The effect of peer-assisted mediation vs. Tutor-intervention within dynamic assessment framework on writing development of Iranian intermediate EFL learners

English Language Teaching

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 128-141

  Erfani, Shiva Seyed ^a   Nikbin, Sareh ^a  

^a ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Attitude; Dynamic assessment; Peer assisted mediation; Tutor intervention

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928661691     PISSN: 19164742     EISSN: 19164750     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5539/elt.v8n4p128     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Azarizad, R., & Ghahremani, D. (2013). The Effect of Dynamic Assessment on EFL Process Writing: Content and Organization. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, 4(4), 874-878.
2. Bailey, K. (1996). Working for washback: A review of the washback concept in language testing. Language Testing, 24(5), 257-279.
3. Brown, H. D. (2007). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive approach to Language Pedagogy. Pearson Education. San Francisco State University.
4. Cheng, L. (2005). Changing language teaching through language testing: A washback study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Dockrell, J. E. (2001). Assessing language skills in pre-school children. Child Psychology and Psychiatry Review, 6(2), 74-83.
6. Douglas, F., & Lynn, S. F. (2005). Journal of Special Education. Peer-assisted learning strategies: Promoting word recognition, fluency, and reading comprehension in young children, 39(1), 34-44.
7. Duke, H., & Daly, K. L. (2011). J Appl Behav Anal. Improving oral reading fluency with a peer-mediated intervention, 44(3), 641-646.
8. Elbow, P., & Belanoff, P. (2002). Sharing and responding. McGraw-Hill Humanities.
9. Haywood, H. C., & Lidz, C. S. (2006). Dynamic assessment in practice: Clinical and educational applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Isavi, E. (2012). The effect of dynamic assessment on Iranian L2 writing performance. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED530902
11. Johnson, D. W., & Douglas, A. (1976). Effects of cooperative versus individualized instruction on student prosocial behavior, attitude toward learning, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68(4), 446-452.
12. Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2004). Dynamic assessment of L2 development: bringing the past into the future. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 49-72.
13. Lidz, C. S. (1991). Dynamic assessment. Guilford Publication. New York.
14. McNamara, T. (2004). Language testing. In A. Davies, & C. Elder (Eds.), The Handbook of Applied Linguistics (pp. 763-783). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
15. Peterman, F. P. (2005). Designing Performance Assessment Systems for Urban Teacher. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. United States.
16. Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting L2 development. The Pennsylvania State University. University Park, PA: USA.
17. Shamir, A., & Steven, S. (2005). Effects of Peer Mediation with Young Children on Autonomous Behavior. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 5(2), 199-215.
18. Shrestha, S., Prithvi, A., & Coffin, C. (2012). Dynamic assessment, tutor mediation and academic writing development. Assessing Writing, 17(1), 55-70.
19. Swain, M., Kinnear, P., & Steinman. (2010). Sociocultural Theory in Second Language Education. Library of Congress. U.K: London.
20. Van der Aalsvoort, G. M., & Lidz, C. S. (2002). Reciprocity in dynamic assessment in Classrooms: Taking contextual influences on individual learning into account. Learning potential assessment and cognitive training: Actual research and perspectives in theory building and methodology, 7(1), 111-144. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
21. Xiaoxiao, L., & Yan, L. (2010). A case study of dynamic assessment in EFL process writing. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 33(1), 24-40.