Removing user fees for facility-based delivery services: A difference-in-differences evaluation from ten sub-Saharan African countries

Health Policy and Planning

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 432-441

  McKinnon, Britt ^a   Harper, Sam ^a   Kaufman, Jay S ^a   Bergevin, Yves ^b  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNITED NATIONS POPULATION FUND   (United States)

Author keywords

difference in differences; maternal health care; neonatal mortality; User fee removal

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AFRICA SOUTH OF THE SAHARA; ECONOMICS; EVALUATION STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HUMAN; INFANT; INFANT MORTALITY; MATERNAL HEALTH SERVICE; MEDICAL FEE; NEWBORN; OBSTETRIC DELIVERY; PREGNANCY; TRENDS; UTILIZATION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AFRICA SOUTH OF THE SAHARA; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FEE-FOR-SERVICE PLANS; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT MORTALITY; INFANT, NEWBORN; MATERNAL HEALTH SERVICES; PREGNANCY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84928940399     PISSN: 02681080     EISSN: 14602237     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czu027     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Angrist JD, Pischke J-S. 2008. Parallel worlds: fixed effects, differencein-differences, and panel data. Mostly Harmless Econometrics. An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 221-47.
2. Ansah EK, Narh-Bana S, Asiamah S et al. 2009. Effect of removing direct payment for health care on utilisation and health outcomes in Ghanaian children: a randomised controlled trial. PLoS Med 6: e1000007.
3. Baird J, Ma S, Ruger JP. 2011. Effects of the World Bank's maternal and child health intervention on Indonesia's poor: evaluating the safe motherhood project. Soc Sci Med 72: 1948-55.
4. Carpenter CS, Stehr M. 2008. The effects of mandatory seatbelt laws on seatbelt use, motor vehicle fatalities, and crash-related injuries among youths. J Health Econ 27: 642-62.
5. Cavallaro F, Cresswell JA, Francą GV et al. 2013. Trends in Caesarean delivery by country and wealth quintile: cross-sectional surveys in southern Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. Bull World Health Organization 91: 914-22.
6. Chuma J, Musimbi J, Okungu V, Goodman C, Molyneux C. 2009. Reducing user fees for primary health care in Kenya: Policy on paper or policy in practice Int J Equity Health 8: 15.
7. Cook T, Shadish W. 2008. Three conditions under which experiments and observational studies produce comparable causal estimates: new findings from within-study comparisons. J Pol Anal Manage 27: 724-50.
8. Darmstadt GL, Bhutta ZA, Cousens S et al. 2005. Evidence-based, costeffective interventions: how many newborn babies can we save Lancet 365: 977-88.
9. De Allegri M, Ridde V, Louis VR et al. 2012. The impact of targeted subsidies for facility-based delivery on access to care and equity-Evidence from a population-based study in rural Burkina Faso. J Public Health Pol 33: 439-53.
10. Deininger K. 2005. Economic and welfare impact of the abolition of health user fees: Evidence from Uganda. J African Econ 14: 55-91.
11. Dzakpasu S, Powell-Jackson T, Campbell OMR. 2014. Impact of user fees on maternal health service utilization and related health outcomes: a systematic review. Health Policy Plan 29: 137-50.
12. Dzakpasu S, Soremekun S, Manu A et al. 2012. Impact of free delivery care on health facility delivery and insurance coverage in Ghana's Brong Ahafo Region. PLoS ONE 7: e49430.
13. Gabrysch S, Campbell OMR. 2009. Still too far to walk: literature review of the determinants of delivery service use. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 9: 34.
14. Glazerman S, Levy DM, Myers D. 2003. Nonexperimental versus experimental estimates of earnings impacts. Ann Am Acad Pol Sci 589: 63-93.
15. Holtz SA, Stanton CK. 2007. Assessing the quality of cesarean birth data in the Demographic and Health Surveys. Stud Family Planning 38: 47-54.
16. Kenyan Ministry of Health. 2007. Statement by Hon Charity Kaluki Ngilu, Minister of Health on a new government policy to abolish delivery fees in all public dispensaries and health centers.
17. Kleinman LC, Norton EC. 2009. What's the risk A simple approach for estimating adjusted risk measures from nonlinear models including logistic regression. Health Serv Res 44: 288-302.
18. Kruk ME, Mbaruku G, Rockers PC, Galea S. 2008. User fee exemptions are not enough: out-of-pocket payments for 'free' delivery services in rural Tanzania. Trop Med Int'l Health 13: 1442-51.
19. Lagarde M, Palmer N. 2011. The impact of user fees on access to health services in low-and middle-income countries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4: 1-70.
20. Lawn JE, Kerber K, Enweronu-Laryea C, Cousens S. 2010. 3.6 million neonatal deaths-what is progressing and what is not Semin Perinatol 34: 371-86.
21. Lawn JE, Kinney MV, Black RE et al. 2012. Newborn survival: a multicountry analysis of a decade of change. Health Policy Plan 27 Suppl 3: iii6-28.
22. Meyer B. 1995. Natural and quasi-experiments in economics. J Bus Econ Stat 13: 151-61.
23. Oestergaard MZ, Inoue M, Yoshida S et al. 2011. Neonatal mortality levels for 193 countries in 2009 with trends since 1990: a systematic analysis of progress, projections, and priorities. PLoS Med 8: e1001080.
24. Pearson L, Gandhi M, Admasu K, Keyes EB. 2011. User fees and maternity services in Ethiopia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 115:310-15.
25. Penfold S, Harrison E, Bell J. 2007. Evaluation of the delivery fee exemption policy in Ghana: population estimates of changes in delivery service utilization in two regions. Ghana Med J 41: 100-109.
26. Rajaratnam JK, Marcus JR, Flaxman AD et al. 2010. Neonatal, postneonatal, childhood, and under-5 mortality for 187 countries, 1970-2010: a systematic analysis of progress towards Millennium Development Goal 4. Lancet 375: 1988-2008.
27. Richard F, Witter S, de Brouwere V. 2010. Innovative approaches to reducing financial barriers to obstetric care in low-income countries. Am J Public Health 100: 1845-52.
28. Ridde V, Morestin F. 2010. A scoping review of the literature on the abolition of user fees in health care services in Africa. Health Policy Plan 26: 1-11.
29. Ridde V, Richard F, Bicaba A, Queuille L, Conombo G. 2011. The national subsidy for deliveries and emergency obstetric care in Burkina Faso. Health Policy Plan 26: ii30-40.
30. Robert E, Ridde VR. 2013. Global health actors no longer in favor of user fees: a documentary study. Globalization and Health 9: 1-1.
31. Rutstein SO, Johnson K. 2004. The DHS Wealth Index. Calverton, MD: ORC Macro.
32. Steinhardt LC, Aman I, Pakzad I et al. 2011. Removing user fees for basic health services: a pilot study and national roll-out in Afghanistan. Health Policy Plan 26: ii92-103.
33. Thaddeus S, Maine D. 1994. Too far to walk: maternal mortality in context. Soc Sci Med 38: 1091-110.
34. Wagstaff A, Claeson M. 2004. The Millennium Development Goals for Health: Rising to the Challenges. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications
35. WHO, United Nations Children's Fund, United Nations Population Fund, World Bank. 2012. Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990 to 2010. Geneva: World Health Organization.
36. Witter S, Armar-klemesu M, Dieng T. 2008. National Fee exemption schemes for deliveries: comparing the recent experiences of Ghana and Senegal. In: Richard F, Witter S, De Brouwere V (eds). Reducing Financial Barriers to Obstetric Care in Low-Income Countries: SHSOP Series: Studies in Health Services Organization & Policy. Antwerp: ITG Press, pp. 167-98.
37. Witter S, Dieng T, Mbengue D, Moreira I, de Brouwere V. 2010. The national free delivery and caesarean policy in Senegal: evaluating process and outcomes. Health Policy Plan 25: 384-92.
38. Witter S, Garshong B. 2009. Something old or something new Social health insurance in Ghana. BMC Int Health Hum Rights 9: 20.
39. World Health Organization, UNFPA, UNICEF, AMDD. 2009. Monitoring Emergency Obstetric Care: A Handbook. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, United Nations Family Planning Agency, UNICEF, Averting Maternal Death and Disability. 1 pp.
40. Yates R. 2009. Universal health care and the removal of user fees. Lancet 373: 2078-81.
41. Yates R. 2010. Women and children first: an appropriate first step towards universal coverage. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 88: 474-75.