The market and the masses in Latin America: Policy reform and consumption in liberalizing economies

The Market and the Masses in Latin America: Policy Reform and Consumption in Liberalizing Economies

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-336

  Baker, Andy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928414122     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511576447     Document Type: Book

References (356)

1. Achen, Christopher, and Larry Bartels. 2006. “It Feels Like We’re Thinking: The Rationalizing Voter and Electoral Democracy.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia.
2. Alcantara, Manuel. 2005. Proyecto de Elites Parlamentarias Latinoamericanas (PELA). Available at http://americo.usal.es/oir/Elites/[accessed May 12, 2008].
3. Alvarez, R. Michael, and John Brehm. 2002. Hard Choices, Easy Answers: Values, Information, and American Public Opinion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4. Amann, Edmund, and Werner Baer. 2002. “Neoliberalism and Its Consequences in Brazil.” Journal of Latin American Studies 34(4): 945-959.
5. Ames, Barry. 2001. The Deadlock of Democracy in Brazil. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
6. Anderson, Benedict R. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread ofNationalism. London: Verso.
7. Antunes, Ricardo, and Sabrina E. Wilson. 1994. “Recent Strikes in Brazil: The Main Tendencies of the Strike Movement of the 1980s.” Latin American Perspectives 21(1): 24-37.
8. Anuatti-Neto, Francisco, Milton Barossi-Filho, Antonio Gledson de Carvalho, and Roberto Macedo. 2005. “Costs and Benefits of Privatization: Evidence from Brazil.” In Privatization in Latin America: Myths and Reality, eds. Alberto Chong and Florencio L6pez-de-Silanes, 145-196. Washington, DC: World Bank.
9. Arce, Moises. 2005. Market Reform in Society: Post-Crisis Politics and Economic Change in Authoritarian Peru. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
10. Armijo, Leslie Elliott, and Philippe Faucher. 2002. “‘We Have a Consensus’: Explaining Political Support for Market Reforms in Latin America.” Latin American Politics and Society 44(2): 1-40.
11. Associacao Brasileira de Shopping Centers [ABRASCE]. 2007. “ABRASCE.” Available at http://www.abrasce.com.br/[accessed February 15, 2007].
12. Avelino, George, David S. Brown, and Wendy Hunter. 2005. “The Effects of Capital Mobility, Trade Openness, and Democracy on Social Spending in Latin America, 1980-1999.” American Journal of Political Science 49(3): 625-641.
13. Baer, Werner. 2001. The Brazilian Economy: Growth and Development, 5th ed. Westport, CT: Praeger.
14. Baker, Andy. 2003. “Why Is Trade Reform So Popular in Latin America? A Consumption-Based Theory of Trade Policy Preferences.” World Politics 55(3): 423-455.
15. Baker, Andy. 2005. “Who Wants to Globalize? Consumer Tastes and Labor Markets in a Theory of Trade Policy Beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science 49(4): 924-938.
16. Baker, Andy, Barry Ames, and Lucio R. Renno. 2006. “Social Context and Campaign Volatility in New Democracies: Networks and Neighborhoods in Brazil’s 2002 Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 50(2): 382-399.
17. Barber, Benjamin R. 1995. Jihad vs. McWorld. New York: Times Books.
18. Barja, Gover, David McKenzie, and Miguel Urquiola. 2005. “Bolivian Capitalization and Privatization: Approximation to an Evaluation.” In Reality Check: The Distributional Impact of Privatization in Developing Countries, eds. John Nellis and Nancy Birdsall, 123-178. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.
19. Bauer, ArnoldJ. 2001. Goods, Power, History: Latin America’s Material Culture. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. Bayliss, Kate. 2002. “Privatization and Poverty: The Distributional Impact of Utility Privatization.” Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 73(4): 603-625.
21. Behrman, Jere R., Nancy Birdsall, and Miguel Szekely. 2003. “Economic Policy and Wage Differentials in Latin America.” Center for Global Development Working Paper Series 29.
22. Berg, Janine, Christoph Ernst, and Peter Auer. 2006. Meeting the Employment Challenge: Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico in the Global Economy. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
23. Berinsky, Adam J. 2004. Silent Voices: Public Opinion and Political Participation in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24. Berinsky, AdamJ. 2007. “Assuming the Costs of War: Events, Elites, and American Public Support for Military Conflict.” Journal of Politics 69(4): 975-997.
25. Berry, Albert, ed. 1998. Poverty, Economic Reform, and Income Distribution in Latin America. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
26. Bertranou, Fabio M. 2001. “Pension Reform and Gender Gaps in Latin America: What Are the Policy Options?” World Development 29(5): 911-923.
27. Biersteker, Thomas J. 1995. “The ‘Triumph’ of Liberal Economic Ideas in the Developing World.” In Global Change, Regional Response: The New International Context of Development, ed. Barbara Stallings, 174-198. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Birdsall, Nancy, and John Nellis. 2003. “Winners and Losers: Assessing the Distributional Impact of Privatization.” World Development 31(10): 1617-1633.
29. Birdsall, Nancy and John Nellis. 2005. “Privatization Reality Check: Distributional Effects in Developing Countries.” In Reality Check: The Distributional Impact of Privatization in Developing Countries, eds. John Nellis and Nancy Birdsall, 1-30. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.
30. Birdsall, Nancy, Augusto de la Torre, and Rachel Menezes. 2001. Washington Contentious: Economic Policies for Social Equity in Latin America. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
31. Blom, Andreas, Lauritz Holm-Nielsen, and Dorte Verner. 2001. “Education, Earning, and Inequality in Brazil, 1982-1998: Implications for Education Policy.” Peabody Journal of Education 76(3&4): 180-221.
32. Blomstrom, Magnus, and Ari Kokko. 1997. “Regional Integration and Foreign Direct Investment: A Conceptual Framework and Three Cases.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 1750.
33. Bound, John, and George Johnson. 1992. “Changes in the Structure of Wages in the 1980’s: An Evaluation of Alternative Explanations.” American Economic Review 82(3): 371-392.
34. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1986. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
35. Branford, Sue, Bernardo Kucinski, and Hilary Wainwright. 2003. Lula and the Workers Party in Brazil. New York: New Press.
36. Bratton, Michael, Robert B. Mattes, and Emmanuel Gyimah-Boadi. 2004. Public Opinion, Democracy, and Market Reform in Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press.
37. Broda, Christian, and John Romalis. 2008. “Inequality and Prices: Does China Benefit the Poor in America?” Chicago: University of Chicago, working paper.
38. Broda, Christian, and David E. Weinstein. 2006. “Globalization and the Gains from Variety.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 121(2): 541-585.
39. Brody, Richard A. 1991. Assessing the President: The Media, Elite Opinion, and Public Support. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
40. Brody, Richard A., and Paul M. Sniderman. 1977. “From Life Space to Polling Place: The Relevance ofPersonal Concerns for Voting Behavior.” British Journal of Political Science 7(3): 337-360.
41. Brooks, Sarah M., and Marcus J. Kurtz. 2007. “Capital, Trade, and the Political Economies of Reform.” American Journal of Political Science 51(4): 703-720.
42. Brown, David S., and Wendy Hunter. 1999. “Democracy and Social Spending in Latin America, 1980-92.” American Political Science Review 93(4): 779-790.
43. Bruhn, Kathleen. 2004. “Globalization and the Renovation of the Latin American Left: Strategies of Ideological Adaptation.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
44. Buendia, Jorge. 2001. “Economic Reforms and Political Support in Mexico, 19881997.” In Public Support for Market Reforms in New Democracies, ed. Susan C. Stokes, 131-159. New York: Cambridge University Press.
45. Bulmer-Thomas, Victor. 1994. The Economic History of Latin America Since Independence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
46. Bulmer-Thomas, Victor, ed. 1996. The New Economic Model in Latin America and Its Impact on Income Distribution and Poverty. Basingstoke, U.K.: Macmillan.
47. Camargo, Jose, Marcelo Neri, and Mauricio Cortez Reis. 2002. “Employment and Productivity in Brazil in the Nineties.” In Brazil in the 1990s: An Economy in Transition, ed. Renato Baumann, 233-261. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
48. Cameron, Maxwell A. 2006. “A False and Damaging Dichotomy.” Available at http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/maxwell_a_cameron/2006/06/the_rightwrong_left_shibboleth.html [accessed May 12, 2008].
49. Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.
50. Cardoso, Fernando Henrique, and Enzo Faletto. 1979. Dependency and Development in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
51. Castaneda, Jorge. 2006. “Latin America’s LeftTurn.” Foreign Affairs 85(3): 28-44.
52. Castaneda, Jorge, and Patricio Navia. 2007. “The Year of the Ballot.” Current History 105(2): 51-57.
53. Castro, Newton de. 1999. “Privatization of the Transportation Sector in Brazil.” In Privatization in Brazil: The Case of Public Utilities, eds. Armando Castelar Pinheiro and Kiichiro Fukasaku, 177-218. Rio de Janeiro: Banco Nacional de Desen- volvimento Economico e Social.
54. Chang, Won, and L. Alan Winters. 2002. “How Regional Blocs Affect Excluded Countries: The Price Effects of MERCOSUR.” American Economic Review 92(4): 889-904.
55. Chisari, Omar, Antonio Estache, and Catherine Waddams Price. 2003. “Access by the Poor in Latin America’s Utility Reform: Subsidies and Service Obligations.” In Utility Privatization and Regulation: A Fair Deal for Consumers? eds. Cecilia Ugaz and Catherine Waddams Price, 25-53. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
56. Chong, Alberto, and Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes. 2005. “The Truth about Privatization in Latin America.” In Privatization in Latin America: Myths and Reality, eds. Alberto Chong and Florencio Loipez-de-Silanes, 1-66. Washington, DC: World Bank.
57. Cohen, Youssef. 1989. The Manipulation of Consent: The State and Working-Class Consciousness in Brazil. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
58. Colburn, Forrest D. 2002. Latin America at the End of Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
59. Collier, David, ed. 1979. The New Authoritarianism in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
60. Collier, Ruth Berins, and David Collier. 1991. Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
61. Converse, Philip E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, ed. David E. Apter, 206-261. London: Free Press of Glencoe.
62. Coppedge, Michael. 1998. “The Dynamic Diversity of Latin American Party Systems.” Party Politics 4(4): 547-568.
63. Cornelius, Wayne A. 1973. “Nation Building, Participation, and Distribution: The Politics of Social Reform under Cardenas.” In Crisis, Choice, and Change: Historical Studies ofPolitical Development, eds. Gabriel A. Almond, Scott C. Flanagan, and Robert J. Mundt, 392-498. Boston: Little, Brown.
64. Couto, Claudio Goncalves. 1998. “A Longa Constituinte: Reforma do Estado e Fluidez Institutional no Brasil.” Dados 41(1): 51-86.
65. Currie, Janet, and Ann Harrison. 1997. “Sharing the Costs: The Impact of Trade Reform on Capital and Labor in Morocco.” Journal of Labor Economics 15(3): S44-S71.
66. Dalgin, Muhammed, Vitor Trindade, and Devashish Mitra. 2008. “Inequality, Nonhomothetic Preferences, and Trade: A Gravity Approach.” Southern Economic Journal 74(3): 747-774.
67. de Soto, Hernando. 1989. The Other Path: The Invisible Revolution in the Third World. New York: Harper and Row.
68. de Soto, Hernando. 2000. The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else. New York: Basic Books.
69. Deaton, Angus. 1989. “Rice Prices and Income Distribution in Thailand: ANon- Parametric Analysis.” The Economic Journal 99(395): 1-37.
70. Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Scott Keeter. 1996. What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
71. Dias, Guilherme Leite Da Silva, and Cicely Moitinho Amaral. 2002. “Structural Change in Brazilian Agriculture, 1980-1998.” In Brazil in the 1990s: An Economy in Transition, ed. Renato Baumann, 204-232. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
72. Diretorio Nacional do PT. 1998. Partido dos Trabalhadores: Resolugoes de Encontros e Congressos. Sao Paulo: Editora Fundacao Perseu Abramo.
73. Dix, Robert H. 1989. “Cleavage Structures and Party Systems in Latin America.” Comparative Politics 22(1): 23-37.
74. Dominguez, Jorge I. 1998. “Free Politics and Free Markets in Latin America.” Journal of Democracy 9(4): 70-84.
75. Dominguez, Jorge I., and James A. McCann. 1996. Democratizing Mexico: Public Opinion and Electoral Choices. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
76. Dore, Elizabeth. 2003. “In the National Interest.” NACLA: Report on the Americas 36(4): 20-23.
77. Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory ofDemocracy. New York: Harper.
78. Duch, Raymond M. 1993. “Tolerating Economic Reform: Popular Support for Transition to a Free Market in the Former Soviet Union.” American Political Science Review 87(3): 590-608.
79. Duckett, Jane, and William L. Miller. 2006. The Open Economy and Its Enemies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
80. Easton, David. 1965. A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: Wiley.
81. Echegaray, Fabian, and Carlos Elordi. 2001. “Public Opinion, Presidential Popularity, and Economic Reform in Argentina, 1989-1996.” In Public Support for Market Reforms in New Democracies, ed. Susan C. Stokes, 187-214. New York: Cambridge University Press.
82. Economic Commission on Latin America and the Caribbean [ECLAC. 2000a]. Foreign Investment in Latin America and the Caribbean. Santiago, Chile: United Nations.
83. Economic Commission on Latin America and the Caribbean [ECLAC]. 2000b. Statistical Yearbook for Latin America and the Caribbean. Santiago, Chile: United Nations.
84. Economic Commission on Latin America and the Caribbean [ECLAC]. 2001. America Latina: Indices de Precios al Consumidor. Santiago, Chile: United Nations.
85. Economic Commission on Latin America and the Caribbean [ECLAC]. 2005. Economic Survey of Latin America and the Caribbean. Santiago, Chile: United Nations.
86. Economist, The. 2005a. “Trade and Poverty: Tired of Globalisation.” The Economist, November 5:11.
87. Economist, The. 2005b. “The Summit of the Americas: Uncle Sam Visits His Restive Neighbours.” The Economist, November 5:41.
88. Economist, The. 2005c. “Bolivia: Mob Rule, Not People Power.” The Economist, June 18:17.
89. Economist, The. 2005D. “Chile’s Conservatives: Out in the Cold.” The Economist, October 29:38.
90. Economist, The. 2008. “Brazil: Happy Families.” The Economist, February 9:39-40.
91. Edwards, Sebastian. 1995. Crisis and Reform in Latin America: From Despair to Hope. New York: Oxford University Press.
92. Edwards, Tim. 2000. Contradictions of Consumption: Concepts, Practices and Politics in Consumer Society. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
93. Encyclopedia of Nations. 2006. “Brazil: Labor.” Encyclopedia of Nations. Available at http://www.nationsencyclopedia.com/Americas/Brazil-LABOR [accessed April 19, 2006].
94. Engel, Ernst. 1857. “Die Productions: Und Consumtionsverhaltnisse des Koni- greichs Sachsen.” Zeitschrift des Statistischen Bureaus des K. Sachsischen 8:27-29.
95. Epstein, Jack. 1999. “Light’s Out.” Latin Trade 7(6): 61-68.
96. Estache, Antonio. 2005. “Latin America’s Infrastructure Experience: Policy Gaps and the Poor.” In Reality Check: The Distributional Impact of Privatization in Developing Countries, eds. John Nellis and Nancy Birdsall, 281-294. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.
97. Estache, Antonio, and Ana Goicoechea. 2005. “A ‘Research’ Database on Infrastructure Economic Performance.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3643.
98. Estache, Antonio, and Martin Rossi. 2004. “Have Consumers Benefited from the Reforms in the Electricity Distribution Sector in Latin America?” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3420.
99. Estevadeordal, Antoni, Dani Rodrik, Alan M. Taylor, and Andreis Velasco, eds. 2004. Integrating the Americas: FTAA and Beyond. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies.
100. Evans, Peter B. 1979. Dependent Development: The Alliance of Multinational, State, and Local Capital in Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
101. Ferranti, David M. de. 2003. Closing the Gap in Education and Technology. Washington, DC: World Bank.
102. Ferraz, Joao Carlos, David Kupfer, and Mariana Iootty. 2004. “Industrial Competitiveness in Brazil: Ten Years after Economic Liberalization.” CEPAL Review 82:91-119.
103. Figueiredo, Argelina Maria Cheibub, and Fernando Papaterra Limongi. 1999. Executivo e Legislativo Na Nova Ordem Constitucional. Rio de Janeiro: Editora FGV.
104. Filmer, Deon, and Lant H. Pritchett. 2001. “Estimating Wealth Effects without Expenditure Data - or Tears: An Application to Educational Enrollments in States of India.” Demography 38(1): 115-132.
105. Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
106. Fishman, Charles. 2006. The Wal-Mart Effect: How the World’s Most Powerful Company Really Works and How It’s Transforming the American Economy. New York: Penguin Press.
107. Forero, Juan. 2002. “Still Poor, Latin Americans Protest Push for Open Markets.” The New York Times, July 19: A1.
108. Forero, Juan. 2005. “Latin America Fails to Deliver on Basic Needs.” The New York Times, February 22: A1.
109. Foster, Vivien, Erwin R. Tiongson, and Caterina Ruggeri Laderchi. 2005. “Utility Reforms.” In Analyzing the Distributional Impact of Reforms: Volume One, eds. Aline Coudouel and Stefano Paternostro, 73-143. Washington, DC: World Bank.
110. Frieden, Jeffry A. 1991. Debt, Development, and Democracy: Modern Political Economy and Latin America, 1965-1985. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
111. Frye, Timothy. 2006. “Original Sin, Good Works, and Property Rights in Russia.” World Politics 58(4): 479-504.
112. Gabel, Matthew J. 1998. Interests and Integration: Market Liberalization, Public Opinion, and European Union. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
113. Gabel, Matthew, and Kenneth Scheve. 2007. “Estimating the Effect of Elite Communications on Public Opinion Using Instrumental Variables.” American Journal of Political Science 51(4): 1013-1028.
114. Galiani, Sebastian, Paul Gertler, Ernesto Schargrodsky, and Federico Sturze- negger. 2005. “The Benefits and Costs of Privatization in Argentina: AMicro- economic Analysis.” In Privatization in Latin America: Myths and Reality, eds. Alberto Chong and Florencio L<5pez-de-Silanes, 67-116. Washington, DC: World Bank.
115. Gallup, John Luke, Alejandro Gaviria, and Eduardo Lora. 2003. Is Geography Destiny? Lessons from Latin America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
116. Gamson, William. 1992. Talking Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
117. Garrett, Geoffrey. 2004. “Globalization’s Missing Middle.” Foreign Affairs 85(6): 84-96.
118. Geddes, Barbara, and John Zaller. 1989. “Sources of Popular Support for Authoritarian Regimes.” American Journal of Political Science 33(2): 319-347.
119. Ger, Guliz, and Russell W. Belk. 1996. “I’d Like to Buy the World a Coke: Consumptionscapes of the ‘Less Affluent World.’” Journal of Consumer Policy 19(3): 271-304.
120. Gervasoni, Carlos. 1995. “El Impacto Electoral de las Politicas de Estabilizacioin y Reforma Estructural en America Latina.” Journal of Latin American Affairs 3(1): 46-50.
121. Gill, Indermit Singh, Truman Packard, and Juan Yermo. 2005. Keeping the Promise of Social Security in Latin America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press and the World Bank.
122. Gilljam, Mikael, and Donald Granberg. 1993. “Should We Take ‘Don’t Know’ for an Answer?” Public Opinion Quarterly 57(3): 348-357.
123. Globescan Research Partners. 2003. 19 Nation Poll on Global Issues: Questionnaire. College Park: University of Maryland: Program on International Policy Attitudes.
124. Goldberg, Pinelopi Koujiano, and Nina Pavcnik. 2004. “Trade, Inequality, and Poverty: What Do We Know?” In Brookings Trade Forum 2004, eds. Susan M. Collins and Carol Graham, 223-269. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
125. Gomez, Brad T., and J. Matthew Wilson. 2006. “Cognitive Heterogeneity and Economic Voting: A Comparative Analysis of Four Democratic Electorates.” American Journal of Political Science 50(1): 127-145.
126. Graham, Carol, and Stefano Pettinato. 2002. Happiness and Hardship: Opportunity and Insecurity in New Market Economies. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
127. Graham, Carol, and Sandip Sukhtankar. 2004. “Does Economic Crisis Reduce Support for Markets and Democracy in Latin America? Some Evidence from Surveys of Public Opinion and Well Being.” Journal of Latin American Studies 36 (2): 349-377.
128. Gramsci, Antonio. 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. New York: International Publishers.
129. Greene, Kenneth F. 2007. Why Dominant Parties Lose: Mexico's Democratization in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
130. Gregory, Mary, Wiemer Salverda, and Ronald Schettkat, eds. 2007. Services and Employment: Explaining the U.S.-European Gap. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
131. Guedes, Patricia, and Nilson Vieira Oliveira. 2006. “Democracy 5: Progress and Aspirations in Sao Paulo’s Periphery.” Braudel Papers 38:1-17.
132. Haggard, Stephan, and Robert R. Kaufman. 1995. The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
133. Hagopian, Frances. 2001. Brazil Congressional Survey, 1999-2000. Unpublished dataset, cited with permission.
134. Hainmueller, Jens, and Michael J. Hiscox. 2006. “Learning to Love Globalization? Education and Individual Attitudes Toward International Trade.” International Organization 60:469-498.
135. Haltiwanger, John, Adriana Kugler, Maurice Kugler, Alejandro Micco, and Carmen Pages. 2004. “Effects of Tariffs and Real Exchange Rates on Job Reallocation: Evidence from Latin America.” Journal of Policy Reform 7(4): 191-208.
136. Harris, Clive, John Hodges, Michael Schur, and Padmesh Shukla. 2003. “Infrastructure Projects: A Review of Canceled Private Projects.” Public Policy for the Private Sector 252:1-6.
137. Harsanyi, John C. 1953. “Welfare Economics of Variable Tastes.” The Review of Economic Studies 21(3): 204-213.
138. Hellwig, Timothy, and David Samuels. 2007. “Voting in Open Economies: The Electoral Consequences of Globalization.” Comparative Political Studies 40(3): 283-306.
139. Hirsch, Fred. 1976. Social Limits to Growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
140. Hiscox, Michael J. 2002. International Trade and Political Conflict: Commerce, Coalitions, and Mobility. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
141. Hojman, David E. 1994. “The Political Economy of Recent Conversions to Market Economics in Latin America.” Journal of Latin American Studies 26(1): 191-219.
142. Hoogeveen, J. G.M. 2002. “Income Risk, Consumption Security and the Poor.” Oxford Development Studies 30(1): 105-121.
143. Houthakker, H. S. 1957. “An International Comparison of Household Expenditure Patterns, Commemorating the Centenary of Engel’s Law.” Econometrica 25 (4): 532-551.
144. Huber, Evelyne, and John D. Stephens. 2000. “The Political Economy of Pension Reform: Latin America in Comparative Perspective.” Occasional Paper Series 7. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
145. Hunter, Linda C., and James R. Markusen. 1988. “Per-Capita Income as a Determinant of Trade.” In Empirical Methods for International Trade, ed. Robert C. Feenstra, 89-109. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
146. Hunter, Wendy. 2007. “The Normalization of an Anomaly: The Workers’ Party in Brazil.” World Politics 59(3): 440-475.
147. Inglehart, Ronald. 1990. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
148. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica [IBGE]. 2006. “Sistema IBGE de Recuperacao Automatica - SIDRA.” Available at http://www.sidra.ibge.gov.br/[accessed June 10, 2006].
149. Inter-American Development Bank [IDB]. 1997. Latin America after a Decade of Reforms: Economic and Social Progress in Latin America, 1997 Report. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
150. Inter-American Development Bank [IDB]. 1998. Facing Up to Inequality in Latin America: Economic and Social Progress in Latin America, 1998-1999 Report. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
151. Inter-American Development Bank [IDB]. 2002a. Beyond Borders: The New Regionalism in Latin America: Economic and Social Progress in Latin America, 2002 Report. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
152. Inter-American Development Bank [IDB]. 2002b. “The Privatization Paradox.” Latin American Economic Policies 18:1-3.
153. Inter-American Development Bank [IDB]. 2004. Good Jobs Wanted: Labor Markets in Latin America: 2004 Economic and Social Progress Report. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
154. Inter-American Development Bank [IDB]. 2006. “Sociometro: Version 0.8.” Available at http://www.iadb.org/sociometsro/[accessed May 12, 2006].
155. International Labour Office [ILO]. 2005. 2005 Labour Overview: Latin America and the Caribbean. Lima, Peru: International Labour Organization.
156. International Telecommunication Union [ITU]. 2005. America’s Telecommunication Indicators, 2005. Geneva: International Telecommunication Union.
157. International Telecommunication Union [ITU]. 2007. World Telecommunication Indicators Database, 9th ed. Geneva: International Telecommunication Union.
158. Irwin, Douglas A. 2005. Free Trade under Fire, 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
159. Irwin, Timothy, and Penelope J. Brook. 2003. “Private Infrastructure and the Poor: Increasing Access.” In Infrastructure for Poor People: Public Policy for Private Provision, eds. Penelope J. Brook and Timothy C. Irwin, 1-19. Washington, DC: World Bank.
160. Jacobs, Meg. 2005. Pocketbook Politics: Economic Citizenship in Twentieth-Century America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
161. James, Estelle. 1998. “Pension Reform: An Efficiency-Equity Tradeoff?” In Beyond Tradeoffs: Market Reforms and Equitable Growth in Latin America, eds. Nancy Birdsall, Carol Graham, and Richard Sabot, 253-272. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
162. James, Jeffrey. 2000. Consumption, Globalization, and Development. Basingstoke, U.K.: Macmillan.
163. Jennings, M. Kent. 1992. “Ideological Thinking Among Mass Publics and Political Elites.” Public Opinion Quarterly 56(4): 419-441.
164. Johnson, Scott. 2004. “Latin America Lags Behind.” Newsweek International July 5: 36.
165. Just, Marion R., Ann N. Crigler, and W. Russell Neuman. 1996. “Cognitive and Affective Dimensions of Political Conceptualization.” In The Psychology of Political Communication, ed. Ann. N. Crigler, 133-148. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
166. Kahneman, Daniel, Paul Slovic, and Amos Tversky, eds. 1982. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.
167. Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.” Econometrica 47(2): 263-291.
168. Katzenstein, Peter J. 1985. Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
169. Kaufman, Robert R., and Alex Segura-Ubiergo. 2001. “Globalization, Domestic Politics, and Social Spending in Latin America: A Time-Series Cross-Section Analysis, 1973-97.” World Politics 53(4): 553-587.
170. Kaufman, Robert R., and Leo Zuckermann. 1998. “Attitudes toward Economic Reform in Mexico: The Role of Political Orientations.” American Political Science Review 92(2): 359-375.
171. Keele, Luke, and Nathan J. Kelly. 2006. “Dynamic Models for Dynamic Theories: The Ins and Outs of Lagged Dependent Variables.” Political Analysis 14(2): 186-205.
172. Kiewiet, D. Roderick. 1983. Macroeconomics and Micropolitics: The Electoral Effects of Economic Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
173. Kinder, Donald R., and D. Roderick Kiewiet. 1979. “Economic Discontent and Political Behavior: The Role of Personal Grievances and Collective Economic Judgments in Congressional Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 23(3): 495-527.
174. Kinder, Donald R., and D. Roderick Kiewiet. 1981. “Sociotropic Politics: The American Case.” British Journal of Political Science 11(2): 129-161.
175. King, Gary, James Honaker, Anne Joseph, and Kenneth Scheve. 2001. “Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data: An Alternative Algorithm for Multiple Imputation.” American Political Science Review 95(1): 49-69.
176. King, Gary, Michael Tomz, and Jason Wittenberg. 2000. “Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation.” American Journal of Political Science 44(2): 347-361.
177. Kolenikov, Stas, and Gustavo Angeles. 2004. “The Use of Discrete Data in Principal Component Analysis with Applications to Socio-Economic Indices.” CPC/MEASURE Working Paper 85.
178. Kono, Daniel Y. 2007. “When Do Trade Blocs Block Trade?” International Studies Quarterly 51(1): 165-181.
179. Krueger, Dirk, and Fabrizio Perri. 2006. “Does Income Inequality Lead to Consumption Inequality? Evidence and Theory.” Review of Economic Studies 73(1): 163-193.
180. Krugman, Paul R. 1996. Pop Internationalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
181. Kuczynski, Pedro-Pablo. 2003. “Reforming the State.” In After the Washington Consensus: Restarting Growth and Reform in Latin America, eds. Pedro-Pablo Kuczynski and John Williamson, 33-48. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
182. Kurtz, Marcus J. 2004. “The Dilemmas of Democracy in the Open Economy: Lessons from Latin America.” World Politics 56(2): 262-302.
183. Lakoff, George. 2004. Don’t Think of an Elephant! Know Your Values and Frame the Debate: The Essential Guide for Progressives. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.
184. Lane, Robert Edwards. 1962. Political Ideology: Why the American Common Man Believes What He Does. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
185. Leamer, Edward E. 1984. Sources of International Comparative Advantage: Theory and Evidence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
186. Leamer, Edward E. 1997. “Access to Western Markets and Eastern Effort.” In Lessons from the Economic Transition, Central and Eastern Europe in the 1990s, ed. Salvatore Zecchini, 503-526. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
187. Leonardi, Marco. 2003. “Product Demand Shifts and Wage Inequality.” IZA Discussion Papers 908.
188. Levitsky, Steven. 2003. Transforming Labor-Based Parties in Latin America: Argentine Peronism in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
189. Li, Wei, and Lixin Colin Xu. 2004. “The Impact of Privatization and Competition in the Telecommunications Sector around the World.” Journal of Law and Economics 47(2): 395-430.
190. Lipset, Seymour M., and Stein Rokkan. 1967. “Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments: An Introduction.” In Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives, eds. Seymour M. Lipset and Stein Rokkan, 1-64. New York: Free Press.
191. Lora, Eduardo, and Ugo Panizza. 2003. “Latin America’s Lost Illusions: The Future of Structural Reform.” Journal of Democracy 14(2): 123-137.
192. Lora, Eduardo, Ugo Panizza, and Myriam Quispe-Agnoli. 2004. “Reform Fatigue: Symptoms, Reasons, and Implications.” Economic Review 9(2): 1-28.
193. Luna, Juan P., and Elizabeth J. Zechmeister. 2005. “Political Representation in Latin America: A Study of Elite-Mass Congruence in Nine Countries.” Comparative Political Studies 38(4): 388-416.
194. Luskin, Robert C. 1987. “Measuring Political Sophistication.” American Journal of Political Science 31(4): 856-899.
195. Macedo, Roberto. 1985. Os Salarios nas Empresas Estatais. Sao Paulo: Nobel.
196. Macedo, Roberto. 2005. “Distribution of Assets and Income in Brazil: New Evidence.” In Reality Check: The Distributional Impact of Privatization in Developing Countries, eds. John Nellis and Nancy Birdsall, 253-280. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.
197. Madrid, Raul L. 2003. Retiring the State: The Politics of Pension Privatization in Latin America and Beyond. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
198. Madrid, Raul L. 2006. “Como Funcionan los Sistemas de Pensiones Privados en America Latina?” Panorama Social 4(2): 21-31.
199. Madsen, Douglas, and Peter Snow. 1991. The Charismatic Bond: Political Behavior in Time of Crisis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
200. Magaloni, Beatriz, and Vidal Romero. 2008. “Political Determinants of Mass Attitudes towards Free Trade and Privatization in Latin America.” Latin American Research Review 43(2): 107-135.
201. Mahon, James E. 2003. “Good-bye to the Washington Consensus?” Current History 101(652): 58-64.
202. Mainwaring, Scott P. 1999. Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case ofBrazil. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
203. Mainwaring, Scott P., Rachel Meneguello, and Timothy J. Power. 2000. “Conservative Parties, Democracy, and Economic Reform in Contemporary Brazil.” In Conservative Parties, the Right, and Democracy in Latin America, ed. Kevin J. Middlebrook, 164-222. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
204. Mainwaring, Scott P., and Timothy Scully, eds. 1995. Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
205. Malloy, James M., ed. 1977. Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
206. Manzetti, Luigi. 1999. Privatization South American Style. New York: Oxford University Press.
207. Marx, Anthony W. 1998. Making Race and Nation: A Comparison of South Africa, the United States, and Brazil. New York: Cambridge University Press.
208. Marx, Karl. 1894 [1981]. Capital: Volume 3. New York: Penguin Books.
209. Mayda, Anna Maria, and Dani Rodrik. 2005. “Why Are Some People (and Countries) More Protectionist Than Others?” European Economic Review 49(6): 1393-1430.
210. McClosky, Herbert. 1964. “Consensus and Ideology in American Politics.” American Political Science Review 58(2): 361-382.
211. McKenzie, David, and Dilip Mookherjee. 2005. “Paradox and Perception: Evidence from Four Latin American Countries.” In Reality Check: The Distributional Impact of Privatization in Developing Countries, eds. John Nellis and Nancy Birdsall, 33-84. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.
212. Megginson, William L., and Jeffry M. Netter. 2001. “From State to Market: A Survey of Empirical Studies on Privatization.” Journal of Economic Literature 39 (2): 321-389.
213. Mesa, Alberto Arenas de, and Fabio Bertranou. 1997. “Learning from Social Security Reforms: Two Different Cases, Chile and Argentina.” World Development 25(3): 329-348.
214. Mesa, Alberto Arenas de, and Veronica Montecinos. 1999. “The Privatization of Social Security and Women’s Welfare: Gender Effects of the Chilean Reform.” Latin American Research Review 34(3): 7-37.
215. Mesa-Lago, Carmelo. 1978. Social Security in Latin America: Pressure Groups, Stratification, and Inequality. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
216. Mesa-Lago, Carmelo. 2005. “Evaluation of a Quarter Century of Structural Pension Reforms in Latin America.” In A Quarter Century of Pension Reform in Latin America and the Caribbean: Lessons Learned and Next Steps, ed. Carolin Crabbe, 43-82. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
217. Milner, Helen V., and Keiko Kubota. 2005. “Why the Move to Free Trade? Democracy and Trade Policy in the Developing Countries.” International Organization 59: 107-143.
218. Moreno, Alejandro. 1999. “Campaign Awareness and Voting in the 1997 Mexican Congressional Elections.” In Toward Mexico’s Democratization: Parties, Campaigns, Elections, andPublic Opinion, eds. Jorge I. Dominguez and Alejandro Poire, 114-146. New York: Routledge.
219. Morley, Samuel. 2001. “The Income Distribution Problem in Latin America and the Caribbean.” Santiago, Chile: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean.
220. Morley, Samuel, Roberto Machado, and Stefano Pettinato. 1999. “Indexes of Structural Reform in Latin America.” ECLAC Series: Economic Reforms (12): 1-36.
221. Movimiento al Socialismo [MAS]. 2005. Press Release. Available at http://www.masbolivia.org/mas/mas.html [accessed September 14, 2006].
222. Muller, Katharina. 2000. “Pension Privatization in Latin America.” Journal of International Development 12(4): 507-518.
223. Munck, Ronaldo. 2003. “Neoliberalism, Necessitariansism and Alternatives in Latin America: There Is No Alternative (TINA)?” Third World Quarterly 24(3): 495-511.
224. Murillo, Maria Victoria. 2001. Labor Unions, Partisan Coalitions and Market Reforms in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
225. Murillo, Maria Victoria. 2002. “Political Bias in Policy Convergence: Privatization Choices in Latin America.” World Politics 54(4): 462-493.
226. Murillo, Maria Victoria. 2009. Voice and Light: Political Competition, Partisanship, and Policymaking. Market Reforms in Latin American Public Utilities. New York: Cambridge University Press.
227. Murillo, Maria Victoria, and Cecilia Martinez-Gallardo. 2005. “Political Competition and Policy Adoption: Market Reforms in Latin American Public Utilities.” ISERP Working Paper 06.
228. Murillo, Maria Victoria, and Cecilia Martinez-Gallardo. 2007. “Political Competition and Policy Adoption: Market Reforms in Latin American Public Utilities.” American Journal of Political Science 51(1): 120-139.
229. Murphy, Kevin M., and Andrei Shleifer. 1997. “Quality and Trade.” Journal of Development Economics 53(1): 1-15.
230. Mutz, Diana C. 1993. “Direct and Indirect Routes to Politicizing Personal Experience: Does Knowledge Make a Difference?” Public Opinion Quarterly 57 (4): 483-502.
231. Naim, Moises. 1994. “Latin America: The Second Stage of Reform.” Journal of Democracy 5(4): 32-48.
232. Naim, Moises. 2006. “The Lost Continent.” Foreign Policy 157: 40-47.
233. Narayan-Parker, Deepa, and Patti L. Petesch, eds. 2002. From Many Lands. Washington, DC: Oxford University Press and the World Bank.
234. Navia, Patricio, and Andres Velasco. 2003. “The Politics of Second Generation Reforms.” In After the Washington Consensus: Restarting Growth and Reform in Latin America, eds. Pedro-Pablo Kuczynski and John Williamson, 265-304. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
235. Needell, Jeffrey D. 1987. A Tropical Belle Epoque:Elite Culture and Society in Turn-of- the-Century Rio de Janeiro. New York: Cambridge University Press.
236. Nellis, John, Rachel Menezes, and Sarah Lucas. 2004. “Privatization in Latin America: The Rapid Rise, Recent Fall, and Continuing Puzzle of a Contentious Economy Policy.” Policy Brief: Center for Global Development 3(1): 1-7.
237. Nelson, Thomas E., and Donald R. Kinder. 1996. “Issue Frames and Group- Centrism in American Public Opinion.” Journal of Politics 58(4): 1055-1078.
238. Neri, Marcelo, and Jose Marcio Camargo. 2002. “Distributive Effects of Brazilian Structural Reforms.” In Brazil in the 1990s: An Economy in Transition, ed. Renato Baumann, 262-312. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
239. Novaes, Ana. 1999. “The Privatization of the Brazilian Telecommunications Sector.” In Privatization in Brazil: The Case of Public Utilities, eds. Armando Castelar Pinheiro and Kiichiro Fukasaku, 111-141. Rio de Janeiro: Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Econcimico e Social.
240. Nurkse, Ragnar. 1953. Problems of Capital Formation in Underdeveloped Countries. New York: Oxford University Press.
241. O’Donnell, Guillermo. 1973. Modernization and Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism: Studies in South American Politics. Berkeley: University of California.
242. O’Donnell, Guillermo. 1978. “State and Alliances in Argentina, 1956-1976.” Journal of Development Studies 15(1): 3-33.
243. O’Donnell, Guillermo. 1994. “Delegative Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 5(1): 55-69.
244. O’Dougherty, Maureen. 2002. Consumption Intensified: The Politics of Middle-Class Daily Life in Brazil. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
245. Olivera, Oscar. 2004. Cochabamba! Water War in Bolivia. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
246. Olson, Mancur. 1982. The Rise and Decline ofNations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
247. Orlove, Benjamin, and Arnold J. Bauer. 1997. “Giving Importance to Imports.” In The Allure of the Foreign: Imported Goods in Postcolonial Latin America, ed. Benjamin Orlove, 1-30. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
248. Panizza, Ugo, and Monica Yafiez. 2005. “Why Are Latin Americans So Unhappy about Reforms?” Journal of Applied Economics 8(1): 1-29.
249. Petras, James F. 1999. The Left Strikes Back: Class Conflict in Latin America in the Age of Neoliberalism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
250. Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. 2003. The Pew Global Attitudes Project: Views of a Changing World. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center for the People and the Press.
251. Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. 2007. The Pew Global Attitudes Project: World Public Welcomes Global Trade - But Not Immigration. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center for the People and the Press.
252. Pierson, Paul. 1996. “The New Politics of the Welfare State.” World Politics 48(2): 143-179.
253. Pinera, Jose. 1996. “Empowering Workers: The Privatization of Social Security in Chile.” Cato’s Letters 10: 1-18.
254. Pinheiro, Armando Castelar. 1996. “Impactos MicroeconSmicos da Privatizacao no Brasil.” Pesquisa e Planejamento Economico 26(3): 357-398.
255. Pinheiro, Armando Castelar, and Fabio Giambiagi. 1997. “Lucratividade, Divi- dendos e Investimentos das Empresas Estatais: Uma Contribuicao para o Debate sobre Privatizacao no Brasil.” Revista Brasileira de Economia 51(1): 93-131.
256. Popkin, Samuel L. 1991. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
257. Porto, Guido G. 2006. “Using Survey Data to Assess the Distributional Effects of Trade Policy.” Journal ofInternational Economics 70(1): 140-160.
258. Poulantzas, Nicos Ar. 1973. Political Power and Social Classes. London: Sheed and Ward.
259. Power, Timothy J. 2005. Surveys of the Brazilian National Congress, 1997-2005. Oxford: Unpublished dataset.
260. Power, Timothy J. 2008. “Centering Democracy? Ideological Cleavages and Convergence in the Brazilian Political Class.” In Democratic Brazil Revisited, eds. Peter R. Kingstone and Timothy J. Power. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
261. Powers, Nancy R. 2001. Grassroots Expectations of Democracy and Economy: Argentina in Comparative Perspective. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
262. Prebisch, Raul. 1950. The Economic Development of Latin America and Its Principal Problems. Lake Success, NY: United Nations Department of Economic Affairs.
263. Price, Vincent, and John Zaller. 1993. “Who Gets the News? Alternative Measures of News Reception and Their Implications for Research.” Public Opinion Quarterly 57(2): 133-164.
264. Przeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
265. Przeworski, Adam. 1993. “Economic Reforms, Public Opinion, and Political Institutions: Poland in Eastern European Perspective.” In Economic Reform in New Democracies: A Social-Democratic Approach, eds. Luiz Carlos Bresser Pereira, Jose Maria Maravall, and Adam Przeworski, 132-198. New York: Cambridge University Press.
266. Ramamurti, Ravi, ed. 1996. Privatizing Monopolies: Lessons from the Telecommunications and Transport Sectors in Latin America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
267. Reardon, Thomas A., and Julio A. Berdegue. 2002. “The Rapid Rise of Supermarkets in Latin America: Challenges and Opportunities for Development.” Development Policy Review 20(4): 371-388.
268. Reel, Monte. 2006. “Turning the Taps Back to the States.” The Washington Post, March 27: A10.
269. Reis, Elisa P., and Zairo B. Cheibub. 1993. “Pobreza, Desigualdade e Con- solidacao Democratica.” Dados 36: 233-259.
270. Remmer, Karen L. 1991. “The Political Impact of Economic Crisis in Latin America in the 1980s.” American Political Science Review 85(3): 777-800.
271. Remmer, Karen L. 1998. “The Politics of Neoliberal Economic Reform in South America, 1980-1994.” Studies in Comparative International Development 33: 3-29.
272. Rhodes, Sybil. 2006. Social Movements and Free-Market Capitalism in Latin America: Telecommunications Privatization and the Rise of Consumer Protest. Albany: State University of New York Press.
273. Ritzer, George. 1996. The McDonaldization of Society: An Investigation into the Changing Character of Contemporary Social Life, rev. ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
274. Robbins, Donald, and T. H. Gindling. 1999. “Trade Liberalization and the Relative Wages for More-Skilled Workers in Costa Rica.” Review of Development Economics 3(2): 140-154.
275. Roberts, Kenneth M. 1998. Deepening Democracy? The Modern Left and Social Movements in Chile and Peru. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
276. Roberts, Kenneth M. 2002. “Social Inequalities without Class Cleavages in Latin America’s Neoliberal Era.” Studies in Comparative International Development 36: 3-33.
277. Roberts, Kenneth M. Forthcoming. Party System Change in Latin America’s Neoliberal Era. New York: Cambridge University Press.
278. Roberts, Kenneth M., and Moises Arce. 1998. “Neoliberalism and Lower-Class Voting Behavior in Peru.” Comparative Political Studies 31(2): 217-246.s
279. Roberts, Kenneth M., and Erik Wibbels. 1999. “Party Systems and Electoral Volatility in Latin America: A Test of Economic, Institutional, and Structural Explanations.” American Political Science Review 93(3): 575-590.
280. Rodriguez, Elsa, Miriam Berges, Karina Casellas, Rosaingela Di Paola, Beatriz Lupin, Laura Garrido, and Natacha Gentile. 2002. “Consumer Behaviour and Supermarkets in Argentina.” Development Policy Review 20(4): 429-439.
281. Rodrik, Dani. 1997. Has Globalization Gone Too Far? Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
282. Rodrik, Dani. 1998. “Why Do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments?” Journal of Political Economy 106(5): 997-1032.
283. Rodrik, Dani. 2001. “Why Is There So Much Economic Insecurity in Latin America?” CEPAL Review 73(1):7-30.
284. Rogowski, Ronald. 1989. Commerce and Coalitions: How Trade Affects Domestic Political Alignments. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
285. Rohter, Larry. 2005. “With New Chief, Uruguay Veers Left, in a Latin Pattern.” The New York Times, February 28:A3.
286. Romer, Paul. 1994. “New Goods, Old Theory, and the Welfare Costs of Trade Restrictions.” Journal of Development Economics 43(1): 5-38.
287. Rosas, Guillermo. 2005. “The Ideological Organization of Latin American Legislative Parties: An Empirical Analysis of Elite Policy Preferences.” Comparative Political Studies 38(7): 824-849.
288. Royston, Patrick. 2004. “Multiple Imputation of Missing Values.” Stata Journal 4: 227-241.
289. Saavedra, Jaime. 2003. “Labor Markets during the 1990s.” In After the Washington Consensus: Restarting Growth and Reform in Latin America, eds. Pedro-Pablo Kuczynski and John Williamson, 213-264. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
290. Samuels, David. 2003. Ambition, Federalism, and Legislative Politics in Brazil. New York: Cambridge University Press.
291. Samuels, David. 2004. “From Socialism to Social Democracy: Party Organization and the Transformation of the Workers’ Party in Brazil.” Comparative Political Studies 37(9): 999-1024.
292. Samuels, David. 2006. “Sources of Mass Partisanship in Brazil.” Latin American Politics and Society 48(2): 1-27.
293. Samuelson, Robert J. 2002. “Global Economics under Siege.” The Washington Post, October 16: A25.
294. Scheiner, Ethan. 2006. Democracy without Competition in Japan: Opposition Failure in a One-Party Dominant State. New York: Cambridge University Press.
295. Scheve, Kenneth F., and Matthew J. Slaughter. 2001. Globalization and the Perceptions of American Workers. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
296. Scheve, Kenneth F., andMatthewJ. Slaughter. 2004. “Economic Insecurity and the Globalization of Production.” American Journal of Political Science 48(4): 662-674.
297. Schneider, Ben Ross. 1992. “Privatization in the Collor Government: Triumph of Liberalism or Collapse of the Development State?” In The Right and Democracy in Latin America, eds. Douglas A. Chalmers, Maria do Carmo Campello de Souza, and Atilio A. Boron, 225-238. New York: Praeger.
298. Schwentesius, Rita, and Manuel Angel Gomez. 2002. “Supermarkets in Mexico: Impacts on Horticulture Systems.” Development Policy Review 20(4): 487-502.
299. Sears, David O., Richard R. Lau, Tom R. Tyler, and Harris M. Allen, Jr. 1980. “Self-Interest vs. Symbolic Politics in Policy Attitudes and Presidential Voting.” American Political Science Review 74(3): 670-684.
300. Seligson, Mitchell A. 1999. “Popular Support for Regional Economic Integration in Latin America.” Journal of Latin American Studies 31(1): 129-150.
301. Selvanathan, E.A., and S. Selvanathan. 2003. International Consumption Comparisons: OECD versus LDC. River Edge, NJ: World Scientific Publishing.
302. Selznick, Philip. 1951. “Institutional Vulnerability in Mass Society.” American Journal of Sociology 56(4): 320-331.
303. Sen, Amartya Kumar. 2000. Development as Freedom. New York: Anchor Books.
304. Shifter, Michael, and Vinay Jawahar. 2005. “Latin America’s Populist Turn.” Current History 104(2):51-57.
305. Shirley, Mary. 2005. “Why Is Sector Reform So Unpopular in Latin America?” The Independent Review 10(2): 195-207.
306. Sikkink, Kathryn. 1991. Ideas and Institutions: Developmentalism in Brazil and Argentina. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
307. Silva, Luiz Inaicio Lula da. 2002. “Carta ao Povo Brasileiro.” Available at http://www2.fpa.org.br/portal/modules/news/article.php?storyid=2324 [accessed May 9, 2008].
308. Silva, Patricio. 1995. “Modernization, Consumerism, and Politics in Chile.” In Neoliberalism with a Human Face? The Politics and Economics of the Chilean Model, ed. David E. Hojman, 118-132. Liverpool, U.K.: Institute for Latin American Studies.
309. Silveira, Flavio Eduardo. 1998. A Decisao do Voto no Brasil. Porto Alegre: Edipucrs.
310. Simon, Herbert Alexander. 1957. Models of Man: Social and Rational: Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in a Social Setting. New York: Wiley.
311. Singer, Andre. 1990. “Collor na Periferia: A Volta por Cima do Populismo?” In De Geisel a Collor: O Balanggo da Transigao, ed. Bolivar Lamounier, 135-152. Sao Paulo: Sumare.
312. Smith, Adam. 1776 [1993]. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
313. Smith, Peter H. 2000. Talons of the Eagle: Dynamics ofU.S.-Latin American Relations, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
314. Sniderman, PaulM., Richard A. Brody, and Philip Tetlock, eds. 1991. Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.s
315. Sniderman, Paul M., and Sean M. Theriault. 2004. “The Structure of Political Argument and the Logic of Issue Framing.” In Studies in Public Opinion:Attitudes, Nonattitudes, Measurement Error, and Change, eds. Willem E. Saris and Paul M. Sniderman, 133-165. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
316. Sola, Lourdes. 1994. “The State, Structural Reform and Democratization in Brazil.” In Democracy, Markets and Structural Reform in Latin America: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, and Mexico, eds. William Smith, Carlos Acuna, and Eduardo Gamarra, 151-181. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
317. Souza, Juarez de. 2000. “Privatization in Brazil: Toward an Evaluation.” In The Impact ofPrivatization in the Americas, eds. Melissa H. Birch and Jerry Haar, 177-202. Miami: North-South Center Press.
318. Stallings, Barbara, and Wilson Peres. 2000. Growth, Employment, and Equity: The Impact of the Economic Reforms in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
319. Stepan, Alfred C. 1978. The State and Society: Peru in Comparative Perspective. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
320. Stewart, Frances. 1977. Technology and Underdevelopment. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
321. Stimson, James A. 1999. Public Opinion in America: Moods, Cycles, and Swings, 2nd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
322. Stimson, James A. 2004. Tides of Consent: How Public Opinion Shapes American Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
323. Stokes, Susan C. 2001a. Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
324. Stokes, Susan C., ed. 2001b. Public Support for Market Reforms in New Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
325. Stolper, Wolfgang F., and Paul A. Samuelson. 1941. “Protection and Real Wages.” The Review of Economic Studies 9(1): 58-73.
326. Structural Adjustment Participatory Review International Network [SAPRIN]. 2004. Structural Adjustment: The SAPRI Report: The Policy Roots of Economic Crisis, Poverty and Inequality. London: Zed Books.
327. Thomas, Vinod. 2006. From Inside Brazil: Development in a Land of Contrasts. Washington, DC: World Bank.
328. Tinsman, Heidi. 2006. “Politics of Gender and Consumption in Authoritarian Chile, 1973-1990: Women Agricultural Workers in the Fruit-Export Industry.” Latin American Research Review 41(3): 7-31.
329. Tomz, Michael, Jason Wittenberg, and Gary King. 2003. CLARIFY: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results. Version 2.1. Stanford University, University of Wisconsin, and Harvard University. January 5. Available at http://gking.harvard.edu/[accessed September 5, 2003].
330. Tullock, Gordon. 1967. “Welfare Costs of Tariffs, Monopolies, and Theft.” Western Economic Journal 5: 224-232.
331. Turner, Frederick C., and Carlos Elordi. 1995. “Economic Values and the Role of the Government in Latin America.” International Social Science Journal 145:474-488.
332. Ugaz, Cecilia. 2003. “Consumer Participation and Pro-Poor Regulation in Latin America.” In Utility Privatization and Regulation: A Fair Deal for Consumers? eds. Cecilia Ugaz and Catherine Waddams Price, 80-98. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
333. Ugaz, Cecilia, and Catherine Waddam Price. 2003. “Introduction.” In Utility Privatization and Regulation: A Fair Deal for Consumers? eds. Cecilia Ugaz and Catherine Waddams Price, 3-24. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
334. United Nations. 2008. “UN Comtrade: United Nations Commodity Trade Statistics Database.” UN Comtrade. Available at http://comtrade.un.org/[accessed January 6, 2008].
335. Veblen, Thorstein. 1899. The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions. Norwood, MA: Norwood Press.
336. Ventura-Dias, Vivianne, Mabel Cabezas, and Jaime Contador. 1999. “Trade Reforms and Trade Patterns in Latin America.” ECLAC Series: International Trade (5): 1-53.
337. Verba, Sidney, Jae–on Kim, and Norman H.Nie.1978.Participation and Political Equality:A Seven–Nation Comparison. New York:Cambridge University Press.s
338. Waisman, Carlos. 1982. Modernization and the Working Class: The Politics ofLegit- imacy. Austin: University of Texas Press.
339. Wallerstein, Immanuel Maurice. 1976. Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. New York: Academic Press.
340. Walton, John, and Charles Ragin. 1990. “Global and National Sources of Political Protest: Third World Responses to the Debt Crisis.” American Sociological Review 55(6): 876-890.
341. Weyland, Kurt. 1996. “Neopopulism and Neoliberalism in Latin America: Unexpected Affinities.” Studies in Comparative International Development 31(3): 3-31.
342. Weyland, Kurt. 1998a. “Swallowing the Bitter Pill: Sources of Popular Support for Neoliberal Reform in Latin America.” Comparative Political Studies 31(5): 539-568.
343. Weyland, Kurt. 1998b. “The Political Fate of Market Reform in Latin America, Africa, and Eastern Europe.” International Studies Quarterly 42(4): 645-673.
344. Weyland, Kurt. 2000. “A Paradox of Success? Determinants of Political Support for President Fujimori.” International Studies Quarterly 44(3): 481-502.
345. Weyland, Kurt. 2002. The Politics of Market Reform in Fragile Democracies: Argentina, Brazil, Peru, and Venezuela. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
346. Weyland, Kurt. 2004. “Neoliberalism and Democracy in Latin America: A Mixed Record.” Latin American Politics and Society 46(1): 135-157.
347. Weyland, Kurt. 2007. Bounded Rationality and Policy Diffusion: Social Sector Reform in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
348. Williamson, John. 1990. “What Washington Means by Policy Reform.” In Latin American Adjustment: How Much Has Happened? ed. John Williamson 7-20. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
349. Wise, Timothy A., Hilda Salazar, and Laura Carlsen, eds. 2003. Confronting Globalization: Economic Integration and Popular Resistance in Mexico. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.
350. Wood, Adrian. 1997. “Openness and Wage Inequality in Developing Countries: The Latin American Challenge to East Asian Conventional Wisdom.” World Bank Economic Review 11(1): 33-57.
351. World Bank. 1994. Averting the Old Age Crisis: Policies to Protect the Old and Promote Growth. New York: Oxford University Press.
352. World Bank. 2006. World Development Indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank.
353. Wright, Erik Olin. 1979. Class Structure and Income Determination. New York: Academic Press.
354. Wright, Erik Olin, and Luca Perrone. 1977. “Marxist Class Categories and Income Inequality.” American Sociological Review 42(1): 32-55.
355. Yeats, Alexander J. 1998. “Does Mercosur’s Trade Performance Raise Concerns about the Effects of Regional Trade Arrangements?” World Bank Economic Review 12(1): 1-28.
356. Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.