Impact of two ionic liquids, 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate and 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium methylphosphonate, on Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Metabolic, physiologic, and morphological investigations

Biotechnology for Biofuels

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Mehmood, Nasir ^a   Husson, Eric ^a   Jacquard, Cédric ^b   Wewetzer, Sandra ^c   Büchs, Jochen ^c   Sarazin, Catherine ^a   Gosselin, Isabelle ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE PICARDIE JULES VERNE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE REIMS CHAMPAGNE ARDENNE   (France)

^c RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Environmental scanning electronic microscopy; Ionic liquid; Respirofermentative metabolism; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Second generation bioethanol

Indexed keywords

BIOACTIVITY; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIOETHANOL; BIOMASS; CARBON; CARBON DIOXIDE; ECOLOGY; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; GLUCOSE; LIQUIDS; METABOLISM; MORPHOLOGY; ONLINE SYSTEMS; PHYSIOLOGY; SACCHARIFICATION; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; VOLATILE FATTY ACIDS; YEAST;

1-ETHYL-3-METHYLIMIDAZOLIUM ACETATES; ENVIRONMENTAL SCANNING; ENVIRONMENTAL SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPES; ENZYMATIC SACCHARIFICATION; ETHANOLIC FERMENTATIONS; LIGNOCELLULOSIC BIOMASS; LIGNOCELLULOSIC BIOMASS PRETREATMENT; SECOND GENERATION BIOETHANOL;

IONIC LIQUIDS;

BIOMASS; FERMENTATION; GROWTH RESPONSE; IONIC COMPOSITION; METABOLISM; MICROORGANISM; MORPHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; YEAST;

ANIMALIA; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84928684807     PISSN: 17546834     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13068-015-0206-2     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Balat M. Production of bioethanol from lignocellulosic materials via the biochemical pathway: a review. Energ Convers Manag. 2011;52:858.
2. Naik SN, Goud VV, Rout PK, Dalai AK. Production of first and second generation biofuels: a comprehensive review. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2010;14:578.
3. Sims REH, Mabee W, Saddler JN, Taylor M. An overview of second generation biofuel technologies. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101:1570.
4. Alvira P, Tomás-Pejó E, Ballesteros M, Negro MJ. Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: a review. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101:4851.
5. Olivier-Bourbigou H, Magna L, Morvan D. Ionic liquids and catalysis: recent progress from knowledge to applications. Appl Catal A. 2010;373:1.
6. Quijano G, Couvert A, Amrane A. Ionic liquids: applications and future trends in bioreactor technology. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101:8923.
7. Mora-Pale M, Meli L, Doherty TV, Linhardt RJ, Dordick JS. Room temperature ionic liquids as emerging solvents for the pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2011;108:1229.
8. Zhao H, Jones CL, Baker GA, Xia S, Olubajo O, Person VN. Regenerating cellulose from ionic liquids for an accelerated enzymatic hydrolysis. J Biotechnol. 2009;139:47.
9. Ouellet M, Datta S, Dibble DC, Tamrakar PR, Benke PI, Li C, et al. Impact of ionic liquid pretreated plant biomass on Saccharomyces cerevisiae growth and biofuel production. Green Chem. 2011;13:2743.
10. Li Q, Jiang X, He Y, Li L, Xian M, Yang J. Evaluation of the biocompatible ionic liquid 1-methyl-3-methylimidazolium dimethylphosphite pretreatment of corn cob for improved saccharification. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;87:117.
11. Nakashima K, Yamaguchi K, Taniguchi N, Arai S, Yamada R, Katahira S, et al. Direct bioethanol production from cellulose by the combination of cellulasedisplaying yeast and ionic liquid pretreatment. Green Chem. 2011;13:2948.
12. Lee SM, Chang WJ, Choi AR, Koo YM. Influence of ionic liquids on the growth of Escherichia coli. Korean J Chem Eng. 2005;22:687.
13. Ganske F, Bornscheuer U. Growth of Escherichia coli, Pichia pastoris and Bacillus cereus in the presence of the ionic liquids [BMIM][BF4] and [BMIM] [PF6] and organic solvents. Biotechnol Lett. 2006;28:465.
14. Pfruender H, Jones R, Weuster-Botz D. Water immiscible ionic liquids as solvents for whole cell biocatalysis. J Biotechnol. 2006;124:182.
15. Sendovski M, Nir N, Fishman A. Bioproduction of 2-phenylethanol in a biphasic ionic liquid aqueous system. J Agr Food Chem. 2010;58:2260.
16. Husson E, Buchoux S, Avondo C, Cailleu D, Djellab K, Gosselin I, et al. Enzymatic hydrolysis of ionic liquid-pretreated celluloses: contribution of CP-MAS 13C NMR and SEM. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:7335.
17. Auxenfans T, Buchoux S, Djellab K, Avondo C, Husson E, Sarazin C. Mild pretreatment and enzymatic saccharification of cellulose with recycled ionic liquids towards one-batch process. Carbohydr Polym. 2012;90:805.
18. Auxenfans T, Buchoux S, Larcher D, Husson G, Husson E, Sarazin C. Enzymatic saccharification and structural properties of industrial wood sawdust: recycled ionic liquids pretreatments. Energ Convers Manag. 2014;88:1094.
19. Chen Z, Feng Y, Wang J, Wang J, Guan W, Zhang H. Effects of [C2mim][OAc] (1-Ethyl-3-methyl-imidazolium acetate) on the growth of wheat seedlings under Cd2+ stress. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2014;92:714.
20. Biczak R, Pawłowska B, Bałczewskia P, Rychter P. The role of the anion in the toxicity of imidazolium ionic liquids. J Hazard Mater. 2014;274:181.
21. Krishnan MS, Ho NWY, Tsao GT. Fermentation kinetics of ethanol production from glucose and xylose by recombinant Saccharomyces 1400 (pLNH33). Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 1999;77-79:373.
22. Franzén CJ. Metabolic flux analysis of RQ-controlled microaerobic ethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 2003;20:117.
23. Alfenore S, Cameleyre X, Benbadis L, Bideaux C, Uribelarrea JL, Goma G, et al. Aeration strategy: a need for very high ethanol performance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae fed-batch process. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004;63:537.
24. Ishtar Snoek IS, de Steensma HY. Factors involved in anaerobic growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 2007;24:1.
25. Rintala E, Toivari M, Pitkänen JP, Wiebe MG, Ruohonen L, Penttilä M. Low oxygen levels as a trigger for enhancement of respiratory metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Genomics. 2009;10:461.
26. Anderlei T, Büchs J. Device for sterile online measurement of the oxygen transfer rate in shaking flasks. Biochem Eng J. 2001;7:157.
27. Anderlei T, Zang W, Papaspyrou M, Buchs J. Online respiration activity measurement (OTR, CTR, RQ) in shake flasks. Biochem Eng J. 2004;17:187.
28. Stockmann C, Losen M, Dahlems U, Knocke C, Gellissen G, Buchs J. Effect of oxygen supply on passaging, stabilising and screening of recombinant Hansenula polymorpha production strains in test tube cultures. FEMS Yeast Res. 2003;4:195.
29. Maier U, Losen M, Buchs J. Advances in understanding and modeling the gas.liquid mass transfer in shake flasks. Biochem Eng J. 2004;17:155.
30. Crabtree HG. Observations on the carbohydrate metabolism of tumours. Biochem J. 1929;23:536.
31. Baumann K, Dato L, Graf AB, Frascotti G, Dragosits M, Porro D, et al. The impact of oxygen on the transcriptome of recombinant S cerevisiae and P pastoris.a comparative analysis. BMC Genomics. 2011;12:218.
32. Christen S, Sauer U. Intracellular characterization of aerobic glucose metabolism in seven yeast species by 13C flux analysis and metabolomics. FEMS Yeast Res. 2011;11:263.
33. Hagman A, Sall T, Piškur J. Analysis on yeast short-term Crabtree effect and its origin. FEBS J. 2014;281:4805.
34. Barnett JA, Entian K.-D. A history of research on yeasts 9: regulation of sugar metabolism. Yeast. 2005;22:835.
35. Frick O, Wittman C. Characterization of the metabolic shift between oxidative and fermentative growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by comparative 13C flux analysis. Microb Cell Fact. 2005;4:30.
36. Cabib E, Arroyo J. How carbohydrates sculpt cells: chemical control of morphogenesis in the yeast cell wall. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2013;11:648.
37. Lesage G, Bussey H. Cell wall assembly in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2006;70:317.
38. Ge L, Wang XT, Ngin Tana S, Hang Tsaic H, Yonga JWH, Huac L. A novel method of protein extraction from yeast using ionic liquid solution. Talanta. 2010;81:1861.
39. Thuy Pham TP, Cho C-W, Yun Y-S. Environmental fate and toxicity of ionic liquids: a review. Water Res. 2010;44:352.
40. Frade RF, Afonso CA. Impact of ionic liquids in environment and humans: an overview. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2010;29:1038.
41. Gouveia W, Jorge TF, Martins S, Meireles M, Carolino M, Cruz C, et al. Toxicity of ionic liquids prepared from biomaterials. Chemosphere. 2014;104:51.
42. Seddon KR, Stark A, Torres MJ. Influence of chloride, water, and organic solvents on the physical properties of ionic liquids. Pure Appl Chem. 2000;72:2275.
43. Nockmann P, Binnemans K, Driesen K. Purification of imidazolium ionic liquids for spectroscopic application. Chem Phys Lett. 2005;415:131.
44. Urbanek M, Varenne A, Gebauer P, Krivankova L, Gareil P. Determination of trace cationic impurities in butylmethylimidazolium-based ionic liquids: from transient to comprehensive single-capillary counterflow isotachophoresis-zone electrophoresis. Electrophoresis. 2006;27:4859.
45. Vicari KJ, Tallam SS, Shatova T, Joo KK, Scarlata CJ, Humbird D, et al. Uncertainty in techno-economic estimates of cellulosic ethanol production due to experimental measurement uncertainty. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2012;5:23.
46. Konda NVSNM, Shi J, Singh S, Blanch HW, Simmons BA, Klein-Marcuschamer D. Understanding cost drivers and economic potential of two variants of ionic liquid pretreatment for cellulosic biofuel production. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2014;7:86.
47. Sarks C, Jin M, Sato TK, Balan V, Dale BE. Studying the rapid bioconversion of lignocellulosic sugars into ethanol using high cell density fermentations with cell recycle. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2014;7:73.
48. da Costa Lopes AM, Joao KG, Rubik DF, Bogel-čukasik E, Duarte LC, Andreaus J, et al. Pre-treatment of lignocellulosic biomass using ionic liquids: wheat straw fractionation. Bioresour Technol. 2013;142:198.
49. Mehmood N, Olmos E, Goergen JL, Blanchard F, Ullisch D, Klockner W, et al. Oxygen supply controls the onset of pristinamycins production by Streptomyces pristinaespiralis in shaking flasks. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2011;108:2151.
50. Gognies S, Belarbi A, Ait BE. Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a potential pathogen towards grapevine, Vitis vinifera. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2001;37:143.