US Preventative Services Task Force FRAX threshold has a low sensitivity to detect osteoporosis in women ages 50–64 years

Osteoporosis International

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 1429-1433

  Bansal, S ^a   Pecina, J L ^b   Merry, S P ^b   Kennel, K A ^b   Maxson, J ^b   Quigg, S ^b   Thacher, T D ^b  

^a Fremont Family Care   (United States)

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Bone density; Fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX); Osteoporosis screening; X ray absorptiometry

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; ASSESSMENT OF HUMANS; BONE DENSITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; FEMALE; FRACTURE RISK ASSESSMENT TOOL; FRAGILITY FRACTURE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; OSTEOPOROSIS; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCREENING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UNITED STATES PREVENTATIVE SERVICE TASK FORCE; COMPLICATION; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOPOROSIS, POSTMENOPAUSAL; OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURES; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHOTON ABSORPTIOMETRY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; BONE DENSITY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOPOROSIS, POSTMENOPAUSAL; OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84928325516     PISSN: 0937941X     EISSN: 14332965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-015-3026-0     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Foundation NO Clinician's Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis. http://nof.org/files/nof/public/content/file/2610/upload/895.pdf Accessed April 30, 2014
2. (2011) Screening for osteoporosis: U.S. preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 154:356-364
3. Watts NB, Bilezikian JP, Camacho PM et al (2010) American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: executive summary of recommendations. Endocr Pract 16:1016–1019
4. (2012) ACOG Practice Bulletin N. 129. Osteoporosis. Obstet Gynecol 120:718-734
5. Lim LS, Hoeksema LJ, Sherin K (2009) Screening for osteoporosis in the adult U.S. population: ACPM position statement on preventive practice. Am J Prev Med 36:366–375
6. FRAX™ WHO Fracture Risk Assessment Tool. https://www.shef.ac.uk/FRAX/tool.aspx Accessed January 22, 2014
7. WHO Scientific Group on the Assessment of Osteoporosis at Primary Health Care Level. http://www.who.int/chp/topics/Osteoporosis.pdf Accessed February 27 2013
8. Choosing Wiselytm An initiative of the ABIM Foundation. http://www.choosingwisely.org/ Accessed January 22, 2014
9. Qaseem A, Alguire P, Dallas P et al (2012) Appropriate use of screening and diagnostic tests to foster high-value, cost-conscious care. Ann Intern Med 156:147–149
10. Cadarette SM, Jaglal SB, Kreiger N, McIsaac WJ, Darlington GA, Tu JV (2000) Development and validation of the Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument to facilitate selection of women for bone densitometry. CMAJ 162:1289–1294
11. Geusens P, Hochberg MC, van der Voort DJ, Pols H, van der Klift M, Siris E, Melton ME, Turpin J, Byrnes C, Ross P (2002) Performance of risk indices for identifying low bone density in postmenopausal women. Mayo Clin Proc 77:629–637
12. Mauck KF, Cuddihy MT, Atkinson EJ, Melton LJ 3rd (2005) Use of clinical prediction rules in detecting osteoporosis in a population-based sample of postmenopausal women. Arch Intern Med 165:530–536
13. Cadarette SM, Jaglal SB, Murray TM, McIsaac WJ, Joseph L, Brown JP (2001) Evaluation of decision rules for referring women for bone densitometry by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. JAMA 286:57–63
14. Crandall CJ, Larson J, Gourlay ML et al (2014) Osteoporosis screening in postmenopausal women 50 to 64 years old: comparison of US Preventive Services Task Force Strategy and Two Traditional Strategies in the Women's Health Initiative. J Bone Miner Res 29:1661–1666