Total Urban Water Cycle Models in Semiarid Environments-Quantitative Scenario Analysis at the Area of San Luis Potosi, Mexico

Water Resources Management

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 239-263

  Martinez, Sandra Edda ^a   Escolero, Oscar ^a   Wolf, Leif ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KARLSRUHE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Integrated management; Simulation model; Urban aquifers; Urban recharge; Water scarcity

Indexed keywords

AQUIFERS; ARID REGIONS; COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; DECISION MAKING; GROUNDWATER POLLUTION; GROUNDWATER RESOURCES; HYDROGEOLOGY; RECHARGING (UNDERGROUND WATERS); RUNOFF; URBAN GROWTH; WATER QUALITY;

CURRENT MONITORING SYSTEMS; INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT; LUMPED PARAMETER MODELING; SIMULATION MODEL; SUSTAINABLE URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN RECHARGE; WATER QUALITY PROTECTION; WATER SCARCITY;

QUALITY CONTROL;

AQUIFER; GROUNDWATER RESOURCE; RECHARGE; RUNOFF; SEMIARID REGION; SIMULATION; STRATEGIC APPROACH; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; WASTEWATER; WATER MANAGEMENT;

MEXICO [NORTH AMERICA]; SAN LUIS POTOSI;

EID: 78650311435     PISSN: 09204741     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-010-9697-6     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Binder C, Schertenleib R, Diaz J, Bader HP, Baccini P (1997) Regional water balance as a tool for water management in developing countries. Water Resour Dev 13(1): 5-20.
2. Burn S, Desilva D, Ambrose M, Meddings S, Diaper C, Correll R, Miller R, Wolf L (2006) A decision support system for urban groundwater resource sustainability. Water Practice & Technology 1(1). doi: 10. 2166/wpt. 2006. 2010.
3. Cardona A (2005) Hidrogeoquímica de sistemas de flujo regional, intermedio y local resultado del marco geológico en la mesa central: Reacciones, procesos y contaminación. Tesis, doctorado, posgrado en ciencias de la tierra, Univ. Nac. Autónoma de Mexico, Mexico, p 252.
4. Carrillo-Rivera JJ, Cardona A, Moss D (1996) Importance of the vertical component of groundwater flow: a hydrochemical approach in the valley of San Luis Potosí, Mexico. J Hydrol 185: 23-44.
5. Carrillo-Rivera JJ, Cardona A, Edmund WM (2002) Use of abstraction regime and knowledge of hydrogeological conditions to control high fluoride concentration in abstracted groundwater: basin of San Luis Potosí, Mexico. J Hydrol 261: 24-47.
6. Clifforde IT, Tomicic B, Mark O (1999) Integrated water management, a European vision for the future. In: Proceeding of the 9th international conference on urban storm drainage. Portland, USA, pp 8-13.
7. Conagua (2005) Actualización hidrogeológica de los acuíferos de Ceballos y Oriente Aguanaval Edo de Dgo, Villa de Arista y San Luis Potosí, Edo de SLP. Informe técnico. Elaboró: Sabinfosistem SA de CV.
8. Cook S, Vanderzalm J, Burn S, Dillon P, Correll R, Vogel M, Rosemann S (2005) Assessing and improving sustainability of urban water resources and systems AISUWRS Work-package 5: field investigations final report. CSIRO, Melbourne.
9. DeSilva D, Burn S, Moglia M, Tjandraatmadja G, Gould S, Sadler P (2006) The models, Network exfiltration and infiltration model. In: Wolf L, Morris B, Burn S (eds) Urban water resources toolbox - integrating groundwater into urban water management. IWA, London, pp 34-50.
10. Diaper C, Mitchell VG (2006) The models, Urban volume and quality. In: Wolf L, Morris B, Burn S (eds) Urban water resources toolbox - integrating groundwater into urban water management. IWA, London, pp 16-33.
11. Fattahi P, Fayyaz S (2010) A compromise programming model to integrated urban Water management. Water Resour Manag 24: 1211-1227. doi: 10. 1007/s11269-009-9492-4.
12. Grimmond CSB, Oke TR (1986) Urban water balance - 2. Results from a Suburb of Vancuover, British Columbia. Water Resour Res 22(10): 1404-1412.
13. HASLP - H. Ayuntamiento de San Luis Potosí (2003) Plan del centro de población estratégico San Luis Potosí-Soledad de Graciano Sánchez. Proyecto de actualización 2003.
14. IMMSA - Industria Metálica Monternach (2009) Identificación de sitios para la disposición in situ de residuos en formación geológicamente estable, en terrenos del complejo metalúrgico de IMMSA en San Luís Potosí. Realizó Instituto de Geología, UNAM.
15. Interapas (2005) Estudio de diagnóstico y planeación integral. Informe técnico. Realizó: Tecnología ASSUL SA de CV.
16. Klinger J, Schaefer M, Wolf L, Hötzl H (2006) AISUWRS Work-package 10, D27, UVQ Report. Department of Applied Geology Commissioned Report, p 43.
17. Kuczera G, Coombes PJ (2002) Towards continuous simulation: a comparative assessment of flood performance of volume-sensitive systems. Paper presented at SIA 2002 conference on stormwater management, Orange, NSW, 23-24 April, 2002.
18. Lekkas DF, Manoli E, Assimacopoulos D (2008) Integrated urban water modeling using the Aquacycle model. Global NEST J 10(3): 310-319.
19. Martinez S, Delgado J, Escolero O, Domínguez E, Suarez M (2010) Socio-economic development in arid zones: the influence of water availability in the San Luis Potosi Basin, Mexico. In: Fernandez-Bernal A, De La Rosa MA (eds) Arid environmental. Nova, New York.
20. o 2005-282. Melbourne, Australia.
21. Mitchell VG, Diaper C (2005b) UVQ: a tool for assessing the water and contaminant balance impacts of urban development scenarios. Water Sci Technol 52(12): 91-98.
22. Mitchell G, Diaper C (2006) Simulating the urban water and contaminant cycle. Environ Model Softw 21: 129-134.
23. Mitchell VG, Diaper C, Gray SR, Rahilly M (2003a) UVQ: modelling the movement of water and contaminants through the total urban water cycle. Paper presented at the 28th international hydrology and water resources symposium. Wollongong, NSW.
24. Mitchell VG, McMahon T, Mein RG (2003b) Component of the total water balance of an urban catchment. Environ Manag 32(6): 735-746.
25. Morris B, Rueedi J, Mansour M (2006) A sandstone aquifer: Doncaster, UK. In: Wolf L, Morris B, Burn S (eds) Urban water resources toolbox-models for sustainability assessment. IWA, London, pp 144-190.
26. PDUSLP - Plan Estatal de Desarrollo Urbano del Estado de San Luis Potosí 2001-2020 (2000) Elaboró: gobierno del Estado de San Luis Potosí, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí.
27. Rueedi J, Cronin AA (2005) AISUWRS Work-package 10: UVQ report. EU project code EVK1-CT-2002-0110. Robens Centre for Public and Environmental Health, Guildford.
28. Souvent P, Vizintin G, Cencur Curk B (2006) A layered aquifer system: Ljubljana, Slovenia. In: Wolf L, Morris B, Burn S (eds) Urban water resources toolbox-models for sustainability assessment. IWA, London, pp 191-216.
29. Stephenson D (1994) Comparison of the water balance for an undeveloped and a suburban catchment. Hydrol Sci 39(4): 295-307.
30. Trueba V (2005) La subsidencia regional y agrietamiento del subsuelo en San Luis Potosí por la sobreexplotación de los acuíferos. In: Proyecto de manejo integrado y sostenible del agua en la región centro de San Luis Potosí. Informe técnico. Programa de modernización del manejo del agua - PROMMA, Organización Meteorológica Mundial.
31. Wolf L (2006) Influence of leaky sewer systems on groundwater resources beneath the City of Rastatt, Germany - Abschätzung der Grundwasserbeeinflussung durch defekte Abwasserkanälem im Gebiet der Stadt Rastatt. Schriftenreihe Angewandte Geologie, 75, 205 p, Universität Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe. Available via http://www. ubka. uni-karlsruhe. de/eva/index. html.
32. Wolf L, Morris B, Dillon P, Vanderzalm J, Rueedi J, Burn S, Cook S (2006a) AISUWRS urban water resources toolbox - a brief summary. In: Wolf L, Morris B, Burn S (eds) AISUWRS urban water resources toolbox - integrating groundwater into urban water management. IWA, London, pp 282-290.
33. Wolf L, Morris BL, Burn S, Hötzl H (2006b) The AISUWRS approach. In: Wolf L, Morris B, Burn S (eds) Urban water resources toolbox-integrating groundwater into urban water management. IWA, London, p 296.
34. Wong T, Coleman J, Duncan H, Fletcher T, Jenkins G, Siriwardena L, Wootton R (2002) Music model for urban stormwater improvement conceptualisation, User Manual. CRC Catchment Hydrology, Australia.
35. Xiaoqin W (2009) A proposal and application of the integrated benefit assessment model for urban water resources exploitation and utilization. Water Resour Manag 23: 1171-1182. doi: 10. 1007/s11269-008-9321-1.