User engagement in sustainability research

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 379-390

  Talwar, Sonia ^a   Wiek, Arnim ^b   Robinson, John ^c  

^a NATURAL RESOURCES CANADA   (Canada)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; ORGANIZATIONAL FRAMEWORK; POLICY APPROACH; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; STAKEHOLDER; SUSTAINABILITY;

CANADA; SWITZERLAND;

EID: 79959871850     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/030234211X12960315267615     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Arnstein, S 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216-224.
2. Baldwin, S 2000. Interactive social science in practice: new approaches to the production of knowledge and their implications. Science and Public Policy, 27(3), 183-194.
3. Blackstock, K L and C E Carter 2007. Operationalising sustainability science for a sustainability directive? Reflecting on three pilot projects. Geographical Journal, 173(4),343-357.
4. Brundiers, K and A Wiek 2011. Educating students in real-world sustainability research - Vision and implementation. Innovative Higher Education, 36(2), 107-124.
5. Carmichael, J, J Tansey and J Robinson 2004. An integrated assessment modelling tool. Global Environmental Change, 14(2), 171-183.
6. Cash, D, W C Clark, F Alcock, N Dickson, N Eckley et al. 2003. Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 100, 8086-8091.
7. Caswill, C and E Hovden 2006. Engaging across boundaries: views from an intermediary space. Paper presented at the NORFACE Workshop on User Engagement, 1-3 November 2006, Montreal, Canada.
8. Caswill, C and E Shove 2000. Introducing interactive social science. Science and Public Policy, 27(3), 154-157.
9. Cornwall, A and R Jewkes 1995. What is participatory research? Social Science & Medicine, 41(12), 1667-1676.
10. Craig, W J, T Harris and D Weiner 2002. Community Participation and Geographic Information Systems. London and New York: Taylor & Francis.
11. Estrella, M and J Gaventa 2000. Who counts reality? Participatory monitoring and evaluation: a literature review. IDS Working Paper 70. Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies.
12. European Science Foundation 2007. Communication on Environmental Research at the Science Policy Interface (CSPI). Report on Workshop held 28-29 November 2006, Brussels.
13. Feldman, M S 1989. Order Without Design: Information Production and Policy Making. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
14. Fischer, F 1993. Citizen participation and the democratization of policy expertise: from theoretical inquiry to practical cases. Policy Sciences, 26(3), 165-187.
15. Fischhoff, B, P Slovic and S Lichtenstein 1983. The public vs. 'the experts' In The Analysis of Actual vs. Perceived Risks V T Covello, W G Flamm, J V Rodricks and R G Tardif eds., pp 235-249. New York: Plenum.
16. Friedmann, J 1993. Towards a non-Euclidean mode of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 59(4), 482-484.
17. Funtowicz, S O and J R Ravetz 1993. Science for the post-normal age. Futures, 25(7), 735-755.
18. Gibbons, M 1999. Science's new social contract with society. Nature, 402, C81-C84.
19. Gibbons, M, C Limoges, H Nowotny, S Schwartzman, P Scott and M Trow 1994. The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.
20. Hanna, K S 2000. The paradox of participation and the hidden role of information: a case study. Journal of the AmericanPlanning Association, 66(4), 398-410.
21. Healey, P 1996. Consensus-building across difficult divisions: New approaches to collaborative strategy making. Planning Practice and Research, 11(2), 207-216.
22. Hirsch Hadorn, G, D Bradley, C Pohl, S Rist, and U Wiesmann 2006. Implications of transdiscipliarity for sustainability research. Ecological Economics, 60(1), 119-128.
23. Innes, JE 1990. Knowledge and Public Policy: The Search forMeaningful Indicators. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
24. Innes, J E 1998. Information in communicative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 64(1), 52-63.
25. Ison, R and D Russell 2000. Agricultural Extension and Rural Development: Breaking Out of Traditions: A Second-order Systems Perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26. Jasanoff, S 1987. Contested boundaries in policy-relevant science. Social Studies of Science, 17(2), 195-230.
27. Jonassen, D H, K L Peck and B G Wilson 1999. Learning with Technology: A Constructivist Perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
28. Kasemir, B, J Jager, C C Jaeger, M T Gardner 2003. Public Participation in Sustainability Science: A Handbook. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29. Kates, R W, W C Clark, R Corell, J M Hall, C C Jaeger et al. 2001. Sustainability science. Science, 291, 641-642.
30. Kingston, R, S Carver, A Evans and I Turton 2000. Web-based public participation geographical information systems: an aid to local environmental decision-making. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 24(2), 109-125.
31. Liu, J, T Dietz, S R Carpenter, C Folke, M Alberti et al. 2007. Coupled human and natural systems. Ambio, 36(8), 639-649.
32. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (Program) 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: A Synthesis Report. Washington, DC: Island Press.
33. Mitchell, R B, W C Clark, D W Cash, N M Dickson eds. 2006. Global Environmental Assessments: Information and Influence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Nowotny, H 2003. Democratising expertise and socially robust knowledge. Science and Public Policy, 30(3), 151-156.
35. Nowotny, H, P Scott, and M Gibbons 2001. Re-thinking Science - Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
36. Orr, D W 2002. Four challenges of sustainability. Conservation Biology, 16(6), 1457-1460.
37. Robinson, J 2003. Future subjunctive: backcasting as social learning. Futures, 35(8), 839-856.
38. Robinson, J 2008. Being undisciplined - transgressions and intersections in academia and beyond. tutures, 40(1), 70-86.
39. Robinson, J and J Tansey 2006. Co-production, emergent properties and strong interactive social research: the Georgia Basin Futures Project. Science and Public Policy, 33(2), 151-160.
40. Rowe, G, and L Frewer 2005. A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 30(2), 251-290.
41. Savelson, A, R van Wynsberghe, J H Frankish, and H Folz 2005. Application of a health promotion model to community-based sustainability planning. Local Environment, 10(6), 629-647.
42. Schlossberg, M, and E Shuford 2005. Delineating 'public' and 'participation' in PPGIS. URISA Journal, 16(2), 15-26.
43. Scholz, R and O Tietje 2002. Embedded Case Study Methods: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Knowledge. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44. Scholz, R W, M Stauffacher, S Boesch, and P Krütli 2004. Leisure in the City of Basel - Mobility and Sustainable Urban Development. Zurich: Switzerland: Ruegger und Pabst (in German).
45. Scholz, R W, D Lang, A Wiek, A Walter, and M Stauffacher 2006. Transdisciplinary case studies as a means of sustainability learning: historical framework and theory. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 7(3), 226-251.
46. Stauffacher, M, A Walter, D Lang, A Wiek, and R W Scholz 2006. Learning to research environmental problems from a functional socio-cultural constructivism perspective: the transdisciplinary case study approach. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 7(3), 252-275.
47. Stauffacher, M, T Flüeler, P Krütli, and R W Scholz 2008. Analytic and dynamic approach to collaborative planning: a transdisciplinary case study on sustainable landscape development in a Swiss pre-alpine region. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 21(6), 409-422.
48. Szanton, P 1981. Not Well Advised. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
49. van Asselt, M B and N Rijkens-Klomp 2002. A look in the mirror: reflection on participation in Integrated Assessment from a methodological perspective. Global Environmental Change, 12(3), 167-184.
50. van Kerkhoff, L and L Lebel 2006. Linking knowledge and action for sustainable development. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31, 445-477.
51. Van Wynsberghe, R, J Moore, J Tansey and J Carmichael 2003. Towards community engagement: six steps to expert learning for future scenario development. Futures, 35, 203-219.
52. Walters, L C, J Aydelotte, and J Miller 2000. Putting more public in policy analysis. Public Administration Review, 60, 349-359.
53. Walter, A, S Helgenberger, A Wiek and R W Scholz 2007. Measuring social effects of transdisciplinary research: design and application of an evaluation method. Evaluation and Program Planning, 30, 325-338.
54. Wiek, A 2007. Challenges of transdisciplinary research as interactive knowledge generation - Experiences from transdisciplinary case study research. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 16(1), 52-57.
55. Wiek, A and A Walter 2009. A transdisciplinary approach for formalized integrated sectoral planning and decision-making in complex systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 197(1), 360-370.
56. Wiek, A, C R Binder and R W Scholz 2006. Functions of scenarios in transition processes. Futures, 38(7), 740-766.
57. Wiek, A, M Scheringer, C Pohl, G Hirsch Hadorn and A Valsangiacomo 2007. Joint problem identification and structuring in environmental research. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 16(1), 72-74.
58. Williams, G 2007. NORFACE Workshop Report: User Engagement in Research. Prepared for Social Sciences and Humanties Research Council of Canada.
59. Ziman, J 2000. Real Science: What it is, and What it Means. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.