Measurement properties of the Disability Rating Index in patients undergoing hip replacement

Rheumatology (United Kingdom)

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 64-71

  Parsons, Helen ^a   Bruce, Julie ^a   Achten, Juul ^a   Costa, Matthew L ^a   Parsons, Nicholas R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Disability evaluation; DRI; Patient reported outcomes; Validity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASSESSMENT OF HUMANS; COXITIS; DISABILITY RATING INDEX; EUROQOL GROUP FIVE DIMENSION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURES; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OXFORD HIP SCORE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RHEUMATOLOGY; RIGIDITY; VALIDATION STUDY; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

EID: 84928726852     PISSN: 14620324     EISSN: 14620332     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keu293     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Guidance for industry: patientreported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006;4:79.
2. Tugwell P, Boers M, Brooks P et al. OMERACT: an international initiative to improve outcome measurement in rheumatology. Trials 2007;8:38.
3. Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust. Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res 2002; 11:193-205.
4. Mokkink L, Terwee C, Patrick D et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res 2010;19:539-49.
5. Speight J, Barendse SM. FDA guidance on patient reported outcomes. BMJ 2010;340:c2921.
6. Terwee C, Bot S, de Boer M et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60:34-42.
7. Revicki D, Hays RD, Cella D, Sloan J. Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;61:102-9.
8. Salén B, Spangfort E, Nygren A, Nordemar R. The Disability Rating Index: an instrument for the assessment of disability in clinical settings. J Clin Epidemiol 1994;47: 1423-35.
9. Lundin A, Magnuson A, Nilsson O. A stiff and straight back preoperatively is associated with a good outcome years after lumbar disc surgery. Acta Orthop 2009;80: 573-8.
10. Sjostrom R, Asplund R, Alricsson M. Two-year outcome of a multidisciplinary vocational rehabilitation programme focused on range of motion of the neck and back. Work 2010;37:341-8.
11. Grotle M, Garratt AM, Krogstad Jenssen H, Stuge B. Reliability and construct validity of self-report questionnaires for patients with pelvic girdle pain. Phys Ther 2012; 92:111-23.
12. Salerno DF, Copley-Merriman C, Taylor TN, Shinogle J, Schulz RM. A review of functional status measures for workers with upper extremity disorders. Occup Environ Med 2002;59:664-70.
13. Bromley Milton M, Borsbo B, Rovner G et al. Is pain intensity really that important to assess in chronic pain patients? A study based on the Swedish Quality Registry for Pain Rehabilitation (SQRP). PLoS One 2013;8:e65483.
14. Nyberg V, Sanne H, Sjolund BH. Swedish Quality Registry for Pain Rehabilitation: purpose, design, implementation and characteristics of referred patients. J Rehabil Med 2011;43:50-7.
15. Grotle M, Brox JI, Vollestad NK. Functional status and disability questionnaires: what do they assess? A systematic review of back-specific outcome questionnaires. Spine 2005;30:130-40.
16. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A, Murray D. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996;78:185-90.
17. Klassbo M, Larsson E, Mannevik E. Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score. An extension of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. Scand J Rheumatol 2003;32:46-51.
18. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988; 15:1833-40.
19. World Health Organization. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2001.
20. Boers M, Brooks P, Strand C, Tugwell P. The OMERACT filter for outcome measures in rheumatology. J Rheumatol 1998;25:198-9.
21. Costa M, Achten J, Parsons N et al. Total hip arthroplasty versus resurfacing arthroplasty in the treatment of patients with arthritis of the hip joint: single centre, parallel group, assessor blinded, randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2012;344.
22. Achten J, Parsons N, Edlin R, Griffin D, Costa M. A randomised controlled trial of total hip arthroplasty versus resurfacing arthroplasty in the treatment of young patients with arthritis of the hip joint. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010;11:8.
23. Harris W. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1969;54:737-55.
24. EuroQol Group. EuroQol-a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990; 16:199-208.
25. Wamper KE, Sierevelt IN, Poolman RW, Bhandari M, Haverkamp D. The Harris Hip Score: do ceiling effects limit its usefulness in orthopedics? Acta Orthop 2010;81:703-7.
26. Kalairajah Y, Azurza K, Hulme C, Molloy S, Drabu K. Health outcome measures in the evaluation of total hip arthroplasties: a comparison between the Harris Hip Score and the Oxford Hip Score. J Arthroplasty 2005;20: 1037-41.
27. Dolan P. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 1997;35:1095-108.
28. Walters SJ, Brazier JE. Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D. Qual Life Res 2005;14: 1523-32.
29. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2013.
30. de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Bouter LM. When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59:1033-9.
31. McHorney C, Tarlov A. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res 1995;4:293-307.
32. A randomised controlled trial of standard wound management versus negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of adult patients with an open fracture of the lower limb [online]. Current Controlled Trials, 2012. http:// www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN33756652 (20 January 2014, date last accessed).
33. UK FixDT-a randomised controlled trial for patients with a displaced fracture of the distal tibia, is there a clinical and cost-effectiveness difference between 'locking' plate fixation and intramedullary nail fixation [online]. Current Controlled Trials, 2013. http://www.controlledtrials. com/ISRCTN99771224 (20 January 2014, date last accessed).
34. Thorborg K, Holmich P, Christensen R, Petersen J, Roos EM. The Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS): development and validation according to the COSMIN checklist. Br J Sports Med 2011;45: 478-91.
35. Terwee CB, Roorda LD, Knol DL, De Boer MR, De Vet HCW. Linking measurement error to minimal important change of patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:1062-7.
36. Tubach F, Ravaud P, Martin-Mola E et al. Minimum clinically important improvement and patient acceptable symptom state in pain and function in rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, chronic back pain, hand osteoarthritis, and hip and knee osteoarthritis: results from a prospective multinational study. Arthritis Care Res 2012; 64:1699-707.