Phenomenology of light sneutrino dark matter in cMSSM/mSUGRA with inverse seesaw

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2012, Issue 9, 2012, Pages

  Bhupal Dev, P S ^a,b   Mondal, Subhadeep ^c   Mukhopadhyaya, Biswarup ^d   Roy, Sourov ^c  

^a University of Maryland   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c DEPARTMENT OF MATERIALS SCIENCE   (India)

^d HARISH CHANDRA RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (India)

Author keywords

Supersymmetry Phenomenology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928527100     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP09(2012)110     Document Type: Article

References (150)

1. G. Bertone, D. Hooper and J. Silk, Particle dark matter: evidence, candidates and constraints, Phys. Rept. 405 (2005) 279 [hep-ph/0404175] [INSPIRE].
2. G. Bertone, Particle dark matter, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K. (2010).
3. Particle Data Group collaboration, J. Beringer et al., Review of Particle Physics (RPP), Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 010001 [INSPIRE].
4. G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski and K. Griest, Supersymmetric dark matter, Phys. Rept. 267 (1996) 195 [hep-ph/9506380] [INSPIRE].
5. K. Griest and M. Kamionkowski, Supersymmetric dark matter, Phys. Rept. 333 (2000) 167 [INSPIRE].
6. T. Hebbeker, Can the sneutrino be the lightest supersymmetric particle?, Phys. Lett. B 470 (1999) 259 [hep-ph/9910326] [INSPIRE].
7. T. Falk, K.A. Olive and M. Srednicki, Heavy sneutrinos as dark matter, Phys. Lett. B 339 (1994) 248 [hep-ph/9409270] [INSPIRE].
8. XENON100 collaboration, E. Aprile et al., Dark matter results from 225 live days of XENON100 data, arXiv:1207.5988 [INSPIRE].
9. WMAP collaboration, E. Komatsu et al., Seven-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: cosmological interpretation, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 192 (2011) 18 [arXiv:1001.4538] [INSPIRE].
10. D. Larson et al., Seven-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: power spectra and WMAP-derived parameters, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 192 (2011) 16 [arXiv:1001.4635] [INSPIRE].
11. J.S. Hagelin, G.L. Kane and S. Raby, Perhaps scalar neutrinos are the lightest supersymmetric partners, Nucl. Phys. B 241 (1984) 638 [INSPIRE].
12. L.E. Ibánez, The scalar neutrinos as the lightest supersymmetric particles and cosmology, Phys. Lett. B 137 (1984) 160 [INSPIRE].
13. The LEP Electroweak Working Group, http://lepewwg.web.cern.ch/LEPEWWG.
14. DAMA collaboration, R. Bernabei et al., First results from DAMA/LIBRA and the combined results with DAMA/NaI, Eur. Phys. J. C 56 (2008) 333 [arXiv:0804.2741] [INSPIRE].
15. DAMA, LIBRA collaboration, R. Bernabei et al., New results from DAMA/LIBRA, Eur. Phys. J. C 67 (2010) 39 [arXiv:1002.1028] [INSPIRE].
16. CoGeNT collaboration, C. Aalseth et al., Results from a search for light-mass dark matter with a p-type point contact germanium detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 131301 [arXiv:1002.4703] [INSPIRE].
17. C. Aalseth et al., Search for an annual modulation in a p-type point contact germanium dark matter detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 141301 [arXiv:1106.0650] [INSPIRE].
18. G. Angloher et al., Results from 730 kg days of the CRESST-II dark matter search, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 1971 [arXiv:1109.0702] [INSPIRE].
19. XENON100 collaboration, E. Aprile et al., Dark matter results from 100 live days of XENON100 data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 131302 [arXiv:1104.2549] [INSPIRE].
20. XENON10 collaboration, J. Angle et al., A search for light dark matter in XENON10 data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 051301 [arXiv:1104.3088] [INSPIRE].
21. CDMS-II collaboration, Z. Ahmed et al., Dark matter search results from the CDMS II experiment, Science 327 (2010) 1619 [arXiv:0912.3592] [INSPIRE].
22. CDMS-II collaboration, Z. Ahmed et al., Results from a low-energy analysis of the CDMS II germanium data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 131302 [arXiv:1011.2482] [INSPIRE].
23. CDMS collaboration, Z. Ahmed et al., Search for annual modulation in low-energy CDMS-II data, arXiv:1203.1309 [INSPIRE].
24. CDMS, EDELWEISS collaboration, Z. Ahmed et al., Combined limits on WIMPs from the CDMS and EDELWEISS experiments, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 011102 [arXiv:1105.3377] [INSPIRE].
25. EDELWEISS collaboration, E. Armengaud et al., A search for low-mass WIMPs with EDELWEISS-II heat-and-ionization detectors, arXiv:1207.1815 [INSPIRE].
26. V. Lebedenko et al., Result from the first science run of the ZEPLIN-III dark matter search experiment, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 052010 [arXiv:0812.1150] [INSPIRE].
27. D.Y. Akimov et al., WIMP-nucleon cross-section results from the second science run of ZEPLIN-III, Phys. Lett. B 709 (2012) 14 [arXiv:1110.4769] [INSPIRE].
28. M. Felizardo et al., Final analysis and results of the phase II SIMPLE dark matter search, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 201302 [arXiv:1106.3014] [INSPIRE].
29. P.J. Fox, J. Liu and N. Weiner, Integrating out astrophysical uncertainties, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 103514 [arXiv:1011.1915] [INSPIRE].
30. J. Kopp, T. Schwetz and J. Zupan, Light dark matter in the light of CRESST-II, JCAP 03 (2012) 001 [arXiv:1110.2721] [INSPIRE].
31. C. Kelso, D. Hooper and M.R. Buckley, Toward a consistent picture For CRESST, CoGeNT and DAMA, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 043515 [arXiv:1110.5338] [INSPIRE].
32. M.T. Frandsen, F. Kahlhoefer, C. McCabe, S. Sarkar and K. Schmidt-Hoberg, Resolving astrophysical uncertainties in dark matter direct detection, JCAP 01 (2012) 024 [arXiv:1111.0292] [INSPIRE].
33. P. Gondolo and G.B. Gelmini, Halo independent comparison of direct dark matter detection data, arXiv:1202.6359 [INSPIRE].
34. R. Foot, Mirror dark matter interpretations of the DAMA, CoGeNT and CRESST-II data, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 023524 [arXiv:1203.2387] [INSPIRE].
35. Particle Data Group, K. Nakamura et al., Review of particle physics, J. Phys. G 37 (2010) 075021 [INSPIRE].
36. O. Buchmueller et al., Higgs and supersymmetry, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2020 [arXiv:1112.3564] [INSPIRE].
37. C. Strege et al., Updated global fits of the CMSSM including the latest LHC SUSY and Higgs searches and XENON100 data, JCAP 03 (2012) 030 [arXiv:1112.4192] [INSPIRE].
38. L. Roszkowski, E.M. Sessolo and Y.-L.S. Tsai, Bayesian implications of current LHC supersymmetry and dark matter detection searches for the constrained MSSM, arXiv:1202.1503 [INSPIRE].
39. J. Ellis, K.A. Olive and K.A. Olive, Revisiting the Higgs mass and dark matter in the CMSSM, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2005 [arXiv:1202.3262] [INSPIRE].
40. A. Fowlie et al., The CMSSM favoring new territories: the impact of new LHC limits and a 125 GeV Higgs, arXiv:1206.0264 [INSPIRE].
41. S. Akula, P. Nath and G. Peim, Implications of the Higgs boson discovery for mSUGRA, arXiv:1207.1839 [INSPIRE].
42. C. Beskidt, W. de Boer, D. Kazakov and F. Ratnikov, Constraints on Supersymmetry from LHC data on SUSY searches and Higgs bosons combined with cosmology and direct dark matter searches, arXiv:1207.3185 [INSPIRE].
43. D. Hooper and T. Plehn, Supersymmetric dark matter: how light can the LSP be?, Phys. Lett. B 562 (2003) 18 [hep-ph/0212226] [INSPIRE].
44. H.K. Dreiner et al., Mass bounds on a very light neutralino, Eur. Phys. J. C 62 (2009) 547 [arXiv:0901.3485] [INSPIRE].
45. E. Kuflik, A. Pierce and K.M. Zurek, Light neutralinos with large scattering cross sections in the minimal supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 111701 [arXiv:1003.0682] [INSPIRE].
46. N. Fornengo, S. Scopel and A. Bottino, Discussing direct search of dark matter particles in the Minimal Supersymmetric extension of the Standard Model with light neutralinos, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 015001 [arXiv:1011.4743] [INSPIRE].
47. L. Calibbi, T. Ota and Y. Takanishi, Light neutralino in the MSSM: a playground for dark matter, flavor physics and collider experiments, JHEP 07 (2011) 013 [arXiv:1104.1134] [INSPIRE].
48. P. Minkowski, μ → eγ at a rate of one out of 1-billion muon decays?, Phys. Lett. B 67 (1977) 421 [INSPIRE].
49. T. Yanagida, Horizontal symmetry and masses of neutrinos, in the proceedings of the Workshop on unified theory and baryon number in the universe, O. Sawada and A. Sugamoto eds., KEK, Tsukuba, Japan (1979).
50. S.L. Glashow, The future of elementary particle physics, in Quarks and leptons, Cargèse lectures, M. Lévy et al. eds., Plenum Press, New York, U.S.A. (1980).
51. R.N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanović, Neutrino mass and spontaneous parity violation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44 (1980) 912 [INSPIRE].
52. A. Mazumdar, The origin of dark matter, matter-anti-matter asymmetry and inflation, arXiv:1106.5408 [INSPIRE].
53. R.N. Mohapatra, Mechanism for understanding small neutrino mass in superstring theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56 (1986) 561 [INSPIRE].
54. R.N. Mohapatra and J.W.F. Valle, Neutrino mass and baryon number nonconservation in superstring models, Phys. Rev. D 34 (1986) 1642 [INSPIRE].
55. C. Arina, F. Bazzocchi, N. Fornengo, J. Romao and J. Valle, Minimal supergravity sneutrino dark matter and inverse seesaw neutrino masses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008) 161802 [arXiv:0806.3225] [INSPIRE].
56. Z. Kang, J. Li, T. Li, T. Liu and J. Yang, Asymmetric sneutrino dark matter in the nmssm with minimal inverse seesaw, arXiv:1102.5644 [INSPIRE].
57. S. Khalil, H. Okada and T. Toma, Right-handed sneutrino dark matter in supersymmetric B-L model, JHEP 07 (2011) 026 [arXiv:1102.4249] [INSPIRE].
58. S. Khalil, TeV-scale gauged B-L symmetry with inverse seesaw mechanism, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 077702 [arXiv:1004.0013] [INSPIRE].
59. F.-X. Josse-Michaux and E. Molinaro, A common framework for dark matter, leptogenesis and neutrino masses, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 125021 [arXiv:1108.0482] [INSPIRE].
60. L. Basso, O. Fischer and J. van der Bij, A natural Z′ model with inverse seesaw and leptonic dark matter, arXiv:1207.3250 [INSPIRE].
61. H. An, P.B. Dev, Y. Cai and R. Mohapatra, Sneutrino dark matter in gauged inverse seesaw models for neutrinos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 081806 [arXiv:1110.1366] [INSPIRE].
62. P.B. Dev and R. Mohapatra, TeV scale inverse seesaw in SO(10) and leptonic non-unitarity effects, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 013001 [arXiv:0910.3924] [INSPIRE].
63. P. Bhupal Dev and R. Mohapatra, Electroweak symmetry breaking and proton decay in SO(10) SUSY-GUT with TeV W(R), Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 035014 [arXiv:1003.6102] [INSPIRE].
64. CMS collaboration, Observation of a new boson with a mass near 125 GeV, PAS-HIG-12-020 (2012).
65. ATLAS collaboration, Observation of an excess of events in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, ATLAS-CONF-2012-093 (2012).
66. H. Baer, V. Barger and A. Mustafayev, Implications of a 125 GeV Higgs scalar for LHC SUSY and neutralino dark matter searches, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 075010 [arXiv:1112.3017] [INSPIRE].
67. H. Baer, V. Barger and A. Mustafayev, Neutralino dark matter in mSUGRA/CMSSM with a 125 GeV light Higgs scalar, JHEP 05 (2012) 091 [arXiv:1202.4038] [INSPIRE].
68. J.L. Feng, K.T. Matchev and D. Sanford, Focus point supersymmetry redux, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 075007 [arXiv:1112.3021] [INSPIRE].
69. A. Arbey, M. Battaglia, A. Djouadi, F. Mahmoudi and J. Quevillon, Implications of a 125 GeV Higgs for supersymmetric models, Phys. Lett. B 708 (2012) 162 [arXiv:1112.3028] [INSPIRE].
70. S. Akula, B. Altunkaynak, D. Feldman, P. Nath and G. Peim, Higgs boson mass predictions in SUGRA unification, recent LHC-7 results and dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 075001 [arXiv:1112.3645] [INSPIRE].
71. L. Aparicio, D. Cerdeno and L. Ibáñez, A 119–125 GeV Higgs from a string derived slice of the CMSSM, JHEP 04 (2012) 126 [arXiv:1202.0822] [INSPIRE].
72. M. Kadastik, K. Kannike, A. Racioppi and M. Raidal, Implications of the 125 GeV Higgs boson for scalar dark matter and for the CMSSM phenomenology, JHEP 05 (2012) 061 [arXiv:1112.3647] [INSPIRE].
73. J. Cao, Z. Heng, D. Li and J.M. Yang, Current experimental constraints on the lightest Higgs boson mass in the constrained MSSM, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 665 [arXiv:1112.4391] [INSPIRE].
74. N. Karagiannakis, G. Lazarides and C. Pallis, Dark matter and Higgs mass in the CMSSM with Yukawa quasi-unification, arXiv:1201.2111 [INSPIRE].
75. J. Cao, Z. Heng, J.M. Yang and J. Zhu, Status of low energy SUSY models confronted with the LHC 125 GeV Higgs data, arXiv:1207.3698 [INSPIRE].
76. M. Hirsch, T. Kernreiter, J.C. Romao and A. Villanova del Moral, Minimal supersymmetric inverse seesaw: neutrino masses, lepton flavour violation and LHC phenomenology, JHEP 01 (2010) 103 [arXiv:0910.2435] [INSPIRE].
77. E. Ma, Radiative inverse seesaw mechanism for nonzero neutrino mass, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 013013 [arXiv:0904.4450] [INSPIRE].
78. F. Bazzocchi, D.G. Cerdeno, C. Muñoz and J.W.F. Valle, Calculable inverse-seesaw neutrino masses in supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 051701 [arXiv:0907.1262] [INSPIRE].
79. S.C. Park, K. Wang and T.T. Yanagida, Neutrino mass from a hidden world and its phenomenological implications, Phys. Lett. B 685 (2010) 309 [arXiv:0909.2937] [INSPIRE].
80. C.S. Fong, R.N. Mohapatra and I. Sung, Majorana neutrinos from inverse seesaw in warped extra dimension, Phys. Lett. B 704 (2011) 171 [arXiv:1107.4086] [INSPIRE].
81. S. Bethke, The 2009 world average of αs, Eur. Phys. J. C 64 (2009) 689 [arXiv:0908.1135] [INSPIRE].
82. Tevatron Electroweak Working Group, CDF, D0 collaboration, Combination of CDF and D0 results on the mass of the top quark using up to 5.8 fb−1 of data, arXiv:1107.5255 [INSPIRE].
83. A. Geringer-Sameth and S.M. Koushiappas, Exclusion of canonical WIMPs by the joint analysis of Milky Way dwarfs with Fermi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 24130-3 [arXiv:1108.2914] [INSPIRE].
84. Fermi-LAT collaboration, M. Ackermann et al., Constraining dark matter models from a combined analysis of Milky Way satellites with the Fermi Large Area Telescope, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 241302 [arXiv:1108.3546] [INSPIRE].
85. G. Venanzoni, Latest on g − 2 from experiment, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 349 (2012) 012008 [arXiv:1203.1501] [INSPIRE].
86. T. Aoyama, M. Hayakawa, T. Kinoshita and M. Nio, Tenth-order QED contribution to the electron g − 2 and an improved value of the fine structure constant, arXiv:1205.5368 [INSPIRE].
87. BaBar collaboration, J. Lees et al., Precision measurement of the B → Xsγ photon energy spectrum, branching fraction and direct CP asymmetry ACP (B → Xs+dγ), arXiv:1207.2690 [INSPIRE].
88. LHCb collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Strong constraints on the rare decays Bs → μ+μ− and B0 → μ+μ−, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 231801 [arXiv:1203.4493] [INSPIRE].
89. A. Abada, C. Biggio, F. Bonnet, M. Gavela and T. Hambye, Low energy effects of neutrino masses, JHEP 12 (2007) 061 [arXiv:0707.4058] [INSPIRE].
90. S. Antusch, J.P. Baumann and E. Fernandez-Martinez, Non-standard neutrino interactions with matter from physics beyond the standard model, Nucl. Phys. B 810 (2009) 369 [arXiv:0807.1003] [INSPIRE].
91. N. Sato et al., Mass limits for dark matter particles derived from high-energy neutrinos from the sun, Phys. Rev. D 44 (1991) 2220 [INSPIRE].
92. CMS supersymmetry physics results, https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMSPublic/PhysicsResultsSUS
93. ATLAS experiment — Public results, https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/AtlasPublic/SupersymmetryPublicResults
94. CMS collaboration, S. Chatrchyan et al., Search for new physics in the multijet and missing transverse momentum final state in proton-proton collisions at √s = 7 TeV, arXiv:1207.1898 [INSPIRE].
95. U. Chattopadhyay and P. Nath, Upper limits on sparticle masses from g − 2 and the possibility for discovery of SUSY at colliders and in dark matter searches, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 5854 [hep-ph/0102157] [INSPIRE].
96. U. Chattopadhyay and P. Nath, Interpreting the new Brookhaven muon (g − 2) result, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 093001 [hep-ph/0208012] [INSPIRE].
97. W. de Boer, M. Huber, C. Sander and D. Kazakov, A global fit to the anomalous magnetic moment, b → Xsγ and Higgs limits in the constrained MSSM, Phys. Lett. B 515 (2001) 283 [INSPIRE].
98. S.P. Martin, A supersymmetry primer, in Perspectives on supersymmetry II, G.L. Kane ed., World Scientific, Singapore (2010), hep-ph/9709356 [INSPIRE].
99. D. Forero, M. Tortola and J. Valle, Global status of neutrino oscillation parameters after Neutrino-2012, arXiv:1205.4018 [INSPIRE].
100. F. Staub, Sarah, arXiv:0806.0538 [INSPIRE].
101. F. Staub, From superpotential to model files for FeynArts and CalcHep/CompHEP, Comput. Phys. Commun. 181 (2010) 1077 [arXiv:0909.2863] [INSPIRE].
102. F. Staub, Automatic calculation of supersymmetric renormalization group equations and self energies, Comput. Phys. Commun. 182 (2011) 808 [arXiv:1002.0840] [INSPIRE].
103. W. Porod, SPheno, a program for calculating supersymmetric spectra, SUSY particle decays and SUSY particle production at e+e− colliders, Comput. Phys. Commun. 153 (2003) 275 [hep-ph/0301101] [INSPIRE].
104. W. Porod and F. Staub, SPheno 3.1: extensions including flavour, CP-phases and models beyond the MSSM, Comput. Phys. Commun. 183 (2012) 2458 [arXiv:1104.1573] [INSPIRE].
105. G. Bélanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov, MicrOMEGAs 2.0: a program to calculate the relic density of dark matter in a generic model, Comput. Phys. Commun. 176 (2007) 367 [hep-ph/0607059] [INSPIRE].
106. G. Bélanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov, Dark matter direct detection rate in a generic model with MicrOMEGAs 2.2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 180 (2009) 747 [arXiv:0803.2360] [INSPIRE].
107. L.J. Hall, D. Pinner and J.T. Ruderman, A natural SUSY Higgs near 126GeV, JHEP 04 (2012) 131 [arXiv:1112.2703] [INSPIRE].
108. H. Baer, V. Barger, P. Huang, A. Mustafayev and X. Tata, Radiative natural SUSY with a 125 GeV Higgs boson, arXiv:1207.3343 [INSPIRE].
109. S. Heinemeyer, D. Stöckinger and G. Weiglein, Two loop SUSY corrections to the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, Nucl. Phys. B 690 (2004) 62 [hep-ph/0312264] [INSPIRE].
110. M. Misiak et al., Estimate of B(¯B → Xsγ) at O(α2 s), Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 022002 [hep-ph/0609232] [INSPIRE].
111. S. Bertolini, F. Borzumati, A. Masiero and G. Ridolfi, Effects of supergravity induced electroweak breaking on rare B decays and mixings, Nucl. Phys. B 353 (1991) 591 [INSPIRE].
112. P. Nath and R.L. Arnowitt, b → sγ decay in supergravity grand unification and dark matter, Phys. Lett. B 336 (1994) 395 [hep-ph/9406389] [INSPIRE].
113. F. Borzumati, M. Drees and M.M. Nojiri, Implications for supersymmetric dark matter detection from radiative b decays, Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 341 [hep-ph/9406390] [INSPIRE]
114. H. Baer, M. Brhlik, D. Castano and X. Tata, b → sγ constraints on the minimal supergravity model with large tan β, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 015007 [hep-ph/9712305] [INSPIRE].
115. A.J. Buras, Minimal flavour violation and beyond: towards a flavour code for short distance dynamics, Acta Phys. Polon. B 41 (2010) 2487 [arXiv:1012.1447] [INSPIRE].
116. S.R. Choudhury and N. Gaur, Dileptonic decay of B(s) meson in SUSY models with large tan β, Phys. Lett. B 451 (1999) 86 [hep-ph/9810307] [INSPIRE].
117. K. Babu and C.F. Kolda, Higgs mediated B0 → μ+μ− in minimal supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 228 [hep-ph/9909476] [INSPIRE].
118. J.K. Mizukoshi, X. Tata and Y. Wang, Higgs mediated leptonic decays of Bs and Bd mesons as probes of supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 115003 [hep-ph/0208078] [INSPIRE].
119. F. Gabbiani, E. Gabrielli, A. Masiero and L. Silvestrini, A complete analysis of FCNC and CP constraints in general SUSY extensions of the standard model, Nucl. Phys. B477 (1996) 321 [hep-ph/9604387] [INSPIRE].
120. A. Ilakovac and A. Pilaftsis, Flavor violating charged lepton decays in seesaw-type models, Nucl. Phys. B 437 (1995) 491 [hep-ph/9403398] [INSPIRE].
121. F. Deppisch and J. Valle, Enhanced lepton flavor violation in the supersymmetric inverse seesaw model, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 036001 [hep-ph/0406040] [INSPIRE].
122. F. Deppisch, T. Kosmas and J. Valle, Enhanced μ−-e− conversion in nuclei in the inverse seesaw model, Nucl. Phys. B 752 (2006) 80 [hep-ph/0512360] [INSPIRE].
123. A. Ibarra, E. Molinaro and S. Petcov, Low energy signatures of the TeV scale see-saw mechanism, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 013005 [arXiv:1103.6217] [INSPIRE].
124. W. Abdallah, A. Awad, S. Khalil and H. Okada, Muon anomalous magnetic moment and μ → eγ in B-L model with inverse seesaw, arXiv:1105.1047 [INSPIRE].
125. A. Abada, D. Das and C. Weiland, Enhanced Higgs mediated lepton flavour violating processes in the supersymmetric inverse seesaw model, JHEP 03 (2012) 100 [arXiv:1111.5836] [INSPIRE].
126. A. Abada, D. Das, A. Vicente and C. Weiland, Enhancing lepton flavour violation in the supersymmetric inverse seesaw beyond the dipole contribution, JHEP 09 (2012) 015 [arXiv:1206.6497] [INSPIRE].
127. M. Malinsky, T. Ohlsson and H. Zhang, Non-unitarity effects in a realistic low-scale seesaw model, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 073009 [arXiv:0903.1961] [INSPIRE].
128. M. Malinsky, T. Ohlsson, Z.-Z. Xing and H. Zhang, Non-unitary neutrino mixing and CP-violation in the minimal inverse seesaw model, Phys. Lett. B 679 (2009) 242 [arXiv:0905.2889] [INSPIRE].
129. R. Lal Awasthi and M.K. Parida, Inverse seesaw in nonsupersymmetric SO(10), proton lifetime, nonunitarity effects and a low-mass Z′ boson, arXiv:1112.1826 [INSPIRE].
130. K. Ghosh, B. Mukhopadhyaya and U. Sarkar, Signals of an invisibly decaying Higgs in a scalar dark matter scenario: a study for the Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 015017 [arXiv:1105.5837] [INSPIRE].
131. Y. Bai, P. Draper and J. Shelton, Measuring the invisible Higgs width at the 7 and 8 TeV LHC, JHEP 07 (2012) 192 [arXiv:1112.4496] [INSPIRE].
132. P.P. Giardino, K. Kannike, M. Raidal and A. Strumia, Reconstructing Higgs boson properties from the LHC and Tevatron data, JHEP 06 (2012) 117 [arXiv:1203.4254] [INSPIRE].
133. J.R. Espinosa, M. Muhlleitner, C. Grojean and M. Trott, Probing for invisible Higgs decays with global fits, arXiv:1205.6790 [INSPIRE].
134. J. Espinosa, C. Grojean, M. Muhlleitner and M. Trott, First glimpses at Higgs’ face, arXiv:1207.1717 [INSPIRE].
135. S. Banerjee, S. Mukhopadhyay and B. Mukhopadhyaya, New Higgs interactions and recent data from the LHC and the Tevatron, arXiv:1207.3588 [INSPIRE].
136. Y. Mambrini, Higgs searches and singlet scalar dark matter: combined constraints from XENON 100 and the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 115017 [arXiv:1108.0671] [INSPIRE].
137. Y. Mambrini, Invisible Higgs and scalar dark matter, arXiv:1112.0011 [INSPIRE].
138. P.B. Dev, R. Franceschini and R. Mohapatra, Bounds on TeV seesaw models from LHC Higgs data, arXiv:1207.2756 [INSPIRE].
139. H. Baer and X. Tata, Dark matter and the LHC, arXiv:0805.1905 [INSPIRE].
140. G. Bélanger, S. Kraml and A. Lessa, Light sneutrino dark matter at the LHC, JHEP 07 (2011) 083 [arXiv:1105.4878] [INSPIRE].
141. F. del Aguila and J. Aguilar-Saavedra, Distinguishing seesaw models at LHC with multi-lepton signals, Nucl. Phys. B 813 (2009) 22 [arXiv:0808.2468] [INSPIRE].
142. F. del Aguila, J. Aguilar-Saavedra and J. de Blas, Trilepton signals: the golden channel for seesaw searches at LHC, Acta Phys. Polon. B 40 (2009) 2901 [arXiv:0910.2720] [INSPIRE].
143. C.-Y. Chen and P.B. Dev, Multi-lepton collider signatures of heavy Dirac and Majorana neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 093018 [arXiv:1112.6419] [INSPIRE].
144. A. Das and N. Okada, Inverse seesaw neutrino signatures at LHC and ILC, arXiv:1207.3734 [INSPIRE].
145. S. Mondal, S. Biswas, P. Ghosh and S. Roy, Exploring novel correlations in trilepton channels at the LHC for the minimal supersymmetric inverse seesaw model, JHEP 05 (2012) 134 [arXiv:1201.1556] [INSPIRE].
146. T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna and P.Z. Skands, PYTHIA 6.4 physics and manual, JHEP 05 (2006) 026 [hep-ph/0603175] [INSPIRE].
147. CTEQ collaboration, H. Lai et al., Global QCD analysis of parton structure of the nucleon: CTEQ5 parton distributions, Eur. Phys. J. C 12 (2000) 375 [hep-ph/9903282] [INSPIRE].
148. J. Pumplin et al., New generation of parton distributions with uncertainties from global QCD analysis, JHEP 07 (2002) 012 [hep-ph/0201195] [INSPIRE].
149. A.J. Barr and C. Gwenlan, The race for supersymmetry: using mT2 for discovery, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 074007 [arXiv:0907.2713] [INSPIRE].
150. M.L. Mangano, M. Moretti, F. Piccinini, R. Pittau and A.D. Polosa, ALPGEN, a generator for hard multiparton processes in hadronic collisions, JHEP 07 (2003) 001 [hep-ph/0206293] [INSPIRE].