOSPHOLIPID MODIFICATION; PHOTO-ACOUSTIC IMAGING; T1-WEIGHTED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

COPPER SULFIDE NANOPROBE; NANOPARTICLE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING AGENT; PHOSPHOLIPID; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CONTRAST MEDIUM; COPPER; SULFUR;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; ATOMIC EMISSION SPECTROMETRY; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIOMIMETICS; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CELL STRUCTURE; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOTOXICITY; DECOMPOSITION; DRUG SYNTHESIS; FEMALE; HELA CELL LINE; HISTOCOMPATIBILITY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; INFRARED PHOTOGRAPHY; MOLECULAR IMAGING; MOUSE; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; NANOFABRICATION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHOTOACOUSTICS; PHOTODEGRADATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ANIMAL; FLUORESCENCE IMAGING; INFRARED RADIATION; NEOPLASMS; PROCEDURES; SYNTHESIS; TEMPERATURE; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ANIMALS; CONTRAST MEDIA; COPPER; HELA CELLS; HUMANS; INFRARED RAYS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MICE; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; NANOPARTICLES; NEOPLASMS; OPTICAL IMAGING; PHOTOACOUSTIC TECHNIQUES; SULFUR; TEMPERATURE;

EID: 84928942613     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.04.020     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Siegel R., Ma J., Zou Z., Jemal A. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2014, 2014(64):9-29.
2. Brody H. Medical imaging. Nature 2013, 502:S81.
3. Fass L. Imaging and cancer: a review. Mol Oncol 2008, 2:115-152.
4. Glasspool R.M., Evans T.R.J. Clinical imaging of cancer metastasis. Eur J Cancer 2000, 36:1661-1670.
5. Sharma P., Singh A., Brown S.C., Bengtsson N., Walter G.A., Grobmyer S.R., et al. Multimodal nanoparticulate bioimaging contrast agents. Methods Mol Biol 2010, 624:67-81.
6. Mulder W.J., Griffioen A.W., Strijkers G.J., Cormode D.P., Nicolay K., Fayad Z.A. Magnetic and fluorescent nanoparticles for multimodality imaging. Nanomedicine (Lond) 2007, 2:307-324.
7. Cheon J., Lee J.H. Synergistically integrated nanoparticles as multimodal probes for nanobiotechnology. Acc Chem Res 2008, 41:1630-1640.
8. Pichler B.J., Judenhofer M.S., Pfannenberg C. Multimodal imaging approaches: PET/CT and PET/MRI. Handb Exp Pharmacol 2008, 109-132.
9. Judenhofer M.S., Wehrl H.F., Newport D.F., Catana C., Siegel S.B., Becker M., et al. Simultaneous PET-MRI: a new approach for functional and morphological imaging. Nat Med 2008, 14:459-465.
10. Harrison V.S.R., Carney C.E., Macrenaris K.W., Meade T.J. Amultimeric MR-optical contrast agent for multimodal imaging. Chem Commun 2014, 50:11469-11471.
11. Que E.L., Chang C.J. Responsive magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents as chemical sensors for metals in biology and medicine. Chem Soc Rev 2010, 39:51-60.
12. Caravan P., Ellison J.J., McMurry T.J., Lauffer R.B. Gadolinium(III) chelates as MRI contrast agents: structure, dynamics, and applications. Chem Rev 1999, 99:2293-2352.
13. Kriege M., Brekelmans C.T.M., Boetes C., Besnard P.E., Zonderland H.M., Obdeijn I.M., et al. Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. NEngl J Med 2004, 351:427-437.
14. Sauter A.W., Wehrl H.F., Kolb A., Judenhofer M.S., Pichler B.J. Combined PET/MRI: one step further in multimodality imaging. Trends Mol Med 2010, 16:508-515.
15. Corr S., Rakovich Y., Gun'ko Y. Multifunctional magnetic-fluorescent nanocomposites for biomedical applications. Nanoscale Res Lett 2008, 3:87-104.
16. 3+-doped upconversion nanoparticles for high-performance T2-weighted brain tumor diagnosis and MR/UCL/CT multimodal imaging. Adv Funct Mater 2014, 24:6613-6620.
17. Rieter W.J., Kim J.S., Taylor K.M.L., An H., Lin W., Tarrant T., et al. Hybrid silica nanoparticles for multimodal imaging. Angew Chem Int Ed 2007, 46:3680-3682.
18. Sanchis-Sanchez E., Vergara-Hernandez C., Cibrian R.M., Salvador R., Sanchis E., Codoner-Franch P. Infrared thermal imaging in the diagnosis of musculoskeletal injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014, 203:875-882.
19. Jadin M.S., Taib S. Recent progress in diagnosing the reliability of electrical equipment by using infrared thermography. Infrared Phys Technol 2012, 55:236-245.
20. Bagavathiappan S., Lahiri B.B., Saravanan T., Philip J., Jayakumar T. Infrared thermography for condition monitoring - a review. Infrared Phys Technol 2013, 60:35-55.
21. Wang L.V., Hu S. Photoacoustic tomography: invivo imaging from organelles to organs. Science 2012, 335:1458-1462.
22. Wang X., Pang Y., Ku G., Xie X., Stoica G., Wang L.V. Noninvasive laser-induced photoacoustic tomography for structural and functional invivo imaging of the brain. Nat Biotechnol 2003, 21:803-806.
23. Beard P. Biomedical photoacoustic imaging. Interface Focus 2011, 1:602-631.
24. Key J., Leary J.F. Nanoparticles for multimodal invivo imaging in nanomedicine. Int J Nanomed 2014, 9:711-726.
25. Al-Jamal W.T., Kostarelos K. Liposome-nanoparticle hybrids for multimodal diagnostic and therapeutic applications. Nanomedicine (Lond) 2007, 2:85-98.
26. Wang L., Bai J., Li Y., Huang Y. Multifunctional nanoparticles displaying magnetization and near-IR absorption. Angew Chem Int Ed 2008, 47:2439-2442.
27. Kobayashi H., Koyama Y., Barrett T., Hama Y., Regino C.A.S., Shin I.S., et al. Multimodal nanoprobes for radionuclide and five-color near-infrared optical lymphatic imaging. ACS Nano 2007, 1:258-264.
28. Jin Y., Jia C., Huang S.W., O'Donnell M., Gao X. Multifunctional nanoparticles as coupled contrast agents. Nat Commun 2010, 1:41.
29. Le Trequesser Q., Seznec H., Delville M.-H. Functionalized nanomaterials: their use as contrast agents in bioimaging: mono- and multimodal approaches. Nanotechnol Rev 2013, 2:125-169.
30. Benyettou F., Lalatonne Y., Chebbi I., Di Benedetto M., Serfaty J.M., Lecouvey M., et al. Amultimodal magnetic resonance imaging nanoplatform for cancer theranostics. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2011, 13:10020-10027.
31. Shi X., Gong H., Li Y., Wang C., Cheng L., Liu Z. Graphene-based magnetic plasmonic nanocomposite for dual bioimaging and photothermal therapy. Biomaterials 2013, 34:4786-4793.
32. 2-xS core-shell nanoparticles for dual-modal imaging and photothermal therapy. JAm Chem Soc 2013, 135:8571-8577.
33. 4 Core@hybrid@Au shell nanocomposite for bimodal imaging and photothermal therapy. Adv Mater 2011, 23:5392-5397.
34. MacDonald T.D., Liu T.W., Zheng G. An MRI-sensitive, non-photobleachable porphysome photothermal agent. Angew Chem Int Ed 2014, 53:6956-6959.
35. Seo W.S., Lee J.H., Sun X., Suzuki Y., Mann D., Liu Z., et al. FeCo/graphitic-shell nanocrystals as advanced magnetic-resonance-imaging and near-infrared agents. Nat Mater 2006, 5:971-976.
36. 4 nanoparticle "nano-pearl-necklaces" for simultaneous targeting, dual-mode imaging, and photothermal ablation of cancer cells. Angew Chem Int Ed 2009, 48:2759-2763.
37. Kircher M.F., de la Zerda A., Jokerst J.V., Zavaleta C.L., Kempen P.J., Mittra E., et al. Abrain tumor molecular imaging strategy using a new triple-modality MRI-photoacoustic-Raman nanoparticle. Nat Med 2012, 18:829-834.
38. 2 nanoparticles: a targeted theranostic platform for magnetic resonance imaging and photoacoustic tomography-guided photothermal therapy. Adv Mater 2014, 26:4114-4120.
39. Kato M., Jonassen H.B., Fanning J.C. Copper(II) complexes with subnormal magnetic moments. Chem Rev 1964, 64:99-128.
40. Yamada S., Kuge Y., Yamanouchi K. Copper (II) complexes with a subnormal magnetic moment. Inorg Chim Acta 1967, 1:139-140.
41. Tolansky S., Forester G.O. The nuclear magnetic moment of copper. Proc Phys Soc 1938, 50:826.
42. Bertrand J.A., Kelley J.A., Breece J.L. Sub-normal magnetic moments in copper (II) complexes: five-coordinate copper in an oxygen-bridged dimer. Inorg Chim Acta 1970, 4:247-250.
43. Ku G., Zhou M., Song S., Huang Q., Hazle J., Li C. Copper sulfide nanoparticles as a new class of photoacoustic contrast agent for deep tissue imaging at 1064 nm. ACS Nano 2012, 6:7489-7496.
44. 2-xS nanodots for highly efficient photoacoustic imaging-guided photothermal therapy. Small 2015, n/a-n/a.
45. Luther J.M., Jain P.K., Ewers T., Alivisatos A.P. Localized surface plasmon resonances arising from free carriers in doped quantum dots. Nat Mater 2011, 10:361-366.
46. Wei T., Liu Y., Dong W., Zhang Y., Huang C., Sun Y., et al. Surface-dependent localized surface plasmon resonances in CuS nanodisks. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2013, 5:10473-10477.
47. Liu X., Swihart M.T. Heavily-doped colloidal semiconductor and metal oxide nanocrystals: an emerging new class of plasmonic nanomaterials. Chem Soc Rev 2014, 43:3908-3920.
48. Ke H., Luo W., Cheng G., Tian X., Pi Z. Synthesis of flower-like CuS nanostructured microspheres using poly(ethylene glycol) 200 as solvent. JNanosci Nanotechnol 2010, 10:7770-7773.
49. Zhang Y.C., Qiao T., Ya Hu X. Asimple hydrothermal route to nanocrystalline CuS. JCryst Growth 2004, 268:64-70.
50. Tian Q., Tang M., Sun Y., Zou R., Chen Z., Zhu M., et al. Hydrophilic flower-like CuS superstructures as an efficient 980 nm laser-driven photothermal agent for ablation of cancer cells. Adv Mater 2011, 23:3542-3547.
51. Du Y., Yin Z., Zhu J., Huang X., Wu X.J., Zeng Z., et al. Ageneral method for the large-scale synthesis of uniform ultrathin metal sulphide nanocrystals. Nat Commun 2012, 3:1177.
52. 2-) influence on the product stoichiometry. Inorg Chem 2011, 50:3065-3070.
53. Li J., Jiu T., Tao G.-H., Wang G., Sun C., Li P., et al. Manipulating surface ligands of copper sulfide nanocrystals: synthesis, characterization, and application to organic solar cells. JColloid Interface Sci 2014, 419:142-147.
54. 2-xS nanocrystals: optical and structural properties of copper-deficient copper(I) sulfides. JAm Chem Soc 2009, 131:4253-4261.
55. Roy P., Mondal K., Srivastava S.K. Synthesis of twinned CuS nanorods by a simple wet chemical method. Cryst Growth Des 2008, 8:1530-1534.
56. Zhong H., Zhou Y., Ye M., He Y., Ye J., He C., et al. Controlled synthesis and optical properties of colloidal ternary chalcogenide CuInS2 nanocrystals. Chem Mater 2008, 20:6434-6443.
57. Chu Y., Li D., Luo Y.-F., He X.-J., Jiang M.-Y. Preparation and invitro evaluation of glycyrrhetinic acid-modified curcumin-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers. Molecules 2014, 19:2445-2457.
58. Shokouhimehr M., Soehnlen E.S., Hao J., Griswold M., Flask C., Fan X., et al. Dual purpose prussian blue nanoparticles for cellular imaging and drug delivery: a new generation of T1-weighted MRI contrast and small molecule delivery agents. JMater Chem 2010, 20:5251-5259.
59. Welsher K., Sherlock S.P., Dai H. Deep-tissue anatomical imaging of mice using carbon nanotube fluorophores in the second near-infrared window. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2011, 108:8943-8948.
60. Homan K., Kim S., Chen Y.S., Wang B., Mallidi S., Emelianov S. Prospects of molecular photoacoustic imaging at 1064 nm wavelength. Opt Lett 2010, 35:2663-2665.
61. Hai P., Yao J., Maslov K.I., Zhou Y., Wang L.V. Near-infrared optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy. Opt Lett 2014, 39:5192-5195.
62. Smith A.M., Mancini M.C., Nie S. Bioimaging: second window for invivo imaging. Nat Nanotechnol 2009, 4:710-711.