Growth response and radiation use efficiency in tomato exposed to short-term and long-term salinized soils

Scientia Horticulturae

Volumn 189, Issue , 2015, Pages 139-149

  De Pascale, S ^a   Maggio, A ^a   Orsini, F ^b   Stanghellini, C ^c   Heuvelink, E ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^c WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Leaf osmotic adjustment; Leaf water potential; Light; RUE; Salt stress; Stomatal resistance

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; DICOTYLEDON; FIELD METHOD; FRUIT PRODUCTION; GROWTH RESPONSE; LEAF AREA INDEX; LIGHT USE EFFICIENCY; PLANT WATER RELATIONS; SALINIZATION; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; YIELD RESPONSE;

CAMPANIA [ITALY]; ITALY; NAPLES; NAPOLI [CAMPANIA];

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM;

EID: 84927946250     PISSN: 03044238     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.03.042     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Adams P., Ho L.C. Effects of constant and fluctuating salinity on the yield, quality and calcium status of tomatoes. J. Hortic. Sci. 1989, 64:725-732.
2. Barbieri G., Vallone S., Orsini F., Paradiso R., De Pascale S., Negre-Zakharov F., Maggio A. Stomatal density and metabolic determinants mediate salt stress adaptation and water use efficiency in basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). J. Plant Physiol. 2012, 169:1737-1746.
3. Black G.R., Hartge K.H. Bulk density. Method Soil Anal. 1986, 1:347-380.
4. Canfora L., Bacci G., Pinzari F., Lo Papa G., Dazzi C., Benedetti A. Salinity and bacterial diversity: to what extent does the concentration of salt affect the bacterial community in a saline soil?. PLoS ONE 2014, 9(9):1-14. (e106662).
5. Cavero J., Plant R.E., Shennan G., Williams J.R., Kiniry J.R., Benson V.W. Application of EPIC model to nitrogen cycling in irrigated processing tomatoes under different management systems. Agric. Syst. 1998, 56:391-414.
6. Cuartero J., Fernàndez-Muñoz R. Tomato and salinity. Sci. Hortic. 1999, 78:83-125.
7. Cuartero J., Bolarìn M.C., Asìns M.J., Moreno V. Increasing salt tolerance in the tomato. J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57:1045-1058.
8. De la Vega A.J., Cantore M.A., Sposaro M.M., Trápani N., López Pereira M., Hall A.J. Canopy stay-green and yield in non-stressed sunflower. Field Crop Res. 2011, 121:175-185.
9. De Pascale S., Orsini F., Caputo R., Palermo M.A., Barbieri G., Maggio A. Seasonal and multiannual effects of salinization on tomato yield and fruit quality. Funct. Plant Biol. 2012, 39:689-698.
10. Dong H., Li W., Eneji A.E., Zhang D. Nitrogen rate and plant density effects on yield and late-season leaf senescence of cotton raised on a saline field. Field Crop Res. 2010, 119:106-113.
11. Earl H.J., Davis R.F. Effect of drought stress on leaf and whole canopy radiation use efficiency and yield of maize. Agron. J. 2003, 95:688-696.
12. Elia A., Conversa G. Agronomic and physiological responses of a tomato crop to nitrogen input. Eur. J. Agron. 2012, 40:64-74.
13. Flexas J., Bota J., Loreto F., Cornic G., Sharkey T.D. Diffusive and metabolic limitations to photosynthesis under drought and salinity in C3 plants. Plant Biol. 2004, 6:269-279.
14. George-Jaeggli B., Jordan D.R., van Oosterom E.J., Broad I.J., Hammer G.L. Sorghum dwarfing genes can affect radiation capture and radiation use efficiency. Field Crop Res. 2013, 149:283-290.
15. Gomez K.A., Gomez A.A. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research 1984, 680. Wiley, New York.
16. Hatfield J.L. Radiation use efficiency: evaluation of cropping and management systems. Agron. J. 2014, 106:1820-1827.
17. Heuvelink E., Bakker M., Stanghellini C. Salinity effects on fruit yield in vegetable crops: a simulation study. Acta Hortic. 2003, 609:133-138.
18. Higashide T., Heuvelink E. Physiological and morphological changes over the past 50 years in yield components in tomato. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2009, 134:460-465.
19. Kang Y.-I., Park J.-M., Kim S.-H., Kang N.-J., Park K.-S., Lee S.-Y., Jeong B.R. Effects of root zone PH and nutrient concentration on the growth and nutrient uptake of tomato seedlings. J. Plant Nutr. 2011, 34(5):640-652.
20. Kemper W.D., Rosenau R.C. Aggregate Stability and Size Distribution 1986, 425-442.
21. Kläring H.-P., Zude M. Sensing of tomato plant response to hypoxia in the root environment. Sci. Hortic. 2009, 122(1):17-25.
22. Lecoeur J., Ney B. Change with time in potential radiation-use efficiency in field pea. Eur. J. Agron. 2003, 19:91-105.
23. Li Y.L., Stanghellini C., Challa H. Effect of electrical conductivity and transpiration on production of greenhouse tomato. Sci. Hortic. 2001, 88:11-29.
24. Li Y.L., Marcelis L.F.M., Stanghellini C. Plant water relations as affected by osmotic potential of the nutrient solution and potential transpiration in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.). J. Hortic. Biotechnol. 2004, 79:211-218.
25. Louarn G., Chenu K., Fournier C., Andrieu B., Giauffret C. Relative contributions of light interception and radiation use efficiency to the reduction of maize productivity under cold temperatures. Funct. Plant Biol. 2008, 35:885-899.
26. Maggio A., De Pascale S., Angelino G., Ruggiero C., Barbieri G. Physiological response of tomato to saline irrigation in long-term salinized soils. Eur. J. Agron. 2004, 21:149-159.
27. Maggio A., De Pascale S., Ruggiero C., Barbieri G. Physiological response of field-grown cabbage to salinity and drought stress. Eur. J. Agron. 2005, 23:57-67.
28. Miranzadeh H., Emam Y., Seyyed H., Zare S. Productivity and radiation use efficiency of four dryland wheat cultivars under different levels of nitrogen and chlormequat chloride. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2011, 13:339-351.
29. Morgan J.M. Osmotic components and properties associated with genotypic differences in osmoregulation in wheat. Funct. Plant Biol. 1992, 19:67-76.
30. Munns R. Genes and salt tolerance: bringing them together. New Phytol. 2005, 167:645-663.
31. Orsini F., Alnayef M., Bona S., Maggio A., Gianquinto G. Low stomatal density and reduced transpiration facilitate strawberry adaptation to salinity. Environ. Exp Bot. 2012, 81:1-10.
32. Pardo J.M. Biotechnology of water and salinity stress tolerance. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2010, 21:185-196.
33. Ramirez A., Rodriguez F., Berenguel M., Heuvelink E. Calibration and validation of complex and simplified tomato growth models for control purposes in the Southeast of Spain. Acta Hortic. 2004, 654:147-154.
34. Razzaghi F., Ahmadi S.H., Jacobsen S.E., Jensen C.R., Andersen M.N. Effects of salinity and soil-drying on radiation use efficiency, water productivity and yield of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2012, 198:173-184.
35. Ridao E., Oliveira C.F., Conde J.R., Minguez M.I. Radiation interception and use, and spectral reflectance of contrasting canopies of autumn sown faba beans and semi-leafless peas. Agric. For. Meteorol. 1996, 79:183-203.
36. Royal Society Reaping the Benefits: Science and the Sustainable Intensification of Global Agriculture 2009, The Royal Society, London, UK, Available at: http://royalsociety.org/Reapingthebenefits/.
37. Rozema J., Flowers T. Crops for a salinized world. Science 2008, 322:1478-1480.
38. Scholberg J., McNeal B.L., Boote K.J., James W., Jones J.W., Locascio S.J., Olson S.M. Nitrogen stress effects on growth and nitrogen accumulation by fieldgrown tomato. Agron. J. 2000, 92:159-167.
39. Sinclair T.R., Horie T. Leaf nitrogen, photosynthesis and crop radiation use efficiency. A review. Crop Sci. 1989, 29:90-98.
40. Srivastava A., Naresh Kumar S., Aggarwal P.K. Assessment on vulnerability of sorghum to climate change in India. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2010, 138:160-169.
41. Stone P., Wilson D., Reid J., Gillespie R. Water deficit effects on sweet corn, I. Water use, radiation use efficiency, growth, and yield. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 2001, 52:103-113.
42. Sui N., Han G. Salt-induced photoinhibition of PSII is alleviated in halophyte Thellungiella halophila by increases of unsaturated fatty acids in membrane lipids. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2014, 36:983-992.
43. Teixeira E.I., George M., Herreman T., Brown H., Fletcher A., Chakwizira E., de Ruiter J., Maley S., Noble A. The impact of water and nitrogen limitation on maize biomass and resource-use efficiencies for radiation, water and nitrogen. Field Crops Res. 2014, 168:109-118.
44. Tesfaye K., Walker S., Tsubo M. Radiation interception and radiation use efficiency of three grain legumes under water deficit conditions in a semi-arid environment. Eur. J. Agric. 2006, 25:60-70.
45. United Nations, 2009. United Nations Population Information Network. Available at www.un.org/popin/data.html.
46. Wang D., Shannon M.C., Grieve C.M. Salinity reduces radiation absorption and use efficiency in soybean. Field Crop Res. 2001, 69:267-277.
47. Yu Z., Chen W., Zhang Q., Yang H., Tang J., Weiner J., Chen X. Salt tolerance and stress level affect plant biomass-density relationships and neighbor effects. Acta Oecol. 2014, 58:1-4.
48. Zahra J., Hussain N., Shengguan C., Yong H., Dezhi W., Binlin Z., Shamsi Imran H., Guoping Z. The influence of salinity on cell ultrastructures and photosynthetic apparatus of barley genotypes differing in salt stress tolerance. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2014, 36:1261-1269.
49. Zhang H.J., Dong H.Z., Li W.J., Zhang D.M. Effects of soil salinity and plant density on yield and leaf senescence of field-grown cotton. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2012, 198:27-37.