An investigation into the online generative capability of chinese digital immigrants

Proceedings - Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, PACIS 2013

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages

  Zhao, Yuxiang ^a   Zhu, Qinghua ^a  

^a NANJING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Chinese local communities; Digital immigrant; Generative capability; Social informatics; User generated content (UGC); Web 2.0

Indexed keywords

HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION SCIENCE; INFORMATION SERVICES; INTERNET; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE); WORLD WIDE WEB;

DIGITAL IMMIGRANTS; GENERATIVE CAPABILITY; LOCAL COMMUNITY; SOCIAL INFORMATICS; USER GENERATED CONTENT (UGC); WEB 2.0;

ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT EXCHANGE;

EID: 84928485196     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (47)

1. Alexander, C. (1999). The origins of pattern theory, the future of the theory, and the generation of a living world. IEEE Software, 16(5), 71-82.
2. Avital, M., & Te'eni, D. (2009). From generative fit to generative capacity: Exploring an emerging dimension of information systems design and task performance. Information Systems Journal, 19(4), 345-367.
3. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cli.s, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4. Bayne, S., and Ross, J. (2007). The 'digital native' and 'digital immigrant': A dangerous opposition. Retrieved October 11, 2011, from http://www.malts.ed.ac.uk/staff/sian/natives-final.pdf
5. Benkler, Y. (2006). The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. London: Yale University Press.
6. Bennett, S., Maton, K., and Kervin, L. (2008) The 'digital natives' debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39 (5), 775-786.
7. Berwick, R.C. (1984). Strong generative capacity, weak generative capacity, and modern linguistic theories. Computational Linguistics, 10 (3), 189-202.
8. Bruns, A. (2007). Produsage: Towards a broader framework for user-led content creation, creativity and cognition ,6, 13-15. Retrieved January 21,2012,from http://snurb.info/files/
9. CNNIC.(2012).The 30th CNNIC Report. Retrieved August 24, 2012. http://www.cnnic.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/hlwtjbg/201207/P020120723477451202474.pdf
10. Crowston, K., and Williams, M.(2000). Reproduced and emergent genres of communication on the World Wide Web. The Information Society, 16(3), 201-215.
11. Erikson, E.H. (1950) .Childhood and Society. New York:W. W. Norton & Company.
12. Faust J. (2009). Positive design. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60 (9), 1887-1894.
13. Fernandez-Villavicencio, N. G. (2010) Helping students become literate in a digital, networking-based society: A literature review and discussion, The International Information & Library Review, 42(2), 124-136.
14. Fontana, A. and Frey, J. H. (2000). The interview: From structured questions to negotiated text. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Golder, S. and Huberman, B. (2006). Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems. Journal of Information Science, 32 (2), 198-208.
16. Greengard, S. (2011). Following the crowd. Communications of the ACM, 54(2), 20-22.
17. Hanseth, Ole; Bygstad, Bendik; Ellingsen, Gunnar; Johannessen, Liv Karen & Larsen, Eli (2012). ICT Standardization Strategies and Service Innovation in Health Care, In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2012.
18. Helsper, E. J., and Eynon, R.(2010).Digital natives: where is the evidence?. British Educational Research Journal, 36(3), 503-520.
19. Ihlstrom, C., and Lundberg, J.(2004). A genre perspective on online newspaper front page design. Journal of Web Engineering, 3(1), 50-74.
20. Joshi, K.D., Chi, L., Datta, A., and Han, S. (2010). Changing the competitive landscape: Continuous innovation through IT-enabled knowledge capabilities. Information Systems Research, 21 (3), 472-495.
21. Ke, W., & Zhang, P. 2010. The Effects of Extrinsic Motivations and Satisfaction in Open Source Software Development. Journal of the Association for Information Systems,11(12), 784-808.
22. Kennedy, G., Krause, K., Judd, T. Churchward, A. and Gray, K.(2008). First year students' experiences with technology: are they really digital natives? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(1),108-122.
23. Kolikant, Y.B.-D. (2010). Digital natives, better learners? Students' beliefs about how the Internet influenced their ability to learn. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1384-1391.
24. Liao, S., Fei, W., and Chen, C. (2007). Knowledge sharing, absorptive capacity and innovation capability: An empirical study of Taiwan's knowledge-intensive industry, Journal of Information Science, 33(3), 340-359.
25. Lu, X.H., Phang, C., and Yu, J. (2011). Encouraging participation in virtual communities through usability and sociability development: An empirical investigation. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems 42(3) 96-114.
26. Malone, T.W., Laubacher, R., & Dellarocas, C. (2010). The Collective Intelligence Genome. MIT Sloan Management Review,51(3), 21-31.
27. Margaryan, A., and Littlejohn ,A.(2011).Are digital natives a myth or reality?: Students' use of technologies for learning. Computers & Education,56(2),429-440.
28. McKenzie, J. (2007) Digital Nativism, Digital Delusions and Digital Deprivation. From Now On: The Educational technology Journal , 17(2). Available at: http://www.fno.org/nov07/nativism.html
29. McNamara ,C.(1999). General Guidance for Conducting Research Interviews. Retrieved January 11,2012, from http://managementhelp.org/businessresearch/interviews.htm
30. Myers, M.D., and Newman, M. (2007). The qualitative interview in IS research: Examining the craft, Information and Organization, 17 (1), 2-26.
31. Nielsen, J., and Wagner, A. (1996), User interface design for the WWW. In Proceedings of CHI 96 Conference Companion(pp. 330-331). New York:ACM.
32. OECD. (2007). Participative web and user-created content: web 2.0, wikis and social networking edition complete. Retrieved November 18,2008, from http://www.oecd.org/document/40/0,3343,en-2649-34223-39428648-1-1-1-1,00.html
33. O'Reilly,T. (2005). What Is Web 2.0:Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. Retrieved October 11,2008, from http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html
34. Preece, J., and Shneiderman, B.(2009). The reader-to-leader framework: Motivating technology-mediated social participation. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 1(1),13-32.
35. Preece, J. (2000). Online Communities: Designing Usability, Supporting Sociability. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
36. Prensky, M. (2001a). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants On the Horizon, 9 (5) Available at: http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part1.pdf
37. Prensky, M. (2001b). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants, Part II: Do They Really Think Differently? On the Horizon, 9(6) Available at: http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part2.pdf
38. Schlagwein, D., Schoder, D., and Fischbach, K. (2011). Social information systems: Review, framework, and research agenda. In Proceedings of the Thirty Second International Conference on Information Systems, Shanghai 2011.
39. Schön, D.A. (1979) .Generative metaphor: a perspective on problem-setting in social policy. In A. Ortony(Ed.), Metaphor and Thought(pp. 254-283). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Selvyn, N. (2009). The digital native-myth and reality. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 61(4), 364-379.
41. Van Osch, W., and Avital, M. Generative Collectives. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Saint Louis, Missouri, 2010.
42. Weick, K.E. (2007) .The generative properties of richness. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 14-19.
43. Yates,J., Orlikowski,W. J., & Jackson, A.(2008). The six key dimensions of understanding media. MIT Sloan Management Review, 49 (2),63-69.
44. Zahra, S. A., George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academic Management Review, 27(2), 185-203.
45. Zhao, Y., and Zhu, Q. (2009). Exploration of the motivations to produce user-generated content in Web 2.0 era. Journal of Library Science in China, 35 (5), 107-116.
46. Zhao ,Y. X., Wu, K.W., Zhu, Q.H., & Meng, F.(2010). Exploring user's classification model for UGC and its influence factors on contribution in social media. In Proceedings of The 2010 International Conference on E-business Intelligence (ICEBI 2010) (pp.434-441), Oxford: Atlantis.
47. Zhao, Y., and Zhu, Q. (2012). Exploring the motivation of participants in crowdsourcing contest. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2012.