Scale and an organism-centric focus for studying interspecific interactions in landscapes

Issues and Perspectives in Landscape Ecology

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 52-69

  Nally, Ralph Mac ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84927975226     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511614415.008     Document Type: Chapter

References (73)

1. Amarasekare, P. (2000).The geometry of coexistence.Biological Journal of the Linnean Society,71,1-31.
2. Berlow, E. L. (1999).Strong effects of weak interactions in ecological communities. Nature,398, 25.
3. Berlow, E. L., Navarette, S. A., Briggs, C. J., Power, M. E., and Menge, B. A. (1999).Quantifying variation in the strengths of species interactions. Ecology,80, 2206-2224.
4. Bevers, M., and Flather, C. H. (1999).The distribution and abundance of populations limited at multiple spatial scales. Journal of Animal Ecology,68, 976-987.
5. Bowers, M. A. and Dooley, J. L. (1999). A controlled, hierarchical study of habitat fragmentation: responses at the individual, patch, and landscape scale. Landscape Ecology, 14, 381-389.
6. Carpenter, S., Kitchell, J., and Hodgson, J. (1985).Cascading trophic interactions and lake productivity. BioScience 35, 634-639.
7. Carpenter, S. R. (1996). Microcosm experiments have limited relevance for community and ecosystem ecology. Ecology, 77, 677-680.
8. Cernusca, A., Bahn, M., Chemini, C., etal. (1998). ECOMONT: a combined approach of field measurements and process- based modelling for assessing effects of land- use changes in mountain landscapes. Ecological Modelling, 113, 167-178.
9. Cooper, S. D., Walde, S. J., and Peckarsky, B. L. (1990). Prey exchange rates and the impact of predators on prey populations in streams. Ecology, 71, 1503-1514.
10. DeAngelis, D. L. and Petersen, J. H. (2001). Importance of the predator’s ecological neighborhood in modeling predation on migrating prey. Oikos, 94, 315-325.
11. DeAngelis, D. L. and Waterhouse, J. C. (1987). Equilibrium and nonequilibrium concepts in ecological models. Ecological Monographs, 57, 1-21.
12. Delbeek, J. C. and Williams, D. D. (1987). Food resource partitioning between sympatric populations of brackish water sticklebacks. Journal ofAnimal Ecology, 56, 949-967.
13. Englund, G. (1997). Importance of spatial scale and prey movements in predator caging experiments. Ecology, 78, 2316-2325.
14. Fleming, T. H., Sahley, C. T., Holland, J. N., Nason, J. D., and Hamrick, J. L. (2001). Sonoran Desert columnar cacti and the evolution of generalized pollination systems. Ecological Monographs, 71, 511-530.
15. Frost, T. M., DeAngelis, D. L., Bartell, S. M., Hall, D. J., and Hurlbert, S. H. (1988). Scale in the design and interpretation of aquatic community research. In Complex Interactions in Lake Communities, ed. S. R. Carpenter. New York, NY: Springer, pp. 229-258.
16. Gaines, S. and Roughgarden, J. (1985). Larval settlement rate: a leading determinant of structure in an ecological community of the marine intertidal zone. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 82,3707-3711.
17. Garnett, S. T. and Crowley, G. M. (2000). The Action Plan for Australian Birds.Canberra: Environment Australia.
18. Gurevitch, J., Morrow, L. L., Wallace, A., and Walsh, J. S. (1992). A meta-analysis of competition in field experiments. American Naturalist, 140, 539-572.
19. Hobbs, R. J. (1987). Disturbance regimes in remnants of natural vegetation. In Nature Conservation: the Role of Remnants of Native Vegetation, ed. D. A. Saunders, G. W. Arnold, A. A. Burbidge, and A. J. M. Hopkins. Sydney: Surrey Beatty, pp. 233-240.
20. Holling, C. S. (1992). Cross-scale morphology, geometry, and dynamics of ecosystems.Ecological Monographs, 62, 447-502.
21. Hughes, T. P., Baird, A. H., Dinsdale, E. A., et al. (2000). Supply-side ecology works both ways: Landscape-scale conservation of an the link between benthic adults, fecundity, endangered migrant: the Swift Parrot and larval recruits. Ecology, 81, 2241-2249.
22. Irwin, R. E. and Brody, A. K. (1998). Nectar robbing in Ipomopsis aggregata: effects on pollinator behavior and plant fitness. Oecologia, 116, 519–527.
23. King, A. W. (1991). Translating models across scales in the landscape. In Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology, ed. M. G. Turner and R. H. Gardner. New York, NY: Springer, pp. 479–517.
24. Kotliar, N. B. and Wiens, J. A. (1990). Multiple scales of patchiness and patch structure: a hierarchical framework for the study of heterogeneity. Oikos, 59, 253–260.
25. Lange, R. S. and Scott, P. E. (1999). Hummingbird and bee pollination of Penstemon pseudospectabilis. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society, 126, 99–106.
26. Levin, S. A. (1992). The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology, 73, 1943–1967.
27. Levin, S. A. (2000). Multiple scales and the maintenance of biodiversity. Ecosystems, 3, 498–506.
28. Lindbladh, M., Bradshaw, R., and Holmqvist, B. H. (2000). Pattern and process in south Swedish forests during the last 3000 years, sensed at stand and regional scales. Journal of Ecology, 88, 113–128.
29. Linder, E. T., Villard, M. A., Maurer, B. A., and Schmidt, E. V. (2000). Geographic range structure in North American landbirds: variation with migratory strategy, trophic level, and breeding habitat. Ecography, 23, 678–686.
30. Mac Nally, R. (1997). Scaling artefacts in confinement experiments: a simulation model. Ecological Modelling, 99, 229–245.
31. Mac Nally, R. (2000a). Co-existence of a locally undifferentiated foraging guild: avian snatchers in a southeastern Australian forest. Austral Ecology, 25, 69–82.
32. Mac Nally, R. (2000b). Modelling confinement experiments in community ecology: differential mobility among competitors. Ecological Modelling, 129, 65–85.
33. Mac Nally, R. (2001). Interaction strengths and spatial scale in community ecology: quadratsampling and confinement experiments involving animals of different mobilities. Ecological Modelling, 144, 139–152.
34. Mac Nally, R. and Horrocks, G. (2000). Landscape-scale conservation of an endangered migrant: the Swift Parrot Lathamus discolor in its winter range. Biological Conservation, 92, 335–343.
35. Mac Nally, R. and Horrocks, G. (2002). Proportionate spatial sampling and equaltime sampling of mobile animals: a dilemma for inferring areal dependence. Austral Ecology, 27, 405–415.
36. Mac Nally, R. and McGoldrick, J. M. (1997). Landscape dynamics of bird communities in relation to mass flowering in some eucalypt forests of central Victoria, Australia. Journal of Avian Biology, 28, 171–183.
37. Mac Nally, R. and Quinn, G. P. (1998). Symposium introduction: the general significance of ecological scale. Australian Journal of Ecology, 23, 1–7.
38. Milne, B. T. (1991). Lessons from applying fractal models to landscape patterns. In Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology, ed. M. G. Turner and R. H. Gardner. New York, NY: Springer, pp. 199–238.
39. Morrison, M. L. and Hall, L. S. (2001). Standard terminology: toward a common language to advance ecological understanding and application. In Predicting Species Occurrences: Issues of Accuracy and Scale, ed. J. M. Scott, P. J. Heglund, and M. L. Morrison. Washington, DC: Island Press, pp. 43–53.
40. Navarro, L. (1999). Pollination ecology and effect of nectar removal in Macleania bullata (Ericaceae). Biotropica, 31, 618–625.
41. Orrock, J. L., Pagels, J. F., McShea, W. J., and Harper, E. K. (2000). Predicting presence and abundance of a small mammal species: the effect of scale and resolution. Ecological Applications, 10, 1356–1366.
42. Palmer, M. W. (1992). The coexistence of species in fractal landscapes. American Naturalist, 139, 375–397.
43. Pascual, M. and Levin, S. A. (1999). From individuals to population densities: searching for the intermediate scale of nontrivial determinism. Ecology, 80, 2225–2236.
44. Paton, D. C. (1980). The importance of manna, honeydew and lerp in the diets of honeyeaters. Emu, 80, 213–226.
45. Peters, R. H. (1983). The Ecological Implications of Body Size. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Peters, R. H. (1991). A Critique for Ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47. Petersen, J. E. and Hastings, A. (2001). Dimensional approaches to scaling experimental ecosystems: designing mousetraps to catch elephants. American Naturalist, 157, 324–333.
48. Petersen, J. E., Cornwell, J. C., and Kemp, W. M. (1999). Implicit scaling in the design of experimental aquatic ecosystems. Oikos, 85, 3–18.
49. Petraitis, P. S., Dunham, A. E., and Niewiarowski, P. H. (1996). Inferring multiple causality: the limitations of path analysis. Functional Ecology, 10, 421–431.
50. Richards, C., Johnson, L. B., and Host, G. E. (1996). Landscape-scale influences on stream habitats and biota. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 53, 295–311.
51. Roughgarden, J. (1979). Theory of Population Genetics and Evolutionary Ecology: an Introduction. New York, NY: Macmillan.
52. Schmitz, O. J. (2000). Combining field experiments and individual-based modeling to identify the dynamically relevant organizational scale in a field system. Oikos, 89, 471–484.
53. Schmitz, O. J., Beckerman, A. P., and O’Brien, K. M. (1997). Behaviorally induced risk on food web interactions. Ecology, 78, 1388–1399.
54. Schneider, D. C. (1994). Quantitative Ecology: Spatial and Temporal Scaling. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
55. Schoener, T. W. (1983). Field experiments on interspecific competition. American Naturalist, 122, 240–285.
56. Seastadt, T. R. and Knapp, A. K. (1993). Consequences of nonequilibrium resource availability across multiple time scales: the transient maxima hypothesis.American Naturalist, 141, 621-633.
57. Smallwood, K. S. and Schonewald, C. (1996).Scaling population density and spatial pattern for terrestrial, mammalian carnivores. Oecologia, 105, 329-335.
58. Smith, F. A., Brown, J. H., and Valone, T. J. (1997). Path analysis: a critical evaluation using long-term experimental data. American Naturalist, 149, 29-42.
59. Thrush, S. F., Hewitt, J. E., Cummings, V. J., Green, M. O., Funnell, G. A., and Wilkinson, M. R. (2000). The generality of field experiments: interactions between local and broad-scale processes.Ecology, 81, 399-415.
60. Turner, M. G. and Dale, V. H. (1991). Modeling landscape disturbance. In Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology, ed. M. G. Turner and R. H. Gardner. New York, NY: Springer, pp. 323-352.
61. Underwood, A. (1986). The analysis of competition by field experiments. In Community Ecology: Pattern and Process, ed. J. Kikkawa and D. J. Anderson. Melbourne: Blackwell, pp. 240-268.
62. Walde, S. J. and Davies, R. W. (1984). Invertebrate predation and lotic prey communities: evaluation of in situ enclosure/ exclosure experiments. Ecology, 65, 1206-1213.
63. Whigham, D. F., Olmstead, I., Cano, E. C., and Harmon, M. E. (1991). The impact of hurricane Gilbert on trees, litterfall, and woody debris in a dry tropical forest in the northwestern Yucatan peninsula. Biotropica, 23, 434-441.
64. Whittaker, R. J., Willis, K. J., and Field, R. (2001). Scale and species richness: towards a general, hierarchical theory of species diversity. Journal of Biogeography, 28,453-470.
65. Wiens, J. A. (1984). Resource systems, populations and communities. InA New Ecology: Novel Approaches to Interactive Systems, ed. P. W. Price, C. N. Slobodchikoff, and W. S. Gaud. New York, NY: Wiley, pp. 397-436.
66. Wiens, J. A., Rotenberry, J. T., and Van Horne, A. (1987). Habitat occupancy patterns of North American shrubsteppe birds: the effects of spatial scale. Oikos, 48,132-147.
67. Williams, T. C. and Webb, T. (1996). Neotropical bird migration during the ice ages: orientation and ecology.Auk, 113,105-118.
68. Wilson, J. and Bennett, A. F. (1999). Patchiness of a floral resource: flowering of red ironbark Eucalyptus tricarpa in a box and ironbark forest.Victorian Naturalist, 116, 48-53.
69. Wootton, J. T. (1994a). The nature and consequences of indirect effects in ecological communities. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 25, 443-466.
70. Wootton, J. T. (1994b). Predicting direct and indirect effects: an integrated approach using experiments and path analysis. Ecology, 75, 151-165.
71. Wootton, J. T. (1997). Estimates and tests of per capita interaction strength: diet, abundance, and impact of intertidally foraging birds. Ecological Monographs, 67, 45-64.
72. Wootton, J. T. (2001). Local interactions predict large-scale pattern in empirically derived cellular automata. Nature, 413, 841-844.
73. Ziv, Y. (2000). On the scaling of habitat specificity with body size. Ecology, 81, 2932-2938.