A hydrogeological conceptual approach to study urban groundwater flow in Bucharest city, Romania

Hydrogeology Journal

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 437-450

  Boukhemacha, Mohamed Amine ^a   Gogu, Constantin Radu ^a   Serpescu, Irina ^a   Gaitanaru, Dragos ^a   Bica, Ioan ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF CIVIL ENGINEERING   (Romania)

Author keywords

Conceptual approach; Groundwater flow; Romania; Sewer system; Urban groundwater

Indexed keywords

AQUIFER; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; FLOW MODELING; GROUNDWATER FLOW; HYDROGEOLOGY; SEWER NETWORK; URBAN AREA;

BUCHAREST [BUCHAREST (ADS)]; BUCHAREST [ROMANIA]; ROMANIA;

EID: 84928324638     PISSN: 14312174     EISSN: 14350157     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10040-014-1220-3     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Al-Rashed MF, Sherif MM (2001) Hydrogeological aspects of groundwater drainage of the urban areas in Kuwait City. Hydrol Process 15(5):777–795. doi:10.1002/hyp.179
2. Boukhemacha MA, Gogu CR, Serpescu I, Gaitanaru D, Bica I, Diaconescu A, Brusten A (2013) Hydraulic characterizing of tunnel’s barrier effect for groundwater flow modeling: application for Bucharest city. 13th SGEM GeoConference on Sci and Technol in Geology. Explor Min 2:179–186. doi:10.5593/SGEM2013/BA1.V2/S02.024
3. Brombach H, Weiß G, Lucas S (2002) Temporal variation of infiltration inflow in combined sewer systems. In: 9th International Conference on Urban Drainage, Portland, OR, September 2002
4. CCIAS (2012) 3D geological models and spatial ditribution of the hydraulic properties. Research report, SIMPA project: sedimentary media modelling platform for groundwater management in urban areas. Technical University of Civil Engineering of Bucharest, Groundwater Engineering Research Center (CCIAS), Bucharest
5. Ertl TW, Dlauhy F, Haberl L (2002) Investigations of the amount of infiltration inflow into a sewage system. 3rd International Conference on Sewer Processes and Networks, Paris, April 2002
6. Gogu R, Velasco V, Vázquez-Suñe E, Gaitanaru D, Chitu Z, Bica I (2011) Sedimentary media analysis platform for groundwater modeling in urban areas. In: Lambrakis N, Stournaras G, Katsanou K (eds) Advances in the research of aquatic environment. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, pp 489–496
7. Gustafsson GL (2000) Alternative drainage schemes for reduction of inflow/infiltration: prediction and follow-up of effects with the aid of an integrated sewer/aquifer model. 1st International Conference on Urban Drainage via Internet, Prague, Czech Republic, 2000
8. Hager WH, Bretscher U, Raymann B (1984) Methoden zur indirekten Fremdwasserermittlung in Abwassersystemen [Methods for indirect determination of extraneous water in sewage systems]. Gas-Wasser-Abwasser 64(7):450–561
9. Harbaugh AW, Banta ER, Hill MC, McDonald MG (2000) MODFLOW-2000, the U.S. Geological Survey modular ground-water model: user guide to modularization concepts and the ground-water flow process. US Geol Surv Open-File Rep 00-92
10. Liteanu E (1952) Geologia zonei orasului Bucuresti [Geology of the Bucharest area]. Com. Geol., Inst. Geol., Bucharest
11. Martinez SE, Escolero O, Wolf L (2010) Total urban water cycle models in semiarid environments: quantitative scenario analysis at the area of San Luis Potosi, Mexico. Water Resour Manag 25(1):239–263. doi:10.1007/s11269-010-9697-6
12. Nakayama T, Watanabe M, Tanji K, Morioka T (2007) Effect of underground urban structures on eutrophic coastal environment. Sci Total Environ 373(1):270–288. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.11.033
13. Popescu C, Lăzărescu F (1988) Contcepţia generală de amenajare complexă a râului Dâmboviţa în municipiul Bucureşti [General concept of the Dambovita River channel-modification works in Bucharest city]. Hidrotehnica 33(1):3–9
14. Rauch W, Stegner T (1994) The colmation of leaks in sewer systems during dry weather flow. Water Sci Technol 30(1):205–210
15. Rueedi J, Cronin AA, Morris BL (2009) Estimation of sewer leakage to urban groundwater using depth-specific hydrochemistry. Water Environ J 23(2):134–144. doi:10.1111/j.1747-6593.2008.00119.x
16. Serpescu I, Radu E, Gogu CR, Boukhemacha MA, Gaitanaru D, Bica I (2013) 3D geological model of Bucharest city Quaternary deposits. 13th SGEM GeoConference on Sci and Technol in Geology. Explor Min 2:1–8. doi:10.5593/SGEM2013/BA1.V2/S02.001
17. Shiklomanov I (1993) World fresh water resources. In: Gleick H (ed) Water in crisis: a guide to the world’s fresh water resources. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 13–14
18. United States Department of Agriculture (1954) National engineering handbook. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC
19. Vázquez-Suné E, Sanchez-Vila X (1999) Groundwater modelling in urban areas as a tool for local authority management: Barcelona case study (Spain). Impacts of Urban Growth on Surface Water and Groundwater Quality, IUGG 99 Symposium HS5, Birmingham, UK, July 1999
20. Weiß G, Brombach H, Haller B (2002) Infiltration and inflow in combined sewer systems: long-term analysis. Water Sci Technol 47(7):11–19
21. Wolf L, Klinger J, Schrage C, Mohrlok U, Eiswirth M, Hötzl H, Burn S, DeSilva Dh, Cook S, Diaper C, Correll R, Vanderzalm J, Rueedi J,Cronin AA, Morris B, Mansour M, Souvent P, Cencur-Curk B, Vizintin G, Voett U, Arras U, Höring K, Rehm-Berbenni C (2005) Assessing and improving sustainability of urban water resources and systems (AISUWRS). Final project report, Department of Applied Geology, Karlsruhe University, Karlsruhe, Germany
22. Wolf L, Eiswirth M, Hotzl H (2006) Assessing sewer–groundwater interaction at the city scale based on individual sewer defects and marker species distributions. Environ Geol 49(6):849–857. doi:10.1007/s00254-006-0180-x
23. Wolf L, Klinger J, Hoetzl H, Mohrlok U (2007) Quantifying mass fluxes from urban drainage systems to the urban soil–aquifer system. J Soil Sedimentol 7(2):85–95. doi:10.1065/jss2007.02.207