Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes of an early experience with robotic and laparoscopic-assisted resection for Rectal Cancer

Hepato-Gastroenterology

Volumn 62, Issue 137, 2015, Pages 34-39

  Yoon, Sang Nam ^a   Kim, Kwang Yong ^a   Kim, Ji Won ^a   Lee, Seung Chul ^a   Kwon, Yongjin ^a   Choi, Ji Woong ^b   Jung, So Young ^a   Kim, Byung Chun ^a  

^a Hallym University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Laparoscopic surgery; Low anterior resection; Rectal cancer; Robot surgery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER STAGING; COMORBIDITY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; ILEOSTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LYMPH VESSEL METASTASIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; PERINEURAL INVASION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECTUM CARCINOMA; RECTUM SURGERY; REOPERATION; ROBOT ASSISTED SURGERY; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUMOR DIFFERENTIATION; TUMOR INVASION; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AGED; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; LAPAROSCOPY; LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; PATHOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROCEDURES; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; ROBOTICS; TIME;

AGED; DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; LAPAROSCOPY; LYMPH NODE EXCISION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; ROBOTICS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84928564251     PISSN: 01726390     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5754/hge14806     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS: Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1991;1:144-150.
2. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study G: A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2050-2059.
3. Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, et al.: Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg 2007;246:655-662; discussion 662-654.
4. Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, et al.: Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:3061-3068.
5. Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, et al.: Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 2005;6:477-484.
6. Baik SH, Kwon HY, Kim JS, et al.: Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol 2009;16:1480-1487.
7. Kim JY, Kim NK, Lee KY, et al.: A comparative study of voidin and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2012;19:2485-2493.
8. Memon S, Heriot AG, Murphy DG, et al.: Robotic versus laparoscopic proctectomy for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2012;19:2095-2101.
9. Baik SH, Kim NK, Lim DR, et al.: Oncologic outcomes and perioperative clinicopathologic results after robot-assisted tumor-specific mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2013;20:2625-2632.
10. Park EJ, Cho MS, Baek SJ, et al.: Long-term Oncologic Outcomes of Robotic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: A Comparative Study With Laparoscopic Surgery. Ann Surg 2014.
11. Baik SH, Lee WJ, Rha KH, et al.: Robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer using four robotic arms. Surg Endosc 2008;22:792-797.
12. Ayav A, Bresler L, Hubert J, et al.: Robotic-assisted pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Surg Endosc 2005;19:1200-1203.
13. Munz Y, Moorthy K, Kudchadkar R, et al.: Robotic assisted rectopexy. Am J Surg 2004;187:88-92.
14. Heemskerk J, Zandbergen R, Maessen JG, et al.: Advantages of advanced laparoscopic systems. Surg Endosc 2006;20:730-733.
15. deSouza AL, Prasad LM, Ricci J, et al.: A comparison of open and robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal adenocarcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 2011;54:275-282.
16. Park JS, Choi GS, Lim KH, et al.: Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer: case-matched analysis of short-term outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 2010;17:3195-3202.
17. Pigazzi A, Luca F, Patriti A, et al.: Multicentric study on robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2010;17:1614-1620.
18. Kelly SB, Mills SJ, Bradburn DM, et al.: Effect of the circumferential resection margin on survival following rectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg 2011;98:573-581.
19. Tilney HS, Rasheed S, Northover JM, et al.: The influence of circumferential resection margins on long-term outcomes following rectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2009;52:1723-1729.
20. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al.: Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial.: multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005;365:1718-1726.
21. Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, et al.: Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2010;97:1638-1645.
22. Kang J, Yoon KJ, Min BS, et al.: The impact of robotic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer: a case-matched analysis of a 3-arm comparison-open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery. Ann Surg 2013;257:95-101.
23. Heemskerk J, de Hoog DE, van Gemert WG, et al.: Robotassisted vs. conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparative study on costs and time. Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50:1825-1830.