Collaborative consumption: Towards a resource-saving consumption culture

Resources

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 184-203

  Leismann, Kristin ^a   Schmitt, Martina ^b   Rohn, Holger ^a,b   Baedeker, Carolin ^b  

^a Trifolium Beratungsgesellschaft mbh   (Germany)

^b Institute for Ecological Economy Research   (Germany)

Author keywords

Collaborative consumption; Ownership substituting services; Product service systems; Product sharing; Rebound effects; Resource efficiency; Resource saving potential; Service; Sustainable consumption patterns

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928759785     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20799276     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/resources2030184     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Schmidt-Bleek, F. Wieviel Umwelt braucht der Mensch-MIPS, das Maß für ökologisches Wirtschaften; Birkhäuser: Basel, Switzerland, 1994.
2. Weizsäcker, E.U.V,. Lovins, A.B,. Lovins, L.H. Faktor Vier: Doppelter Wohlstand, halbierter Naturverbrauch. Der neue Bericht an den Club of Rome; Droemer Knaur: München, Germany, 1995.
3. Lettenmeier, M,. Rohn, H,. Liedtke, C,. Schmidt-Bleek, F. Resource Productivity in 7 Steps: How to Develop Eco-Innovative Products and Services and Improve Their Material Footprint. Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy: Wuppertal, Germany. Available online: http://epub.wupperinst.org/frontdoor/index/index/docId/3384. (accessed on 29 April 2013).
4. Liedtke, C,. Wiesen, K,. Teubler, J,. Bienge, K,. Greiff, K,. Lettenmeier, M,. Rohn, H. Resource intensity analysis at micro level: Measuring dematerialization at product, company and household level. Resources 2013, Submitted for Publication.
5. Mancini, L,. Lettenmeier, M,. Rohn, H,. Liedtke, C. Application of the MIPS method for assessing the sustainability of production-consumption systems of food. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 2012, 81, 779-793. Available online: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268111000357 (accessed on 20 April 2013).
6. Ritthoff, M,. Rohn, H,. Liedtke, C. MIPS berechnen. Ressourcenproduktivität von Produkten und Dienstleistungen. Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy: Wuppertal, Germany, 2002.
7. Samus, T,. Lang, B,. Rohn, H. Assessing the natural resource use and the resource efficiency potential of the Desertec concept. Sol. Energy 2013, 87, 176-183.
8. Schmidt Bleek, F,. Bierter, W. Das MIPS Konzept. Weniger Naturverbrauch, mehr Lebensqualität durch Faktor 10; Droemer Knaur: München, Germany, 1998.
9. Federal ministry for the Environment; Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU) Programme for the Sustainable Use and Conservation of Natural Resources; BMU: Berlin, Germany, 2012. Available online: http://www.bmu.de/fileadmin/bmu-import/files/pdfs/allgemein/ application/pdf/progress_en_bf.pdf (accessed on 29 April 2013).
10. Federal Government. Perspektiven für Deutschland. Unsere Strategie für eine Nachhaltige Entwicklung; Federal Government: Berlin , Germany, 2002.
11. Lettenmeier, M,. Göbel, C,. Liedtke, C,. Rohn, H,. Teitscheid, P. Material Footprint of a Sustainable Nutrition System in 2050-Need for Dynamic Innovations in Production, Consumption and Politics. In Proceedings of 6th International European Forum (Igls-Forum) on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks, Innsbruck, Austria, 13-17 February 2012; pp. 484-598.
12. Lettenmeier, M,. Liedtke, C,. Rohn, H. Roadmap to lifestyles of low resource consumption-New perspectives on sustainable transformation processes on the level of households. Resources 2013, Submitted for Publication.
13. Liedtke, C,. Buhl, J,. Ameli, N. Designing value through less by integrating sustainability strategies into lifestyles. Int. J. Sustain. Des. 2013, in press. Available online: http://www.inderscience.com/ info/ingeneral/forthcoming.php?jcode=ijsdes (accessed on 26 April 2013).
14. Liedtke, C,. Buhl, J,. Ameli, N. Microfoundations for sustainable growth with eco-intelligent product service-arrangements. Sustainability 2013, 5, 1141-1160.
15. Liedtke, C,. Hasselkuß, M,. Welfens, M.J,. Nordmann, J,. Baedeker, C. Transformation Towards Sustainable Consumption: Changing Consumption Patterns Through Meaning in Social Practices. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Sustainability Transitions, Zurich, Switzerland, 19-21 June 2013.
16. Liedtke, C,. Lettenmeier, M,. Mancini, L,. Urbaneja, D.M. Resource consumption by private households. Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy: Wuppertal, Germany, unpublished work, 2013.
17. Welfens, M.J,. Liedtke, C,. Rohn, H. Living Lab: Research and Development of Sustainable Products and Services Through User-Driven Innovation in Experimental-Oriented Environments. In Proceedings of the ERSCP-EMSU Knowledge Collaboration & Learning for Sustainable Innovation Conference, Delft, the Netherlands, 25-29 October 2010.
18. Bringezu, S,. Bleischwitz, R. Sustainable Resource Management. Trends, Visions and Policies for Europe and the World; Greenleaf Publisher: Sheffield, UK, 2009.
19. Liedtke, C,. Baedeker, C,. Rohn, H,. Hasselkuß, M,. Grinewitschus, V. Sustainable LivingLabs- European Research Infrastructure for the User-Integrated Development of Sustainable Product and Service Innovation (SusLabNWE). In Proceedings of the 17th International Sustainable Innovation Conference, Bonn, Germany, 29-30 October 2012. Available online: http://www.read. dk/karch/files/39618923/SI12_Proceedings_Papers_2012_10_24_.pdf (accessed on 23 July 2013)
20. Liedtke, C,. Welfens, M.J,. Rohn, H,. Nordmann, J. LIVING LAB: user-driven innovation for sustainability. Int. Sustain. High. Edu. 2012, 13, 106-118.
21. Rohn, H,. Wiesen, K,. Lettenmeier, M,. Pastewski, N. Quantitative Benefits of Sustainable Innovation: Resource Efficiency Potentials of Technologies, Products and Strategies. In Proceedings of the Sustainable Innovation 2010 Conference, Rotterdam, the Netherland, 8-9 November 2010.
22. Rohn, H,. Wiesen, K,. Lettenmeier, M,. Pastewski, N. Sustainability Through Innovative Technologies, Products and Strategies with High Resource Efficiency Potentials: Results from Current Research Studies in Germany. In Proceedings of the ERSCP-EMSU Conference Knowledge Collaboration & Learning for Sustainable Innovation, Delft, the Netherland, 25-29 October 2010.
23. Talwar, S,. Wiek, A,. Robinson, J. User engagement in sustainability research. Sci. Public Policy 2011, 38, 379-390.
24. Botsman, R,. Rogers, R. Beyond zipcar: Collaborative consumption. Harvard Business Review October 2010. Available online: http://hbr.org/2010/10/beyond-zipcar-collaborative-consumption/ (accessed on 23 July 2013).
25. Botsman, R,. Rogers, R. What's Mine is Yours: The Rise of Collaborative Consumption. How Collaborate Consumption is Changing the Way of Life; Harpercollins: London, UK, 2011.
26. Schmidt-Bleek, F,. Tischner, U. Produktentwicklung, Nutzen Gestalten-Natur Schonen; Wirtschaftskammer: Vienna, Austria, 1995.
27. Baedeker, C,. Liedtke, C,. Welfens, M.J,. Busch, T,. Kristof, K,. Kuhndt, M,. Schmitt, M,. Türk, V. Analyse Vorhandener Konzepte zur Messung des Nachhaltigen Konsums in Deutschland Einschließlich der Grundzüge eines Entwicklungskonzeptes; Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy: Wuppertal, Germany, 2005. Available online: http://wupperinst.org/ uploads/tx_wupperinst/messung-nachh-konsum.pdf (accessed on 29 April 2013).
28. Hirschl, B,. Konrad, W,. Scholl, G,. Zundel, S. Nachhaltige Produktnutzung. Sozial-ökonomische Bedingungen und ökologische Vorteile alternativer Konsumformen; Institut für ökologische Wirtschaftsforschung (IöW): Berlin, Germany, 2001.
29. Baines, T.S,. Lightfoot, H,. Steve, E,. Neely, A,. Greenough, R,. Peppard, J; Roy, R,. Shehab, E,. Braganza, A,. Tiwari, A,. et al. State-of-the-art in product service-systems. J. Eng. Manu. 2007, 221, 1543-1552.
30. Tukker, A. Eight types of product-sevice system: eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from suspronet. Bus. Strat. Env. 2004, 13, 246-260.
31. Bierter, W,. Stahel, W.R,. Schmidt-Bleek, F. öko-intelligente Produkte, Dienstleistungen und Arbeit. Wuppertal Spezial; Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy: Wuppertal, Germany, 1996.
32. Scholl, G. Eine Ressourcenschonende Konsumkultur. In Oekom e.V.-Verein für ökologische Kommunikation. Rohstoffquelle Abfall. Wie aus Müll Produkte von Morgen Werden Oekom; Nutzen statt Besitzen: Munich, Germany, 2012; pp. 92-96.
33. Schumpeter, J. The Business of Sharing. Available online: http://www.economist.com/node/ 17249322/print (accessed on 23 July 2013)
34. Scott, D.A. Sharing to Advantage: A New Paradigm for Business. Newsletter Strategy & Innovation from Harvard Business School; Harvard Business School: Cambrigde, MA, USA, 2004.
35. Varian, H.R. Buying, Sharing and renting information goods. J. Ind. Econ. 2000, 48, 473-488.
36. Stengel, O. Suffizienz: die Konsumgesellschaft in der ökologischen Krise, Dissertationsschrift, Wuppertaler Schriften zur Forschung für eine nachhaltige Entwicklung; Oekom: Munich, Germany, 2011.
37. Stengel, O. Weniger ist schwer. Barrieren in der Umsetzung suffizienter Lebensstile-und wie wir sie überwinden können. GAIA 2011, 20, 26-30.
38. Welfens, M.J,. Liedtke, C,. Nordman, J. Sustainable Consumption: Between Unsustainable Reality and People's Willingness to Act. In Proceedings of the ERSCP-EMSU Knowledge Collaboration & Learning for Sustainable Innovation Conference, Delft, the Netherlands, 25-29 October 2010.
39. Felson, M,. Spaeth, J.L. Community structure and collaborative consumption: a routine activity approach. Am. Behav. Sci. 1978, 21, 614-624.
40. Wuppertal Institute for Climate. Environment and Energy. Sustainable Germany in a Globalised World; Birkhäuser Verlag: Basel, Switzerland, 1996.
41. Stahel, W. Vertiefungsstudie zu Langlebigkeit und Materialrecycling im Bereich der Produkte. Ministry for the environment: Stuttgart, Germany, 1991.
42. Leismann, K,. Schmitt, M,. Rohn, H,. Baedeker, C. Nutzen statt Besitzen. Auf dem Weg zu einer ressourcenschonenden Konsumkultur; Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung: Berlin, Germany, 2012.
43. Hertwich, E.G. Consumption and the rebound effect: An industrial ecology perspective; J. Ind. Ecol. 2005, 9, 85-98.
44. Kristof, K,. Süßbauer, E. Material Efficiency and Resource Conservation. In Handlungsoptionen zur Steigerung der Ressourceneffizienz im Konsumalltag; Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy: Wuppertal, Germany, 2009. Available online: http://ressourcen.wupperinst.org/ downloads/MaRess_AP12_2.pdf (accessed on 26 April 2013)
45. European Commission (EC). A Resource-Efficient Europe-Flagship Initiative under the Europe 2020 Strategy; European Commission: Brüssel, Belgium, 2011. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/ resource-efficient-europe/pdf/resource:efficient_europe_en.pdf (accessed on 26 April 2013).
46. European Commission (EC). Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament. European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2011. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/resource:efficiency/about/roadmap/index_en.htm (accessed on 27 April 2013).
47. Geels, F.W,. Schot, J.W. Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Res. Policy 2007, 36, 399-417.
48. German Advisory Council on Global Change (WBGU). World in Transition-A Social Contract for Sustainability; WBGU: Berlin, Germany, 2011. Available online: http://www.wbgu.de/fileadmin/ templates/dateien/veroeffentlichungen/hauptgutachten/jg2011/wbgu_jg2011.pdf (accessed on 26 April 2013).
49. Schneidewind, U,. Scheck, H,. Augenstein, K,. Baedeker, C,. Beuermann, C,. Bleischwitz, R,. Böhler, S,. Bringezu, S,. Fischedick, M,. Jordan, N.D,. et al. Transitions towards Sustainability. Rethinking the Wuppertal Institute Research Perspective; Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy: Wuppertal, Germany, 2011.
50. Schneidewind, U,. Singer-Brodowski, M. Transformative Wissenschaft. Klimawandel im deutschen Wissenschafts-und Hochschulsystem; Metropolis-Verlag: Marburg, Germany, 2013.
51. Söderholm, P,. Tilton, J.E. Material efficiency: An economic perspective. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2012, 61, 75-82.
52. Welfens, M.J; Liedtke, C,. Schaefer, I. Encouraging sustainability-educational program for civil society. Int. Textb. Res. 2008, 2, 639-674.
53. Seiler-Hausmann, J.D,. Liedtke, C,. Weizsacker, E.U. Eco-efficiency and Beyond: Towards the Sustainable Enterprise; Greenleaf Publisher: Sheffield, UK, 2004.
54. Erdmann, L. Quantifizierung der Umwelteffekte des privaten Gebrauchtwarenhandels am Beispiel von eBay. In Wiederverkaufskultur im Internet. Chancen für nachhaltigen Konsum am Beispiel von eBay; Behrendt, S., Blättel-Mink, B., Clausen, J., Eds,. Springer: Heidelberg, Germany, 2011; pp.127-158.
55. Scholl, G,. Bietz, S,. Kristof, K,. Otto, S,. Reisch, L,. Rubik, F,. Süßbauer, E. Consumer-Oriented Approaches to Foster Resource Efficiency; European Commission: Wuppertal, Germany, 2010.
56. Scholl, G. Product-Service Systems: Taking a Functional and a Symbolic Perspective on Usership. In System Innovation for Sustainability 1: Perspectives on Radical Changes to Sust; Greenleaf Publishing in association with GSE Research: Sheffield, UK, 2008; pp. 255-270.
57. Tukker, A,. Huppes, G,. Suh, S,. Heijungs, R,. Guinée, J,. de Koning, A,. Geerken, T,. Jansen, G,. van Holderbeke, M,. Nielsen, P. Environmental Impacts of Products; European Commission: Seville, Spain, 2006.
58. Scholl, G. Marketing nachhaltiger Dienstleistungen. Bedingungen der übernahme und Empfehlungen zur Vermarktung von eigentumsersetzenden Konsumpraktiken; Metropolis Verlag: Marburg, Germany, 2009.
59. Paulitsch, K,. Rohn, H. Nackte Tatsachen: Warum das T-Shirt ökologisch schlechter ist als sein Ruf. In Der ökologische Rucksack: Wirtschaft für eine Zukunft mit Zukunft; Schmidt-Bleek, F., Ed,. Hirzel: Stuttgart, Germany, 2004; pp. 68-78.
60. Behrendt, S,. Behr, F. öko-Rent im Bereich Heimwerken, Baueigenleistungen und Gartenpflege; WerkstattBericht No. 41. Institut für Zunftsstudien und Technologiebewertung (IZT): Berlin, Germany, 2000.
61. BiPRO/Federal Environment Agency (UBA): Chemical Leasing-Beispiel für Ressourcen-und Materialeffizienz. In Proceedings of Background Paper for a Workshop, Berlin, Germany, 6 June 2011.
62. Lahl, U,. Zeschmar-Lahl, B. Going Green: Chemie-Handlungsfelder für eine ressourceneffiziente Chemieindustrie; Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung: Berlin, Germany, 2011.
63. Federal Environment Agency (UBA). Chemikalienleasing als Modell zur nachhaltigen Entwicklung mit Prüfprozeduren und Qualitätskriterien anhand von Pilotprojekten in Deutschland; UBA: Dessau-Roßlau, Germany, 2010.
64. Stengel, O,. Liedtke, C,. Baedeker, C,. Welfens, M.J. Theorie und praxis eines bildungskonzepts für Nachhaltigkeit. Umweltpsychologie 2008, 12, 29-42.
65. Harms, S. Besitzen oder Teilen. Carsharing-Sozialinnovativ Und Kulturell Selektiv? Möglichkeiten und Grenzen Einer Nachhaltigen Mobilität. In Sozialwissenschaftliche Analyse des Car-Sharings; Steding, D., Herrmann, A., Lange, M., Eds,. Rüegger-Verlag, Zürich, Switzerland, 2003.
66. Scholl, G. Product Service Systems. Taking a Functional and a Symbolic Perspective on Usership. In Perspectives on Radical Changes to Sustainable, Consumption and Production; Proceedings of Sustainalbe Consumption Research Exchange, Copenhagen, Denmark, 20-21 April 2006; pp. 25-43.