Why dominant parties lose: Mexico’s democratization in comparative perspective

Why Dominant Parties Lose: Mexico's Democratization in Comparative Perspective

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1-350

  Greene, Kenneth F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928289454     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511509803     Document Type: Book

References (397)

1. Abramson, Paul, John Aldrich, and David Rohde (1994) Change and Continuity in the 1992 Elections. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
2. Adams, James (1999) “Policy Divergence in Multicandidate Probabilistic Spatial Voting” Public Choice 100: 103–122.
3. Adams, James, Samuel Merrill III, and Bernard Grofman (2005) A Unified Theory of Party Competition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
4. Aguilar Zinser, Adolfo (1995) Vamos a ganar! La pugna de Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas por el poder. Mexico City: Oceano.
5. Aldrich, John (1983) “A Downsian Spatial Model with Party Activism” American Political Science Review 77, 4: 974–990.
6. Aldrich, John (1993) “Rational Choice and Turnout” American Journal of Political Science 37, 1: 246–278.
7. Aldrich, John (1995) Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. Aldrich John and William Bianco (1992) “A Game-Theoretic Model of Party Affiliation of Candidates and Office Holders” Mathematical and Computer Modeling 16, 8–9: 103–116.
9. Alesina Alberto and Stephen Spear (1988) “An Overlapping Generations Model of Electoral Competition” Journal of Public Economics 37, 3: 359–79.
10. Alvarez, R. Michael and Jonathan Nagler (1998) “When Politics and Model Collide: Estimating Models of Multiparty Elections” American Journal of Political Science 42, 1 (June): 55–96.
11. Alves, Maria Helena (1985) State and Opposition in Military Brazil. Austin: University of Texas Press.
12. Ames, Barry (1970) “Bases of Support for Mexico’s Dominant Party” American Political Science Review 64, 1: 153–167.
13. Arian, Alan and Samuel Barnes (1974) “The Dominant Party System: A Neglected Model of Democratic Stability” Journal of Politics 36, 3 (August): 592–614.
14. Arredondo Ramírez, Pablo, Gilberto Fregoso Peralta, and Raul Trejo Delabre (1991) Asíse calló el sistema: Comunicación y elecciones en 1988. Guadalajara: University of Guadalajara.
15. Arrellano, David and Juan Pablo Guerrero (2000) “Stalled Administrative Reform of the Mexican State” in B. Schneider and B. Heredia (eds.) Reinventing Leviathan: The Political Economy of Administrative Reform in Developing Countries. Miami: North-South Center Press.
16. Arriola, Carlos (1988) Los empresarios y el estado, 1970–1982. Mexico City: Porrúia.
17. Arriola, Carlos (1994) Ensayos sobre el PAN. Mexico: Porrúa.
18. Aspe, Pedro (1993) Economic Transformation the Mexican Way. Cambridge: MIT Press.
19. Bailey, John (1988) Governing Mexico: The Statecraft of Crisis Management. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
20. Banks, Jeffrey and Roderick Kiewiet (1989) “Explaining Patterns of Candidate Competition in Congressional Elections” American Journal of Political Science 33, 4: 997–1015.
21. Barnes, Samuel and Roy Pierce (1971) “Public Opinion and Political Preference in France and Italy” Midwest Journal of Political Science 15, 4: 643–660.
22. Bartels, Larry (1986) “Issue Voting Under Uncertainty: An Empirical Test” American Journal of Political Science 30, 4 (November): 709–728.
23. Bartra, Roger (1987) La jaula de la melancolia: identidad y metamorfosis del mexicano. Mexico: Grijalbo.
24. Bartra, Roger (1989) “Changes in Political Culture: The Crisis of Nationalism” in W. Cornelius, J. Gentleman, and P. Smith (eds.) Mexico’s Alternative Political Futures. La Jolla: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies.
25. Basañez, Miguel (1983) La lucha por la hegemonia en Mexico, 1968–1980. Mexico City: Siglo Veintiuno.
26. Basanez, Miguel (1996) El pulso de los sexenios: 20 años de crisis en México. Mexico City: Siglo Veintiuno.
27. Beck, Thorsten, George Clarke, Alberto Groff, Philip Keefer, and Patrick Walsh (2001) “New Tools in Comparative Political Economy: The Database of Political Institutions” World Bank Economic Review 15 (February): 165–176.
28. Berton, Peter (2000) “Japanese Communist Party: The ‘Lovable’ Party” in R. Hrebenar Japan’s New Party System. Boulder: Westview Press.
29. Besley, Timothy and Steven Coate (1997) “An Economic Model of Representative Democracy” Quarterly Journal of Economics 112, 1: 85–114.
30. Blondel, Jean (1972) Comparing Political Systems. New York: Praeger.
31. Boix, Carles (1998) Political Parties, Growth and Equality. New York: Cambridge University Press.
32. Boix, Carles (2003) Democracy and Redistribution. New York: Cambridge University Press.
33. Boix, Carles and Susan Stokes (2003) “Endogenous Democratization” World Politics 55, 4 (July): 517–549.
34. Borjas Benavente, Adriana (2003) Partido de la Revolución Democrática: Estructura, organización interna y desempeño público, 1989–2003. Mexico City: Gernika.
35. Bortolotti, Bernardo (2005) “Italy’s Privatization Process and its Implications for China” Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei Working Paper No. 118, Milan, Italy.
36. Bouton, Lawrence and Mariusz Sumlinski (2000) “Trends in Private Investment in Developing Countries” International Finance Corporation Paper 41. Washington, DC: World Bank.
37. Brandenburg, Frank (1956) Mexico: An Experiment in One-Party Democracy. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
38. Brandenburg, Frank (1964) The Making of Modern Mexico. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
39. Brody, David and Benjamin Page (1972) “Comment: The Assessment of Policy Voting” American Political Science Review 66, 2 (June): 450–458.
40. Brooker, Paul (2000) Non-Democratic Regimes: Theory, Government and Politics. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
41. Brownlee, Jason (2005) “Ruling Parties and Durable Authoritarianism” Working Paper No. 23, Center on Democracy, Development, and the Rule of Law, Stanford University.
42. Bruhn, Kathleen (1996) “Social Spending and Political Support: The ‘Lessons’ of the National Solidarity Program in Mexico” Comparative Politics 28, 2: 151–177.
43. Bruhn, Kathleen (1997) Taking on Goliath: The Emergence of a New Left Party and the Struggle for Democracy in Mexico. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
44. Bruhn, Kathleen (2000) “The Importance of Being Cuauhtémoc: The 2000 Presidential Campaign of the PRD.” University of California, Santa Barbara, mimeo.
45. Bruhn, Kathleen (2001) “Party Ideological Placement and the Left-Right Cleavage: A Reassessment from the South.” University of California, Santa Barbara, mimeo.
46. Bruhn, Kathleen (2004) “The Making of the Mexican President 2000: Parties, Candidates, and Campaign Strategy” in J. Dominguez and C. Lawson (eds.) Mexico’s Pivotal Democratic Election. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
47. Bruhn, Kathleen and Kenneth F. Greene (2007) “Elite Polarization Meets Mass Moderation in Mexico’s 2006 Elections” PS: Political Science and Politics 40, 1 (January): 33–37.
48. Bruno, Giovanni and Luciano Segreto (1996) “Finanza e industria in Italia, 1963– 1995” in F. Barbagallo (ed.) L’ltalia nella crisi mondiale: L’ultimo ventennio. Storia dell’Italia repubblicana Vol. 3, No. 1. Economia e società. Turin, Italy: Einaudi.
49. Buendía, Jorge (2004) “The Changing Mexican Voter, 1991–2000” in K. Middlebrook (ed.) Dilemmas of Political Change in Mexico. London: Institute of Latin American Studies, University of London.
50. Cain, Bruce, John Ferejohn, and Morris Fiorina (1987) The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
51. Calder, Kent (1988) Crisis and Compensation: Public Policy and Political Stability in Japan. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
52. Camp, Roderic (1995) Political Recruitment across Two Centuries: Mexico, 1884–1991. Austin: University of Texas Press.
53. Camp, Roderic (2003) Politics in Mexico. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54. Campbell, John (1989) “Democracy and Bureaucracy in Japan” in T. Ishida and E. Krauss (eds.) Democracy in Japan. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
55. Carey, John and Mathew Shugart (1995) “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas” Electoral Studies 14, 4: 417–439.
56. Carothers, Thomas (2002) “The End of the Transition Paradigm” Journal of Democracy 13, 1: 5–21.
57. Carr, Barry (1985) Mexican Communism, 1968–1983: Eurocommunism in the Americas? La Jolla: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies.
58. Carr, Barry (1992) Marxism and Communism in Twentieth-Century Mexico. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
59. Case, William (2001) “Malaysia’s Resilient Pseudodemocracy” Journal of Democracy 12, 1: 43–57.
60. Castaneda, Jorge (2000) Perpetuating Power: How Mexican Presidents Were Chosen. New York: The New Press.
61. Castles, Francis and Peter Mair (1984) “Left-Right Political Scales: Some Expert Judgments” European Journal of Political Research 12, 83–88.
62. Centeno, Miguel (1994) Democracy within Reason: Technocratic Revolution in Mexico. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
63. Chand, Vikram (2001) Mexico’s Political Awakening. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
64. Chandra, Kanchan (2004) Why Ethnic Parties Succeed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
65. Charlesworth, James (1948) “Is Our Two-Party System Natural?” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 259: 1–9.
66. Chaudhry, Kiren (1997) The Price of Wealth: Economies and Institutions in the Middle East. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
67. Cheng, Tun-jen (2001) “One-Party Hegemony and Democratic Transition: Comparing Mexico, Taiwan and Turkey.” Paper prepared for presentation at Conference on The Rise of the DPP and PAN in Taiwan and Mexico, Duke University, January 26–27.
68. Chhibber, Pradeep (2001) Democracy without Associations. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
69. Chong, Dennis (1991) Collective Action and the Civil Rights Movement. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
70. Chong, Dennis (2000) Rational Lives: Norms and Values in Politics and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
71. Christensen, Ray (2000) Ending the LDP Hegemony: Party Cooperation in Japan. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
72. Chu, Yun-han (2001) “The Legacy of One-Party Hegemony in Taiwan” in L. Diamond and R. Gunther (eds.) Political Parties and Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
73. Chua, Huat Beng (2001) “Defeat of the KMT: Implications for One-Party Quasi-Democratic Regimes in Southeast Asia” in M. Alagappa (ed.) Taiwan’s Presidential Politics: Democratization and Cross-Strait Relations in the Twenty-First Century. New York: M. E. Sharpe.
74. Clark, Peter and James Wilson (1961) “Incentive Systems: A Theory of Organizations” Administrative Studies Quarterly 6: 129–166.
75. Cline, Howard (1962) Mexico: Revolution to Evolution, 1940–1960. London: Oxford University Press.
76. Coleman, James (1960) “The Politics of Sub-Saharan Africa” in G. Almond and J. Coleman (eds.) The Politics of Developing Areas. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
77. Collier, Ruth Berins and David Collier (1991) Shaping the Political Arena. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
78. Collier, Ruth Berins (1992) The Contradictory Alliance: State-Labor Relations and Regime Change in Mexico. Berkeley: International and Area Studies, University of California.
79. Conover, Pamela Johnston and Stanley Feldman (1989) “Candidate Perception in an Ambiguous World: Campaigns, Cues, and Inference Processes” American Journal of Political Science 33, 4 (November): 912–940.
80. Cornelius, Wayne (1975) Politics and the Migrant Poor in Mexico City. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
81. Cornelius, Wayne (2004) “Mobilized Voting in the 2000 Elections: The Changing Efficacy of Vote Buying and Coercion in Mexican Electoral Politics” in J. Domínguez and C. Lawson (eds.) Mexico’s Pivotal Democratic Election. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
82. Cornelius, Wayne and Ann Craig (1991) The Mexican Political System in Transition. Monograph 35, Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies.
83. Cotton, James (1997) “East Asian Democracy: Progress and Limits” in L. Diamond, M. Plattner, Y. Chu, and H. Tien (eds.) Consolidating the Third Wave Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
84. Coulon, Christian (1990) “Senegal: The Development and Fragility of Semidemocracy” in L. Diamond, J. Linz, and S. M. Lipset (eds.) Politics in Developing Countries: Comparing Experiences with Democracy. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
85. Cover, Albert and Bruce Brumberg (1982) “Baby Books and Ballots: The Impact of Congressional Mail on Constituent Opinion” American Political Science Review 76, 2: 347–359.
86. Cox, Gary (1987) “The Uncovered Set and the Core” American Journal of Political Science 31, 2: 408–422.
87. Cox, Gary (1990) “Centripetal and Centrifugal Incentives in Electoral Systems” American Journal of Political Science 34, 4 (November): 903–935.
88. Cox, Gary (1996) “Is the Single Nontransferable Vote Superproportional: Evidence from Japan and Taiwan” American Journal of Political Science 40, 3 (August): 740–755.
89. Cox, Gary (1997) Making Votes Count. New York: Cambridge University Press.
90. Crespo, José Antonio (1996) Votar en los estados: Analisis comparado de las legislaciones electorales estatales en México. Mexico City: Fundación Friedrich Naumann.
91. Cross, John (1998) Informal Politics: Street Vendors and the State in Mexico City. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
92. Crouch, Harold (1996) Government and Society in Malaysia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
93. Cuéllar Vázquez, Angélica (1993) La noche es de ustedes, el amanecer es nuestro: Asamblea de Barrios y Superbarrio Gómez en la Ciudad de México. Mexico City: National Autonomous University of Mexico.
94. Curtis, Gerald (1971) Election Campaigning, Japanese Style. New York: Columbia University Press.
95. Curtis, Gerald (1988) The Japanese Way of Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
96. Curtis, Gerald (1999) The Japanese Logic of Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
97. Dahl, Robert (1992) “Why Free Markets Are Not Enough” Journal of Democracy 3, 3 (July): 82–89.
98. Davis, Otto, Melvin Hinich, and Peter Ordeshook (1970) “An Expository Development of a Mathematical Model of the Electoral Process” American Political Science Review 64: 426–448.
99. de Palma, André, Gap-Seon Hong, and Jean-Francoise Thisse (1990) “Equilibria in Multi-Party Competition under Uncertainty” Social Choice and Welfare 7: 247–259.
100. Della Porta, Donatella and Alberto Vannucci (1999) Corrupt Exchanges: Actors, Resources, and Mechanisms of Political Corruption. New York: Aldine and Gruyter.
101. Della Porta, Donatella and Alberto Vannucci (2000) “Corruption and Political Financing in Italy” Transparency International Workshop on Corruption and Political Financing. http://www.transparency.org/working_papers/country/italy_paper.html
102. Deininger, Klaus and Lyn Squire (1996) “A New Data Set Measuring Income Inequality” World Bank Economic Review 10, 3: 565–591.
103. Di Palma, Giuseppe (1980) “The Available State: Problems of Reform” in P. Lange and S. Tarrow (eds.) Italy in Transition. London: Frank Cass.
104. Diamond, Larry (2001) “Anatomy of an Electoral Earthquake: How the KMT Lost and the DPP Won the 2000 Presidential Election” in M. Alagappa (ed.) Taiwan’s Presidential Politics. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
105. Diamond, Larry (2002) “Thinking about Hybrid Regimes” Journal of Democracy 13, 2 (April): 21–35.
106. Diaw, Aminata and Mamadou Diouf (1998) “The Senegalese Opposition and its Quest for Power” in A. Olukoshi (ed.) The Politics of Opposition in Contemporary Africa. Stockholm: Uppsala.
107. Diaz-Cayeros, Alberto (1997) “Asignación política de recursos en el federalismo mexicano: Incentivos y restricciones” Perfiles Latinoamericanos 6, 10: 35–74.
108. Díaz-Cayeros, Alberto, Federico Estéivez, Beatriz Magaloni (2001) “A Portfolio Diversification Model of Electoral Investment: Competition and Policy Choice in Mexico’s PRONASOL, 1989–1994” American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, August 30–September 2.
109. Dillon, Samuel (2000) “Mexico’s Ruling Party Accused of Diverting Public Money” New York Times, March 27, 2000: A6.
110. Domínguez, Jorge and James McCann (1996) Democratizing Mexico: Public Opinion and Electoral Choices. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
111. Dow, Jay and James Endersby (2004) “Multinomial Probit and Multinomial Logit: A Comparison of Choice Models for Voting Research” Electoral Studies 23: 107–122.
112. Downs, Anthony (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
113. Dresser, Denise (1991) Neopopulist Solutions to Neoliberal Problems: Mexico’s National Solidarity Program. La Jolla: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies.
114. Duverger, Maurice (1954) Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. Translated by Barbara and Robert North. New York: Wiley.
115. Ebenstein, William (1945) “Public Administration in Mexico” Public Administration Review 5, 2 (Spring): 102–112.
116. Eckstein, Susan (1977) The Poverty of Revolution: The State and the Urban Poor in Mexico. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
117. Eisenstadt, Shmuel and Luis Roniger (1981) “The Study of Patron-Client Relations and Recent Developments in Sociological Theory” in S. N. Eisenstadt and René Lémarchand (eds.), Political clientelism, Patronage, and Development. Beverly Hills: Sage.
118. Eisenstadt, Todd (1999) “Electoral Justice in Mexico: From Oxymoron to Legal Norm in Less Than a Decade,” Third International Congress on Electoral Law, National Autonomous University of Mexico, UNAM-IIJ, Mexico City.
119. Eisenstadt, Todd (2004) Courting Democracy in Mexico: Party Strategies and Electoral Institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
120. Enelow, James and Melvin Hinich (1982) “Nonspatial Candidate Characteristics and Electoral Competition” Journal of Politics 44: 115–130.
121. Epstein, Leon (1986) Political Parties in the American Mold. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
122. Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (1985) Politics against Markets: The Social Democratic Road to Power. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
123. Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (1990) “Single-Party Dominance in Sweden: The Saga of Social Democracy” in T. J. Pempel (ed.) Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
124. Eyton, Laurence (2002) “Taiwan opposition shoots itself in the foot” Asia Times, June 29. http://www.atimes.com/china/DF29Ad01.html.
125. Farneti, Paolo (1985) The Italian Party System, 1945–1980. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
126. Feddersen Timothy, Itai Sened, and Stephen Wright (1990) “Rational Voting and Candidate Entry under Plurality Rule” American Journal of Political Science 34, 4: 1005–1016.
127. Féher, Ferenc, Agnes Heller, and Gyorgy Markus (1983) Dictatorship over Needs. London: Basil Blackwell.
128. Ferdinand, Peter (1998) “Party Funding and Political Corruption in East Asia: The Cases of Japan, South Korea and Taiwan” in R. Austin and M. Tjernström (eds.) Funding of Political Parties and Election Campaigns. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.
129. Fields, Karl (1998) “KMT, Inc. Party Capitalism in a Developmental State” JPRI Working Paper No. 47 (June).
130. Fiorina, Morris (1981) Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.
131. Fischer, Bernhard, Egbert Gerken, and Ulrich Hiemenz (1982) Growth, Employment, and Trade in an Industrializing Economy: A Quantitative Analysis of Mexican Development Policies. Tubingen: J. C. B. Mohr.
132. Fish, Steven (1995) Democracy from Scratch: Opposition and Regime in the New Russian Revolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
133. Fitzgibbon, Russell (1951) “Measurement of Latin-American Political Phenomena: A Statistical Experiment” American Political Science Review 45, 2 (June): 517–523.
134. Garretón, Manuel Antonio (1989) The Chilean Political Process. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
135. Garrido, Luis Javier (1987) “Un partido sin militantes” in S. Loaeza and R. Segovia (eds.) La vida política mexicana en la crisis. Mexico City: El Colegio de Meixico.
136. Geddes, Barbara (1994) Politician’s Dilemma: Building State Capacity in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
137. Geddes, Barbara (1999a) “What Do We Know About Democratization After Twenty Years?” Annual Review of Political Science 2: 115–144.
138. Geddes, Barbara (1999b) “Authoritarian Breakdown: Empirical Test of a Game Theoretic Argument” American Political Science Association, Atlanta, September 2–5.
139. Geddes, Barbara (2003) Paradigms and Sand Castles: Theory Building and Research Design in Comparative Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
140. Gerschenkron, Alexander (1962) Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
141. Givens, Terri (2005) Voting Radical Right in Western Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.
142. Golden, Miriam (2000) “Political Patronage, Bureaucracy and Corruption in Postwar Italy.” Working Paper without number. Russell Sage Foundation.
143. Golden, Miriam (2004) “International Economic Sources of Regime Change: How European Integration Undermined Italy’s Postwar Party System” Comparative Political Studies 37, 10 (December): 1238–1274.
144. Gomez, Edmund (1991) Money Politics in the Barisan Nasional. Kuala Lumpur: Forum.
145. Gomez, Edmund (1994) Political Business: Corporate Involvement in Malaysian Political Parties. Cairns: James Cook University Press.
146. Gomez, Edmund (2002) “Political Business in Malaysia: Party Factionalism, Corporate Development, and Economic Crisis” in E. Gomez (ed.) Political Business in Asia. New York: Routledge.
147. Gómez, Leopoldo and John Bailey (1990) “La transición política y los dilemas del PRI” Foro Internacional 31, 1: 57–87.
148. González Casanova, Pablo (1965) La democracia en México. Mexico City: Era.
149. Goodliffe, Jay (2001) “The Effect of War Chests on Challenger Entry in U.S. House Elections” American Journal of Political Science 45, 4: 830–844.
150. Green, Donald and Jonathan Krasno (1988) “Salvation for the Spendthrift Incumbent: Reestimating the Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections” American Journal of Political Science 32, 4: 884–907.
151. Greenberg, Joseph and Kenneth Shepsle (1987) “The Effects of Electoral Rewards in Multiparty Competition with Entry” American Political Science Review 81: 525–537.
152. Greene, Kenneth F. (1997) “Complejidad, cohesióin y longevidad en un movimiento urbano popular: La Asamblea de Barrios de la Ciudad de Méixico” in S. Zermeño (ed.) Movimientos sociales e identidades colectivas en México. Mexico City: UNAM–IIS.
153. Greene, Kenneth F. (2002a) “Opposition Party Strategy and Spatial Competition in Dominant Party Regimes: A Theory and the Case of Mexico” Comparative Political Studies 35, 7 (September): 755–783.
154. Greene, Kenneth F. (2002b) Defeating Dominance: Opposition Party Building and Democratization in Mexico. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Political Science, University of California, Berkeley.
155. Greene, Kenneth F. (2008) “Dominant Party Strategy and Democratization” American Journal of Political Science (forthcoming).
156. Greene, Kenneth F., Joseph Klesner, and Chappell Lawson (2004) “How to Win a Mexican Election (Legally): Campaign Effects in a New Democracy” Latin American Studies Association, Las Vegas, Nevada, October 7–9.
157. Grindle, Merilee (1977) Bureaucrats, Politicians, and Peasants in Mexico: A Case Study in Public Policy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
158. Groseclose, Tim (2001) “A Model of Candidate Location When One Candidate Has a Valence Advantage” American Journal of Political Science 45, 4 (October): 862–886.
159. Grzymala-Busse, Anna (2002) Redeeming the Communist Past: The Regeneration of Communist Parties in East Central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
160. Guillermoprieto, Alma (1994) The Heart that Bleeds: Latin America Now. New York: Knopf.
161. Guzzini, Stefano (1994) “The Implosion of Clientelistic Italy in the 1990s” Working Paper No. 94/12, European University Institute, Florence, Italy.
162. Haber, Paul (1997) “!Vamos por la dignidad de Durango! Un estudio del poder sociopolítico” in S. Zermeño (ed.) Movimientos sociales e identidades colectivas en Méixico. Mexico City: UNAM–IIS.
163. Haber, Paul (2006) Power from Experience: Urban Popular Movements in Late Twentieth-Century Mexico. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
164. Haggard, Stephan and Robert Kaufman (1995) The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
165. Hartz, Louis (1955) The Liberal Tradition in America: An Interpretation of American Political Thought Since the Revolution. New York: Harcourt Brace.
166. Hechter, Michael (1987) Principles of Group Solidarity. Berkeley: University of California Press.
167. Hellman, Judith Adler (1983) Mexico in Crisis. 2nd ed. New York: Holmes and Meier.
168. Hellman Judith Adler (1994) “Mexican Popular Movements, Clientelism, and the Process of Democratization.” Latin American Perspectives 21, 2: 124–142.
169. Hellman, Stephen (1975) “Generational Differences in the Bureaucratic Elite of Italian Communist Provincial Federations” Canadian Journal of Political Science 1: 82–106.
170. Hine, David (1987) “Italy: Parties and Government under Pressure” in A. Ware (ed.) Political Parties. London: Blackwell.
171. Hinich, Melvin and Michael Munger (1997) Analytical Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
172. Hirschman, Albert (1970) Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Declines of Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
173. Holm, John (1987) “Elections in Botswana: Institutionalization of a New System of Legitimacy” in F. M. Hayward (ed.) Elections in Independent Africa. Boulder: Westview Press.
174. Howard, Marc and Phillip Roessler (2006) “Liberalizing Electoral Outcomes in Competitive Authoritarian Regimes” American Journal of Political Science 50, 2 (April): 365–381.
175. Hrebenar, Ronald (2000) Japan’s New Party System. Boulder: Westview Press.
176. Hsieh, John Fuh-sheng, Dean Lacy, and Emerson Niou (1998) “Retrospective and prospective voting in a one-party-dominant democracy: Taiwan’s 1996 presidential election” Public Choice 97: 383–399.
177. Huang, Teh-fu and Ching-shin Yu (1999) “Developing a Party System and Democratic Consolidation” in S. Tsang and H. Tien (eds.) Democratization in Taiwan: Implications for China. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
178. Hug, Simon (2001) Altering Party Systems. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
179. Huntington, Samuel (1970) “Social and Institutional Dynamics of One-Party Systems” in S. Huntington and C. Moore (eds.) Authoritarian Politics in Modern Society: The Dynamics of Established One-Party Dominant Systems. New York: Basic Books.
180. Huntington, Samuel and Clement Moore (1970) “Conclusion: Authoritarianism, Democracy, and One-Party Politics” in S. Huntington and C. Moore (eds.) Authoritarian Politics in Modern Society: The Dynamics of Established One-Party Dominant Systems. New York: Basic Books.
181. Inoguchi, Takashi (1990) “The Political Economy of Conservative Resurgence under Recession: Public Policies and Political Support in Japan, 1977–1983” in T.J. Pempel (ed.) Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
182. Jackson, John (1999) “Electoral Competition with Endogenous Activists” American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Atlanta, Georgia, September 2–5.
183. Jacobson, Gary (1980) Money in Congressional Politics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
184. Jacobson, Gary and Samuel Kernell (1981) Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.
185. Johnson, Chalmers (1982) MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925–1975. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
186. Johnson, Kenneth (1965) “Ideological Correlates of Right Wing Political Alienation in Mexico” American Political Science Review 59, 3 (September): 656–664.
187. Johnson, Kenneth (1978) Mexican Democracy: A Critical View. New York: Praeger.
188. Johnston, Richard, André Blais, Henry Brady, and Jean Crete (1992) Letting the People Decide: Dynamics of a Canadian Election. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
189. Jones, Mark and Scott Mainwaring (2003) “The Nationalization of Parties and Party Systems: An Empirical Measure and an Application to the Americas” Party Politics 9 (March): 139–166.
190. Jowitt, Kenneth (1992) New World Disorder: The Leninist Extinction. Berkeley: University of California Press.
191. Kalyvas, Stathis (1996) The Rise of Christian Democracy in Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
192. Karl, Terry (1986) “Imposing Consent? Electoralism vs. Democratization in El Salvador” in P. Drake and E. Silva (eds.) Elections in Latin America. La Jolla: Institute of Latin American Studies, University of California, San Diego.
193. Karl, Terry and Philippe Schmitter (1991) “What Democracy Is … And Is Not” Journal of Democracy 2 (Summer): 75–89.
194. Katz, Richard and Peter Mair (1995) “Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party” Party Politics 1, 1: 5–28.
195. Kaufman Purcell, Susan (1973) “Decision-Making in an Authoritarian Regime: Theoretical Implications from a Mexican Case Study” in World Politics 26, 1 (October): 28–54.
196. Kessler, Timothy (1999) Global Capital and National Politics: Reforming Mexico’s Financial System. Westport: Praeger.
197. Key, V. O. (1964a) Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York: Knopf.
198. Key, V. O. (1964b) Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups. New York: Crowell.
199. Key, V. O. (1966) The Responsible Electorate: Rationality in Presidential Voting, 1936–1960. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
200. King, Gary, Robert Keohane, and Sidney Verba (1994) Designing Social Inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
201. King, Gary, Michael Tomz, and Jason Wittenberg (2000) “Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation” American Journal of Political Science 44, 2 (April): 347–61.
202. Kirchheimer, Otto (1966) “The Transformation of West European Party Systems” in J. LaPalambara and M. Weiner (eds.) Political Parties and Political Development. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
203. Kitschelt, Herbert (1989a) The Logics of Party Formation: Ecological Politics in Belgium and West Germany. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
204. Kitschelt, Herbert (1989b) “The Internal Politics of Parties: The Law of Curvilinear Disparity Revisited” Political Studies 37, 3: 400–421.
205. Kitschelt, Herbert (1990) Beyond the European Left: Ideology and Political Action in the Belgian Ecology Parties. Durham: Duke University Press.
206. Kitschelt, Herbert (1994) The Transformation of European Social Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
207. Kitschelt, Herbert (1995) The Radical Right in Western Europe. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
208. Kitschelt, Herbert (2000) “Linkages between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Polities” Comparative Political Studies 33, 6/7 (August/September): 845–879.
209. Kitschelt, Herbert and Steve Wilkinson (eds.) (2007) Patrons, Clients and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
210. Klesner, Joseph (1994) “Realignment or Dealignment? Consequences of Economic Crisis and Restructuring for the Mexican Party System” in M. Cook, K. Middle– Brook, and J. Molinar (eds.) Politics of Economic Restructuring: State-Society Relations and Regime Change in Mexico. La Jolla: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies.
211. Klesner, Joseph (1997) “Electoral Reform in Mexico’s Hegemonic Party System: Perpetuation of Privilege or Democratic Advance?” American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, August 28–31.
212. Kollman, Kenneth, John Miller, and Scott Page (1992) “Adaptive Parties in Spatial Elections” American Political Science Review 86, 4: 929–937.
213. Kostoris, Fiorella (1993) Italy: The Sheltered Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
214. Krauze, Enrique (1997) Mexico, Biography of Power: A History of Modern Mexico, 1810–1996, Translated by Hank Heifetz. New York: HarperCollins.
215. Kuo, Chengtian (2000) “New Financial Politics in Taiwan, Thailand, and Malaysia,” Department of Political Science, National Chengchi University, http://www.la.utexas.eduresearch/cgots/accessed9/2305.
216. Kuran, Timur (1991) “Now out of Never: The Element of Surprise in the East European Revolution of 1989” World Politics 44 (October): 7–48.
217. Laakso, Markku and Rein Taagapera (1979) “Effective Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe” Comparative Political Studies 12: 3–27.
218. Langston, Joy (2001) “Why Rules Matter: Changes in Candidate Selection in Mexico’s PRI, 1988–2000” Journal of Latin American Studies 33: 485–511.
219. LaPalombara, Joseph (1964) Interest Groups in Italian Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
220. Laver, Michael and Norman Schofield (1990) Multiparty Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
221. Lawson, Chappell (2002) Building the Fourth Estate: Democratization and the Rise of a Free Press in Mexico. Berkeley: University of California Press.
222. Lawson, Chappell (2004) “Television Coverage, Vote Choice, and the 2000 Campaign” in J. Dominguez and C. Lawson (eds.) Mexico’s Pivotal Democratic Election. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
223. Lehoucq, Fabrice (2003) “Electoral Fraud: Causes, Types, and Consequences” Annual Review of Political Science 6: 233–256.
224. Levite, Ariel and Sydney Tarrow (1983) “The Legitimation of Excluded Parties in Dominant Party Systems: A Comparison of Israel and Italy” Comparative Politics 15, 3 (April): 295–327.
225. Levitsky, Steven (2003) Transforming Labor-Based Parties in Latin America: Argentine Peronism in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
226. Levitsky, Steven and Lucan Way (2002) “The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism” Journal of Democracy 13, 2: 51–65.
227. Levitsky, Steven and Lucan Way (2006) “Competitive Authoritarianism: The Origins and Evolution of Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War.” Unpublished manuscript of chapters 1 and 2, Harvard University and University of Toronto.
228. Levitt, Steven and Catherine Wolfram (1997) “Decomposing the Sources of Incumbency Advantage in the U.S. House” Legislative Studies Quarterly 22: 45–60.
229. Lichbach, Mark (1996) The Cooperator’s Dilemma. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
230. Lichbach, Mark (1998) The Rebel’s Dilemma. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
231. Lin, Oliver (2000) “Lien wants KMT assets put in trust” Taipei Times, January 3: A1.
232. Lin, Tse-min, James Enelow, and Han Dorussen (1999) “Equilibrium in Multi-candidate Probabilistic Voting” Public Choice 98: 59–82.
233. Lin, Tse-min (2007) “The ‘Minumum-Sum Point’ as a Solution Concept in Spatial Voting” Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association meeting, Chicago IL, April 12–15.
234. Linz, Juan and Arturo Valenzuela (eds.) (1994) The Failure of Presidential Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
235. Lipset, Seymour Martin (ed.) (1998) Democracy in Europe and the Americas. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
236. Lipset, Seymour Martin and Stein Rokkan (1967) “Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments: An Introduction” in S. M. Lipset and S. Rokkan (eds.) Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: Free Press.
237. Lipson, Leslie (1953) “The Two-Party System in British Politics” American Political Science Review 47: 337–358.
238. Liu, I-chou (1999) “The Development of the Opposition” in S. Tsang and H. Tien (eds.) Democratization in Taiwan: Implications for China. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
239. Loaeza, Soledad (1999) El Partido Acción Nacional, la larga marcha, 1939– 1994: Oposición leal y partido de protesta. Mexico City: Fonda de Cultura Econóimica.
240. Locke, Richard (1995) Remaking the Italian Economy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
241. Londregan, John and Tom Romer (1993) “Polarization, Incumbency and the Personal Vote” in W. Barnett, M. Hinich and N. Schofield (eds.) Political Economy: Institutions, Competition and Representation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
242. Lujambio, Alonso (2000) El poder compartido: Un ensayo sobre la democratización mexicana. Mexico City: Oceano.
243. Lujambio, Alonso (2001) “Dinero y democratización: El financiamiento y la fiscalizacioin de los partidos políticos en la transicióin mexicana a la democra– cia, 1988–2000.” International Seminar on Money and Electoral Competition: Challenges for Democracy, Federal Elections Institute, Mexico City, June 5–8.
244. Lustig, Nora (1992) Mexico: the Remaking of an Economy. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
245. Mabry, Donald (1973) Mexico’s Acción Nacional: A Catholic Alternative to Revolution. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.
246. MacLeod, Dag (2004) Downsizing the State: Privatization and the Limits of Neoliberal Reform in Mexico. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
247. Magaloni, Beatriz (1996) “Dominancia de partido y dilemas duvergerianos en las elecciones federales de 1994” Política y Gobierno 3, 2: 281–326.
248. Magaloni, Beatriz (1997) The Dynamics Of Dominant Party Decline: The Mexican Transition To Multipartyism. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Political Science, Duke University.
249. Magaloni, Beatriz (2006) Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico. New York: Cambridge University Press.
250. Magaloni, Beatriz and Alejandro Poiré (2004a) “The Issues, the Vote, and the Mandate for Change” in J. Domínguez and C. Lawson (eds.) Mexico’s Pivotal Democratic Election. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
251. Magaloni, Beatriz and Alejandro Poiré (2004b) “Strategic Coordination in the 2004 Mexican Presidential Race” in J. Domínguez and C. Lawson (eds.) Mexico’s Pivotal Democratic Election. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
252. Magar, Eric and Juan Molinar Horcasitas (1995) “Medios de comunicación y democracia” in J. Alcocer (ed.) Elecciones, dialogo y reforma en Mexico, 1994, Volume 2. Mexico City: Nuevo Horizonte.
253. Mainwaring, Scott (1999) Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
254. Mair, Peter and Ingrid Van Biezen (2001) “Party Membership in Twenty European Democracies, 1980–2000” Party Politics 7, 1: 5–21.
255. Manikas, Peter and Laura Thornton (2003) Political Parties in Asia: Promoting Reform and Combating Corruption in Eight Countries. Washington, DC: National Democratic Institute.
256. Martínez Valle, Adolfo (1995) El Partido Acción Nacional: Una historia política, 1939–1976. Unpublished B.A. thesis, Department of Political Science, Autonomous Technological Institute of Mexico (ITAM), Mexico City.
257. Martínez Verdugo, Arnoldo (1985) Historia del comunismo en México. Mexico City: Grijalbo.
258. Martínez, Omar (2002) “Datos duros sobre monitoreos de coberturas electorales” http://www.cem.itesm.mx/dacs/buendia/rmc/rmc63/omartinez.html, accessed 10/10/02.
259. May, John (1973) “Opinion Structures and Political Parties: The Special Law of Curvilinear Disparity” Political Studies 21: 135–151.
260. Mayhew, David (1974) Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.
261. McCann, James and Chappell Lawson. 2003. “An Electorate Adrift? Public Opinion and the Quality of Democracy in Mexico” Latin American Research Review 38, 3 (October): 60–81.
262. McDonald, Ronald (1971) Party Systems and Elections in Latin America. Chicago: Markham.
263. McKelvey, Richard (1986) “Covering, Dominance, and Institution-Free Properties of Social Choice” American Journal of Political Science 30, 2: 283–314.
264. Means, Gordon Paul (1996) “Soft Authoritarianism in Malaysia and Singapore” Journal of Democracy 7, 4 (October): 103–117.
265. Meguid, Bonnie (2005) “Competition between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party Success” American Political Science Review 99, 3 (August): 347–359.
266. Merino, Mauricio (1996) “De la lealtad individual a la responsabilidad pública” Revista de Administracióin Púiblica 91: 5–18.
267. Mershon, Carol and Gianfranco Pasquino (eds.) (1995) Italian Politics: Ending the First Republic. Boulder: Westview Press.
268. Middlebrook, Kevin (1986) “Political Liberalization in an Authoritarian Regime: The Case of Mexico” in G. O’Donnell, P. Schmitter, and L. Whitehead (eds.). Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Latin America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
269. Middlebrook, Kevin (1995) The Paradox of Revolution: Labor, The State, and Authoritarianism in Mexico. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
270. Miller, Warren and Donald Stokes (1963) “Constituency influence in Congress” American Political Science Review 57 (March): 45–56.
271. Miller, Warren and Kent Jennings (1986) Parties in Transition: A Longitudinal Study of Party Elites and Party Supporters. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
272. Mizrahi, Yemile (1998) “The Costs of Electoral Success: The Partido Acción Nacional in Mexico” in M. Serrano (ed.). Governing Mexico: Political Parties and Elections. London: Institute of Latin American Studies.
273. Mizrahi, Yemile (2003) From Martyrdom to Power: The Partido Acción Nacional in Mexico. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
274. Moctezuma Barragáin, Esteban and Andráis Roemer (2001) A New Public Management in Mexico. Burlington: Ashgate.
275. Moe, Terry (1980) The Organization of Interests: Incentives and the Internal Dynamics of Political Interest Groups. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
276. Molinar Horcasitas, Juan (1991) El tiempo de la legitimidad. Mexico City: Cal y Arena.
277. Molinar Horcasitas, Juan (2001) “Las elecciones de 1997 en México: Evaluacióin del sistema de partidos y la reforma electoral en materia de regulación financiera.” Conference on Political Parties and Elections, Federal Elections Institute (IFE), Mexico City. http://www.trife.gob.mx/wcongreso/molinarc.html.
278. Molinar Horcasitas, Juan and Jeffrey Weldon (1994) “Electoral Determinants and Consequences of National Solidarity” in W. Cornelius, A. Craig, and J. Fox (eds.) Transforming State–Society Relations in Mexico: The National Solidarity Strategy. La Jolla: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies.
279. Moreno, Alejandro (1999) “Ideologia y voto: Dimensiones de competencia política en México en los noventa” Politica y Gobierno 6, 1: 45–81.
280. Moreno, Alejandro (2003) El votante mexicano: Democracia, actitudes políticas y conducta electoral. Mexico City: Fonda de Cultura Econóimica.
281. Munro-Kua, Anne (1996) Authoritarian Populism in Malaysia. London: Mac-Millan.
282. Muramatsu, Michio and Ellis Krauss (1990) “The Dominant Party and Social Coalitions in Japan” in T. J. Pempel (ed.) Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
283. Needler, Martin (1971) Politics and Society in Mexico. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
284. Niou, Emerson and Peter Ordeshook (1992) “A Game Theoretic Analysis of the Republic of China’s Emerging Electoral System” International Political Science Review 13, 1: 59–79.
285. O’Donnell, Guillermo and Philippe Schmitter (1986) Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
286. Olson, Mancur (1971) The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
287. Olukoshi, Adebayo (1998) “Introduction” in A. Adebayo (ed.) The Politics of Opposition in Contemporary Africa. Uppsala: Nordiska Afrikainstitutet.
288. Oppenheimer, Andréis (1996) Bordering on Chaos: Guerrillas, Stockbrokers, Politicians, and Mexico’s Road to Prosperity. Boston: Little, Brown.
289. OrtizPardo, Francisco and Francisco Ortiz Pinchetti (2000) “La meta: 20 mil-lones de votos” Proceso 1215 (February 13): 12–24.
290. Ortiz, Francisco (2002) Comprender a la gente: Por qué ganó Fox. Mexico City: Nuevo Siglo.
291. Osborne, Martin and Al Slivinski (1996) “A Model of Political Competition with Citizen–Candidates” Quarterly Journal of Economics 111, 1: 65–96.
292. Osei-Hwedie, Bertha (2001) “The Political Opposition in Botswana: The Politics of Factionalism and Fragmentation” Transformation 45: 57–77.
293. Otake, Hideo (1990) “Defense Controversies and One-Party Dominance: The Opposition in Japan and West Germany” in T. J. Pempel (ed.) Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
294. Padgett, Leon (1976) The Mexican Political System, 2d ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
295. Palfrey, Thomas (1984) “Spatial Equilibrium with Entry” Review of Economic Studies 51, 1: 139–156.
296. Panebianco, Angelo (1988) Political Parties: Organization and Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.
297. Pempel, T. J. (1990) “Introduction. Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes” in T. J. Pempel (ed.) Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
298. Pempel, T.J. (1998) Regime Shift: Comparative Dynamics of the Japanese Political Economy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
299. Pignatelli, Andrea (1985) “Italy: The Development of a Late Developing State” in R. Rose (ed.) Public Employment in Western Nations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
300. Poiré, Alejandro (1999) “Retrospective Voting, Partisanship, and Loyalty in Presidential Elections: 1994” in J. Domínguez and A. Poire (eds.) Toward Mexico’s Democratization. New York: Routledge.
301. Pomper, Gerald (1992) Passions and Interests: Political Party Concepts of American Democracy. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
302. Prescott, Edward and Michael Visscher (1977) “Sequential Location among Firms with Foresight” Bell Journal of Economics 8: 378–393.
303. Preston, Julia and Samuel Dillon (2004) Opening Mexico. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
304. Prud’homme, Jean-Francois (1997) “El PRD: Su vida interna y sus elecciones estratéigicas.” Working Paper No. 39. Divisióin de Estudios Políticos, Centro de Investigación y Docencia Econóimicas (CIDE), Mexico City.
305. Przeworski, Adam and John Sprague (1986) Paper Stones: A History of Electoral Socialism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
306. Przeworski, Adam, Michael Alvarez, José Cheibub, and Fernando Limongi (2000) Democracy and Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.
307. Putnam, Robert (1971) “Studying Elite Political Culture: The Case of ‘Ideology’” American Political Science Review 65, 3 (September): 651–681.
308. Putnam, Robert (1975) “The Italian Communist Politician” in D. Blackmer and S. Tarrow (eds.) Communism in Italy and France. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
309. Rahim, Lily (2001) “The Political Agenda Underpinning Economic Policy Formulation in Singapore’s Authoritarian Developmental State” in U. Johannen and J. Gomez (eds.) Democratic Transitions in Asia. Singapore: Select Publishing.
310. Ramanadham, V. V. (ed.) (1995) Privatization and Equity. New York: Routledge.
311. Ramírez Saiz, Juan Manuel (1986) El movimiento urbano popular en México. Mexico, D.F.: Siglo Veintiuno.
312. Reed, Steven and Ethan Scheiner (2003) “Electoral Incentives and Policy Preferences: Mixed Motives Behind Party Defections in Japan” British Journal of Political Science 33: 469–490.
313. Reveles Váisquez, Francisco (1996) El proceso de institucionalización organizativa del Partido Acción Nacional, 1984–1995. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Faculty of Political Science, National Autonomous University of Mexico.
314. Reyna, José Luis and Richard Weinert (eds.) (1977) Authoritarianism in Mexico. Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues, Inter-American Politics Series.
315. Richardson, Bradley (1997) Japanese Democracy: Power, Coordination, and Performance. New Haven: Yale University Press.
316. Richardson, Bradley (2001) “Japan’s ‘1955 System’ and Beyond” in L. Diamond and R. Gunther (eds.) Political Parties and Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
317. Rigger, Shelley (2001a) From Opposition to Power: Taiwan’s Democratic Progressive Party. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
318. Rigger, Shelley (2001b) “The Democratic Progressive Party in 2000: Obstacles and Opportunities” China Quarterly 168: 944–959.
319. Riker, William (1976) “The Number of Political Parties: A Reexamination of Duverger’s Law” Comparative Politics 9, 1: 93–106.
320. Riker, William (1983) “Political Theory and the Art of Heresthetics” in A. Finifter (ed.) Political Science: The State of the Discipline. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
321. Rimanelli, Marco (1999) Comparative Democratization and Peaceful Change in Single-Party-Dominant Countries. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
322. Rivera Ríos, Miguel Angel (1986) Crisis y reorganización del capitalismo mexicano, 1960–1985. Mexico City: Ediciones Era.
323. Rocha Menocal, Alina (2001) “Do Old Habits Die Hard? A Statistical Exploration of the Politicization of Progresa, Mexico’s Latest Federal Poverty-Alleviation Programme, under the Zedillo Administration” Journal of Latin American Studies 33, 51:513–558.
324. Rodríguez Araujo, Octavio and Carlos Sirvent (2005) Instituciones electorales y partidos polítocs en México. Mexico City: Jorale.
325. Roeder, Philip (2001) “Ethnolinguistic Fractionalization (ELF) Indices, 1961 and 1985.” http//:weber.ucsd.edu\~proeder\elf.htm, accessed December 10, 2003.
326. Rogozinski, Jacques (1993) La privatización de empresas paraestatales. Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Econóimica.
327. Rohde, David (1979) “Risk-bearing and Progressive Ambition: The Case of the United States House of Representatives” American Journal of Political Science 23 (February), 1–26.
328. Rosenstone, Steve, Roy Behr, and Edward Lazarus (1984) Third Parties in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
329. Ross, Michael (2001) “Does Oil Hinder Democracy?” World Politics 53, 3 (April):325–361.
330. Saldierna, Georgina (1999) “Dar prioridad al frente nacional progresista, pide Lóipez Obrador” La Jornada, (January 18): 3
331. Salinas, Carlos (1994) “Sexto Informe de Gobierno, Anexo Estadístico” Mexico City: Poder Ejecutivo Federal.
332. Samuels, David (2002) “Presidentialized Parties: The Separation of Power and Party Organization and Behavior” Comparative Political Studies 35, 4 (May): 461–483.
333. Sáinchez, Marco Aurelio (1999) PRD, la elite en crisis: Problemas organizativos, indeterminación ideológica y deficiencias programáticas. Mexico City: Plaza y Valdés.
334. Sanderson, Steven (1981) Agrarian Populism and the Mexican State. Berkeley: University of California Press.
335. Sartori, Giovanni (1968) “The Sociology of Parties: A Critical Review” in O. Stammer (ed.) Party Systems, Party Organizations, and the Politics of New Masses. Berlin: Institute for Political Science, Free University of Berlin.
336. Sartori, Giovanni (1976) Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
337. Schattschneider, E. E. (1942) Party Government. New York: Rinehart.
338. Schedler, Andreas (2002) “The Menu of Manipulation” Journal of Democracy 13, 2 (April): 36–50.
339. Schedler, Andreas (2005) “From Electoral Authoritarianism to Democratic Consolidation” in R. Crandall, G. Paz, and R. Roett (eds.) Mexico’s Democracy at Work. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
340. Scheiner, Ethan (2006) Democracy without Competition: Opposition Failure in a One-Party Dominant State. New York: Cambridge University Press.
341. Schlesinger, Jacob (1997) Shadow Shoguns: The Rise and Fall of Japan’s Political Machine. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
342. Schlesinger, Joseph (1966) Ambition and Politics: Political Careers in the United States. Chicago: Rand McNally.
343. Schlesinger, Joseph (1991) Political Parties and the Winning of Office. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
344. Schmitt, Karl (1970) Communism in Mexico. Austin: University of Texas Press.
345. Schumpeter, Joseph (1947) Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper.
346. Scott, Robert (1964) Mexican Government in Transition. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
347. Semo, Enrique (2003) La búsqueda, 1. La izquierda mexicana en los albores del siglo X. Mexico City: Oceano.
348. Shadlen, Ken (2004) Democratization without Representation: The Politics of Small Industry in Mexico. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
349. Shalev, Michael (1990) “The Political Economy of Labor-Party Dominance and Decline in Israel” in T. J. Pempel (ed.) Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
350. Shefter, Martin (1977a) “Patronage and its Opponents: A Theory and Some European Cases,” Cornell University Western Societies Program Occasional Paper No. 8.
351. Shefter, Martin (1977b) “Party and Patronage: Germany, England, and Italy” Politics and Society 7: 403–451.
352. Shefter, Martin (1994) Political Parties and the State: The American Historical Experience. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
353. Shirk, David (2005) Mexico’s New Politics: The PAN and Democratic Change. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
354. Shvetsova, Olga (1995) Design of Political Institutions in Divided Societies. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Political Science, California Institute of Technology.
355. Singh, Hari (2000) “Opposition Politics and the 1999 Malaysian Elections” Trends in Malaysia: Election Assessment 1 (January): 33–38.
356. Skocpol, Theda and Margaret Somers (1980) “The Uses of Comparative History in Macrosocial Inquiry” Comparative Studies in Society and History 22: 174–197.
357. Smith, Benjamin (2005) “Life of the Party: The Origins of Regime Breakdown and Persistence under Single-Party Rule” World Politics 57 (April): 421–451.
358. Smith, Peter H. (1979) Labyrinths of Power: Political Recruitment in Twentieth-Century Mexico. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
359. Smith, Peter H. (1989) “The 1988 Presidential Succession in Historical Perspective” in W. Cornelius, J. Gentleman, and P. Smith (eds.) Mexico’s Alternative Political Futures. La Jolla: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies.
360. Snyder, James (1994) “Safe Seats, Marginal Seats, and Party Platforms: The Logic of Platform Differentiation” Economics and Politics 6: 201–214.
361. Snyder, Richard (2001) Politics after Neoliberalism: Reregulation in Mexico. New York: Cambridge University Press.
362. Solinger, Debra (2001) “Ending One-Party Dominance: Korea, Taiwan, Mexico” Journal of Democracy 12, 1: 30–42.
363. Spotts, Frederic and Theodor Wieser (1986) Italy: A Difficult Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
364. Stokes, Susan (2001) Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
365. Stokes, Susan (2007) “Political Clientelism” in C. Boix and S. Stokes (ed.) Handbook of Comparative Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
366. Stone, Walter, Sandy Maisel, and Cherie Maestas (2004) “Quality Counts: Extending the Strategic Politician Model of Incumbent Deterrence” American Journal of Political Science 48, 3 (July): 479–495.
367. Taagapera, Rein and Matthew Shugart (1991) Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven: Yale University Press.
368. Tarrow, Sidney (1967) Peasant Communism in Southern Italy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
369. Tarrow, Sidney (1990) “Maintaining Hegemony in Italy: ‘The Softer they Rise, the Slower they Fall!’ ” in T. J. Pempel (ed.) Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
370. Tarrow, Sydney (1994) Power in Movement. New York: Cambridge University Press.
371. Teh, Yik Koon (2002) “Money Politics in Malaysia” Journal of Contemporary Asia 32, 3: 338–345.
372. Tien, Hung-mao (1997) “Taiwan’s Transformation” in L. Diamond, M. Plattner, Y. Chu, and H. Tien (eds.) Consolidating the Third Wave Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
373. Tien, Hung-mao and Tun-jen Cheng (1999) “Crafting Democratic Institutions” in S. Tsang and H. Tien (eds.) Democratization in Taiwan: Implications for China. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
374. Tomz, Michael, Jason Wittenberg, and Gary King (2001) “CLARIFY: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results” http://gking.harvard.edu/clarify/
375. Trejo, Guillermo and Claudio Jones (1998) “Political Dilemmas of Welfare Reform: Poverty and Inequality in Mexico” in S. Purcell and L. Rubio (eds.), Mexico under Zedillo. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
376. Trejo Delabre, Raúl (2000) “Procesos electorales y medios de comunicación” Federal Elections Institute, Mexico City. http://www.raultrejo.tripod.com/ensayosmedios/ProcesoselectoralesymediosIFEmayo00ppt, accessed 12/7/05.
377. Tsebelis, George (1990) Nested Games: Rational Choice in Comparative Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
378. Tucker, Robert (1961) “Towards a Comparative Politics of Movement-Regimes” American Political Science Review 55, 2 (June): 281–289.
379. Tucker, Robert (1965) “The Dictator and Totalitarianism” World Politics 17, 4: 555–583.
380. Tullock, Gordon (1971) “The Paradox of Revolution” Public Choice 11 (Fall): 89–99.
381. Van de Walle, Nicolas (2002) “Africa’s Range of Regimes” Journal of Democracy 13, 2 (April): 66–80.
382. Van de Walle, Nicolas (2006) “Tipping Games: When Do Opposition Parties Coalesce?” in A. Schedler (ed.) Electoral Authoritarianism. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
383. Vande Walle, Nicolas and Kimberly Butler (1999) “Political Parties and Party Systems in Africa’s Illiberal Democracies” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 12, 1: 14–28.
384. Ware, Alan (1996) Political Parties and Party Systems. New York: Oxford University Press.
385. Warner, Carolyn (1998) “Getting out the Vote with Patronage and Threat: The French and Italian Christian Democratic Parties, 1945–1958” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 28, 4: 553–582.
386. Weiner, Robert (2003) Anti-competition in ‘Competitive’ Party Systems. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Political Science, University of California, Berkeley.
387. Weldon, Jeffrey (2004) “Changing Patterns of Executive-Legislative Relations in Mexico” in J. Middlebrook (ed.) Dilemmas of Political Change in Mexico. London: Institute of Latin American Studies, University of London.
388. White, James (1970) The Sokagakkai and Mass Society. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
389. Wittman, Donald (1983) “Candidate Motivation: A Synthesis of Alternative Theories” American Political Science Review 77, 1: 142–157.
390. Woodall, Brian (1996) Japan under Construction: Corruption, Politics, and Public Works. Berkeley: University of California Press.
391. World Bank, World Development Report 2000–2001. Washington, DC: World Bank.
392. Xu, Dianqing (1997) “The KMT Party’s Enterprises in Taiwan” Modern Asian Studies 31, 2: 399–413.
393. Zaller, John (1998) “Politicians as Prize Fighters: Electoral Selection and Incumbency Advantage” in J. Geer (ed.) Politicians and Party Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
394. Zarembo, Alan (2001) “Truth and Consequences” Newsweek International (December 10): 40.
395. Zermeño, Sergio (1982) “De Echeverría a de la Madrid: Las clases altas y el estado mexicano en la batalla por la hegemonía. Washington, DC: Wilson Center, Working Paper 118.
396. Zolberg, Aristide (1966) Creating Political Order: The Party-States of West Africa. Chicago: Rand McNally.
397. Zuckerman, Alan (1979) The Politics of Faction: Christian Democratic Rule in Italy. New Haven: Yale University Press.