Applying sustainable development principles to contaminated land management using the SuRF-UK framework

Remediation

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 77-100

  Bardos, Paul ^a   Bone, Brian ^b   Boyle, Richard ^c   Ellis, Dave ^d   Evans, Frank ^e   Harries, Nicola D ^f   Smith, Jonathan W N ^g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b Bone Environmental Consultant Ltd   (United Kingdom)

^c National Housing and Regeneration Agency for England   (United Kingdom)

^d DUPONT COMPANY   (United States)

^e NATIONAL GRID   (United Kingdom)

^f CL:AIRE   (United Kingdom)

^g SHELL GLOBAL SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL B V   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928321274     PISSN: 10515658     EISSN: 15206831     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rem.20283     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Al-Tabbaa, A., Smith, S., De Munck, C., Dixon, T., Doak, J., Garvin, S., & Raco, M. (2007). Climate change, pollutant linkage and brownfield regeneration. In T. Dixon, M. Raco, P. Catney, & D. N. Lerner (Eds.), Sustainable brownfield regeneration (pp. 265–314). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
2. Bardos, R. P. (2003). Report of the NICOLE workshop: Management of contaminated land towards a sustainable future: Opportunities, challenges and barriers for the sustainable management of contaminated land in Europe. March 12–14, 2003, Barcelona, Spain. Land Contamination and Reclamation, 11, 449–472.
3. Bardos, R. P. (2008). Report of the NICOLE/SAGTA workshop: Sustainable remediation, March 3, 2008, London, UK. Land Contamination and Reclamation, 16, 381–403.
4. Bardos, R. P. (2010). Report of the NICOLE workshop: Sustainable remediation—A solution to an unsustainable past? June 3–5, 2009, Leuven, Belgium. Land Contamination and Reclamation, 18, 81–119.
5. Bardos, P., Bakker, L., Slenders, H., & Nathanail, P. (in press). Sustainable remediation. In F. A. Swartjes (Ed.), Dealing with contaminated sites: From theory towards practical application. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
6. Bardos, R. P., Lewis, A. J., Nortcliff, S., Mariotti, C., Marot, F., & Sullivan, T. (2002). Review of decision support tools for contaminated land management, and their use in Europe, final report. Wien, Austria: Austrian Federal Environment Agency on behalf of CLARINET.
7. Building Research Establishment. (2004). Assessment of sustainability tools. BRE Report 15961. Glasgow, UK: Author.
8. Contaminated Land: Applications in Real Environments (CL:AIRE). (2006). The role of the UK development industry in brownfield regeneration. London: Author.
9. Contaminated Land: Applications in Real Environments (CL:AIRE). (2007a). Uncovering the true impacts of remediation. London: Author.
10. Contaminated Land: Applications in Real Environments (CL:AIRE). (2007b). Measuring sustainability: What's in a number? London: Author.
11. Contaminated Land: Applications in Real Environments (CL:AIRE). (2009). A review of published sustainability indicator sets: How applicable are they to contaminated land remediation indicator-set development? London: Author.
12. Contaminated Land: Applications in Real Environments (CL:AIRE). (2010a). A decade of change for UK's land use: Economic growth through sustainable regeneration. Public Consultation. London: Author.
13. Contaminated Land: Applications in Real Environments (CL:AIRE). (2010b). A framework for assessing the sustainability of soil and groundwater remediation. London: Author.
14. Denneman, C. (1999). The Netherlands. In C. Ferguson & H. Kasamas (Eds.), Risk assessment for contaminated sites in Europe (Vol. 2, pp 107–121) Nottingham: UK: LQM Press.
15. Dixon, T., Raco, M., Catney, P., & Lerner, D. N. (2007). Sustainable brownfield regeneration: Liveable places from problem spaces. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
16. Donnelly, A., Jennings, E., Mooney, P., Finnan, J., Lynn, D., Jones, M., O'Mahony, T., …. Byrne, G. (2006). Workshop approach to developing objectives, targets and indicators for use in SEA. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 8, 135–156.
17. Donnelly, A., Jones, M., O'Mahony, T., & Byrne, G. (2007). Selecting environmental indicators for use in strategic environmental assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27, 161–175.
18. Edwards, D., Pahlen, G., Bertram, C., & Nathanail, P. (2005). Best practice guidance for sustainable brownfield regeneration. Retrieved from http://www.rescue-europe.com.
19. Environment Agency. (1999a). Cost benefit analysis for remediation of land contamination. R&D Technical Report P316. Bristol, UK: Author.
20. Environment Agency. (1999b). Costs and benefits associated with remediation of contaminated groundwater: A review of the issues. R&D Technical Report P278. Bristol, UK: Author.
21. Environment Agency. (2000a). Assessing the wider environmental value of remediating land contamination. R&D Technical Report P238. Bristol, UK: Author.
22. Environment Agency. (2000b). Costs and benefits associated with remediation of contaminated groundwater: Framework for assessment. R&D Technical Report P279. Bristol, UK: Author.
23. Environment Agency. (2005). Indicators for land contamination. Science Report SC030039/SR. Bristol, UK: Author.
24. Environment Agency & Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. (2004). Model procedures for the management of land contamination. R&D Report CLR11. Bristol, UK: Author.
25. Ernst and Young. (2006, September). Eco-industry, its size, employment, perspectives and barriers to growth in an enlarged EU. Final Report for the European Commission DG Environment. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/enveco/eco_industry/pdf/ecoindustry2006.pdf.
26. EURODEMO Project Consortium. (2006). Model protocols and guidance for analytical sustainability assessment tools. Deliverable reference number: D 5-4. Project no. (GOCE) 003985. Vienna, Austria: Umweltbundesamt. Retrieved from http://www.eurodemo.info/project-information-2/.
27. EURODEMO Project Consortium. (2007). Framework for sustainable land remediation and management. Deliverable reference number: D 5-3. Project no. (GOCE) 003985. Vienna, Austria: Umweltbundesamt. Retrieved from http://www.eurodemo.info/project-information-2/.
28. European Environment Agency. (2007). Progress in management of contaminated sites (CSI 015). Retrieved from http://themes.eea.europa.eu/IMS/IMS/ISpecs/ISpecification20041007131746/IAssessment1152619898983/view_content.
29. Forbes, R., Favara, P., Lovenburg, J., Downey, D., & De Groot, P. (2009). Sustainable remediation. Military Engineer, 101(659), 69–70.
30. Franken, R., van den Berg, R., van Wezel, A., de Cleen, M., & Versluijs, C. W. (2008). Societal cost-benefit analysis of the soil remediation operation in the Netherlands. ConSoil 2008 Proceedings of the 10th International UFZ-Deltares-TNO Conference on Soil-Water Systems, pp. 134–140.
31. Franz, M., Koj, A., & Nathanail, P. (2007). Sustainability assessment of brownfield regeneration—A review of different approaches. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Managing Urban Land: Towards More Effective and Sustainable Brownfield Revitalisation Policies, pp. 255–267.
32. Harbottle, M. J., Al-Tabbaa, A., & Evans, C. W. (2008a). Sustainability of land remediation, Part 1: Overall analysis. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers Geotechnical Engineering, 161, 75–92.
33. Harbottle, M. J., Al-Tabbaa, A., & Evans, C. W. (2008b). Sustainability of land remediation, Part 2: Impact assessment. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers Geotechnical Engineering, 161, 117–127.
34. Hardisty, P. E., Ozdemiroglu, E., & Arch, S. (2008). Sustainable remediation: Including the external costs of remediation. Land Contamination and Reclamation, 16, 307–317.
35. Harmsma, S. (2010). The Dutch inventory of contaminated sites: The balance after five years. In R. P. Bardos, Report of the NICOLE workshop: Contaminated land management: Opportunities, challenges and financial consequences of evolving legislation in Europe, July 6–7, 2010, Trietse, Italy. Retrieved from http://www.nicole.org/publications/library.asp?listing=1.
36. Haughton, A. J., Bond, A. J., Lovett, A. A., Dockerty, T., Sünnenberg, G., Clark, S. J., Bohan, D. A., …. Karp, A. (2009). A novel, integrated approach to assessing social, economic and environmental implications of changing rural land-use: A case study of perennial biomass crops. Journal of Applied Ecology, 46, 315–322.
37. Her Majesty's Government, Scottish Executive, Welsh Assembly Government & Northern Ireland Office. (2005). One future—Different paths. The UK's shared framework for sustainable development. London: DEFRA.
38. Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council (ITRC). (2006). Life cycle cost analysis. RPO-2. Washington, DC: Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council, Remediation Process Optimization Team.
39. Network for Industrially Contaminated Land in Europe (NICOLE). (2010). NICOLE road map and guidance: Considering sustainability in remediation. Apeldoorn, the Netherlands: NICOLE, Deltares.
40. NOBIS. (1995a). Risk reduction, environmental merit and costs, REC-Method, Phase 1. Document 95-1-03. Gouda, the Netherlands: CUR/NOBIS.
41. NOBIS. (1995b). Risk reduction, environmental merit and costs, REC-Method, Phase 2: A methodology based on risk reduction, environmental merit and costs. Document 95-1-03. Gouda, the Netherlands: CUR/NOBIS.
42. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. (2005). Sustainability appraisal of regional spatial strategies and local development documents. London: Author. Retrieved from http://www.communities.gov.uk/index.asp?id=1161341.
43. Onwubuya, K., Cundy, A., Puschenreiter, M., Kumpiene, J., Bone, B., Greaves, J., …. Müller, I. (2009). Developing decision support tools for the selection of “gentle” remediation approaches. Science of the Total Environment, 407, 6132–6142.
44. Page, C. A., Diamond, M. L., Campbell, M., & McKenna, S. (1999). Life-cycle framework for assessment of site remediation options: case study. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 18, 801–810.
45. Pediaditi, K., Wehrmeyer, W., & Chenoweth, J. (2005). Monitoring the sustainability of brownfield redevelopment projects: The redevelopment assessment framework (RAF). Contaminated Land and Reclamation, 13(2), 173–183.
46. Pediaditi, K., Wehrmeyer, W., & Chenoweth, J. (2006). Developing sustainability indicators for brownfield redevelopment projects. Engineering Sustainability, 159(1), 3–10.
47. Pediaditi, K., Wehrmeyer, W., & Burnigham, K. (2007). Evaluating the sustainability of brownfield redevelopment projects. In T. Dixon, M. Raco, P. Catney, & D. N. Lerner (Eds.), Sustainable brownfield regeneration (pp. 315–351). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
48. Pollard, S. J. T., Brookes, A., Earl, N., Lowe, J., Kearney, T. E., & Nathanail, C. P. (2004). Integrating decision tools for the sustainable management of land contamination. Science of the Total Environment, 325(1–3), 15–28.
49. RESCUE. (2003). Analytical sustainability framework in the context of brownfield regeneration in France, Germany, Poland and the UK. Final report of Work Package 1. Retrieved from http://www.rescue-europe.com.
50. Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA). (2009). Dealing with land contamination in Scotland. Edinburgh, UK: Author.
51. Slenders, H., Haselhoff, A., Lewnears, H., Nijboer, M., Sinke, A., & Volkers, B. (2005). Practijkdocument ROSA: Handreiking voor het maken van keuzes en afspraken en mobiele verontreingingen. September 2005. SKB Project PP04-102. Apeldoorn, the Netherlands: TNO.
52. Therivel, R. (2004, June 9). Sustainable urban environment—Metrics, models and toolkits: Analysis of sustainability/social tools. Report to the SUE-MoT consortium. Retrieved from http://sue-mot.org/publications/
53. US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). (2008, April). Green remediation: Incorporating sustainable environmental practices into remediation of contaminated sites. Technology Primer April 2008. EPA 542-R-08-002. Retrieved from http://www.cluin.org/download/remed/Green-Remediation-Primer.pdf.
54. US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). (2009). Superfund green remediation strategy. Washington, DC: US EPA, Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation.
55. US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). (2010). Archive of July 12, 2010 seminar: US and EU perspectives on green and sustainable remediation. Retrieved from http://www.cluin.org/consoil/.
56. US Sustainable Remediation Forum. (2009). Integrating sustainable principles, practices, and metrics into remediation projects. Remediation Journal, 19(3), 5–114.
57. Vegter, J., Lowe J., & Kasamas, H. (Eds.). (2002). Sustainable management of contaminated land: An overview. Report. Wien, Austria: Austrian Federal Environment Agency on behalf of CLARINET. Retrieved from http://www.commonforum.eu/publications_clarinet.asp.
58. Vejre, H., Jensen, S. F., & Thorsen, B. J. (2009). Demonstrating the importance of intangible ecosystem services from peri-urban landscapes. Ecological Complexity, 7, 338–348.
59. Veraat, J. L., Hoogeveen, N. Y., & Westrik, K. G. (2005). We learn(ed) how to act: A Dutch perspective on soil management. ConSoil 2005 Proceedings of the 9th International FZK/TNO Conference on Soil-Water Systems, pp. 3038–3055.
60. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). (1987). Our common future. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
61. Worrall, R., Neil, D., Brereton, D., & Mulligan, D. (2009). Towards a sustainability criteria and indicators framework for legacy mine land. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17, 1426–1434.