Gamma oscillations as a neural signature of shifting times in narrative language

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2015, Pages

  Brederoo, Sanne Gøren ^a,b   Bos, Laura Simone ^a,b   Dragoy, Olga ^a,c   Bastiaanse, Roelien ^a   Baggio, Giosuè ^d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^c NATIONAL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY HIGHER SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Russian Federation)

^d SISSA   (Italy)

^e NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; GAMMA RHYTHM; GRAMMAR; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; LINGUISTICS; MALE; NARRATIVE; NERVE POTENTIAL; NORMAL HUMAN; OSCILLATORY POTENTIAL; PREDICTION; SEMANTICS; STIMULUS RESPONSE; BRAIN; EVOKED RESPONSE; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; BRAIN; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; MALE; TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84928807112     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121146     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Sinha C, Gärdenfors P. Time, space, and events in language and cognition: a comparative view. Annals of the New York Academy of Science 2014; 1326: 72-81. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12491 PMID: 25098724
2. Suddendorf T, Addis DR, Corballis MC. Mental time travel and the shaping of the human mind. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 2009; 364: 1317-1324. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0301 PMID: 19528013
3. van Lambalgen M, Hamm F. The proper treatment of events. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2005.
4. Comrie B. Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1985.
5. Prior AN. Now. NoÛs 1968; 2: 101-119.
6. Kamp H. Formal properties of 'now'. Theoria 1971; 37: 227-273.
7. Kaplan D. Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics, and Epistemology of Demonstratives and Other Indexicals. In: Almog J, Perry J, Wettstein H, editors. Themes from Kaplan. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1989. pp. 481-563.
8. Bar-Hillel Y. Indexical expressions. Mind 1954; 63: 359-379.
9. Predelli S. Utterance, interpretation and the logic of indexicals. Mind and Language 1998; 13: 400-414.
10. Smith Q. The multiple uses of indexicals. Synthese 1989; 78: 167-191.
11. Voltolini A. Fiction as a base of interpretation contexts. Synthese 2006; 153: 23-47.
12. Dilligham Pierson C. Among The Pond People. New York: Dutton; 1901.
13. Corazza E. On the alleged ambiguity of 'now' and 'here'. Synthese 2004; 138: 289-313.
14. Sag IA, Hankamer J. Toward a theory of anaphoric processing. Linguistics and Philosophy 1984; 7: 325-345.
15. Kutas M, Hillyard S. Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science 1980; 207: 203-205. PMID: 7350657
16. Osterhout L, Holcomb P. Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language 1992; 31: 785-806.
17. Hagoort P, Brown C, Groothusen J. The syntactic positive shift (SPS) as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Language and Cognitive Processes 1993; 8: 439-483.
18. Pylkkänen L, McElree B. An MEG study of silent meaning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2007; 19: 1905-1921. PMID: 17958491
19. Baggio G, Choma T, van Lambalgen M, Hagoort P. Coercion and compositionality. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2010; 22: 2131-2140. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21303 PMID: 19583469
20. Kuperberg GR, Choi A, Cohn N, Paczynski M, Jackendoff R. Electrophysiological correlates of complement coercion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2010; 22: 2685-2701. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21333 PMID: 19702471
21. Paczynski M, Jackendoff R, Kuperberg GR. When events change their nature: The neurocognitive mechanisms underlying aspectual coercion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2010; 26: 1905-1917.
22. Nieuwland M, van Berkum J. When peanuts fall in love: N400 evidence for the power of discourse. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2006; 18: 1098-1111. PMID: 16839284
23. Dragoy O, Stowe LA, Bos LS, Bastiaanse R. From time to time: Processing time reference violations in Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language 2012; 66: 307-325.
24. Bos LS, Dragoy O, Stowe LA, Bastiaanse R. Time reference teased apart from tense: Thinking beyond the present. Journal of Neurolinguistics 2013; 26: 283-297.
25. Bastiaansen MCM, Hagoort P. Oscillatory neuronal dynamics during language comprehension. Progress in Brain Research 2006; 159: 179-196. PMID: 17071231
26. Braeutigam S, Bailey AJ, Swithenby SJ. Phase-locked gamma band responses to semantic violation stimuli. Cognitive Brain Research 2001; 10: 365-377. PMID: 11167062
27. Hald L, Bastiaansen MCM, Hagoort P. EEG theta and gamma responses to semantic violations in online sentence processing. Brain and Language 2006; 96: 90-105. PMID: 16083953
28. Penolazzi B, Angrilli A, Job R. Gamma EEG activity induced by semantic violation during sentence reading. Neuroscience Letters 2009; 465: 74-78. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.08.065 PMID: 19723559
29. Hoeks JCJ, Stowe LA, Doedens G. Seeing words in context: The interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading. Cognitive Brain Research 2004; 19: 59-73. PMID: 14972359
30. Sabourin L. Grammatical gender and second language processing: An ERP study. Groningen Dissertation in Linguistics 42; 2003.
31. Oostenveld R, Fries P, Maris E, Schoffelen JM. FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience 2011; 156869.
32. Maris E, Oostenveld R. Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2007; 164: 177-190. PMID: 17517438
33. Grossmann A, Kronland-Martinet R, Morlet J. Reading and understanding continuous wavelets transforms. In: Combes JM, Grossmann A, Tchamitchian P, editors. Wavelets, time- frequency methods and phase space. New York: Springer; 1989. pp. 2-20.
34. Tallon-Baudry C, Bertrand O, Delpuech C, Pernier J. Stimulus specificity of phase-locked and non-phase-locked 40Hz visual responses in human. Journal of Neuroscience 1996; 16: 4240-4249. PMID: 8753885
35. Fonseca A, Boboeva V, Brederoo SG, Baggio G. Disrupting morphosyntactic and lexical semantic processing has opposite effects on the sample entropy of neural signals. Brain Research, 2015; doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.01.030
36. Kamp H, Reyle U. From Discourse to Logic. Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 1993.
37. Recanati F. Are 'here' and 'now' indexicals? Texte 2001; 127/8: 115-127.
38. Hunter J. Now: A discourse-based theory. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2012; 7218: 371-380.
39. Hunter J. Presuppositional indexicals. Journal of Semantics 2013; 30: 321-481.
40. Yuval-Greenberg Y, Tomer O, Keren AS, Nelken I, Deouell LY. Transient induced gamma-band response in EEG as a manifestation of miniature saccades. Neuron 2008; 58: 429-441. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.03.027 PMID: 18466752
41. Fries P, Scheeringa R, Oostenveld R. Finding gamma. Neuron 2008; 58: 303-305. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.020 PMID: 18466741
42. Baggio G, van Lambalgen M, Hagoort P. Language, linguistics and cognition. In: Fernando T, Asher N, edirors. Philosophy of Linguistics. Elsevier; 2012. pp. 325-355.
43. Baggio G. Processing temporal constraints: An ERP study. Language Learning 2008; 58: 35-55.
44. Baggio G, van Lambalgen M, Hagoort P. Computing and recomputing discourse models: An ERP study. Journal of Memory and Language 2008; 59: 36-53.
45. Singer W, Gray CM. Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. Annual Review of Neuroscience 1995; 18: 555-586. PMID: 7605074
46. Engel AK, Singer W. Temporal binding and the neural correlates of sensory awareness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2001; 5: 16-25. PMID: 11164732
47. Sejnowski TJ, Paulsen O. Network oscillations: Emerging computational principles. Journal of Neuroscience 2006; 26: 1673-1676. PMID: 16467514
48. Fries P. Neuronal gamma-band synchronization as a fundamental process in cortical computation. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2009; 32: 209-224. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135603 PMID: 19400723
49. Nigam A, Hoffman JE, Simons RF. N400 to semantically anomalous pictures and words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1992; 4: 15-22. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1992.4.1.15 PMID: 23967854
50. Patel A, Gibson E, Ratner J, Besson M, Holcomb PJ. Processing syntactic relations in language and music: An event-related potential study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1998; 10: 717-733. PMID:9831740
51. Baggio G, Hagoort P. The balance between memory and unification in semantics. A dynamic account of the N400. Language and Cognitive Processes 2011; 26: 1338-1367.
52. Baggio G, van Lambalgen M, Hagoort P. The processing consequences of compositionality. In M Werning, W Hinzen, and E Machery, editors. The Oxford Handbook of Compositionality. Oxford; 2012. pp. 657-674.