Exploring the modifiable areal unit problem in spatial water assessments: A case of water shortage in Monsoon Asia

Water (Switzerland)

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 898-917

  Salmivaara, Aura ^a   Porkka, Miina ^a   Kummu, Matti ^a   Keskinen, Marko ^a   Guillaume, Joseph H A ^a   Varis, Olli ^a  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Asia; Environmental assessments; MAUP; Spatial analysis; Transboundary river basins; Vulnerability assessments; Water resources management; Water shortage

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC THERMODYNAMICS; GROUNDWATER; RIVERS; WATERSHEDS; ZONING;

ASIA; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; MAUP; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; TRANS-BOUNDARY RIVERS; VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENTS; WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT; WATER SHORTAGES;

WATER RESOURCES;

BASIN MANAGEMENT; MONSOON; RIVER BASIN; SPATIAL VARIATION; WATER AVAILABILITY;

ASIA; CHINA; YELLOW RIVER BASIN;

EID: 84928718296     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20734441     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/w7030898     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Eade, J.D.O.; Moran, D. Spatial economic valuation: Benefits transfer using Geographical Information Systems. J. Environ. Manag. 1996, 48, 97-110.
2. Herr, A. Data integration issues in research supporting sustainable natural resource management. Geogr. Res. 2007, 45, 376-386.
3. Van Oel, P.R.; Odongo, V.O.; Mulatu, D.W.; Muthoni, F.K.; Ndungu, J.N.; Ogada, J.O.; van der Veen, A. Supporting IWRM through spatial integrated assessment in the Lake Naivasha basin, Kenya. Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 2014, 30, 605-618.
4. Vörösmarty, C.J.; McIntyre, P.B.; Gessner, M.O.; Dudgeon, D.; Prusevich, A.; Green, P.; Glidden, S.; Bunn, S.E.; Sullivan, C.A.; Liermann, C.R.; et al. Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 2010, 467, 555-561.
5. Del Campo, A.G. GIS in environmental assessment: A review of current issues and future needs. J. Environ. Assess. Policy Manag. 2012, 14, doi:10.1142/S146433321250007X.
6. Chapman, L.; Thornes, J.E. The use of Geographical Information Systems in climatology and meteorology. Progress Phys. Geogr. 2003, 27, 313-330.
7. Díez, E.; McIntosh, B.S. A review of the factors which influence the use and usefulness of information systems. Environ. Model. Softw. 2009, 24, 588-602.
8. Volk, M.; Lautenbach, S.; van Delden, H.; Newham, L.T.; Seppelt, R. How can we make progress with decision support systems in landscape and river basin management? Lessons learned from a comparative analysis of four different decision support systems. Environ. Manag. 2010, 46, 834-849.
9. Vörösmarty, C.J.; Green, P.; Salisbury, J.; Lammers, R.B. Global water resources: Vulnerability from climate change and population growth. Science 2000, 289, 284-288.
10. Kummu, M.; de Moel, H.; Eisner, S.; Flörke, M.; Guillaume, J.H.A.; Porkka, M.; Siebert, S.; Veldkamp, T.I.E.; Ward, P.J. Global water use and water scarcity trajectories for the 20th century. Available online: http://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2014/EGU2014-12310.pdf (accessed on 28 February 2015)
11. Schewe, J.; Heinke, J.; Gerten, D.; Haddeland, I.; Arnell, N.W.; Clark, D.B.; Dankers, R.; Eisner, S.; Fekete, B.M.; Colón-González, F.J.; et al. Multimodel assessment of water scarcity under climate change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 3245-3250.
12. Varis, O.; Kummu, M.; Salmivaara, A. Ten major river basins in Monsoon Asia-Pacific: An assessment of vulnerability. Appl. Geogr. 2012, 32, 441-454.
13. UN DESA. World Population Prospects: The 2012 revision. Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat. Available online: http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/index.htm (accessed on 21 August 2014).
14. Rockström, J.; Falkenmark, M.; Karlberg, L.; Hoff, H.; Rost, S.; Gerten, D. Future water availability for global food production: The potential of green water for increasing resilience to global change. Water Resour. Res. 2009, 45, doi:10.1029/2007WR006767.
15. Perveen, S.; James, L.A. Scale invariance of water stress and scarcity indicators: Facilitating cross-scale comparisons of water resources vulnerability. Appl. Geogr. 2011, 31, 321-328.
16. Perveen, S.; James, L.A. Changes in correlation coefficients with spatial scale and implications for water resources and vulnerability data. Prof. Geogr. 2012, 64, 389-400.
17. Perveen, S.; James, L.A. Multiscale effects on spatial variability metrics in global water resources data. Water Resour. Manag. 2010, 24, 1903-1924.
18. Brown, A.; Matlock, M.D. A review of water scarcity indices and methodologies. Available online: http://www.sustainabilityconsortium.org/wp-content/themes/sustainability/assets/pdf/whitepapers/2011_Brown_Matlock_Water-Availability-Assessment-Indices-and-Methodologies-Lit-Review.pdf (accessed on 10 June 2014).
19. Rijsberman, F.R. Water scarcity: Fact or fiction? Agric. Water Manag. 2006, 80, 5-22.
20. Falkenmark, M.; Lundqvist, J.; Widstrand, C. Macro-scale water scarcity requires micro-scale approaches. Aspects of vulnerability in semi-arid development. Natl. Resour. Forum 1989, 13, 258-267.
21. Weedon, G. Watch Technical Report Number 37, Creation of the Watch 20th Century Ensemble Product; Technical Report; UK Met Office: Wallingford, UK, 2011. Available online: http://www.eu-watch.org/media/default.aspx/emma/org/10730457/Technical+Report+37+Creation+of+the+WATCH+20th+Century+Ensemble+Product.pdf (accessed on 18 January 2015)
22. Haddeland, I.; Clark, D.B.; Franssen, W.; Ludwig, F.; Voß, F.; Arnell, N.W.; Bertrand, N.; Best, M.; Folwell, S.; Gerten, D. Multimodel estimate of the global terrestrial water balance: Setup and first results. J. Hydrometeorol. 2011, 12, 869-884.
23. Grübler, A.; O'Neill, B.; Riahi, K.; Chirkov, V.; Goujon, A.; Kolp, P.; Prommer, I.; Scherbov, S.; Slentoe, E. Regional, national, and spatially explicit scenarios of demographic and economic change based on SRES. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2007, 74, 980-1029.
24. Klein Goldewijk, K.; Beusen, A.; Janssen, P. Long-term dynamic modelling of global population and built-up area in a spatially explicit way: HYDE 3.1. Holocene 2010, 20, 565-573.
25. Gassert, F.; Reig, P.; Luo, T.; Maddocks, A. Aqueduct Country and River Basin Rankings: A Weighted Aggregation of Spatially Distinct Hydrological Indicators, Working Paper; World Resources Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2013.
26. Arnell, N.W. Climate change and global water resources: SRES emissions and socio-economic scenarios. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2004, 14, 31-52.
27. Kummu, M.; Ward, P.J.; de Moel, H.; Varis, O. Is physical water scarcity a new phenomenon? Global assessment of water shortage over the last two millennia. Environ. Res. Lett. 2010, 5, doi:10.1088/1748-9326/5/3/034006.
28. Meybeck, M.; Kummu, M.; Dürr, H.H. Global hydrobelts and hydroregions: Improved reporting scale for water-related issues? Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2013, 17, 1093-1111.
29. Oki, T.; Agata, Y.; Kanae, S.; Saruhashi, T.; Yang, D.; Musiake, K. Global assessment of current water resources using total runoff integrating pathways. Hydrol. Sci. J. 2001, 46, 983-995.
30. Arnell, N.W.; van Vuuren, D.P.; Isaac, M. The implications of climate policy for the impacts of climate change on global water resources. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2011, 21, 592-603.
31. Gain, A.K.; Giupponi, C.; Renaud, F.G. Climate change adaptation and vulnerability assessment of water resources systems in developing countries: A generalized framework and a feasibility study in Bangladesh. Water 2012, 4, 345-366.
32. Goodchild, M.F. Scale in GIS: An overview. Geomorphology 2011, 130, 5-9.
33. Wong, D.W. Modifiable Areal Unit Problem. In International Encyclopedia of Human Geography; Rob, K., Nigel, T., Eds.; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2009; pp. 169-174.
34. Dark, S.J.; Bram, D. The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem (MAUP) in Physical Geography. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 2007, 31, 471-479.
35. Gehlke, C.E.; Biehl, K. Certain effects of grouping upon the size of the correlation coefficient in census tract material. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1934, 29, 169-170.
36. Fotheringham, A.S.; Wong, D.W.S. The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem in multivariate statistical analysis. Environ. Plan. A 1991, 23, 1025-1044.
37. Goodchild, M.F.; Quattrochi, D.A. Scale, Multiscaling, Remote Sensing, and GIS; CRC Press LLC: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1997.
38. Amrhein, C.; Reynolds, H. Using spatial statistics to assess aggregation effects. Geogr. Syst. 1996, 3, 143-158.
39. Arbia, G.; Benedetti, R.; Espa, G. Effects of the MAUP on image classification. Geogr. Syst. 1996, 3, 123-141.
40. Marceau, D.J.; Gratton, D.J.; Fournier, R.A.; Fortin, J.-P. Remote sensing and the measurement of geographical entities in a forested environment. 2. The optimal spatial resolution. Remote Sens. Environ. 1994, 49, 105-117.
41. Openshaw, S. A geographical solution to scale and aggregation problems in region-building, partitioning and spatial modelling. Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr. 1977, 459-472.
42. Openshaw, S. Ecological fallacies and the analysis of areal census data. Environ. Plan. A 1984, 16, 17-31.
43. Openshaw, S.; Alvanides, S. Designing zoning system for the representation of socio-economic data. In Life and Motion of Socio-Economic Units, GISDATA 8 Series; Masser, I., Salgé, F., Frank, A., Raper, J., Cheylan, J.-P., Eds.; Taylor & Francis: London, UK, 2001; pp. 273-292.
44. Openshaw, S.; Taylor, P.J. A million or so correlation coefficients: Three experiments on the Modifiable Areal Unit Problem. Stat. Appl. Spat. Sci. 1979, 21, 127-144.
45. Kattelus, M.; Kummu, M.; Keskinen, M.; Salmivaara, A.; Varis, O. China's south-bound transboundary river basins-A case of asymmetry. Water Int. 2015, 40, 113-138.
46. WWAP. The United Nations world water development report 2014: Water and energy. In United Nations World Water Assessment Programme; UNESCO: Paris, France, 2014.
47. Lorenz, C.M.; Gilbert, A.J.; Cofino, W.P. Indicators for transboundary river management. Environ. Manag. 2001, 28, 115-129.
48. Gain, A.K.; Giupponi, C. A dynamic assessment of water scarcity risk in the lower Brahmaputra River basin: An integrated approach. Ecol. Indic. 2015, 48, 120-131.
49. Käkönen, M.; Hirsch, P. The anti-politics of Mekong knowledge production. In Contested Waterscapes in the Mekong Region-Hydropower, Livelihoods and Governance; Molle, F., Foran, T., Käkönen, M., Eds.; Earthscan: London, UK; Sterling, VA, USA, 2009.
50. Mandelbrot, B.B. How long is the coast of Britain. Science 1967, 156, 636-638.
51. Openshaw, S. The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem; Geo Books: Norwich, UK, 1983.
52. O'Sullivan, D.; Unwin, D.J. The pitfalls and potential of spatial data. In Geographic Information Analysis; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010; pp. 33-53.
53. Clark, W.A.; Avery, K.L. The effects of data aggregation in statistical analysis. Geogr. Anal. 1976, 8, 428-438.
54. King, G. A Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem: Reconstructing Individual Behavior from Aggregate Data; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2013.
55. Nelson, A. Analysing data across geographic scales in Honduras: Detecting levels of organisation within systems. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2001, 85, 107-131.
56. Lehner, B.; Verdin, K.; Jarvis, A. New global hydrography derived from spaceborne elevation data. Eos Trans. AGU 2008, 89, 93-94.
57. GADM Database for Global Administrative Areas, version 2.0. Available online: www.gadm.org (accessed on 24 March 2014).
58. Kottek, M.; Grieser, J.; Beck, C.; Rudolf, B.; Rubel, F. World map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorol. Z. 2006, 15, 259-263.
59. Ramankutty, N.; Hertel, T.; Lee, H.-L.; Rose, S.K. Global agricultural land use data for integrated assessment modelling. In Human-Induced Climate Change-An Interdisciplinary Assessment; Schlesinger, M.E., Kheshgi, H.S., Smith, J., de la Chesnaye, F.C., Reilly, J.M., Wilson, T., Kolstad, C., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007.
60. BGR & UNESCO. Groundwater resources of the world 1:25,000,000. Hannover, Germany, Paris, France. Available online: http://www.whymap.org (accessed on 1 April 2014).
61. HarvestChoice. HCID: Grid databases at multiple spatial resolutions. Available online: http://harvestchoice.org/node/2232 (accessed on 24 April 2014).
62. Falkenmark, M.; Widstrand, C. Population and water resources: A delicate balance. Popul. Bull. 1992, 47, 1-36.
63. Shah, T.; Singh, O.P.; Mukherji, A. Some aspects of South Asia's groundwater irrigation economy: Analyses from a survey in India, Pakistan, Nepal Terai and Bangladesh. Hydrogeol. J. 2006, 14, 286-309.
64. Shahid, S.; Behrawan, H. Drought risk assessment in the western part of Bangladesh. Nat. Hazards 2008, 46, 391-413.
65. Siebert, S.; Burke, J.; Faures, J.-M.; Frenken, K.; Hoogeveen, J.; Döll, P.; Portmann, F.T. Groundwater use for irrigation-A global inventory. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2010, 14, 1863-1880.
66. Wang, J.; Huang, J.; Blanke, A.; Huang, Q.; Rozelle, S. The development, challenges and management of groundwater in rural China. In The Agricultural Groundwater Revolution: Opportunities and Threats to Development; Giordano, M. Villholt, K.G., Eds.; International Water Management Institute: Colombo, Sri Lanka; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 2007; pp. 37-62.
67. Wada, Y.; Bierkens, M.F.P. Sustainability of global water use: Past reconstruction and future projections. Environ. Res. Lett. 2014, 9, doi:10.1088/1748-9326/9/10/104003.
68. Gleeson, T.; Wada, Y.; Bierkens, M.F.P.; van Beek, L.P.H. Water balance of global aquifers revealed by groundwater footprint. Nature 2012, 488, 197-200.
69. Wada, Y.; van Beek, L.P.H.; Bierkens, M.F.P. Nonsustainable groundwater sustaining irrigation: A global assessment. Water Resour. Res. 2012, 48, doi:10.1029/2011WR010562.
70. Wada, Y.; van Beek, L.P.H.; van Kempen, C.M.; Reckman, J.W.T.M.; Vasak, S.; Bierkens, M.F.P. Global depletion of groundwater resources. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2010, 37, doi:10.1029/2010GL044571.
71. Weeks, J.R. The role of spatial analysis in demographic research. In Spatially Integrated Social Science; Goodchild, M.F., Janelle, D.G., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2004; pp. 381-399.
72. Tobler, W.R. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Econ. Geogr. 1970, 46, 234-240.
73. Salmivaara, A.; Kummu, M.; Varis, O.; Keskinen, M. Socio-economic changes in Cambodia's unique Tonle Sap lake area: A spatial approach. Appl. Spat. Anal. Policy, 2015, submitted for publication.
74. Allan, J.A. Virtual water: A strategic resource global solutions to regional deficits. Ground Water 1998, 36, 545-546.
75. Jelinski, D.E.; Wu, J. The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem and implications for landscape ecology. Landsc. Ecol. 1996, 11, 129-140.
76. Tobler, W. Cellular geography. In Philosophy in Geography; Gale, S., Olsson, G., Eds.; D. Reidel Publishing Company: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1979.
77. Marceau, D.J.; Hay, G.J. Remote sensing contributions to the scale issue. Can. J. Remote Sens. 1999, 25, 357-366.
78. Openshaw, S.; Alvanides, S. Applying geocomputation to the analysis of spatial distributions. Geogr. Inf. Syst. Princ. Tech. Issues 1999, 1, 267-282.
79. Openshaw, S.; Rao, L. Algorithms for reengineering 1991 census geography. Environ. Plan. A 1995, 27, 425-446.
80. Viegas, J.M.; Martínez, L.M.; Silva, E.A. Effects of the Modifiable Areal Unit Problem on the delineation of traffic analysis zones. Environ. Plan. B Plan. Des. 2009, 36, 625-643.