Provisioning ecosystem services supply and demand: The role of landscape management to reinforce supply and promote synergies with other ecosystem services

Land Use Policy

Volumn 47, Issue , 2015, Pages 145-155

  Palacios Agundez, Igone ^a   Onaindia, Miren ^a   Barraqueta, Pilar ^b   Madariaga, Iosu ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

^b Ekos   (Spain)

^c Environment Department of the Regional Government of Biscay   (Spain)

Author keywords

Basque Country; Ecological footprint; Ecosystem services; Land use policy; Scale mismatch

Indexed keywords

DEMAND ANALYSIS; ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS; LAND MANAGEMENT; LAND USE PLANNING; POLICY APPROACH;

BASQUE COUNTRY [SPAIN]; SPAIN;

EID: 84928229080     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.03.012     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Aall C., Norland I.T. The use of the ecological footprint in local politics and administration: results and implications from Norway. Local Environment 2005, 10:159-172.
2. Amezaga I., Onaindia M. The effect of evergreen and deciduous coniferous plantations on the field layer and seed bank of native woodlands. Ecography 1997, 20:308-318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.1997.tb00375.x.
3. Anton C., Young J., Harrison P.A., Musche M., Bela G., Feld C.K., Harrington R., Haslett J.R., Pataki G., Rounsevell M.D.A., Skourtos M., Sousa J.P., Sykes M.T., Tinch R., Vandewalle M., Watt A., Settele J. Research needs for incorporating the ecosystem service approach into EU biodiversity conservation policy. Biodivers. Conserv. 2010, 19:2979-2994.
4. Bagliani M., Galli A., Niccolucci V., Marchettini N. Ecological footprint analysis applied to a sub-national area: the case of the Province of Siena (Italy). J. Environ. Manage. 2008, 86:354-364.
5. Basque Government Forest Inventory of the Basque Country 2011 2013, 〈http://www.nasdap.ejgv.euskadi.net/r50-7212/es/contenidos/informacion/inventario_forestal_2011/es_agripes/inventario_forestal_2011.html〉 (accessed August 2014).
6. Borucke M., Moore D., Cranston G., Gracey K., Iha K., Larson J., Lazarus E., Moraüles J.C., Wackernagel M., Galli A. Accounting for demand and supply of the Biosphere's regenerative capacity: the National Footprint Accounts' underlying methodology and framework. Ecol. Indic. 2013, 24:518-533.
7. Burkhard B., Kroll F., Nedkov S., Müller F. Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 21:17-29.
8. Carlsson-Kanyama A., González A.D. Potential contributions of food consumption patterns to climate change. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009, 89:1704S-1709S.
9. Casado-Arzuaga I., Onaindia M., Madariaga I., Verburg P.H. Mapping recreation and aesthetic value of ecosystems in the Bilbao Metropolitan Greenbelt (northern Spain) to support landscape planning. Landscape Ecol. 2013, 10.1007/s10980-013-9945-2.
10. Casado-Arzuaga I., Madariaga I., Onaindia M. Perception, demand and user contribution to ecosystem services in the Bilbao Metropolitan Greenbelt. J. Environ. Manage. 2013, 129:33-43.
11. Collins A., Flynn A., Wiedmann T., Barrett J. The environmental impacts of consumption at a subnational level: the ecological footprint of Cardiff. J. Ind. Ecol. 2006, 10(3.):9-24. ISSN 1088-1980.
12. Davies A.R. Co-creating sustainable eating futures: technology, ICT and citizen-consumer ambivalence. Futures 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.04.006.
13. Daily G.C. Nature's services. Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems 1997, Island Press, Washington, DC.
14. DeFries R.S., Ellis E.C., Chapin F.S., Matson P.A., Turner B.L., Agrawal A., Crutzen P.J., Field C., Gleick P., Kareiva P.M., Lambin E., Liverman D., Ostrom E., Sanchez P.A., Syvitski J. Planetary opportunities: a social contract for global change science to contribute to a sustainable future. Bioscience 2012, 62(6):603-606. 10.1525/bio.2012.62.6.11.
15. DFB: Regional Government of Biscay Waste Information of Biscay Historic Territory for the Period 2000-2010 2013, Waste Observatory of the Regional Government of Biscay, 〈http://www.bizkaia.net/home2/Temas/DetalleTema.asp?Tem_Codigo=7710&idioma=CA&dpto_biz=9&codpath_biz=935177097710&bnetmobile=0〉 (online).
16. Eustat: Basque Statistics Office Gross Domestic Product of the Basque Country by Province and Component. Supply and Demand Current Prices (Thousands of Euros). 2005-2012(a) 2013, Eustat, Economic Accounts, 〈http://en.eustat.es/ci_ci/elementos/ele0010000/ti_Producto_interior_bruto_de_la_CA_de_Euskadi_por_territorio_histrico_y_componente_Oferta_Precios_corrientes_miles_de_euros_2005-2012a/tbl0010079_i.html#axzz3AvCEXMjN〉 (online).
17. Fisher B., Turner R.K., Morling P. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68:643-653.
18. GFN (Global Footprint Network) National Footprint Accounts, 2014 Edition: Research Edition of Spain's National Footprint Accounts 2000-2010 2014, GFN (Global Footprint Network), 〈www.footprintnetwork.org〉.
19. GFN (Global Footprint Network) Glossary 2012, GFN (Global Footprint Network), 〈www.footprintnetwork.org〉.
20. Gómez Sal A., González García A. A comprehensive assessment of multifunctional agricultural land-use systems in Spain using a multi-dimensional evaluative model. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2007, 120:82-91.
21. Gómez-Baggethun E., Barton D.N. Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning. Ecol. Econ. 2013, 86:235-245. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.019.
22. Gómez-Baggethun E., de Groot R. Natural capital and ecosystem services: the ecological foundation of human society. Issues Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 30:105e121.
23. Gómez-Baggethun E., Mingorria S., Reyes-Garcia V., Calvet L., Montes C. Traditional ecological knowledge trends in the transition to a market economy: empirical study in the Donana natural areas. Conserv. Biol. 2010, 24(3):721-729. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01401.x.
24. Groome H.J. Historia de la política forestal en el estado español 1990, Agencia de Medio Ambiente, Madrid, Spain.
25. Happaerts S. Sustainable development and subnational governments: going beyond symbolic politics?. Environ. Dev. 2012, 4:2-17.
26. Jenerettea G.D., Marussicha W.A., Newell J.P. Linking ecological footprints with ecosystem valuation in the provisioning of urban freshwater. Ecol. Econ. 2006, 59:38-47.
27. Johansson T., Hjalten J., de Jong J., von Stedingk H. Environmental considerations from legislation and certification in managed forest stands: a review of their importance for biodiversity. For. Ecol. Manage. 2013, 303:98-112.
28. Jorgenson A.K., Burns T.J. The political-economic causes of change in the ecological footprints of nations, 1991-2001: a quantitative investigation. Soc. Sci. Res. 2007, 36:834-853.
29. Kastner T., Erb K.H., Haberl H. Rapid growth in agricultural trade: effects on global area efficiency and the role of management. Environ. Res. Lett. 2014, 9(3):034015. 10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/034015.
30. Kitzes J., Galli A., Bagliani M., Barrett J., Dige G., Ede S., Erb K.-H., Giljum S., Haberl H., Hails C., Jungwirth S., Lenzen M., Lewis K., Loh J., Marchettini N., Messinger H., Milne K., Moles R., Monfreda C., Moran D., Nakano K., Pyhälä A., Rees W., Simmons C., Wackernagel M., Wada Y., Walsh C., Wiedmann T. A research agenda for improving national ecological footprint accounts. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68(7):1991-2007.
31. Kumar M., Kumar P. Valuation of the ecosystem services: a psycho-cultural perspective. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 64:808-819.
32. Lambin E.F., Meyfroidt P. Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:3465-3472.
33. Leslie A.D., Mencuccini M., Perks M. The potential for eucalyptus as a wood fuel in the UK. Appl. Energy 2012, 89:176-182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.07.037.
34. Madariaga I., Arana X., Casado-Arzuaga I., Palacios-Agúndez I. Servicios de los ecosistemas del paisaje cultural de Bizkaia. Perspectiva histórica de la actividad forestal y minera. Revista Forum de Sostenibilidad 2011, 4:33-46. [online] http://www.ehu.es/cdsea/web/revista/numero_4/ Servicios_ecosistemas_paisaje_cultural_Bizkaia.pdf.
35. McDonald R. Ecosystem service demand and supply along the urban-to-rural gradient. J. Conserv. Plann. 2009, 5:1-14.
36. Merino A., Fernández-Lúpez A., Solla-Gullón F., Edeso J.M. Soil changes and tree growth in intensively managed Pinus radiata in northern Spain. For. Ecol. Manage. 2004, 196:393-404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.04.002.
37. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA) Ecosystems and Human Wellbeing: A Synthesis Report 2005, Island Press, Washington, DC, 〈http://www.unep.org/maweb/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf〉.
38. Monfreda C., Wackernagel M., Deumling D. Establishing national natural capital accounts based on detailed ecological footprint and biocapacity assessments. Land Use Policy 2004, 21:231-246.
39. Mueller N.D., Gerber J.S., Johnston M., Ray D.K., Ramankutty N., Foley J.Á. Closing yield gaps through nutrient and water management. Nature 2012, 490:254-257.
40. Onaindia M., Fernández de Manuel B., Madariaga I., Rodríguez-Loinaz G. Co-benefits and trade-offs between biodiversity, the carbon storage and water flow regulations. For. Ecol. Manage. 2013, 289:1-9.
41. Onaindia M., Madariaga I., Palacios I., Arana X. Nature and Human-wellbeing in Biscay-Basque Country: Ecosystem Services Assessment, science applied to management 2015, University of the Basque Country Press (UPV/EHU), (in press).
42. Otero J., Onaindia M. Landscape structure and live fences in Andes Colombian agrosystems: upper basin of the Cane-iguaque river. Rev. Biol. Trop. 2009, 57(4):1183-1192.
43. Otero-Rozas E., Martin-Lopez B., Lopez C.A., Palomo I., Gonzalez J.A. Envisioning the future of transhumant pastoralism through participatory scenario planning: a case study in Spain. Rangeland J. 2013, 35(3):251-272. 10.1071/RJ12092.
44. Palacios-Agundez I., Fernández de Manuel B., Rodríguez-Loinaz G., Peña L., Ametzaga-Arregi I., Alday G., Casado-Arzuaga J., Madariaga I., Arana X., Onaindia M. Integrating stakeholders' demands and scientific knowledge for the inclusion of ecosystem services in landscape planning. Landscape Ecol. 2014, 29(8):1423-1433.
45. Perrings C., Duraiappah A., Larigauderie A., Mooney H. The biodiversity and ecosystem services science-policy interface. Science 2011, 331:17-19.
46. Poppy G.M., et al. Food security in a perfect storm: using the ecosystem services framework to increase understanding. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2014, 369:20120288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0288.
47. Potschin M., Haines-Young R. Landscapes, sustainability and the place-based analysis of ecosystem services. Landscape Ecol. 2013, 28:1053-1065.
48. Power A.G. Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies (review). Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2010, 365:2959-2971.
49. Redman C.L. Human Impact on Ancient Environments 1999, 239. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ.
50. Rodríguez-Loinaz G., Amezaga I., Onaindia M. Use of native species to improve carbon sequestration and contribute towards solving the environmental problems of the timberlands in Biscay, northern Spain. J. Environ. Manage. 2013, 120:18-26.
51. Santos T., Telleria J.L., Díaz M., Carbonell R. Evaluating the benefits of CAP reforms: can afforestations restore bird diversity in Mediterranean Spain?. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2006, 7:483-495. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2005.11.001.
52. Seppelt R., Dormann C.F., Eppink F.V., Lautenbach S., Schmidt S. A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. J. Appl. Ecol. 2011, 48:630-636.
53. Smith P., Haberl H., Popp A., Erb K., Lauk C., Harper R., Tubiello F.N., De Siqueira Pinto A., Jafari M., Sohi S., Masera O., Böttcher H., Berndes G., Bustamante M., Ahammad H., Clark H., Dong H., Elsiddig E.A., Mbow C., Ravindranath N., Rice C.W., Abad C.R., Romanovskaya A., Sperling F., Herrero M., House J., Rose S. How much land-based greenhouse gas mitigation can be achieved without compromising food security and environmental goals?. Global Change Biol. 2013, 19:2285-2302. 10.1111/gcb.12160.
54. Toso E.A.V., Alem D. Effective location models for sorting recyclables in public management. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2014, 234(3):839-860. 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.10.035.
55. Viglizzo E.F., Paruelo J.M., Laterra P., Jobbágy E.G. Ecosystem service evaluation to support land-use policy. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2012, 154:78-84.
56. Wackernagel M., Monfreda C., Erb K.H., Haberl H., Schulz N.B. Ecological footprint time series of Austria, the Philippines, and South Korea for 1961-1999: comparing the conventional approach to an 'actual land area' approach. Land Use Policy 2004, 21:261-269.
57. Wackernagel M., Monfreda C., Schulz N.B., Erb K.H., Haberl H., Krausmann F. Calculating national and global ecological footprint time series: resolving conceptual challenges. Land Use Policy 2004, 21(3):271-278.
58. Wackernagel M., Monfreda C., Moran D., Wermer P., Goldfinger vD., Deumling D., Murray M. National Footprint and Biocapacity Accounts 2005: The Underlying Calculation Method 2005, Global Footprint Network, Oakland, CA.
59. Wackernagel M., Rees W. Our Ecological Footprint. Reducing Human Impact on the Earth 1996, New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island.
60. Weighell T. UK dependence on non-UK ecosystem services. UK National Ecosystem Assessment. The UK National Ecosystem Assessment Technical Report 2011, 1045-1065. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, 〈http://uknea.unep-wcmc.org〉 (acceded May 2014).
61. Weinzettel J., Hertwich E.G., Peters G.P., Steen-Olsen K., Galli A. Affluence drives the global displacement of land use. Global Environ. Change-Hum. Policy Dimens. 2013, 23(2):433-438. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.010.
62. Winter J.A., Allamano P., Claps P. Virtuous and vicious virtual water trade with application to Italy. PLoS ONE 2014, 9(4):e93084. 10.1371/journal.pone.0093084.