Consistency between stated and revealed preferences: A discrete choice experiment and a behavioural experiment on vaccination behaviour compared

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Lambooij, Mattijs S ^a   Harmsen, Irene A ^a,c   Veldwijk, Jorien ^a,b   De Melker, Hester ^a   Mollema, Liesbeth ^a   Van Weert, Yolanda W M ^a   De Wit, G Ardine ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^c MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

DCE; Hepatitis B; Predictive value; Revealed preferences; Stated preferences; Vaccination

Indexed keywords

HEPATITIS B VACCINE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HEPATITIS B; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEWBORN; PARENT; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; VACCINATION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEYS; HEPATITIS B; HEPATITIS B VACCINES; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PARENTS; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; VACCINATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84928733114     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712288     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12874-015-0010-5     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. De Bekker-Grob, E.W., M. Ryan, and K. Gerard, Discrete choice experiments in health economics: A review of the literature. Health Economics. 2010
2. Cheng J, Pullenayegum E, Marshall DA, Marshall JK, Thabane L. An empirical comparison of methods for analyzing correlated data from a discrete choice survey to elicit patient preference for colorectal cancer screening. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12(15). doi:10.1186/1471-2288-12-15
3. Kruijshaar ME, Essink-Bot ML, Donkers B, Looman CWN, Siersema PD, Steyerberg EW. A labelled discrete choice experiment adds realism to the choices presented: preferences for surveillance tests for Barrett esophagus. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9(31). doi:10.1186/1471-2288-9-31
4. De Bekker-Grob EW, Hofman R, Donkers B, van Ballegooijen M, Helmerhorst TJM, Raat H, et al. Girls' preferences for HPV vaccination: A discrete choice experiment. Vaccine. 2010;28:6692-7.
5. Brown DS, Johnson FR, Poulosa C, Messonnier ML. Mothers' preferences and willingness to pay for vaccinating daughters against human papillomavirus. Vaccine. 2010;28:1702-8.
6. Johnson FR, Mohamed AF, Özdemira S, Marshall DA, Phillipse KA. How does cost matter in health-care discrete-choice experiments? Health Economics. 2011;20:323-30. doi:10.1002/hec.1591.
7. Cascetta E. Random Utility Theory. In: Cascetta E, editor. Transportation Systems Analysis: models and applications. New York: Springer; 2009. p. 89-167.
8. Louviere JJ, Hensher DA, Swait JD. Stated choice methods, Analysis and application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
9. Ryan M. A comparison of stated preferencemethods for estimating monetary values. Health Econ. 2004;13:291-6.
10. Ding M. An incentive-aligned mechanism for conjoint analysis. J Mark Res. 2007;XLIV:214-23.
11. Hensher DA. Hypothetical bias, choice experiments and willingness to pay. Transportation Res B. 2009;44:735-52.
12. Blumenschein K, Joannesson M, Yokoyama K, Freeman P. Hypothetical versus real willingness to pay in the health care sector. J Health Econ. 2001;20:441-57.
13. Clarke PM. Testing the convergent validity of the contingent valuation and travel cost methods in valuing the benefits of health care. Health Econ. 2001;11(2):117-27.
14. Bults M, Beaujean DJ, de Zwart O, Kok G, van Empelen P, van Steenbergen JE et al. Perceived risk, anxiety, and behavioural responses of the general public during the early phase of the Influenza A (H1N1) pandemic in the Netherlands: results of three consecutive online surveys. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(e2). doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-2
15. Sodoyer SC, Paulussen TGW, Smit H, Mollema L, Oomen P, Hoving C, et al. Acceptability of universal infant hepatitis B vaccination among parents in the Netherlands. In: Poster on European Society for Paediatric Infectious Diseases conference (Vol. 727). The Hague, The Netherlands: National Institution for Public Health and the Environment; 2011.
16. Hontelez JA, Hahné SJ, Oomen P, de Melker H. Parental attitude towards childhood HBV vaccination in The Netherlands. Vaccine. 2010;28(4):1015-20.
17. Psyma. Survey regarding the Perception of Vaccines and Vaccinations. International Summary Report. Rückersdorf/Nürnberg (Germany): Psyma International Medical Marketing Research; 2004.
18. Paulussen TGW, Hoekstra F, Lanting CI, Buijs GB, Hirasing RA. Determinants of Dutch parents' decisions to vaccinate their child. Vaccine. 2006;24:644-51.
19. Rondy M, van Lier A, van de Kasteele J, de Melker H. Determinants for HPV vaccine uptake in the Netherlands: A multilevel study. Vaccine. 2009;28:2070-5.
20. Van Keulen HM, Fekkes M, Otten W, Van der Pal S, Kocken P, Ruiter R, et al. Onderzoek naar de HPV-vaccinatiebereidheid bij moeders en dochters naar aanleiding van de inhaalcampagne in Nederland. Leiden: TNO, Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research; 2010.
21. Sturm LA, Mays RM, Zimet GD. Parental beliefs and decision making about child and adolescent immunization: from polio to sexually transmitted infections. Dev Behav Pediatr. 2005;26(6):441-52.
22. Harmsen IA, Lambooij MS, Ruiter RA, Mollema L, Veldwijk J, van Weert YJ, et al. Psychosocial determinants of parents' intention to vaccinate their newborn child against hepatitis B. Vaccine. 2012;30(32):4771-7.
23. Ryan M, Gerard K, Amaya-Amaya M. Using Discrete Choice Experiments to Value Health and Health Care. In: Bateman IJ, editor. The Economics of Non-Market Goods and Resources. Dordrecht: Springer; 2008.
24. Akobeng AK. Understanding diagnostic tests 1: sensitivity, specificity and predictive values. Acta Paediatr. 2006;96:338-41.
25. Ruijs WLM, Hautvast JLA, van der Velden K, de Vos S, Knippenberg H, Hulscher MELJ. Religious subgroups influencing vaccination coverage in the Dutch Bible belt: an ecological study. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(102). doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-102.
26. Ruijs WLM, Hautvast JLA, van IJzendoorn G, van Ansem WJC, van der Velden K, Hulscher MEJL. How orthodox protestant parents decide on the vaccination of their children: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2012;12 (408). doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-408
27. Woonink F. Objections against vaccination, The perspective of those who refuse. Bilthoven, the Netherlands: National Institute of Public Health and Environment; 2009.
28. Feinstein AR, Cicchetti DV. High agreement but low kappa. I. The problems of two paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43:543-9.
29. Feinstein AR, Cicchetti DV. High agreement but low kappa. II. Resolving the paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43:551-8.
30. de Bekker-Grob EW, Ryan M, Gerard K. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature. Health Econ. 2012;21:145-72.
31. Ryan M, Watson V. Comparing welfare estimates from payment card contingent valuation and discrete choice experiments. Health Econ. 2009;18:389-401.
32. Brazell JD, Diener CG, Karniouchina E, William L, Moore WL, Severin V, et al. The no-choice option and dual response choice designs. Mark Lett. 2006;17:255-68. doi:10.1007/s11002-006-7943-8.
33. National Institute of Public Health and the Environment. Helft 12-jarige meisjes haalt HPV-vaccinatie (Half of 12 year old girls get HPV vaccination). Bilthoven: National Institute of Health and the Environment; 2012.