Examining user comments for deliberative democracy: A corpus-driven analysis of the climate change debate online

Environmental Communication

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 189-207

  Collins, Luke ^a   Nerlich, Brigitte ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

climate change; corpus linguistics; deliberation; user comments; online journalism

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928767595     PISSN: 17524032     EISSN: 17524040     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17524032.2014.981560     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Anderson, A. A., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., Xenos, M. A., & Ladwig, P. (2013). The "nasty effect:" Online incivility and risk perceptions of emerging technologies. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 373-387. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12009
2. Bowman, S., & Willis, C. (2003). Introduction to participatory journalism. In S. Bowman & C. Willis (Eds.), We media: How audiences are shaping the future of news and information. (Vol. 11(1), pp. 7-8). Reston, VA: The Media Center at the American Press Institute. Retrieved October 23, 2013, from http://www.hypergene.net/wemedia/download/we-media.pdf
3. Bruns, A. (2005). Gatewatching: Collaborative online news production. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
4. Cavanagh, A., & Dennis, A. (2013). Having your say: The social organisation of online news commentary. Sociological Research Online, 18(2), 4-13. doi:10.5153/sro.2919
5. Davis, R. (1999). The web of politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Freelon, D. (2010). Analyzing online political discourse discussion using three models of democratic communication. New Media & Society, 12, 1172-1190. doi:10.1177/1461444809357927
7. Freelon, D. (2013). Discourse architecture, ideology and democratic norms in online political discussion. New Media & Society, 1-20. Retrieved October 24, 2014, from http://nms.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/12/02/1461444813513259.full.pdf+html
8. Gillmor, D. (2003). Moving toward participatory journalism. Nieman Reports, 57(3), 79-80.
9. Graham, T. S. (2002). The public sphere needs you. Deliberating in online forums: New hope for the public sphere? (MA dissertation). Amsterdam: The Amsterdam School of Communications Research.
10. Habermas, J. (1962/1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. (Thomas Burger, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
11. Hagemann, C. (2002). Participation in and contents of two Dutch political party discussion lists on the Internet. Javnost- The Public, 9(2), 61-76.
12. Hayward, B. (2008). Let's talk about the weather: Decentering democratic debate about climate change. Hypatia, 23(3), 79-98. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2008.tb01206.x
13. Hermida, A., & Thurman, N. (2008). The integration of user-generated content within professional journalistic frameworks at British newspaper websites. Journalism Practice, 2, 343-356. doi:10.1080/17512780802054538
14. Hobson, K., & Niemeyer, S. (2012). "What sceptics believe": The effects of information and deliberation on climate change scepticism. Public Understanding of Science, 22, 396-412. doi:10.1177/0963662511430459
15. Holliman, R. (2011). Advocacy in the tail: Exploring the implications of "climategate" for science journalism and public debate in the digital age. Journalism, 12, 832-846. doi:10.1177/1464884911412707
16. Hulme, M. (2009). Why we disagree about climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Jankowski, N. W., & van Selm, M. (2000). The promise and practice of public debate in cyberspace. In K. L. Hacker & J. van Dijk (Eds.), Digital democracy: Issues of theory and practice (pp.149-165). London: Sage.
18. Janssen, D., & Kies, R. (2004, May 22-23). Online forums and deliberative democracy: Hypotheses, variables and methodologies. Paper prepared for the conference on "Empirical approaches to deliberative politics", European University Institute, Florence. Retrieved April 29, 2014, http://edemocracycentre.ch/files/onlineforums.pdf
19. Jensen, J. L. (2003). Public spheres on the internet: Anarchic or government-sponsored- a comparison. Scandinavian Political Studies, 26, 349-374. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.2003.00093.x
20. Koteyko, N., Jaspal, R., & Nerlich, B. (2013). Climate change and "climategate" in online reader comments: A mixed methods study. The Geographical Journal, 179(1), 74-86. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4959.2012.00479.x
21. Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E. W., Roser-Renouf, C., Smith, N., & Dawson, E. (2010). Climategate, public opinion, and the loss of trust (Working Paper SSRN). Retrieved October 23, 2013, from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1633932
22. Levy, P. (2002). Cyberdemocracy. Paris: Odile Jacob.
23. List, C., Luskin, R. C., Fishkin, J. S., & McLean, I. (2006). Deliberation, single-peakedness, and the possibility of meaningful democracy: Evidence from deliberative polls (PSE Working Papers 1-2006). London: Department of Government, London School of Economics and Political Science. Retrieved October 24, 2014, from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/20069/1/PSPE-WP1-06-(LSERO).pdf
24. Manosevitch, E., & Walker, D. (2009, April 17-18). Reader comments to online opinion journalism: A space of public deliberation. Paper presented at the 10th International Symposium on Online Journalism, Austin, TX.
25. Milioni, D., Vadratsikas, K., & Papa, V. (2012). "Their two cents worth": A content analysis of online readers' comments in mainstream news outlets. Observatorio (OBS∗), 6(3), 21-47.
26. Niemeyer, S. (2012). Building the foundations of deliberative democracy: The deliberative person and climate change (Working Paper 2012/1). Canberra: Australian National University. Retrieved October 22, 2013, from http://deliberativedemocracy.anu.edu.au/sites/default/files/documents/working-papers/2012%201%20Simon%20Niemeyer.pdf
27. Niemeyer, S. (2013). Democracy and climate change: What can deliberative democracy contribute? Australian Journal of Politics & History, 59, 429-448. doi:10.1111/ajph.12025
28. O'Halloran, K. A. (2010). How to use corpus linguistics in the study of media discourse. In A. O'Keeffe & M. J. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 563-577). Abingdon: Routledge.
29. Painter, J. (2011). Poles apart: The international reporting of climate scepticism. Oxford: ReutersInstitute for the Study of Journalism.
30. Papacharissi, Z. (2004). Democracy online: Civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups. New Media & Society, 6, 259-283. doi:10.1177/1461444804041444
31. Pearce, W., Holmberg, K., Hellsten, I., & Nerlich, B. (2014). Climate change on twitter: Topics, communities and conversations about the 2013 IPCC Working Group 1 report. PLoS ONE, 9 (4): e94785. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0094785.t009
32. Poortinga, W., Spence, A., Whitmarsh, L., Capstick, S., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2011). Uncertain climate: An investigation into public scepticism about anthropogenic climate change. Global Environmental Change, 21, 1015-1024. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.03.001
33. Rayson, P. (2002). Matrix: A statistical method and software tool for linguistic analysis through corpus comparison (PhD thesis). Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
34. Scheufele, D. A., Hardy, B. W., Brossard, D., Waismel-Manor, I. S., & Nisbet, E. (2006). Democracy based on difference: Examining the links between structural heterogeneity, heterogeneity of discussion networks, and democratic citizenship. Journal of Communication, 56, 728-753. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00317.x
35. Schneider, S. M. (1997). Extending the public sphere through computer-mediated communication: Political discussion about abortion in a usenet newsgroup. (Doctoral thesis). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
36. Shank, G. (1993). Abductive multiloguing. The semiotic dynamics of navigating the Net. The Arachnet Electronic Journal on Virtual Culture, 1(1). Retrieved August 22, 2014, from http://www.infomotions.com/serials.aejvc/aejvc-v1n01-shank-abductive.txt
37. Sjöberg, L. (2003). Risk perception is not what it seems: The psychometric paradigm revisited. In K. Andersson (Ed.), VALDOR Conference 2003 (pp. 14-29). Stockholm: V Aldor.
38. Slovic, P., & Peters, E. (1998). The importance of worldviews in risk perception. Risk Decision and Policy, 3, 165-170. doi:10.1080/135753098348275
39. Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7, 321-326. doi:10.1089/1094931041291295
40. Sunstein, C. (2009). Republic.com 2.0. Oxfordshire: Princeton University Press.
41. Uldam, J., & Askanius, T. (2013). Online civic cultures: Debating climate change activism on YouTube. International Journal of Communication, 7, 1185-1204.
42. Upham, P., Whitmarsh, L., Poortinga, W., Purdam, K., Darnton, A., McLachlan, C., & Devine-Wright, P. (2009). Public attitudes to environmental change: A selective review of theory and practice. A research synthesis for the living with environmental change programme. Swindon: Research Councils. Retrieved October 23, 2013, from http://www.lwec.org.uk/
43. White, P. R. R. (2003). Beyond modality and hedging: A dialogic view of the language of intersubjective stance. Text, 23, 259-284.
44. Whitmarsh, L. (2011). Scepticism and uncertainty about climate change: Dimensions, determinants and change over time. Global Environmental Change, 21, 690-700. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.016
45. Wilhelm, A. G. (1999). Virtual sounding boards: How deliberative is online political discussion? In B. N. Hague & B. D. Loader (Eds.), Digital democracy. Discourse and decision making in the information age (pp. 154-178). London: Routledge.
46. Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.