Anthropogenic impacts to the sediment budget of São Francisco River navigation channel using SWAT

International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 1-20

  Creech, Calvin T ^a,c   Siqueira, Rafael Brito ^b   Selegean, James P ^c   Miller, Carol ^a  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Companhia de Desenvolvimento dos Vales do São Francisco e do Parnaíba ^*  (Brazil)

^c U S ARMY   (United States)

Author keywords

Aggradation rate; Anthropogenic impact; Sediment budget; SWAT; S o Francisco River

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; BUDGET CONTROL; CALIBRATION; DECISION MAKING; GAGES; NAVIGATION; RIVERS; WATERSHEDS;

AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES; AGRICULTURAL EXPANSION; ANTHROPOGENIC IMPACTS; INTERNATIONAL PARTNERSHIPS; PRE-EUROPEAN SETTLEMENT; SEDIMENT BUDGETS; SWAT; US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS;

SEDIMENTS;

EID: 84928816849     PISSN: 19346344     EISSN: 19346352     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3965/j.ijabe.20150803.1372     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Arnold J G, Srinivasan R, Muttiah R S, Williams J R. Large-area hydrologic modeling and assessment. I: Model development. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1998; 34(1): 73-89.
2. Arnold J G, Fohrer N. SWAT2000: current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modeling. Hydrological Processes, 2005; 19(3): 563-572Doi: 10.1002/hyp.5611.
3. Williams J R, Arnold J G, Kiniry J R, Gassman P W, Green C H. History of model development at Temple, Texas. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 2008; 53(5): 948-960Doi: 10.1623/hysj.53.5.948.
4. Arnold J G, Moriasi D N, Gassman P W, Abbaspour K C, White M J, Srinivasan R, et al. SWAT: Model use, calibration, and validation. Transactions of the ASABE, 2012; 55(4): 1491-1508Doi: 10.13031/2013.42256.
5. Gassman P W, Reyes M R, Green C H, Arnold J G. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Historical Development, Applications, and Future Research Directions. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 2007; 50(4): 1211-1250.
6. Douglas-Mankin K R, Srinivasan R, Arnold J G. Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model: Current developments and applications. Transactions of the ASABE. 2010; 53(5): 1423-1431Doi: 10.13031/2013.34915.
7. Tuppad P, Douglas-Mankin K R, Lee T, Srinivasan R, Arnold J G. Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) hydrologic/water quality model: Extended capability and wider adoption. Transactions of the ASABE, 2011; 54(5): 1677-1684Doi: 10.13031/2013.34915.
8. Gassman P W, Sadeghi A M, Srinivasan R. Applications of the SWAT Model Special Section: Overview and Insights. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2014; 43(1): 1-8Doi: 10.2134/jeq2013.11.0466.
9. Krysanova V, White M. Advances in water resources assessment with SWAT—an overview. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 2015; Doi: 10.1080/02626667.2015.1029482.
10. Betrie G D, Mohamed Y A, van Griensven A, Srinivasan R. Sediment management modelling in the Blue Nile Basin using SWAT mode, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2011; 15: 807-818. doi:10.5194/hess-15-807-2011.
11. Tripathi M P, Panda R K, Raghuwanshi N S. Calibration and validation of SWAT model for predicting runoff and sediment yield of a small watershed in India. International Agricultural Engineering Journal, 2003; 12(1-2): 95-118.
12. Rostamian R, Jaleh A, Afyuni M, Mousavi S F, Heidarpour M, Jalalian A, Abbaspour K C. Application of a SWAT model for estimating runoff and sediment in two mountainous basins in central Iran. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 2008; 54(5): 977-988.doi:10.1623/hysj.53.5.977.
13. O'Donnell, T.K, C. Baffaut, D.L. Galat. 2010. Predicting effects of best management practices on sediment loads to improve watershed management in the Midwest, USA. International Journal of River Basin Management. 6(3): 243-256Doi: 10.1080/15715124.2008.9635352.
14. Martinez-Casanovas, J.A, M.C. Ramos, G. Benites. 2013. SWAT soil loss simulation at the sub-basin scale in the Alt Penedes-Anoia vineyard region (ne Spain) in the 2000s. Land Degradation & DevelopmentDoi: 10.1002/ldr.2240.
15. Paim J B, de Menezes J T. Estimate of sediment budget of the Tijucas River Basin applying SWAT hydrologic model. Revista Geografica Academica, 2009; 3(2): 5-14.
16. Galharte C A, Villela J M, Crestana S. Sediment yield estimation due to changes in land use and cover. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, 2014: 18(2): 194-201.
17. Carvalho Neto J G. Simulação Hidrossedimentológica da Bacia do Riacho dos Namorados com o Modelo SWAT. Dissertação de Mestrado. Pós-graduação em Engenharia Civil e Ambiental, Campina Grande-PB, 2011.
18. Bressiani D.A, Gassman, P.W, Fernandes, J.G, Garbossa, L.H.P, Srinivasan, R, Mendiondo, E.M, Bonumá, N.B. A review of SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) applications in Brazil: challenges and prospects.Int J AgricBiol Eng. 2015; (forthcoming).
19. Sun C. Ren L. Assessing crop yield and crop water productivity and optimizing irrigation scheduling of winter wheat and summer maize in the Haihe plain using SWAT model. Hydrological Process, 2014; 28(4): 2478-2498. doi:10.1002/hyp.9759.
20. Panagopoulos Y, Makropoulos C, Kossida M, Mimikou M. Optimal implementation of irrigation practices: A cost-effective desertification action plan for Pinios. J. of Water. Resources Planning and Management, 2014; 139: 31-42. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000428.
21. Gayley, A. 2013. A SWAT-based evapotranspirative water conservation analysis performed on irrigated croplands to determine potential regional water savings. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering. 139(6): 456-462Doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000562.
22. Kannan, N, J. Jeong, R. Srinivasan. 2011. Hydrologic modeling of a canal-irrigated agricultural watershed with irrigation best management practices: Case study. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering. 16(9): 746-757Doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000364.
23. White J D, Prochnow S J, Filstrup C T, Scott J T, Byars B W, Zygo-Flynn L. A combined watershed-water quality modeling analysis of the Lake Waco reservoir: I. Calibration and confirmation of predicted water quality. Lake and Reservoir Management, 2010; 26: 147-158.
24. Bosch N S. The influence of impoundments on riverine nutrient transport: an evaluation using the soil and water assessment tool. Journal of Hydrology, 2008; 355: 131-147.
25. Mishra A, Froebrich J, Gassman P W. Evaluation of the SWAT model for assessing sediment control structures in a small watershed in India. Trans. ASABE, 2007; 50(2): 469-478.
26. Ficklin D, Stewart I, Maurer E. Effects of climate change on stream temperature, dissolved oxygen, and sediment concentration in the Sierra Nevada in California. Water Resources Research, 2013; 49(5): 2765-2782. doi:10.1002/wrcr.20248.
27. Lu S, Kronvang B, Audet J, Trolle D, Andersen H E, Thodsen H, van Griensven A. Modelling sediment and total phosphorus export from a lowland catchment: Comparing sediment routing methods. Hydrological Processes, 2014; 29(2): 280-294. doi:10.1002/hyp.10149.
28. Nash J E. Sutcliffe J V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part I-A discussion of Principles. Journal of Hydrology, 1970; 10(3): 282-290.
29. Moriasi D N, Arnold J G, Van Liew M W, Binger R L, Harmel R D, Veith T L. Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations. Transactions of the ASABE, 2007; 50 (3): 885-900.
30. Flynn K F, Van Liew M W. Evaluation of SWAT for sediment prediction in a mountainous snowmelt-dominated catchment. Transactions of the ASABE, 2011; 54(1): 113-122, doi:10.13031/2013.36265.
31. Mittal N, Mishra A, Singh R, Bhave A G, van der Valk M. Flow regime alteration due to anthropogenic and climatic changes in the Kangsabati River, India. Ecohydrology and Hydrobiology, 2014; 14(3): 182-191. doi:10.1016/j.ecohyd.2014.06.002.
32. Bosch N S, Allen J D, Selegean J P, Scavia D. Scenario-testing of agricultural best management practices in Lake Erie watersheds. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 2013; 39: 429-436. doi:10.1016/j.jglr.2013.06.004.
33. World Bank. Rio São Francisco (BR) Multimodal Transport Corridor Project, Task B. Final Report, 2012.
34. ANEEL, EMBRAPA, ANA, CODEVASF. Diagnostico do fluxo de sedimentos em suspensão na Bacia do Rio São Francisco. Brasilia, DF, 2001.
35. CODEVASF, ANA. Multitemporal Analysis of the Dynamic of Alteration of the Conformation of the Sao Francisco Riverbed-Middle Course. Brasilia, DF, 2002.
36. Williams J R. Sediment routing for agricultural watersheds. Water Resources Bulletin, 1975; 11(5): 965-974.
37. Hanson G J, Simon A. Erodability of cohesive streambeds in the loess area of the Midwestern USA. Hydrological Processes, 2001; 15: 23-38.
38. Eaton B C, Miller R G. Optimal alluvial channel width under a bank stability constraint. Geomorphology, 2004; 62: 35-45.
39. European Space Agency. GlobCover Dataset (2006). http://due.esrin.esa.int/globcover/. Accessed on [2013-06-17].
40. EMPRAPA. Mapa de solos do Brasil. Excala 1:5,000,000. Rio de Janeiro, 1981. 9 p. Communicado expositivo do mapa de solos do Brasil, 1981l.
41. Batjes N H. ISRIC-WISE derived soil properties on a 5 by 5 arc-minutes global grid (ver. 1.2). Report 2012/01, ISRIC-World Soil Information, Wageningen Report, 2012. 1. pp 52. (with data set, available at www.isric.org).
42. NASA. Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer Website. http://asterweb.jpl.nasa. gov/. Accessed on [2013-06-17].
43. CODEVASF. Irrigation permitted data. Unpublished raw data, 2013.
44. ANA. Pluviométrica gage data of the São Francisco River Basin (2013). http://hidroweb.ana.gov.br/. Accessed on [2014-12-28].
45. Suranjana Saha, Shrinivas Moorthi, Hua-Lu Pan, Xingren Wu, Jiande Wang, Sudhir Nadiga, et al. The NCEP climate forecast system reanalysis. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 2010; 91(8): 1015-1057.
46. Bressiani D A, Srinivasan R, Jones CA, Mendiondo E M. Effects of different spatial and temporal weather data resolutions on the streamflow modeling of a semi-arid basin, Northeast Brazil. Int J AgricBiol Eng. 2015; (forthcoming).
47. Abbaspour K C. User Manual for SWAT-CUP, SWAT Calibration and Uncertainty Analysis Programs. Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Eawag, Dübendorf, Switzerland, 2007. http://www.eawag.ch/forschung/siam/software/swat/index. Accessed on [2015-02].
48. Arnold J G, Allen P M, Muttiah R, Bernhardt G. Automated base flow separation and recession analysis techniques. Ground Water, 1995; 33(6): 1010-1018.
49. Carvalho N O, Filizola N P, Santos P M C, Lima J E F W. Guia de práticas sedimentométricas, Brasília: Aneel, 2000, 132 p.
50. CODEVASF-USACE. Sambaiba Island Geotube Project Final Report, February 2013.
51. Halfeld H G F. Atlas e relatorio concernente a exploração do Rio de S. Francisco desde a Cachoeira da Pirapora até ao Oceano Atlantico : levantado por Ordem do Governo de S. M. I. O Senhor Dom Pedro II, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1860.
52. Creech C T. Coupled Sediment Yield and Sediment Transport Model to Support Navigation Planning in Northeast Brazil. Dissertation, Wayne State University. Ann Arbor: Proquest/UMI, 2014. (Publication No. 3646957).
53. Syvitski J P M, Milliman J D. Geology, Geography, and Humans Battle for Dominance over the Delivery of Fluvial Sediment to the Coast Ocean. Journal of Geology, 2007; 115(1): 1-19.
54. Mahmood K. Reservoir sedimentation: impact, extent, and mitigation. Washington, D.C, World Bank, 1987.
55. White R. Evacuation of sediments from reservoirs, Thomas Telford Press, London, 2001.
56. Syvitski J P M, Vorosmarty C H, Kettner A J, Green P. Impact of humans on the flux of terrestrial sediment to the global coastal ocean. Science, 2005; 308: 376-380.
57. Walker H J, Coleman J M, Roberts H H, Tye R S, Wetland loss in Louisiana. Geogr. Ann., 1987; 69A: 189-200.