Clinical Course Score (CCS): A new clinical score to evaluate efficacy of neurotrauma treatment in traumatic brain injury and subarachnoid hemorrhage

Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 26-30

  Brandner, Sebastian ^a   Kellermann, Isabel ^a   Hore, Nirjhar ^a   Bozhkov, Yavor ^a   Buchfelder, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ERLANGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Neurointensive care; Neurotrauma; Subarachnoidal hemorrhage; Traumatic brain injury

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL COURSE SCORE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; GLASGOW COMA SCALE; GLASGOW OUTCOME SCALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE ASSESSMENT; NEUROTRAUMATOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SEX DIFFERENCE; SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY; ADOLESCENT; BRAIN INJURIES; INJURY SCALE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; BRAIN INJURIES; FEMALE; GLASGOW COMA SCALE; GLASGOW OUTCOME SCALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE; TRAUMA SEVERITY INDICES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84928268990     PISSN: 08984921     EISSN: 15371921     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000083     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Stead LG, Bodhit AN, Patel PS, et al. TBI surveillance using the common data elements for traumatic brain injury: A population study. Int J Emerg Med. 2013;6: 5-11.
2. Carney NA, Ghajar J. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. Introduction. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24(suppl 1): S1-S2.
3. Adams HP Jr, del Zoppo G, Alberts MJ, et al. Guidelines for the early management of adults with ischemic stroke: A guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council, Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council, and the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and Quality of Care Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Groups: The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline as an educational tool for neurologists. Stroke. 2007;38: 1655-1711.
4. Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet. 1974;2: 81-84.
5. Udekwu P, Kromhout-Schiro S, Vaslef S, et al. Glasgow Coma Scale score, mortality, and functional outcome in head-injured patients. J Trauma. 2004;56: 1084-1089.
6. Kornbluth J, Bhardwaj A. Evaluation of coma: A critical appraisal of popular scoring systems. Neurocrit Care. 2011;14: 134-143.
7. Wijdicks EFM, Bamlet WR, Maramattom BV, et al. Validation of a new coma scale: The FOUR score. Ann Neurol. 2005;58: 585-593.
8. Benzer A, Mitterschiffthaler G, Marosi M, et al. Prediction of nonsurvival after trauma: Innsbruck Coma Scale. Lancet. 1991;338: 977-978.
9. Starmark JE, Stalhammar D, Holmgren E, et al. A comparison of the Glasgow Coma Scale and the Reaction Level Scale (RLS85). J Neurosurg. 1988;69: 699-706.
10. Kelly CA, Upex A, Bateman DN. Comparison of consciousness level assessment in the poisoned patient using the alert/verbal/painful/unresponsive scale and the Glasgow Coma Scale. Ann Emerg Med. 2004;44: 108-113.
11. Mullie A, Verstringe P, Buylaert W, et al. Predictive value of Glasgow coma score for awakening after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Cerebral Resuscitation Study Group of the Belgian Society for Intensive Care. Lancet. 1988;1: 137-140.
12. Schefold JC, Storm C, Kruger A, et al. The Glasgow Coma Score is a predictor of good outcome in cardiac arrest patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia. Resuscitation. 2009;80: 658-661.
13. Geocadin RG, Buitrago MM, Torbey MT, et al. Neurologic prognosis and withdrawal of life support after resuscitation from cardiac arrest. Neurology. 2006;67: 105-108.
14. Niskanen M, Kari A, Nikki P, et al. Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II) and Glasgow coma scores as predictors of outcome from intensive care after cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med. 1991;19: 1465-1473.
15. Starke RM, Komotar RJ, Kim GH, et al. Evaluation of a revised Glasgow Coma Score scale in predicting long-Term outcome of poor grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients. J Clin Neurosci. 2009;16: 894-899.
16. Nichol AD, Higgins AM, Gabbe BJ, et al. Measuring functional and quality of life outcomes following major head injury: Common scales and checklists. Injury. 2011;42: 281-287.
17. Jennett B, Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet. 1975;1: 480-484.
18. Anderson SI, Housley AM, Jones PA, et al. Glasgow Outcome Scale: An inter-rater reliability study. Brain Inj. 1993;7: 309-317.
19. Wilson JT, Pettigrew LE, Teasdale GM. Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: Guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma. 1998;15: 573-585.
20. Choi SC, Marmarou A, Bullock R, et al. Primary end points in phase III clinical trials of severe head trauma: DRS versus GOS. The American Brain Injury Consortium Study Group. J Neurotrauma. 1998;15: 771-776.
21. Bullock MR, Povlishock JT. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. Editor's Commentary. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24(suppl 1): Vii-viii.
22. Connolly ES Jr, Rabinstein AA, Carhuapoma JR, et al. Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/american Stroke Association. Stroke. 2012;43: 1711-1737.
23. Oshiro EM, Walter KA, Piantadosi S, et al. A new subarachnoid hemorrhage grading system based on the Glasgow Coma Scale: A comparison with the Hunt and Hess and World Federation of Neurological Surgeons Scales in a clinical series. Neurosurgery. 1997;41: 140-147; discussion 147-148.
24. Sessler CN, Gosnell MS, Grap MJ, et al. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale: Validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166: 1338-1344.