Application of 3D rapid prototyping technology in posterior corrective surgery for Lenke 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients

Medicine (United States)

Volumn 94, Issue 8, 2015, Pages e582-

  Yang, Mingyuan ^a   Li, Chao ^a   Li, Yanming ^a   Zhao, Yingchuan ^a   Wei, Xianzhao ^a   Zhang, Guoyou ^a   Fan, Jianping ^a   Ni, Haijian ^a   Chen, Ziqiang ^a   Bai, Yushu ^a   Li, Ming ^a  

^a SECOND MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEMOGLOBIN;

ADDING ON PHENOMENON; ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; ARTICLE; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CHILD; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COBB ANGLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; FEMALE; HOSPITAL COST; HUMAN; KYPHOSIS; LENGTH OF STAY; LORDOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL DEVICE COMPLICATION; OPERATION DURATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; PEDIATRIC SURGERY; PEDICLE SCREW FIXATION DEVICE; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTERIOR SPINE FUSION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCHOOL CHILD; SCREW LOOSENING; SCREW MISPLACEMENT; SURGICAL INFECTION; SURGICAL PATIENT; SURGICAL TECHNOLOGY; THREE DIMENSIONAL PRINTING; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; PREOPERATIVE CARE; SCOLIOSIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; PREOPERATIVE CARE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SCOLIOSIS;

EID: 84928495674     PISSN: 00257974     EISSN: 15365964     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000582     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Basques BA, Bohl DD, Golinvaux NS, et al. Patient factors are associated with poor short-Term outcomes after posterior fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473:286-294.
2. Liu T, Hai Y. Sagittal plane analysis of selective posterior thoracic spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison study of all pedicle screw and hybrid instrumentation. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014;27:277-282.
3. Upendra BN, Meena D, Chowdhury B, et al. Outcome-based classification for assessment of thoracic pedicular screw placement. Spine. 2008;33:384-390.
4. Di Silvestre M, Parisini P, Lolli F, et al. Complications of thoracic pedicle screws in scoliosis treatment. Spine. 2007;32:1655-1661.
5. Abul-Kasim K, Ohlin A. The rate of screw misplacement in segmental pedicle screw fixation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Acta Orthop. 2011;82:50-55.
6. McGurk M, Amis AA, Potamianos P, et al. Rapid prototyping techniques for anatomical modelling in medicine. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1997;79:169-174.
7. Petzold R, Zeilhofer HF, Kalender WA. Rapid protyping technology in medicine-basics and applications. Comput Med Imag Graph. 1999;23:277-284.
8. Hurson C, Tansey A, ODonnchadha B, et al. Rapid prototyping in the assessment, classification and preoperative planning of acetabular fractures. Injury. 2007;38:1158-1162.
9. Bustamante S, Bose S, Bishop P, et al. Novel application of rapid prototyping for simulation of bronchoscopic anatomy. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2014;28:1134-1137.
10. Gear JI, Long C, Rushforth D, et al. Development of patient-specific molecular imaging phantoms using a 3D printer. Medical physics. 2014;41:082502.
11. Dankowski R, Baszko A, Sutherland M, et al. 3D heart model printing for preparation of percutaneous structural interventions: description of the technology and case report. Kardiol Pol. 2014;72:546-551.
12. Mao K, Wang Y, Xiao S, et al. Clinical application of computerdesigned polystyrene models in complex severe spinal deformities: a pilot study. Eur Spine J. 2010;19:797-802.
13. Abul-Kasim K, Strombeck A, Ohlin A, et al. Reliability of lowradiation dose CT in the assessment of screw placement after posterior scoliosis surgery, evaluated with a new grading system. Spine. 2009;34:941-948.
14. Abul-Kasim K, Ohlin A, Strombeck A, et al. Radiological and clinical outcome of screw placement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: evaluation with low-dose computed tomography. Eur Spine J. 2010;19:96-104.
15. Hedequist DJ, Emans JB. The correlation of preoperative threedimensional computed tomography reconstructions with operative findings in congenital scoliosis. Spine. 2003;28:2531-2534.
16. Sakai Y, Matsuyama Y, Nakamura H, et al. Segmental pedicle screwing for idiopathic scoliosis using computer-Assisted surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008;21:181-186.
17. Lu S, Zhang YZ, Wang Z, et al. Accuracy and efficacy of thoracic pedicle screws in scoliosis with patient-specific drill template. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2012;50:751-758.
18. Wu ZX, Huang LY, Sang HX, et al. Accuracy and safety assessment of pedicle screw placement using the rapid prototyping technique in severe congenital scoliosis. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011;24:444-450.
19. Abul-Kasim K, Ohlin A. Evaluation of implant loosening following segmental pedicle screw fixation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a 2 year follow-up with low-dose CT. Scoliosis. 2014;9:13.
20. Ohtori S, Inoue G, Orita S, et al. Comparison of teriparatide and bisphosphonate treatment to reduce pedicle screw loosening after lumbar spinal fusion surgery in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis from a bone quality perspective. Spine. 2013;38:E487-E492.
21. Wu ZX, Gong FT, Liu L, et al. A comparative study on screw loosening in osteoporotic lumbar spine fusion between expandable and conventional pedicle screws. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012;132:471-476.
22. Wang Y, Hansen ES, Hoy K, et al. Distal adding-on phenomenon in Lenke 1A scoliosis: risk factor identification and treatment strategy comparison. Spine. 2011;36:1113-1122.
23. Cho RH, Yaszay B, Bartley CE, et al. Which Lenke 1A curves are at the greatest risk for adding-on. and why?. Spine. 2012;37: 1384-1390.
24. Dede O, Ward WT, Bosch PP, et al. Using the free hand pedicle screw placement technique in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery: what is the incidence of neurologic symptoms secondary to misplaced screws?. Spine. 2013.
25. Lehman RA Jr, Lenke LG, Keeler KA, et al. Computed tomography evaluation of pedicle screws placed in the pediatric deformed spine over an 8-year period. Spine. 2007;32:2679-2684.