The Joint Commission Practice Performance Evaluation: A Primer for Radiologists

Journal of the American College of Radiology

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 425-430

  Steele, Joseph R ^a   Hovsepian, David M ^b   Schomer, Don F ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c Radiology Imaging Associates   (United States)

Author keywords

FPPE; Joint Commission; OPPE; practice performance evaluation; radiology quality

Indexed keywords

HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; JOB PERFORMANCE; PATIENT SAFETY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; RADIOLOGIST; REVIEW; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; ACCREDITATION; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; PHYSICIAN; RADIOLOGY; STANDARDS; UNITED STATES;

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL; JOINT COMMISSION ON ACCREDITATION OF HEALTHCARE ORGANIZATIONS; PHYSICIANS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; RADIOLOGY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84928096024     PISSN: 15461440     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2010.01.027     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Van Moore Jr. A. ACR presidential address: with change inevitable, can we survive?. J Am Coll Radiol 6 (2009) 749-755
2. Tilman L.M. Survival of the (financially) fittest. http://www.forbes.com/2009/02/05/financial-darwinism-recession-opinions-darwin09_0205_leo_tilman.html Accessed January 15, 2010
3. In: Kohn L.T., Corrigan J.M., and Donaldson M.S. (Eds). To err is human: building a safer health system (2000), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
4. Winter J. Michael Jackson's doctor to be charged with manslaughter. FoxNews. http://foxnews.com/story/0,2933,540540,00.html
5. Ornstein C. State cites safety drug lapses at Cedars-Sinai. The Los Angeles Times (January 10, 2008)
6. The Joint Commission. Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation. (MS.08.01.03). http://www.jointcommission.org/AccreditationPrograms/Hospitals/Standards/09_FAQs/MS/Ongoing_Professional_Practice_Evaluation.htm Accessed March 22, 2010
7. The Joint Commission. Focused Professional Practice Evaluation. (MS.08.01.01). http://www.jointcommission.org/AccreditationPrograms/Hospitals/Standards/09_FAQs/MS/Focused_Professional_Practice.htm Accessed March 22, 2010
8. Strife J.L., Kun L., Becker G., Dunnick N.R., Bosma J., and Hattery R. The American Board of Radiology perspective on maintenance of certification: part IV-practice quality improvement in diagnostic radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188 (2007) 1183-1186
9. Rebagliati G.S. Physician-specific OPPE models in academic medical centers. Ann Surg 249 (2009) 700-701
10. Donnelly L.F. Performance-based assessment of radiology practitioners: promoting improvement in accordance with the 2007 Joint Commission standards. J Am Coll Radiol 4 (2007) 699-703
11. Quiroz J. Assessment of equivalence using a concordance correlation coefficient in a repeated measurements design. J Biopharm Stat 15 (2005) 913-928
12. Lin L.I. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 45 (1989) 255-268
13. Berlin L. Reporting the "missed" radiologic diagnosis: medicolegal and ethical considerations. Radiology 192 (1994) 183-187
14. Gould J.E. Building a better doctor; The ACGME outcome project and radiology training. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17 11pt-2 (2006 Nov) S133-S140
15. Catalano Jr. E.W., Ruby S.G., Talbert M.L., and Knapman D.G. College of American Pathologists considerations for the delineation of pathology clinical privileges. Arch Pathol Lab Med 133 (2009) 613-618
16. Taplin S.H., Ichikawa L.E., Kerlikowske K., et al. Concordance of breast imaging reporting and data system assessments and management recommendations in screening mammography. Radiology 222 (2002) 529-535
17. Elmore J.G., Jackson S.L., Abraham L., et al. Variability in interpretive performance at screening mammography and radiologists' characteristics associated with accuracy. Radiology 253 (2009) 641-651
18. Steele J.R., and Schomer D.F. Continuous quality improvement programs provide new opportunities to drive value innovation initiatives in hospital-based radiology practices. J Am Coll Radiol 6 (2009) 491-499
19. Brant-Zawadzki M.N., and Enzmann D.R. The disaggregation of radiology. J Am Coll Radiol 5 (2008) 1181-1185
20. Boland G.W. The impact of teleradiology in the United States over the last decade: driving consolidation and commoditization of radiologists and radiology services. Clin Radiol 64 (2009) 457-462
21. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Outcome Project. http://www.acgme.org/outcome/ Accessed October 10, 2009
22. Misenko S. The value of accreditation for your critical access hospital (2008), The Joint Commission, Oakbrook Terrace, Ill
23. The Joint Commission. Facts about federal deemed status and state recognition. http://www.jointcommission.org/StateFederal/deemed_status.htm Accessed October 13, 2009
24. Borgstede J.P., Lewis R.S., Bhargavan M., and Sunshine J.H. RADPEER quality assurance program: a multifacility study of interpretive disagreement rates. J Am Coll Radiol 1 (2004) 59-65
25. Jackson V.P., Cushing T., Abujudeh H.H., et al. RADPEER scoring white paper. J Am Coll Radiol 6 (2009) 21-25
26. Mahgerefteh S., Kruskal J.B., Yam C.S., Blachar A., and Sosna J. Peer review in diagnostic radiology: current state and a vision for the future. Radiographics 29 (2009) 1221-1231