The laboratory mouse and wild immunology

Parasite Immunology

Volumn 37, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 267-273

  Viney, M ^a   Lazarou, L ^a   Abolins, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Mus; Ecoimmunology; Fitness; Wild

Indexed keywords

COTTON RAT; DOMESTICATION; ECOLOGY; EXPERIMENTAL MOUSE; GENE MAPPING; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HUMAN; IMMUNE RESPONSE; IMMUNOLOGY; INBRED STRAIN; MAMMALIAN GENETICS; MOUSE; MUS MUSCULUS DOMESTICUS; NATURAL KILLER CELL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATTUS NORVEGICUS; REVIEW; SIGMODON HISPIDUS; TAXONOMY; WILD ANIMAL; ANIMAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EXPERIMENTAL ANIMAL; RAT;

ANIMALIA; MAMMALIA; MUS MUSCULUS DOMESTICUS; RATTUS;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, LABORATORY; ANIMALS, WILD; MICE; RATS;

EID: 84928315597     PISSN: 01419838     EISSN: 13653024     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/pim.12150     Document Type: Review

References (42)

1. Silver LM. Mouse Genetics. Concepts and Applications. Oxford, OUP, 1995: 362.
2. Lundrigan BL, Jansa SA & Tucker PK. Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Mus, based on paternally, maternally, and biparentally inherited characters. Syst Biol 2002; 51: 410-431.
3. Suzuki H, Nunome M, Kinoshita G, et al. Evolutionary and dispersal history of Eurasian house mice Mus musculus clarified by more extensive geographic sampling of mitochondrial DNA. Heredity 2013; 111: 375-390.
4. Berry RJ & Scriven PN. The house mouse: a model and motor for evolutionary understanding. Biol J Linn Soc 2005; 84: 335-347.
5. Raufaste N, Orth A, Belkhir K, et al. Inferences of selection and migration in the Danish house mouse hybrid zone. Biol J Linn Soc 2005; 84: 593-616.
6. Wade CM, Kulbokas EJ, Kirby AW, et al. The mosaic structure of variation in the laboratory mouse genome. Nature 2002; 420: 574-578.
7. Ideraabdullah FY, Casa-Esperón E, Bell TA, et al. Genetic and haplotype diversity among wild-derived mouse inbred strains. Genome Res 2004; 14: 1880-1887.
8. Bronson FH. Energy allocation and reproductive development in wild and domestic house mice. Biol Reprod 1984; 31: 83-88.
9. Bronson FH. The reproductive ecology of the house mouse. Q Rev Biol 1979; 54: 265-299.
10. Speakman J. Factors influencing the daily energy expenditure of small mammals. Proc Nutr Soc 1997; 56: 1119-1136.
11. Stueck KL & Barrett GW. Effects of resource partitioning on the population dynamics and energy utilization strategies of feral house mice (Mus musculus) populations under experimental field conditions. Ecology 1978; 59: 539-551.
12. Pocock MJO, Hauffe HC & Searle JB. Dispersal in house mice. Biol J Linn Soc 2005; 84: 565-583.
13. Berry RJ & Bronson FH. Life-history and bioeconomy of the house mouse. Biol Rev 1992; 67: 519-550.
14. Rowe FP, Bradfield A, Quy RJ & Swinney T. Relationship between eye lens weight and age in the wild house mouse (Mus musculus). J Appl Ecol 1985; 22: 55-61.
15. Becker SD, Bennett M, Stewart JP & Hurst JL. Serological survey of virus infection among wild mice (Mus domesticus) in the UK. Lab Anim 2007; 41: 229-238.
16. Parker SE, Malone S, Bunte RM & Smith AL. Infectious diseases in wild mice (Mus musculus) collected on and around the University of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia) campus. Comp Med 2009; 59: 424-430.
17. Murphy RG, Williams RW, Hughes JM, Hide G, Ford NJ & Oldbury DJ. The urban house mouse (Mus domesticus) as a reservoir of infection for the human parasite Toxoplasma gondii: an unrecognised public health issue. Int J Environ Health Res 2008; 18: 177-185.
18. Moro D, Lloyd ML, Smith AL, Shellam GR & Lawson MA. Murine viruses in an island population of introduced house mice and endemic short-tailed mice in Western Australia. J Wildl Dis 1999; 35: 301-310.
19. Smith AL, Singleton GR, Hansen GM & Shellam G. A serologic survey for viruses and Mycoplasma pulmonis among wild house mice (Mus domesticus) in south-eastern Australia. J Wildl Dis 1993; 29: 219-229.
20. Tattersall FH, Nowell F & Smith RH. A review of the endoparasites of wild house mice Mus domesticus. Mamm Rev 1994; 24: 61-71.
21. Behnke JM & Wakelin D. The survival of Trichuris muris in wild populations of its natural hosts. Parasitology 1973; 67: 157-164.
22. Singleton GR. Population dynamics of Mus musculus and its parasites in Mallee wheatlands in Victoria during and after a drought. Aust Wildlife Res 1985; 12: 437-445.
23. Lochmiller RL, Vestey MR & McMurray ST. Primary immune responses of selected small mammal species to heterologous erythrocytes. Comp Biochem Physiol A 1991; 100: 139-143.
24. Abolins SR, Pocock MJO, Hafalla JCR, Riley EM & Viney ME. Measures of immune function of wild mice, Mus musculus. Mol Ecol 2011; 20: 881-892.
25. Boysen P, Eide DM & Storset AK. Natural killer cells in free-living Mus musculus have a primed phenotype. Mol Ecol 2011; 20: 5103-5110.
26. Stephan K, Smirnova I, Jacque B & Poltorak A. Genetic analysis of the innate immune responses in wild-derived inbred strains of mice. Eur J Immunol 2007; 37: 212-223.
27. Mahieu T, Park JM, Revets H, et al. The wild-derived inbred mouse strain SPRET/Ei is resistant to LPS and defective in IFN-β production. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103: 2292-2297.
28. Thiriot A, Drapier AM, Mémet S, et al. Wild-derived mouse strains, a valuable model to study B cell responses. Mol Immunol 2009; 46: 601-612.
29. Scalzo AA, Manzur M, Forbeds CA, Brown MG & Shellman GR. NK gene complex haplotype variability and host resistance alleles to murine cytomegalovirus in wild mouse populations. Immunol Cell Biol 2005; 83: 144-149.
30. Espeli M, Clatworthy MR, Bökers S, et al. Analysis of a wild mouse promoter variant reveals a novel role for FcγRIIb in the control of the germinal center and autoimmunity. J Exp Med 2012; 209: 2307-2319.
31. Devalapalli AP, Lesher A, Shieh K, et al. Increased levels of IgE and autoreactive, polyreactive IgG in wild rodents: implications for the hygiene hypothesis. Scand J Immunol 2006; 64: 125-136.
32. Lesher A, Li B, Whitt P, et al. Increased IL-4 production and attenuated proliferative and pro-inflammatory responses of splenocytes from wild-caught rats (Rattus norvegicus). Immunol Cell Biol 2006; 84: 374-382.
33. Trama AM, Holzknecht ZE, Thomas AD, et al. Lymphocyte phenotypes in wild-caught rats suggest potential mechanisms underlying increased immune sensitivity in post-industrial environments. Cell Mol Immunol 2012; 9: 163-174.
34. Lochmiller RL, Vestey MR & McMurray ST. Temporal variation in humoral and cell-mediated immune response in a Sigmodon hispidus population. Ecology 1994; 75: 236-245.
35. Viney ME & Riley EM. From Immunology to Eco-immunology: More than a New Name. In Malagoli D, Ottaviani E (eds): Eco-Immunology: Evolutive Aspects and Future Perspectives. London, Springer, 2014: 1-19.
36. Webb RE, Leslie DM, Lochmiller RL & Masters RE. Immune function and hematology of male cottons rats (Sigmodon hispidus) in response to food supplementation and methionine. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 2003; 136: 577-589.
37. Viney ME, Riley EM & Buchanan KL. Optimal immune responses: immunocompetence revisited. Trends Ecol Evol 2005; 20: 665-669.
38. Pedersen AB & Babayan SA. Wild immunology. Mol Ecol 2011; 20: 872-880.
39. Telfer S, Lambin X, Birtles R, et al. Species interactions in a parasite community drive infection risk in a wildlife population. Science 2010; 330: 243-246.
40. Clutton-Brock TH & Pemberton JM. Soay Sheep: Dynamics and Selection in an Island Population. Cambridge, CUP, 2004: 383.
41. Stockley P, Ramm SA, Sherborne A, Thom M, Paterson S & Hurst JL. Baculum morphology predicts reproductive success of male house mice under sexual selection. BMC Biol 2013; 11: 66.
42. Baldwin IT. Training a new generation of biologists: the genome-enabled field biologists. Proc Am Philos Soc 2009; 156: 205-214.