Particle-antiparticle mixing, CP violation and rare K and B decays in a minimal theory of fermion masses

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2013, Issue 4, 2013, Pages

  Buras, Andrzej J ^a   Girrbach, Jennifer ^a   Ziegler, Robert ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Beyond standard model; CP violation; Rare decays

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928229151     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP04(2013)168     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. A.J. Buras, C. Grojean, S. Pokorski and R. Ziegler, FCNC effects in a minimal theory of fermion masses, JHEP 08 (2011) 028 [arXiv:1105.3725] [INSPIRE].
2. −, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 021801 [arXiv:1211.2674] [INSPIRE].
3. A.J. Buras, F. Fazio and J. Girrbach, The anatomy of Z' and Z with flavour changing neutral currents in the flavour precision era, JHEP 02 (2013) 116 [arXiv:1211.1896] [INSPIRE].
4. s,dγ in the littlest Higgs model with T-Parity, JHEP 12 (2006) 003 [hep-ph/0605214] [INSPIRE].
5. K. Agashe, G. Perez and A. Soni, Flavor structure of warped extra dimension models, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 016002 [hep-ph/0408134] [INSPIRE].
6. M. Blanke, A.J. Buras, B. Duling, S. Gori and A. Weiler, ΔF = 2 observables and fine-tuning in a warped extra dimension with custodial protection, JHEP 03 (2009) 001 [arXiv:0809.1073] [INSPIRE].
7. Z. Lalak, S. Pokorski and G.G. Ross, Beyond MFV in family symmetry theories of fermion masses, JHEP 08 (2010) 129 [arXiv:1006.2375] [INSPIRE].
8. F. del Aguila and J. Santiago, Universality limits on bulk fermions, Phys. Lett. B 493 (2000) 175 [hep-ph/0008143] [INSPIRE].
9. F. del Aguila, M. Pérez-Victoria and J. Santiago, Effective description of quark mixing, Phys. Lett. B 492 (2000) 98 [hep-ph/0007160] [INSPIRE].
10. F. del Aguila, M. Pérez-Victoria and J. Santiago, Observable contributions of new exotic quarks to quark mixing, JHEP 09 (2000) 011 [hep-ph/0007316] [INSPIRE].
11. A.J. Buras, B. Duling and S. Gori, The impact of Kaluza-Klein fermions on standard model fermion couplings in a RS model with custodial protection, JHEP 09 (2009) 076 [arXiv:0905.2318] [INSPIRE].
12. cb|, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 031301 [arXiv:0907.2461] [INSPIRE].
13. C.-H. Chen and S.-h. Nam, Left-right mixing on leptonic and semileptonic B → U decays, Phys. Lett. B 666 (2008) 462 [arXiv:0807.0896] [INSPIRE].
14. A.J. Buras, K. Gemmler and G. Isidori, Quark flavour mixing with right-handed currents: an effective theory approach, Nucl. Phys. B 843 (2011) 107 [arXiv:1007.1993] [INSPIRE].
15. dγ and constraints on new physics, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 114005 [arXiv:1106.5499] [INSPIRE].
16. τ with a hadronic tagging method using the full data sample of Belle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 131801 [arXiv:1208.4678] [INSPIRE].
17. C. Tarantino, Flavor lattice QCD in the precision era, arXiv:1210.0474 [INSPIRE].
18. S mass difference by short distance QCD corrections beyond leading logarithms, Nucl. Phys. B 419 (1994) 292 [hep-ph/9310311] [INSPIRE].
19. S. Herrlich and U. Nierste, Indirect CP-violation in the neutral kaon system beyond leading logarithms, Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 6505 [hep-ph/9507262] [INSPIRE].
20. S. Herrlich and U. Nierste, The complete |ΔS| = 2 Hamiltonian in the next-to-leading order, Nucl. Phys. B 476 (1996) 27 [hep-ph/9604330] [INSPIRE].
21. 0 mixing in the presence of a heavy top quark, Nucl. Phys. B 347 (1990) 491 [INSPIRE].
22. 0 mixing with an extended Higgs sector, Nucl. Phys. B 523 (1998) 40 [hep-ph/9710245] [INSPIRE].
23. K at next-to-next-to-leading order: the charm-top-quark contribution, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 094026 [arXiv:1007.0684] [INSPIRE].
24. K, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 121801 [arXiv:1108.2036] [INSPIRE].
25. M. Ciuchini, E. Franco, V. Lubicz, G. Martinelli, I. Scimemi et al., Next-to-leading order QCD corrections to ΔF = 2 effective Hamiltonians, Nucl. Phys. B 523 (1998) 501 [hep-ph/9711402] [INSPIRE].
26. A.J. Buras, M. Misiak and J. Urban, Two loop QCD anomalous dimensions of flavor changing four quark operators within and beyond the standard model, Nucl. Phys. B 586 (2000) 397 [hep-ph/0005183] [INSPIRE].
27. A.J. Buras, S. Jager and J. Urban, Master formulae for ΔF = 2 NLO QCD factors in the standard model and beyond, Nucl. Phys. B 605 (2001) 600 [hep-ph/0102316] [INSPIRE].
28. A.J. Buras and J. Girrbach, Complete NLO QCD corrections for tree level ΔF = 2 FCNC processes, JHEP 03 (2012) 052 [arXiv:1201.1302] [INSPIRE].
29. f = 2 + 1 chiral fermions, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 054028 [arXiv:1206.5737] [INSPIRE].
30. f = 2 tmQCD and model independent constraints from the UTA, JHEP 03 (2013) 089 [arXiv:1207.1287] [INSPIRE].
31. C. Bouchard, E. Freeland, C. Bernard, A. El-Khadra, E. Gamiz et al., Neutral B mixing from 2 + 1 flavor lattice-QCD: the standard model and beyond, PoS LATTICE2011 (2011) 274 [arXiv:1112.5642] [INSPIRE].
32. A.J. Buras and D. Guadagnoli, Correlations among new CP-violating effects in ΔF = 2 observables, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 033005 [arXiv:0805.3887] [INSPIRE].
33. K beyond lowest order in the operator product expansion, Phys. Lett. B 688 (2010) 309 [arXiv:1002.3612] [INSPIRE].
34. UTfit collaboration, M. Bona et al., The UTfit collaboration report on the status of the unitarity triangle beyond the standard model. I. Model-independent analysis and minimal flavor violation, JHEP 03 (2006) 080 [hep-ph/0509219] [INSPIRE].
35. sγ, JHEP 08 (2011) 124 [arXiv:1105.5146] [INSPIRE].
36. qγ decays in the left-right model: Higgs particles striking back, JHEP 03 (2012) 024 [arXiv:1111.5014] [INSPIRE].
37. M. Blanke, A.J. Buras, B. Duling, K. Gemmler and S. Gori, Rare K and B decays in a warped extra dimension with custodial protection, JHEP 03 (2009) 108 [arXiv:0812.3803] [INSPIRE].
38. G. Buchalla and A.J. Buras, The rare decays K → π neutrino anti-neutrino, B → × neutrino anti-neutrino and B → lepton+ lepton: an update, Nucl. Phys. B 548 (1999) 309 [hep-ph/9901288] [INSPIRE].
39. +νν at the next-to-next-to-leading order in QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 261805 [hep-ph/0508165] [INSPIRE].
40. +νν at next-to-next-to-leading order, JHEP 11 (2006) 002 [Erratum 1211 (2012) 167] [hep-ph/0603079] [INSPIRE].
41. +νν, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 034006 [arXiv:0805.4119] [INSPIRE].
42. J. Brod, M. Gorbahn and E. Stamou, Two-loop electroweak corrections for the K− > πνν decays, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 034030 [arXiv:1009.0947] [INSPIRE].
43. M. Misiak and J. Urban, QCD corrections to FCNC decays mediated by Z penguins and W boxes, Phys. Lett. B 451 (1999) 161 [hep-ph/9901278] [INSPIRE].
44. 0νν, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80 (2008) 965 [hep-ph/0405132] [INSPIRE].
45. G. Isidori, Flavor physics with light quarks and leptons, eConf C 060409 (2006) 035 [hep-ph/0606047] [INSPIRE].
46. C. Smith, Theory review on rare K decays: standard model and beyond, hep-ph/0608343 [INSPIRE].
47. F. Mescia and C. Smith, Improved estimates of rare K decay matrix-elements from Kl3 decays, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 034017 [arXiv:0705.2025] [INSPIRE].
48. G. Isidori, F. Mescia and C. Smith, Light-quark loops in K → πνν, Nucl. Phys. B 718 (2005) 319 [hep-ph/0503107] [INSPIRE].
49. +νν branching ratio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008) 191802 [arXiv:0808.2459] [INSPIRE].
50. 0νν, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 072004 [arXiv:0911.4789] [INSPIRE].
51. −: a binary STAR on the stage of flavor physics, JHEP 08 (2006) 088 [hep-ph/0606081] [INSPIRE].
52. J. Prades, ChPT progress on non-leptonic and radiative kaon decays, PoS KAON (2008) 022 [arXiv:0707.1789] [INSPIRE].
53. − within the SM, Eur. Phys. J. C 36 (2004) 57 [hep-ph/0404127] [INSPIRE].
54. S. Friot, D. Greynat and E. De Rafael, Rare kaon decays revisited, Phys. Lett. B 595 (2004) 301 [hep-ph/0404136] [INSPIRE].
55. c expansion, Z. Phys. C 57 (1993) 585 [hep-ph/9209231] [INSPIRE].
56. −, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 021805 [hep-ex/0309072] [INSPIRE].
57. −, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 5279 [hep-ex/0001006] [INSPIRE].
58. − parity, JHEP 01 (2007) 066 [hep-ph/0610298] [INSPIRE].
59. s mixing, arXiv:0805.4393 [INSPIRE].
60. − decays, Nucl. Phys. B 672 (2003) 387 [hep-ph/0308008] [INSPIRE].
61. − beyond leading logarithms, Nucl. Phys. B 423 (1994) 349 [hep-ph/9402347] [INSPIRE].
62. A.J. Buras, R. Fleischer, S. Recksiegel and F. Schwab, Anatomy of prominent B and K decays and signatures of CP-violating new physics in the electroweak penguin sector, Nucl. Phys. B 697 (2004) 133 [hep-ph/0402112] [INSPIRE].
63. − at next-to-next-to-leading, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 122002 [hep-ph/0605203] [INSPIRE].
64. −, JHEP 01 (2004) 009 [hep-ph/0311084] [INSPIRE].
65. 0 , Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 034010 [arXiv:1111.4882] [INSPIRE].
66. s decays, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 014027 [arXiv:1204.1735] [INSPIRE].
67. − effective lifetime, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 041801 [arXiv:1204.1737] [INSPIRE].
68. −, arXiv:1208.2843 [INSPIRE].
69. −, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 231801 [arXiv:1203.4493] [INSPIRE].
70. −), Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2172 [arXiv:1208.0934] [INSPIRE].
71. sνν decays, JHEP 04 (2009) 022 [arXiv:0902.0160] [INSPIRE].
72. +νν in the standard model, Phys. Lett. B 680 (2009) 471 [arXiv:0908.1174] [INSPIRE].
73. −, JHEP 11 (2009) 011 [arXiv:0909.1512] [INSPIRE].
74. τ and BR (b → S νν), Eur. Phys. J. C 19 (2001) 213 [hep-ex/0010022] [INSPIRE].
75. BELLE collaboration, K.-F. Chen et al., Search for B → h*νν decays at Belle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 221802 [arXiv:0707.0138] [INSPIRE].
76. BaBar collaboration, B. Aubert et al., Search for B → K*νν decays, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 072007 [arXiv:0808.1338] [INSPIRE].
77. UTfit collaboration, M. Bona et al., An improved standard model prediction of BR(B → τν) and its implications for new physics, Phys. Lett. B 687 (2010) 61 [arXiv:0908.3470] [INSPIRE].
78. W. Altmannshofer, A.J. Buras, S. Gori, P. Paradisi and D.M. Straub, Anatomy and phenomenology of FCNC and CPV effects in SUSY theories, Nucl. Phys. B 830 (2010) 17 [arXiv:0909.1333] [INSPIRE].
79. d -mixing and in sin(2β) determinations, Phys. Lett. B 666 (2008) 162 [arXiv:0803.4340] [INSPIRE].
80. A.J. Buras, M.V. Carlucci, S. Gori and G. Isidori, Higgs-mediated FCNCs: natural flavour conservation vs. Minimal flavour violation, JHEP 10 (2010) 009 [arXiv:1005.5310] [INSPIRE].
81. 3 models, JHEP 01 (2013) 007 [arXiv:1206.3878] [INSPIRE].
82. Particle Data Group collaboration, K. Nakamura et al., Review of particle physics, J. Phys. G 37 (2010) 075021 [INSPIRE].
83. J. Laiho, E. Lunghi and R.S. Van de Water, Lattice QCD inputs to the CKM unitarity triangle analysis, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 034503 [arXiv:0910.2928] [INSPIRE].
84. K. Chetyrkin, J. Kuhn, A. Maier, P. Maierhofer, P. Marquard et al., Charm and bottom quark masses: an update, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 074010 [arXiv:0907.2110] [INSPIRE].
85. HPQCD collaboration, I. Allison et al., High-precision charm-quark mass from current-current correlators in lattice and continuum QCD, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 054513 [arXiv:0805.2999] [INSPIRE].
86. s oscillations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 242003 [hep-ex/0609040] [INSPIRE].
87. s (3)π decays, Phys. Lett. B 709 (2012) 177 [arXiv:1112.4311] [INSPIRE].
88. s mixing, LHCb-TALK-2012-029 (2012).
89. Heavy Flavor Averaging Group collaboration, D. Asner et al., Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron and τ -lepton properties, arXiv:1010.1589 [INSPIRE].
90. A.J. Buras, Relations between Δ M(s, d) and B(s, d) → μμ in models with minimal flavor violation, Phys. Lett. B 566 (2003) 115 [hep-ph/0303060] [INSPIRE].
91. 0 neutrino anti-neutrino beyond the standard model, Phys. Lett. B 398 (1997) 163 [hep-ph/9701313] [INSPIRE].
92. K on the new physics flavour structure, Acta Phys. Polon. B 41 (2010) 127 [arXiv:0904.2528] [INSPIRE].
93. W. Altmannshofer and D.M. Straub, Cornering new physics in B → S transitions, JHEP 08 (2012) 121 [arXiv:1206.0273] [INSPIRE].
94. F. Beaujean, C. Bobeth, D. van Dyk and C. Wacker, Bayesian fit of exclusive b → sℓℓ decays: the standard model operator basis, JHEP 08 (2012) 030 [arXiv:1205.1838] [INSPIRE].
95. − at large recoil, JHEP 01 (2013) 048 [arXiv:1207.2753] [INSPIRE].