Preparation of a forward osmosis membrane using a highly porous polyketone microfiltration membrane as a novel support

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 487, Issue , 2015, Pages 51-59

  Yasukawa, Masahiro ^a   Mishima, Shoji ^a   Shibuya, Masafumi ^a   Saeki, Daisuke ^a   Takahashi, Tomoki ^a   Miyoshi, Taro ^a   Matsuyama, Hideto ^a  

^a KOBE UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Forward osmosis membrane; Microfiltration membrane; Polyketone; Porous membrane; Thin film composite

Indexed keywords

COMPOSITE MEMBRANES; FILM PREPARATION; KETONES; MICROFILTRATION; OSMOSIS MEMBRANES; PHASE SEPARATION; PORE SIZE; THIN FILMS; WATER TREATMENT;

FORWARD OSMOSIS MEMBRANES; MICRO-FILTRATION MEMBRANES; POLYKETONES; POROUS MEMBRANES; THIN FILM COMPOSITES;

MEMBRANES;

ARTICLE; CHANNEL GATING; FILM; FLUORESCENCE POLARIZATION; FORWARD OSMOSIS MEMBRANE; MEMBRANE; MICROFILTRATION; OSMOTIC PRESSURE; PHASE SEPARATION; POLYMERIZATION; POROSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVERSE OSMOSIS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 84927934214     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: 18733123     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.03.043     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. McCutcheon J.R., McGinnis R.L., Elimelech M. Desalination by ammonia-carbon dioxide forward osmosis: influence of draw and feed solution concentrations on process performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 278:114-123.
2. Phuntsho S., Vigneswaran S., Kandasamy J., Hong S., Lee S., Shon H.K. Influence of temperature and temperature difference in the performance of forward osmosis desalination process. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 415-416:734-744.
3. Sairam M., Sereewatthanawut E., Li K., Bismarck A., Livingston A.G. Method for the preparation of cellulose acetate flat sheet composite membranes for forward osmosis-Desalination using MgSO4 draw solution. Desalination 2011, 273:299-307.
4. Hickenbottom K.L., Hancock N.T., Hutchings N.R., Appleton E.W., Beaudry E.G., Xu P., Cath T.Y. Forward osmosis treatment of drilling mud and fracturing wastewater from oil and gas operations. Desalination 2013, 312:60-66.
5. Zhang X., Ning Z., Wang D.K., Diniz da Costa J.C. A novel ethanol dehydration process by forward osmosis. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 232:397-404.
6. Ling M.M., Chung T.-S. Novel dual-stage FO system for sustainable protein enrichment using nanoparticles as intermediate draw solutes. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 372:201-209.
7. Ge Q., Ling M., Chung T.-S. Draw solutions for forward osmosis processes: developments, challenges, and prospects for the future. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 442:225-237.
8. Wei J., Qiu C., Tang C.Y., Wang R., Fane A.G. Synthesis and characterization of flat-sheet thin film composite forward osmosis membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 372:292-302.
9. Cath T., Childress A., Elimelech M. Forward osmosis: principles, applications, and recent developments. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 281:70-87.
10. Tiraferri A., Yip N.Y., Phillip W.A., Schiffman J.D., Elimelech M. Relating performance of thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes to support layer formation and structure. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 367:340-352.
11. Han G., Zhang S., Li X., Widjojo N., Chung T.-S. Thin film composite forward osmosis membranes based on polydopamine modified polysulfone substrates with enhancements in both water flux and salt rejection. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2012, 80:219-231.
12. Chou S., Shi L., Wang R., Tang C.Y., Qiu C., Fane A.G. Characteristics and potential applications of a novel forward osmosis hollow fiber membrane. Desalination 2010, 261:365-372.
13. Widjojo N., Chung T.-S., Weber M., Maletzko C., Warzelhan V. The role of sulphonated polymer and macrovoid-free structure in the support layer for thin-film composite (TFC) forward osmosis (FO) membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 383:214-223.
14. Song X., Liu Z., Sun D.D. Nano gives the answer: breaking the bottleneck of internal concentration polarization with a nanofiber composite forward osmosis membrane for a high water production rate. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23:3256-3260.
15. Bui N.-N., Lind M.L., Hoek E.M.V., McCutcheon J.R. Electrospun nanofiber supported thin film composite membranes for engineered osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 385-386:10-19.
16. Wang R., Shi L., Tang C.Y., Chou S., Qiu C., Fane A.G. Characterization of novel forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 355:158-167.
17. Danforth R.L., Machado J.M., Jordaan J.C.M. Aliphatic polyketones: a new family of engineering thermoplastics. Plast. Eng. 1996, 52:77-79.
18. Ohsawa O., Lee K.-H., Kim B.-S., Lee S., Kim I.-S. Preparation and characterization of polyketone (PK) fibrous membrane via electrospinning. Polymer 2010, 51:2007-2012.
19. Marklund U.W.G.E., Hedenqvist M.S., Wiberg G. Properties of polyketone/polypropylene blends. Polymer 2001, 42:3153-3160.
20. ASAHI KASEI FIBERS CORPORATION, . http://www.asahi-kasei.co.jp/fibers/cnb/pk02.html.
21. Stone M.L., Rae C., Stewart F.F., Wilson A.D. Switchable polarity solvents as draw solutes for forward osmosis. Desalination 2013, 312:124-129.
22. Duong P.H.H., Chung T.-S. Application of thin film composite membranes with forward osmosis technology for the separation of emulsified oil-water. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 452:117-126.
23. Ahn J., Chung W.-J., Pinnau I., Guiver M.D. Polysulfone/silica nanoparticle mixed-matrix membranes for gas separation. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 314:123-133.
24. D. Sato, M. Kaneda, T. Komatsu, Polyketone porous film, Patent WO/2013/035747, (2013).
25. Saeki D., Nagao S., Sawada I., Ohmukai Y., Maruyama T., Matsuyama H. Development of antibacterial polyamide reverse osmosis membrane modified with a covalently immobilized enzyme. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 428:403-409.
26. Xie M., Price W.E., Nghiem L.D., Elimelech M. Effects of feed and draw solution temperature and transmembrane temperature difference on the rejection of trace organic contaminants by forward osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 438:57-64.
27. Iyengar Y., Erickson D.E. Role of adhesive-substrate compatibility in adhesion. J. App. Polym. Sci. 1967, 11:2311-2324.
28. Mulder M. Basic Principles of Membrane Technology 1996, 128-129. Kluwer Academic Publishers. second edition.
29. Amarnath V., Anthony D.C., Amarnath K., Valentine W.M., Wetterau L.A., Graham D.G. Intermediates in the Paal-Knorr synthesis of pyrroles. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56:6924-6931.
30. Demir A.S., Igdir A.C., Günay N.B. Amination/annulation of chlorobutenones with chiral amine compounds: synthesis of 1,2,4-trisubstituted pyrroles. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2005, 16:3170-3175.
31. Duan M., Wang Z., Xu J., Wang J., Wang S. Influence of hexamethyl phosphoramide on polyamide composite reverse osmosis membrane performance. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2010, 75:145-155.
32. Zhao S., Zou L., Mulcahy D. Effects of membrane orientation on process performance in forward osmosis applications. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 382:308-315.
33. Klaysom C., Cath T.Y., Depuydt T., Vankelecom I.F. Forward and pressure retarded osmosis: potential solutions for global challenges in energy and water supply. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42:6959-6989.
34. Shi L., Chou S.R., Wang R., Fang W.X., Tang C.Y., Fane A.G. Effect of substrate structure on the performance of thin-film composite forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes. J. Membrane Sci. 2011, 382:116-123.
35. Sukitpaneenit P., Chung T.S. High performance thin-film composite forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes with macrovoid-free and highly porous structure for sustainable water production. Environ. Sci Technol. 2012, 46:7358-7365.
36. Wang K.Y., Chung T.-S., Amy G. Developing thin-film-composite forward osmosis membranes on the PES/SPSf substrate through interfacial polymerization. AIChE J. 2012, 58:770-781.
37. Chou S., Wang R., Shi L., She Q., Tang C., Fane A.G. Thin-film composite hollow fiber membranes for pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) process with high power density. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 389:25-33.
38. Li X., Wang K.Y., Helmer B., Chung T.-S. Thin-film composite membranes and formation mechanism of thin-film layers on hydrophilic cellulose acetate propionate substrates for forward osmosis processes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51:10039-10050.
39. Han G., Chung T.-S., Toriida M., Tamai S. Thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes with novel hydrophilic supports for desalination. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 423-424:543-555.
40. Cath T.Y., et al. Standard methodology for evaluating membrane performance in osmotically driven membrane processes. Desalination 2013, 312:31-38.
41. Porifera PFO technology, . http://www.porifera.com/pfo-advantages/.