Updated global fits of the cMSSM including the latest LHC SUSY and Higgs searches and XENON100 data

Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics

Volumn 2012, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 1-20

  Strege, C ^a   Bertone, G ^b   Cerdeno D G ^c,d   Fornasa, M ^e   Ruiz De Austri, R ^f   Trotta, R ^a,g  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c CSIC   (Spain)

^d UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^e INSTITUTO DE ASTROFÍSICA DE ANDALUCÍA CSIC   (Spain)

^f INSTITUTO DE FÍSICA CORPUSCULAR IFIC   (Spain)

^g AFRICAN INSTITUTE FOR MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Dark matter experiments; Dark matter theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881652314     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14757516     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2012/03/030     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. A. Cakir, Searches for supersymmetry with the CMS experiment, arXiv:1111.4820 [INSPIRE].
2. CMS collaboration, S. Chatrchyan et al., Search for supersymmetry at the LHC in events with jets and missing transverse energy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 221804 [arXiv:1109.2352] [INSPIRE].
3. ATLAS collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for squarks and gluinos using final states with jets and missing transverse momentum with the ATLAS detector in √s = 7 TeV proton-proton collisions, arXiv:1109.6572 [INSPIRE].
4. A.H. Chamseddine, R.L. Arnowitt and P. Nath, Locally supersymmetric grand unification, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 (1982) 970 [INSPIRE].
5. R.L. Arnowitt and P. Nath, SUSY mass spectrum in SU(5) supergravity grand unification, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 (1992) 725 [INSPIRE].
6. G.G. Ross and R.G. Roberts, Minimal supersymmetric unification predictions, Nucl. Phys. B 377 (1992) 571 [INSPIRE].
7. V.D. Barger, M.S. Berger and P. Ohmann, The supersymmetric particle spectrum, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 4908 [hep-ph/9311269] [INSPIRE].
8. G.L. Kane, C.F. Kolda, L. Roszkowski and J.D. Wells, Study of constrained minimal supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 6173 [hep-ph/9312272] [INSPIRE].
9. G. Bertone ed., Particle dark matter: observations, models and searches, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K. (2010) [INSPIRE].
10. L. Bergstrom, Nonbaryonic dark matter: observational evidence and detection methods, Rept. Prog. Phys. 63 (2000) 793 [hep-ph/0002126] [INSPIRE].
11. C. Muñoz, Dark matter detection in the light of recent experimental results, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 19 (2004) 3093 [hep-ph/0309346] [INSPIRE].
12. G. Bertone, D. Hooper and J. Silk, Particle dark matter: evidence, candidates and constraints, Phys. Rept. 405 (2005) 279 [hep-ph/0404175] [INSPIRE].
13. ATLAS and CMS collaborations, Update on the search for the Higgs boson by the ATLAS and CMS experiments at CERN, CERN seminar, Geneva Switzerland, 6 Dec 2011, streaming video available on http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1406786.
14. G. Bertone et al., Global fits of the CMSSM including the first LHC and XENON100 data, JCAP 01 (2012) 015 [arXiv:1107.1715] [INSPIRE].
15. XENON100 collaboration, E. Aprile et al., Dark matter results from 100 live days of XENON100 data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 131302 [arXiv:1104.2549] [INSPIRE].
16. O. Buchmüller et al., Supersymmetry and dark matter in light of LHC 2010 and Xenon100 data, Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1722 [arXiv:1106.2529 ] [INSPIRE].
17. M. Farina et al., Implications of XENON100 and LHC results for dark matter models, Nucl. Phys. B 853 (2011) 607 [arXiv:1104.3572] [INSPIRE].
18. A. Fowlie, A. Kalinowski, M. Kazana, L. Roszkowski and Y.L.S. Tsai, Bayesian implications of current LHC and XENON100 search limits for the constrained MSSM, arXiv:1111.6098 [INSPIRE].
19. S. Profumo, The quest for supersymmetry: early LHC results versus direct and indirect neutralino dark matter searches, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 015008 [arXiv:1105.5162] [INSPIRE].
20. O. Buchmüller et al., Supersymmetry in light of 1/fb of LHC data, arXiv:1110.3568 [INSPIRE].
21. O. Buchmüller et al., Higgs and supersymmetry, arXiv:1112.3564 [INSPIRE].
22. F. Feroz and M.P. Hobson, Multimodal nested sampling: an efficient and robust alternative to MCMC methods for astronomical data analysis, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 384 (2008) 449 [arXiv:0704.3704] [INSPIRE].
23. R. Ruiz de Austri, R. Trotta and L. Roszkowski, A Markov chain Monte Carlo analysis of the CMSSM, JHEP 05 (2006) 002 [hep-ph/0602028] [INSPIRE].
24. R. Trotta, F. Feroz, M.P. Hobson, L. Roszkowski and R. Ruiz de Austri, The impact of priors and observables on parameter inferences in the constrained MSSM, JHEP 12 (2008) 024 [arXiv:0809.3792] [INSPIRE].
25. F. Feroz, K. Cranmer, M. Hobson, R. Ruiz de Austri and R. Trotta, Challenges of profile likelihood evaluation in multi-dimensional SUSY scans, JHEP 06 (2011) 042 [arXiv:1101.3296] [INSPIRE].
26. L.E. Strigari and R. Trotta, Reconstructing WIMP properties in direct detection experiments including galactic dark matter distribution uncertainties, JCAP 11 (2009) 019 [arXiv:0906.5361] [INSPIRE].
27. F. Feroz et al., Bayesian selection of sign(μ) within mSUGRA in global fits including WMAP5 results, JHEP 10 (2008) 064 [arXiv:0807.4512] [INSPIRE].
28. J.R. Ellis, K.A. Olive and Y. Santoso, Calculations of neutralino stop coannihilation in the CMSSM, Astropart. Phys. 18 (2003) 395 [hep-ph/0112113] [INSPIRE].
29. L. Roszkowski, R. Ruiz de Austri and R. Trotta, Implications for the constrained MSSM from a new prediction for b → sγ, JHEP 07 (2007) 075 [arXiv:0705.2012] [INSPIRE].
30. M. Lisanti, L.E. Strigari, J.G. Wacker and R.H. Wechsler, The dark matter at the end of the galaxy, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 023519 [arXiv:1010.4300] [INSPIRE].
31. M. Vogelsberger et al., Phase-space structure in the local dark matter distribution and its signature in direct detection experiments, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 395 (2009) 797 [arXiv:0812.0362] [INSPIRE].
32. J.I. Read, G. Lake, O. Agertz and V.P. Debattista, Thin, thick and dark discs in LCDM, arXiv:0803.2714 [INSPIRE].
33. T. Bruch, J.I. Read, L. Baudis and G. Lake, Detecting the Milky Way's dark disk, Astrophys. J. 696 (2009) 920 [arXiv:0804.2896] [INSPIRE].
34. C.W. Purcell, J.S. Bullock and M. Kaplinghat, The dark disk of the Milky Way, Astrophys. J. 703 (2009) 2275 [arXiv:0906.5348] [INSPIRE].
35. A. Schneider, L. Krauss and B. Moore, Impact of dark matter microhalos on signatures for direct and indirect detection, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 063525 [arXiv:1004.5432] [INSPIRE].
36. P.D. Serpico and G. Bertone, Astrophysical limitations to the identification of dark matter: indirect neutrino signals vis-a-vis direct detection recoil rates, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 063505 [arXiv:1006.3268] [INSPIRE].
37. R. Trotta, Bayes in the sky: Bayesian inference and model selection in cosmology, Contemp. Phys. 49 (2008) 71 [arXiv:0803.4089] [INSPIRE].
38. P. Scott et al., Direct constraints on minimal supersymmetry from Fermi-LAT observations of the dwarf galaxy Segue 1, JCAP 01 (2010) 031 [arXiv:0909.3300] [INSPIRE].
39. D.A. Easson and R. Gregory, Circumventing the eta problem, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 083518 [arXiv:0902.1798] [INSPIRE].
40. SuperBayeS: Supersymmetry Parameters Extraction Routines for Bayesian Statistics, http://superbayes.org/.
41. DarkSUSY, http://www.darksusy.org/.
42. P. Gondolo et al., DarkSUSY: computing supersymmetric dark matter properties numerically, JCAP 07 (2004) 008 [astro-ph/0406204] [INSPIRE].
43. SOFTSUSY, http://projects.hepforge.org/softsusy/.
44. B.C. Allanach, SOFTSUSY: a program for calculating supersymmetric spectra, Comput. Phys. Commun. 143 (2002) 305 [hep-ph/0104145] [INSPIRE].
45. MicrOMEGAs, http://lapth.in2p3.fr/micromegas/.
46. G. Bélanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov, MicrOMEGAs 2.0: a program to calculate the relic density of dark matter in a generic model, Comput. Phys. Commun. 176 (2007) 367 [hep-ph/0607059] [INSPIRE].
47. SuperIso, http://superiso.in2p3.fr/.
48. F. Mahmoudi, SuperIso v2.3: a program for calculating flavor physics observables in supersymmetry, Comput. Phys. Commun. 180 (2009) 1579 [arXiv:0808.3144] [INSPIRE].
49. sγ] in the MSSM with minimal flavor violation, Comput. Phys. Commun. 179 (2008) 759 [arXiv:0712.3265] [INSPIRE].
50. SusyBSG, http://slavich.web.cern.ch/slavich/susybsg/.
51. F. Feroz, M.P. Hobson and M. Bridges, MultiNest: an efficient and robust Bayesian inference tool for cosmology and particle physics, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 398 (2009) 1601 [arXiv:0809.3437] [INSPIRE].
52. B.C. Allanach, Impact of CMS multi-jets and missing energy search on CMSSM fits, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 095019 [arXiv:1102.3149] [INSPIRE].
53. J.L. Feng, K.T. Matchev and T. Moroi, Focus points and naturalness in supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 075005 [hep-ph/9909334] [INSPIRE].
54. J.L. Feng, K.T. Matchev and F. Wilczek, Neutralino dark matter in focus point supersymmetry, Phys. Lett. B 482 (2000) 388 [hep-ph/0004043] [INSPIRE].
55. K.L. Chan, U. Chattopadhyay and P. Nath, Naturalness, weak scale supersymmetry and the prospect for the observation of supersymmetry at the Tevatron and at the CERN LHC, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 096004 [hep-ph/9710473] [INSPIRE].
56. H. Baer and M. Brhlik, Neutralino dark matter in minimal supergravity: direct detection versus collider searches, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 567 [hep-ph/9706509] [INSPIRE].
57. ±ν, JHEP 04 (2009) 121 [arXiv:0902.2393] [INSPIRE].
58. M.R. Ahmady and F. Mahmoudi, Constraints on the mSUGRA parameter space from NLO calculation of isospin asymmetry in B → K*γ, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 015007 [hep-ph/0608212] [INSPIRE].
59. MUON G-2 collaboration, G.W. Bennett et al., Final report of the muon E821 anomalous magnetic moment measurement at BNL, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 072003 [hep-ex/0602035] [INSPIRE].
60. F. Jegerlehner and A. Nyffeler, The muon g - 2, Phys. Rept. 477 (2009) 1 [arXiv:0902.3360] [INSPIRE].
61. 2), Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1515 [arXiv:1010.4180] [INSPIRE].
62. 2) re-evaluated using new precise data, J. Phys. G 38 (2011) 085003 [arXiv:1105.3149] [INSPIRE].
63. XENON1T collaboration, E. Aprile et al., XENON1T at LNGS. Proposal, (Apr 2010); Technical Design Report, (Oct 2010).
64. ICECUBE collaboration, R. Abbasi et al., Multi-year search for dark matter annihilations in the Sun with the AMANDA-II and IceCube detectors, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 042002 [arXiv:1112.1840] [INSPIRE].
65. G. Bertone, D. Cumberbatch, R. Ruiz de Austri and R. Trotta, Dark matter searches: the nightmare scenario, JCAP 01 (2012) 004 [arXiv:1107.5813] [INSPIRE].
66. B.C. Allanach, Naturalness priors and fits to the constrained minimal supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Lett. B 635 (2006) 123 [hep-ph/0601089] [INSPIRE].
67. B.C. Allanach, K. Cranmer, C.G. Lester and A.M. Weber, Natural priors, CMSSM fits and LHC weather forecasts, JHEP 08 (2007) 023 [arXiv:0705.0487] [INSPIRE].
68. M.E. Cabrera, J.A. Casas and R. Ruiz de Austri, Bayesian approach and naturalness in MSSM analyses for the LHC, JHEP 03 (2009) 075 [arXiv:0812.0536] [INSPIRE].
69. M.E. Cabrera, J.A. Casas and R. Ruiz de Austri, MSSM forecast for the LHC, JHEP 05 (2010) 043 [arXiv:0911.4686] [INSPIRE].
70. J.R. Ellis, K. Enqvist, D.V. Nanopoulos and F. Zwirner, Observables in low-energy superstring models, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 1 (1986) 57 [INSPIRE].
71. R. Barbieri and G.F. Giudice, Upper bounds on supersymmetric particle masses, Nucl. Phys. B 306 (1988) 63 [INSPIRE].