Accuracy and safety assessment of pedicle screw placement using the rapid prototyping technique in severe congenital scoliosis

Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques

Volumn 24, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 444-450

  Wu, Zi Xiang ^a   Huang, Lu Yu ^a   Sang, Hong Xun ^a   Ma, Zhen Sheng ^a   Wan, Shi Yong ^a   Cui, Geng ^a   Lei, Wei ^a  

^a FOURTH MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

congenital scoliosis; pedicle screw; Rapid prototyping; spinal instrumentation; spine

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LUMBAR SPINE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OPERATION DURATION; PEDICLE SCREW; PEDICLE SCREW PLACEMENT; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RAPID PROTOTYPING; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCHOOL CHILD; SCOLIOSIS; TECHNIQUE; THORACIC SPINE;

ADOLESCENT; BONE SCREWS; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; SCOLIOSIS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SPINAL FUSION; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80053356443     PISSN: 15360652     EISSN: 15392465     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318201be2a     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Hedequist D, Emans J. Congenital scoliosis: A review and update. J Pediatr Orthop. 2007;27:106-116 (Pubitemid 46045706)
2. Andrew T, Piggott H. Growth arrest for progressive scoliosis: Combined anterior and posterior fusion of the convexity. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985; 67:193-197 (Pubitemid 15109867)
3. Lazar RD, Hall JE. Simultaneous anterior and posterior hemivertebra excision. Clin Orthop. 1999;364:76-84 (Pubitemid 29333988)
4. Ruf M, Harms J. Hemivertebra resection by a posterior approach: Innovative operative technique and first results. Spine. 2002;27:1116-1123 (Pubitemid 34525981)
5. Thompson A, Marks D, Syampanathan S, et al. Long-term results of combined anterior and posterior convex epiphysiodesis for congenital scoliosis due to hemivertebra. Spine. 1995;20:1380-1385
6. Winter RB, Moe JH, Lonstein JE. Posterior spinal arthrodesis for congenital scoliosis: An analysis of the cases of two hundred and ninety patients, five to nineteen years old. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:1188-1197 (Pubitemid 15206096)
7. Van Dijk M, Smit TH, Jiya TU, et al. Polyurethane real-size models used in planning complex spinal surgery. Spine. 2001;26:1920-1926 (Pubitemid 32844688)
8. Rampersaud YR, Pik JH, Salonen D, et al. Clinical accuracy of fluoroscopic computer-assisted pedicle screw fixation: A CT analysis. Spine. 2005;30:E183-190
9. Modi HN, Suh SW, Fernandez H, et al. Accuracy and safety of pedicle screw placement in neuromuscular scoliosis with free-hand technique. Eur Spine J. 2008;17:1686-1696
10. Gertzbein SD, Robbins SE. Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in vivo. Spine. 1990;15:11-15
11. Hamill CL, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. The use of pedicle screw fixation to improve correction in the lumbar spine of patients with idiopathic scoliosis: Is it warranted? Spine. 1996;21: 1241-1249 (Pubitemid 26161391)
12. Suk SI, Lee CK, KimWJ, et al. Segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 1995;20:1399-1405
13. Brown CA, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. Complications of pediatric thoracolumbar and lumbar pedicle screws. Spine. 1998;23: 1566-1571 (Pubitemid 28459961)
14. Castro WH, Halm H, Jerosch J, et al. Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in lumbar vertebrae. Spine. 1996;21:1320-1324 (Pubitemid 26169507)
15. Jutte PC, Castelein RM. Complications of pedicle screws in lumbar and lumbosacral fusions in 105 consecutive primary operations. Eur Spine J. 2002;11:594-598 (Pubitemid 35435872)
16. Faraj AA, Webb JK. Early complications of spinal pedicle screw. Eur Spine J. 1997;6:324-326 (Pubitemid 27471154)
17. Shono Y, Abumi K, Kaneda K. One-stage posterior hemivertebra resection and correction using segmental posterior instrumentation. Spine. 2001;26:752-757 (Pubitemid 32268378)
18. Amiot LP, Lang K, Putzier M, et al. Comparative results between conventional and computer assisted pedicle screw installation in the thoracic, lumbar and sacral spine. Spine. 2000;25:606-614 (Pubitemid 30158220)
19. Belmont PJ, Klemme WR, Dhawan A, et al. In vivo accuracy of thoracic pedicle screws. Spine. 2001;26:2340-2346 (Pubitemid 33043316)
20. Danesh-Clough T, Taylor P, Hodgson B, et al. The use of evoked EMG in detecting misplaced thoracolumbar pedicle screws. Spine. 2001;26:1313-1316 (Pubitemid 32552505)
21. Fisher CG, Sahajpal V, Keynan O, et al. Accuracy and safety of pedicle screw fixation in thoracic spine trauma. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006;5:520-526 (Pubitemid 47325337)
22. Girardi FP, Cammisa FP, Sandhu HS. The placement of lumbar pedicle screws using computerised steriotactic guidance. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81B:825-829 (Pubitemid 29438358)
23. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. Free hand pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine: Is it safe? Spine. 2004;29:333-342 (Pubitemid 38155737)
24. Zdichavsky M, Blauth M, Knop C, et al. Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in thoracic spine fracturesFpart II: A retrospective analysis of 278 pedicle screws using computed tomographic scans. Eur J Trauma. 2004;30:241-247 (Pubitemid 39222871)
25. Suk SI, Kim WJ, Lee SM, et al. Thoracic pedicle screw fixation in spinal deformities: Are they really safe? Spine. 2001;26:2049-2057
26. Newton PO, Hahn GW, Fricka KB, et al. Utility of threedimensional and multiplanar reformatted computed tomography for evaluation of pediatric congenital spine abnormalities. Spine. 2002;27:844-850 (Pubitemid 34522249)
27. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Cheh G, et al. Evaluation of pedicle screw placement in the deformed spine using intraoperative plain radiographs: A comparison with computerized tomography. Spine. 2005; 30:2084-2088 (Pubitemid 41362371)
28. Onishi K, Maruyama Y. Three-dimensional solid model integrated with dental model for maxillofacial surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:1696-1699 (Pubitemid 33032639)
29. Stoker NG, Mankovich NJ, Valentino D. Stereolithographic models for surgical planning: Preliminary report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992;50:466-471
30. Wagner JD, Baack B, Brown GA, et al. Rapid 3-dimensional prototyping for surgical repair of maxillofacial fractures: A technical note. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62:898-901 (Pubitemid 38881140)
31. Winder J, Bibb R. Medical rapid prototyping technologies: State of the art and current limitations for application in oral and maxillofacial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63:1006-1015 (Pubitemid 40897757)
32. Brown GA, Milner B, Firoozbakhsh K. Application of computergenerated stereolithography and interpositioning template in acetabular fractures: A report of eight cases. J Orthop Trauma. 2002;16: 347-352 (Pubitemid 34520568)
33. Izatt MT, Thorpe PL, Thompson RG, et al. The use of physical biomodeling in complex spinal surgery. Eur Spine J. 2007;16:1507-1518 (Pubitemid 47389486)
34. Müller A, Krishnan KG, Uhl E, et al. The application of rapid prototyping techniques in cranial reconstruction and preoperative planning in neurosurgery. J Craniofac Surg. 2003;14:899-914
35. Mizutani J, Matsubara T, Fukuoka M, et al. Application of fullscale three-dimensional models in patients with rheumatoid cervical spine. Eur Spine J. 2008;17:644-649
36. D'Urso PS, Askin G, Earwaker JS, et al. Spinal biomodeling. Spine. 1999;24:1247-1251 (Pubitemid 29279470)
37. D'Urso PS, Williamson OD, Thompson RG. Biomodeling as an aid to spinal instrumentation. Spine. 2005;30:2841-2845 (Pubitemid 43011052)
38. Ron E. Let's not relive the past: A review of cancer risk after diagnostic or therapeutic irradiation. Pediatr Radiol. 2002;32:739-744 (Pubitemid 36067732)
39. Jimenez RR, Deguzman MA, Shiran S, et al. CT versus plain radiographs for evaluation of c-spine injury in young children: Do benefits outweigh risks? Pediatra Radiol. 2008;38:635-644.