Co-Authorship Network Analysis in Industrial Ecology Research Community

Journal of Industrial Ecology

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 222-235

  Kim, Junbeum ^a,b   Perez, Charles ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TECHNOLOGIE DE TROYES   (France)

^b NATIONAL RESEARCH TOMSK POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

^c Paris School of Business   (France)

Author keywords

Bibliometrics; Co authorship; Industrial ecology; Information visualization; Network; Scientific collaboration

Indexed keywords

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; ECOLOGY; INFORMATION SCIENCE; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; NETWORKS (CIRCUITS);

BIBLIOMETRICS; CO-AUTHORSHIPS; INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY; INFORMATION VISUALIZATION; SCIENTIFIC COLLABORATION;

INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH;

BIBLIOGRAPHY; INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY; RESEARCH WORK; VISUALIZATION;

EID: 84927910784     PISSN: 10881980     EISSN: 15309290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12256     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Allenby, B. 2006. The ontologies of industrial ecology. Progress in Industrial Ecology (Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.) 3(1-2): 28-40.
2. Amaral, L. A. N., A. Scala, M. Barthelemy, and H. E. Stanley . 2000. Classes of small-world networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97(21): 11149-11152.
3. ASONAM (The IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Network Analysis and Mining). 2014. ASONAM home page. www.asonam2014.org/. Accessed June 2014.
4. Barabási, A.-L. and E. Bonabeau . 2003. Scale free networks. Scientific American 288(5): 60-69.
5. Batagelj, V. and A. Mrvar . 2000. Some analyses of Erdos collaboration graph. Social Networks 22(2): 173-186
6. Bozeman, B. and S. Lee . 2003. The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Paper prepared for presentation at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, 13-18 February, Denver, CO, USA. http://gtresearchnews.gatech.edu/newsrelease/Collab.pdf. Accessed June 2014.
7. Brandes, U. and D. Wagner . 2004. Visone-Analysis and visualization of social networks. In Graph Drawing Software (pp. 321-340), edited byM. Jünger and P. Mutzel . Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
8. Chen, W. K. 1990. Theory of nets: Flows in networks. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
9. Chen, C. and R. J. Paul . 2001. Visualizing a knowledge domain's intellectual structure. IEEE Computer 34(3): 65-71.
10. Christen, P. 2006. A comparison of personal name matching: Techniques and practical issues. Technical report TR-CS-06-02. Canberra, ACT, Australia: The Australian National University, Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology.
11. Cunningham, S. J. and S. Dillon . 1997. Authorship patterns in information systems research. Scientomitrics 39(1): 19-27.
12. Dorogovtsev, S. N. and J. F. F. Mendes . 2002. Evolution of networks. Advances in Physics 51(4): 1079-1187.
13. Edmondson, G., L. Valigra, M. Kenward, R. L. Hudson, and H. Belfield . 2012. Making industry-university partnerships work-Lesson from successful collaborations. Brussels: Science Business Innovation Board AISBL.
14. Egghe, L., R. Rousseau, and G. van Hooydonk . 2000. Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries: Consequences for evaluation studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 51(2): 145-157.
15. Farkas, I., I. Derenyi, H. Jeong, Z. N. Neda, Z. N. Oltvai, E. Ravasz, A. Schubert, A.-L. Barabási, and T. Vicsek . 2002. Networks in life: Scaling properties and eigenvalue spectra. Physica A 314(1): 25-34.
16. Freeman, L. 1977. A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry 40(1): 35-41.
17. Freeman, L. 1979. Centrality in social networks. 1. Conceptual clarification. Social Networks 1: 215-239.
18. Freeman, L. 2000. Visualizing social networks. Journal of Social Structure 1(1): 1-15.
19. Garfield, E. 1979. Citation indexing-Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
20. Gaskill, D., P. Morrison, F. Sanders, E. Forster, H. Edwards, S. McClure, and R. Fleming . 2003. University and industry partnerships: Lessons from collaborative research. International Journal of Nursing Practice 9(6): 347-355.
21. Graedel, T. E. and B. Allenby . 1995. Industrial ecology. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall.
22. Heyman, K. 2006. Making connections. Science 313(5787): 604-606.
23. IJLCA (The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment). 2013. IJLCA home page. www.springer.com/environment/journal/11367. Accessed October 2013.
24. IJSNM (International Journal of Social Network Mining). 2014. IJSNM home page. www.inderscience.com/jhome.php?jcode=IJSNM. Accessed October 2014.
25. INSNA (International Network for Social Network Analysis). 2014. INSNA home page. www.insna.org. Accessed October 2014.
26. JIE (Journal of Industrial Ecology). 2013. JIE home page. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/%28ISSN%291530-9290. Accessed 7 January 2015.
27. Lee, S. and B. Bozeman . 2005. The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science 35(5): 673-702.
28. Moody, J. 2004. The structure of a social science collaboration network: Disciplinary cohesion from 1963 to 1999. American Sociological Review 69(2): 213-238.
29. Newman, M. E. J. 2001. Scientific collaboration networks: I. Network construction and fundamental results. Physical Review E 64(1): 016131.
30. Newman, M. E. J. 2004a. Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101(1): 5200-5205.
31. Newman, M. E. J. 2004b. Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks. Physical Review E 69(6): 066133.
32. OII (Oxford Internet Institute). 2014. http://blogs.oii.ox.ac.uk/vis/?page_id=25.
33. Porter, E. H. and W. E. Winkler . 1997. Approximate string comparison and its effect on an advanced record linkage system. Research report. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census.
34. Smeaton, A. F., G. Keogh, C. Gurrin, K. McDonald, and T. Sodring . 2002. Analysis of papers from twenty-five years of SIGIR conferences: What have we been doing for the last quarter of a century. SIGIR Forum 36(2): 39-43.
35. Song, C., S. Havlin, and H. Makse . 2005. Self-similarity of complex networks. Nature 433(7024): 392-395.
36. US GPO (U.S. Government Printing Office). 2014. Public Law 110-140. www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-110publ140/html/PLAW-110publ140.htm. Accessed March 2014.
37. Velden, T., A. Haque, and C. Lagoze . 2010. A new approach to analyzing patterns of collaboration in co-authorship networks-Mesoscopic analysis and interpretation. Ithaca, NY USA: Cornell University, Computer and Information Science.
38. Yoshikane, F., T. Nozawa, and K. Tsuji . 2006. Comparative analysis of co-authorship networks considering authors' roles in collaboration: Differences between the theoretical and application areas. Scientomentrics 68(3): 643-655.
39. Yoshikane, F., N. Takayuki, and T. Keita . 2005. Comparative analysis of co-authorship networks considering authors' roles in collaboration: Differences between the theoretical and application areas. ISSI 2: 509-516.
40. Yu, C., C. Davis, and G. P. J. Dijkema . 2014. Understanding the evolution of industrial symbiosis research-A bibliometic and network analysis (1997-2012). Journal of Industrial Ecology 18(2): 280-293.