A new sampling strategy for SVM-based response surface for structural reliability analysis

Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics

Volumn 41, Issue , 2015, Pages 1-12

  Alibrandi, Umberto ^a,d   Alani, Amir M ^b   Ricciardi, Giuseppe ^c  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WEST LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MESSINA   (Italy)

^d NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Design Point; FORM; Response Surface; Sampling Directions; Structural Reliability Analysis; SVM; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

FORMING; RELIABILITY; SAMPLING; SURFACE PROPERTIES; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

DESIGN POINTS; RESPONSE SURFACE; STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; SVM; UNCERTAINTY;

RELIABILITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 84928496652     PISSN: 02668920     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.probengmech.2015.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. H.O. Madsen, S. Krenk, and N.C. Lind Methods of Structural Safety 1986 Prentice-Hall
2. O. Ditlevsen, and H.O. Madsen Structural Reliability Methods 1996 Wiley
3. R.E. Melchers Structural Reliability, analysis and prediction 1999 Wiley & Sons New York
4. A. Der Kiureghian, and T. Dakessian Multiple design points in first and second-order reliability Struct. Saf. 20 1998 37 49
5. L. Faravelli Response-surface approach for reliability analysis J. Eng. Mech. 115 1989 2763 2781
6. C. Bucher, and U. Bourgund A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problems Struct. Saf. 7 1990 57 66
7. M.R. Rajashekhar, and B.R. Ellingwood A new look at the response surface approach for reliability analysis Struct. Saf. 12 1983 205 220
8. S.-H. Kim, and S.-W. Na Response surface method using vector projected sampling points Struct. Saf. 19 1997 3 19
9. Y. Zheng, and P.K. Das Improved response surface method and its application to stiffened plate reliability analysis Eng. Struct. 22 2000 544 551
10. X.L. Guan, and R.E. Melchers Effect of response surface parameter variation on structural reliability estimates Struct. Saf. 23 2001 429 444
11. T. Most, and C. Bucher Adaptive response surface approach using artificial neural networks and moving least squares K. Gurlebeck, C. Konke, Proceedings of the 17th International Confernce Application of Computer Science and Mathematics in Architecture and Civil Engineering 2006 Bauhaus-University Weimar
12. C. Bucher, and T. Most A comparison of approximate response functions in structural reliability analysis Probab. Eng. Mech. 23 2008 154 163
13. V. Dubourg, B. Sudret, and J.M. Bourinet Reliability-based design optimization using kriging surrogates and subset simulation Struct. Multidiscip, Optimizat, 44 5 2011 673 690
14. V. Dubourg, B. Sudret, and F. Deheeger Metamodel-based importance sampling for structural reliability analysis Probab. Eng. Mech. 33 2013 47 57
15. B. Gaspar, A.P. Teixeira, and C. Guedes Soares Assessment of the efficiency of Kriging surrogate models for structural reliability analysis Probab. Eng. Mech. 37 2014 24 34
16. B. Echard, N. Gayton, and M. Lemaire AK-MCS: an active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo simulation Struct. Saf. 33 2 2014 145 154
17. F. Cadini, F. Santos, and E. Zio An improved adaptive kriging-based importance technique for sampling multiple failure regions of low probability Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 131 2014 109 117
18. O. Ditlevsen, and T. Arnbjerg-Nielsen Model correction factor method in structural reliability Journal of Engineering Mechanics 120 1 1994 1 10
19. P. Franchin, O. Ditlevsen, and A. Der Kiureghian Model correction factor method for reliability problems involving integrals of non-Gaussian random fields Probab. Eng. Mech. 17 2002 109 122
20. Alibrandi U. & Der Kiureghian A. The Model Correction Factor Method in NonLinear Stochastic Dynamic Analysis, in: Proceedings of the 6th Computational Stochastic Mechanics Conference, June 13-16, 2010, Rhodos, Greece.
21. U. Alibrandi, and A. Der Kiureghian A gradient-free method for determining the design point in nonlinear stochastic dynamic analysis Probab. Eng. Mechan. 28 2012 2 10
22. U. Alibrandi A response surface method for stochastic dynamic analysis Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 26 2014 44 53
23. Alibrandi U. & Ricciardi G. Bounds of the probability of collapse of rigid-plastic structures by means of Stochastic Limit Analysis, in: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability, Rome, Italy, 19-23 June 2005
24. U. Alibrandi, and G. Ricciardi The use of stochastic stresses in the static approach of probabilistic limit analysis Int. J. Num. Methods Eng. 73 6 2008 747 782
25. U. Alibrandi, N. Impollonia, and G. Ricciardi Probabilistic eigenvalue buckling analysis solved through the ratio of polynomial response surface Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 199 9-12 2010 450 464
26. V. Vapnik The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory 1995 Springer-Verlag New York
27. C.J.C. Burges A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 2 1998 121 167
28. J.E. Hurtado, and D.A. Alvarez A classification approach for reliability analysis with stochastic finite element modeling J. Struct. Eng. 129 2003 1141 1149
29. J.E. Hurtado An examination of methods for approximating implicit limit state functions from the viewpoint of statistical learning theory Struct. Saf. 26 2004 271 293
30. J.E. Hurtado Filtered importance sampling with support vector margin: a powerful method for structural reliability analysis Struct. Saf. 29 2007 2 15
31. J.E. Hurtado, and D.A. Alvarez An optimization method for learning statistical classifiers in structural reliability Probab. Eng. Mech. 25 2010 26 34
32. J.-M. Bourinet, F. Deheeger, and M. Lemaire Assessing small failure probabilities by combined subset simulation and Support Vector Machines Struct. Saf. 33 2011 343 353
33. S.K. Au, and J.L. Beck Estimation of small failure probabilities in high dimensions by subset simulation Probab. Eng. Mech. 16 2001 263 277
34. S. Boyd, and L. Vandenberghe Convex Optimization 2004 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
35. H.J. Pradlwarter, G.I. Schueller, P.S. Koutsourelakis, and D.C. Charmpis Application of line sampling simulation method to reliability benchmark problems Struct.Saf. 29 2007 208 221
36. P. Bjerager Probability integration by directional simulation J. Eng. Mech. 114 8 1988 1285 1302
37. Bourinet J.-M., Mattrand C., Dubourg V. A review of recent features and improvements added to FERUM software, in: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability (ICOSSAR'09), Osaka, Japan, 2009.
38. K.T. Fang, and Y. Wang Number Theoretic Methods in Statistics 1994 Chapman & Hall London
39. J.C. Mitteau Error evaluations for the computation of failure probability in static structural reliability problems Probab. Eng. Mech. 14 1999 119 135
40. M. Lemaire Structural Reliability 2009 Wiley
41. J.E. Hurtado Dimensionality reduction and visualization of structural reliability problems using polar features Probab. Eng. Mech. 29 2012 16 31
42. L.S. Katafygiotis, and K.M. Zuev Geometric insight into the challenges of solving high-dimensional reliability problems Probab. Eng. Mech. 23 2008 208 218
43. M.A. Valdebenito, H.J. Pradlwarter, and G.I. Schuëller The role of the design point for calculating failure probabilities in view of dimensionality and structural nonlinearities Struct. Saf. 32 2010 101 111
44. U. Alibrandi An alternative linear response surface improving FORM solution for stochastic dynamic analysis 24-27 2012 Reliability and Optimization of Structural Systems Yerevan, Armenia June
45. Alibrandi U., Alani A. & Koh C.G. Implications of high dimensional geometry for structural reliability analysis and a novel linear response surface method based on SVM, International Journal of Computational Methods [to appear].
46. Alibrandi U., Ma C.Y. & Koh C.G. Linear Response Surfaces for Structural Reliability Analysis: FORM and the Secant Hyperplane Method, (Submitted for publication), 2015.
47. Alibrandi U. & Koh C.G. FORM and improved FORM for Stochastic Dynamic Analysis, in: Proceedings of the 17th Working Conference of the IFIP working group 7.5 on Reliability and Optimization of Structural Systems (IFIP 2014), 3 - 7 July 2014, Huangshan, China
48. P.-L. Liu, and A. Der Kiureghian Finite element reliability of geometrically nonlinear uncertain structures J. Eng. Mech. 117 8 1991 1806 1825
49. Y. Zhang, and A. Der Kiureghian Dynamic response sensitivity of inelastic structures Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 108 1993 23 36
50. T. Haukaas, and A. Der Kiureghian Finite Element Reliability and Sensitivity Methods for Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering, Peer Report 2003 Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California Berkeley, CA 04
51. F. Mckenna, G.L. Fenves, and M.H. Scott Open system for earthquake engineering simulation. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center 2003 University of California Berkeley, CA
52. S. Engelund, and R. Rackwitz A benchmark study on importance sampling techniques in structural reliability Struct. Saf. 12 1993 255 276