Evaluating the Sustainability of Brownfield Redevelopment Projects

Sustainable Brownfield Regeneration: Liveable Places from Problem Spaces

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 315-351

  Pediaditi, Kalliope ^a   Wehrmeyer, Walter ^b   Burningham, Kate ^b  

^a MEDITERRANEAN AGRONOMIC INSTITUTE OF CHANIA   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Brownfield redevelopment; Indicator systems; Land use; Redevelopment projects; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

EID: 84889476047     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470692110.ch12     Document Type: Chapter

References (32)

1. Adams, D. and Watkins, C. (2002) Greenfields, Brownfields and Housing Development. Blackwell Science, Oxford.
2. Ball, M. (1999) Chasing a snail: innovation and housebuilding firms' strategies. Housing Studies, 14 (1), 9-22.
3. Bardos, R.P., Nathanail, C.P. and Weenk, A. (1999) Assessing the Wider Environmental Value of Remediating Land Contamination, A Review. R&D Technical Report P238. Environment Agency, Swindon.
4. Bell, S. and Morse, S. (2003) Measuring Sustainability: Learning from Doing. Earthscan, London.
5. Dair, C. and Williams, K. (2004) Sustainable Land Re-Use: The Influence of Different Stakeholders in Achieving Brownfield Development in England. Brownfield Research Paper, No.1. Centre for Sustainable Development, Oxford Brookes University, Headington.
6. Deakin, M., Huovila, P., Rao, S., Sunikka, M. and Vreeker, R. (2002) The assessment of sustainable urban development. Building Research and Information, 30 (2), 95-108.
7. Deakin, N. and Edwards, J. (1993) The Enterprise Culture and the Inner City. Routledge, London.
8. Defra and EA (2004) Model Procedures for the Management of Land Contamination, Contaminated Land Report 11. www.environment-agency.gov.uk/commondata/105385/model_procedures_881483.pdf
9. DETR (1998) Planning for Communities of the Future. The Stationery Office, London.
10. Environment Council (2002) Dialogue for Sustainability: Facilitation Skills and Principles. Environmental Council C1/V1, London.
11. Harris, M.R., Herbert, S.M. and Smith, M.A. (1995) Remedial Treatment for Contaminated Land: Classification and Selection of Remedial Methods, IV, SP104. CIRIA, London.
12. IEMA (2002) Perspectives: Guidelines on Participation in Environmental Decisionmaking. Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment, Lincoln.
13. Imrie, R. and Thomas, H. (1993) The limits of property led regeneration. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 11, 87-102.
14. Innes, J.E. and Booher, D.E. (2000) Indicators for sustainable communities: a strategy building on complexity theory and distributed intelligence. Planning Theory and Practice, 1 (2), 173-86.
15. Mitchell, G. (1996) Problems and fundamentals of sustainable development indicators. Sustainable Development, 4, 1-11.
16. ODPM (1999) Projections of Households in England 2021 (19 October 1999) www.odpm.gov.uk/stellent/groups/odpm_housing/document/page/odpm_house_604206.hcsp
17. Patton, M.Q. (1997) Utilization-Focused Evaluation: The New Century Text, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA and London.
18. Pediaditi, K. (2006) Evaluating the sustainability of brownfield redevelopment projects: the Redevelopment Assessment Framework (RAF). PhD thesis, Surrey University.
19. Pediaditi, K., Wehrmeyer, W. and Chenoweth, J. (2006a) Developing sustainability indicators for brownfield redevelopment projects. Engineering Sustainability, 159 (March), 3-10.
20. Pediaditi, K., Wehrmeyer, W. and Burningham, K. (2006b) Evaluating brownfield redevelopment projects: a review of existing sustainability indicator tools and their adoption by the UK development industry. In: Brownfields III, Prevention, Assessment, Rehabilitation and Development of Brownfield Sites (eds C.A. Brebbia and U. Mander), pp. 51-62. WIT Press, Billerica MA.
21. Pediaditi, K., Wehrmeyer, W. and Chenoweth, J. (2005) Monitoring the sustainability of brownfield redevelopment projects: the Redevelopment Assessment Framework (RAF). Contaminated Land and Reclamation, 13 (2), 173-83.
22. RESCUE (2005) Development of an Analytical Sustainability Framework for the Context of Brownfield Regeneration in France, Germany, Poland and Wales. Workpackage 1. www.rescue-europe.com
23. RICS Foundation (2003) Benchmarking urban regeneration. FiBRE Findings in Built and Rural Environments, December. Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, London.
24. Rudland, D.J. and Jackson, S.D. (2004) Selection of Remedial Treatments for Contaminated Land: A Guide to Good Practice. CIRIA C622, London.
25. Sanoff, H. (2000) Community Participation Methods in Design and Planning. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.
26. SNIFFER (1999) Communicating Understanding of Contaminated Land Risks, SR97(11)F. Stirling.
27. SUE-MoT (2004) http://www.sue-mot.org.uk
28. Tinker, L., Cobb, D., Bond, A. and Cashmore, M. (2005) Impact mitigation in environmental impact assessment: paper promises or the basis of consent conditions. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 23 (4), 265-80.
29. Ukaga, O. and Maser, C. (2004) Evaluating Sustainable Development: Giving People a Voice in their Destiny. Stylus Publishing, Virginia.
30. Wehrmeyer, W. (2001) A guide to communicating contaminated land risk. Land Contamination and Reclamation, 9 (1), 21-8.
31. Weston, J. (2000a) EIA, decision-making theory and screening and scoping in UK practice. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 43 (2), 185-203.
32. Weston, J. (2000b) Reviewing environmental statements: new demands for the UK's EIA procedures. Planning Practice and Research, 15 (1/2), 135-42.