Evaluating a communication technology assessment tool (CTAT): A case of a cloud based communication tool

Proceedings - Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, PACIS 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  Gill, Asif Qumer ^a   Bunker, Deborah ^a   Seltsikas, Philip ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Agile; Cloud; Communication technologies; Distributed adaptive development environment

Indexed keywords

CLOUDS; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT;

AGILE; COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES; COMMUNICATION TOOLS; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS; CONTEXT-AWARE CLOUDS; DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENT; HUMAN COMMUNICATIONS; INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT;

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84928174840     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Agile Manifesto (2001). Manifesto for Agile Software Development. http://agilemanifesto.org/.
2. Ambler, S.W. (2002). Lessons in agility from internet-based development. IEEE Software, 19 (2), pp. 66-73.
3. Ambler, S.W. (2009). Communication on Agile Software Projects. http://www.agilemodeling.com/essays/communication.htm
4. Daft R.L. and Lengel, R.H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), pp. 554-571.
5. Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology, MIS Quarterly, (13), pp. 319-340.
6. Dennis, A.R., and Valacich, J.S. (1999). Rethinking Media Richness: Towards a Theory of Media Synchronicity. Proceedings of the 22nd Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences.
7. DeLone, W.H., and McLean, E.R. (2002) Information Systems Success Revisited. Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 02). Big Island, Hawaii: pp. 238-249.
8. DeLone, W.H., and McLean, E.R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update, Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 9-30.
9. Espinosa, J.A. and Carmel, E. (2003) The impact of time separation on coordination in global software teams: A conceptual foundation, Software Process Improvement Pract., pp.249-266.
10. Fowler, M. (2003). The New Methodology, http://martinfowler.com/articles/newMethodology.html.
11. Glaser, B.G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA.
12. Gill, A.Q., and Bunker, D. (2012a). SaaS Requirements Engineering for Agile Development. Agile and Lean Service-Oriented Development: Foundations, Theory and Practice, IGI Global Publishing.
13. Gill, A.Q., and Bunker, D. (2012b). Communication Technologies Assessment Tool (CTAT). VINE: The Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems.
14. Gill, A.Q., and Bunker, D. (2011). Conceptualization of a Context Aware Cloud Adaptation (CACA) Framework. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Cloud and Green Computing CGC 2011, Sydney, Australia.
15. Green, R., Mazzuchi, T. and Sarkani, S. (2010) Communication and Quality in Distributed Agile Development: An Empirical Case Study. International Journal of Information and Communication Engineering, 6(3).
16. Herbsleb, J.D. and Moitra, D. (2001) Global software development. IEEE software, vol. 18, no.2, pp16-20.
17. Herbsleb, J. and Mockus, A. (2003). An empirical study of speed and communication in globally distributed software development. IEEE Transactions on software engineering, vol. 29, pp.481-494.
18. Kircher, M., Jain, P., Corsaro, A. and Levine, D. (2001). Distributed extreme programming. Second international conference on extreme programming and agile processes in software engineering.
19. Law, J. and Callon, M. (1988). Engineering and Sociology in a Military Aircraft Project: A Network Analysis of Technological Change, Social Problems 35(3): 284-297.
20. Lehtonen, I. (2009). Communication challenges in agile global software development. University of Helsinki.
21. Malone, T. and Crowston, K. (1994). The interdisciplinary study of coordination, ACM Computing Survey vol. 26, no. 1.
22. P. Mell and T. Grance. (2009). The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing. http://www.nist.gov/itl/cloud/upload/cloud-def-v15.pdf, 2009
23. Persson, J.S. & Mathiassen, L., Boeg, J., Madsen, T.S., and Steinson, F. (2009) Managing risks in distributed software projects: An integrative framework. IEEE transactions on engineering management, vol. 56, no. 3.
24. Poole, C. (2004). Distributed product development using extreme programming. Proceedings of XP 2004.
25. Prikladnicki, R., Audy, J., and Evaristo, R. (2003). Distributed software development: toward an understanding of the relationship between project team, users and customers. ICEIS, Angers, France.
26. Ralyte, J., Lamielle, X., Arni-bloch, N. and Leonard, M. (2008). DISTRIBUTED INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT: A FRAMEWORK FOR UNDERSTANDING AND MANAGING. International Journal of Computer Science and Applications, 5(3b), pp. 1-24.
27. Rene, M., and Taylor-Powell, E. (2003). "Analyzing qualitative data", University of Wisconsin-Extension., Cooperative Extension, Madison Wisconsin, USA.
28. SalesForce, (2000). www.salesforce.com.
29. Schummer T., and Schummer, J. (2001) Support for distributed teams in extreme programming. Addision-Wesley.
30. Sureshchandra, K., and Shrinivasavadhani, J. (2008). Adopting agile in distributed development, IEEE conference on Global Software engineering pp.217-221.
31. Venkatesh, V. and Davis F.D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test, Decision Sciences, 27(3) pp. 451-480.
32. Wall, Q. and Bhanot, S. (2011). An Introduction to Salesforce Chatter. http://wiki.developerforce.com/page/An-Introduction-To-Salesforce-Chatter.
33. Wiredu, G.O. (2005) Coordination as the Challenge of Distributed Software Development. International Workshop on Distributed Software Development (IEEE RE'05).