Hatching asynchrony aggravates inbreeding depression in a songbird (Serinus canaria): An inbreeding-environment interaction

Evolution

Volumn 69, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 1063-1068

  de Boer, Raïssa A ^a   Eens, Marcel ^a   Fransen, Erik ^a   Müller, Wendt ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Developmental stress; Growth rate; Maternal effects; Sibling competition

Indexed keywords

GROWTH RATE; HATCHING; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; MATERNAL EFFECT; SIBLING; SONGBIRD;

AVES; PASSERI; SERINUS CANARIA;

ANIMAL; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; INBREEDING; MALE; NESTING; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION; SERINUS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; CANARIES; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; INBREEDING; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; NESTING BEHAVIOR; REPRODUCTIVE PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA;

EID: 84927909371     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12625     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Armbruster, P., R. A. Hutchinson, and T. Linvell . 2000. Equivalent inbreeding depression under laboratory and field conditions in a tree-hole-breeding mosquito. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 267:1939-1945.
2. Armbruster, P., and D. H. Reed . 2005. Inbreeding depression in benign and stressful environments. Heredity 95:235-242.
3. Avilés, J. M., D. Parejo, and J. Rodríguez . 2011. Parental favouritism strategies in the asynchronously hatching European Roller (Coracias garrulus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65:1549-1557.
4. Bates, D. M. 2010. lme4: Mixed-effects modeling with R. (URL http://www.wordlatex.com/static/templates/pdf/book_B.pdf)
5. Bates, D., M. Maechler, B. Bolker, and S. Walker . 2014. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1-5. (URL http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4)
6. Bijlsma, R., J. Bundgaard, and W. F. Van Putten . 1999. Environmental dependence of inbreeding depression and purging in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Evol. Biol. 12:1125-1137.
7. Blount, J. D., P. F. Surai, R. G. Nager, D. C. Houston, A. P. Møller, M. L. Trewby, and M. W. Kennedy . 2002. Carotenoids and egg quality in the lesser black-backed gull Larus fuscus: a supplemental feeding study of maternal effects. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 269:29-36.
8. Carr, D. E., and M. R. Dudash . 1995. Inbreeding depression under a competitive regime in Mimulus guttatus: consequences for potential male and female function. Heredity 75:437-445.
9. Charlesworth, D., and B. Charlesworth . 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18:237-268.
10. Chen, X. 1993. Comparison of inbreeding and outbreeding in hermaphroditic Arianta arbustorum (L.) (land snail). Heredity 71:456-461.
11. Cheptou, P.-O., E. Imbert, J. Lepart, and J. Escarré . 2000. Effects of competition on lifetime estimates of inbreeding depression in the outcrossing plant Crepis sancta (Asteraceae). J. Evol. Biol. 13:522-531.
12. Cheptou, P.-O., J. Lepart, and J. Escarré . 2001. Inbreeding depression under intraspecific competition in a highly outcrossing population of Crepis sancta (Asteraceae): evidence for frequency-dependent variation. Am. J. Bot. 88:1424-1429.
13. Cheptou, P.-O., and K. Donohue . 2011. Environment-dependent inbreeding depression: its ecological and evolutionary importance. New Phytol. 189:395-407.
14. Cotton, P. A., J. Wright, and A. Kacelnik . 1999. Chick begging strategies in relation to brood hierarchies and hatching asynchrony. Am. Nat. 153:412-420.
15. Darwin C. R. 1876. The effects of cross and self-fertilization in the vegetable kingdom. Murray, London, UK.
16. Dudash, M. R. 1990. Relative fitness of selfed and outcrossed progeny in a self-compatible, protandrous species, Sabatia angularis L. (Gentianaceae): a comparison in three environments. Evolution 44:1129-1139.
17. Eraud, C., C. Trouvé, S. Dano, O. Chastel, and B. Faivre . 2008. Competition for resources modulates cell-mediated immunity and stress hormone level in nestling collared doves (Streptopelia decaocto). Gen. Comp. Endocr. 155:542-551.
18. Fitzmaurice, G. M., N. M. Laird, and J. H. Ware . 2004. Applied longitudinal analysis. John Wiley and sons, New York, USA.
19. Fox, C. W., and D. H. Reed . 2011. Inbreeding depression increases with environmental stress: an experimental study and meta-analysis. Evolution 65:246-258.
20. Gallardo, J. A., and R. Neira . 2005. Environmental dependence of inbreeding depression in cultured Coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch): aggressiveness, dominance and intraspecific competition. Heredity 95:449-456.
21. Halekoh, U., and S. Højsgaard . 2013. pbkrtest: Parametric bootstrap and Kenward Roger based methods for mixed model comparison. R package version 0.3-8. (URL http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pbkrtest)
22. Hemmings, N. L., J. Slate, and T. R. Birkhead . 2012. Inbreeding causes early death in a passerine bird. Nat. Comm. 3:863.
23. Jiménez, J. A., K. A. Hughes, G. Alaks, L. Graham, and R. C. Lacy . 1994. An experimental study of inbreeding depression in a natural habitat. Science 266:271-273 .
24. Keller, L. F., P. R. Grant, B. R. Grant, and K. Petren . 2002. Environmental conditions affect the magnitude of inbreeding depression in survival of Darwin's finches. Evolution 56:1229-1239.
25. Keller, L. F., and D. M. Waller . 2002. Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:230-241.
26. Kilner, R. 2002. Sex differences in canary (Serinus canaria) provisioning rules. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 52:400-407.
27. Kristensen, T. N., J. S.F. Barker, K. S. Pedersen, and V. Loeschcke . 2008. Extreme temperatures increase the deleterious consequences of inbreeding under laboratory and semi-natural conditions. Proc. R. Soc. B. 275:2055-2061.
28. Leimu, R., P. Vergeer, F. Angeloni, and N. J. Ouborg . 2010. Habitat fragmentation, climate change, and inbreeding in plants. Ann. NY. Acad. Sci. 1195:84-98.
29. Liao, W., and D. H. Reed . 2009. Inbreeding-environment interactions increase extinction risk. Anim. Conserv. 12:54-61.
30. Marr, A. B., P. Arcese, W. M. Hochachka, J. M. Reid, and L. F. Keller . 2006. Interactive effects of environmental stress and inbreeding on reproductive traits in a wild bird population. J. Anim. Ecol. 75:1406-1415.
31. Meagher, S., D. J. Penn, and W. K. Potts . 2000. Male-male competition magnifies inbreeding depression in wild house mice. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:3324-3329.
32. Merkling, T., O. Chastel, P. Blanchard, C. Trouvé, S. A. Hatch, and E. Danchin . 2014. Physiological and fitness correlates of experimentally altered hatching asynchrony magnitude in chicks of a wild seabird. Gen. Comp. Endocr. 198:32-38.
33. Mock, D. W., and G. A. Parker . 1997. The evolution of sibling rivalry. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, UK.
34. Müller, W., S. Boonen, T. G. G. Groothuis, and M. Eens . 2010. Maternal yolk testosterone in canary eggs: toward a better understanding of mechanisms and function. Behav. Ecol. 21:493-500.
35. Nager, R. G., P. Monaghan, and D. C. Houston . 2000. Within-clutch trade-offs between the number and quality of eggs: experimental manipulations in gulls. Ecology 81:1339-1350.
36. Nathan, A., S. Legge, and A. Cockburn . 2001. Nestling aggression in broods of a siblicidal kingfisher, the laughing kookaburra. Behav. Ecol. 12:716-725.
37. Neter, J., M. H. Kutner, C. J. Nachtsheim, and W. Wasserman . 1996. Applied linear statistical models. 4th ed. Irwin, Chicago, USA.
38. Newbrey, J. L., C. A. Paszkowski, K. J. McGraw, and S. Ogle . 2015. Laying-sequence variation in yolk carotenoids and egg characteristics in the red-winged blackbird Agelaius phoeniceus. J. Avian Biol. 46:46-54.
39. R Core Team 2014. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (URL http://www.R-project.org/).
40. Reed, D. H., C. W. Fox, L. S. Enders, and T. N. Kristensen . 2012. Inbreeding-stress interactions: evolutionary and conservation consequences. Ann. NY. Acad. Sci. 1256:33-48.
41. Royle, N. J., P. F. Surai, R. J. Mccartney, and B. K. Speake . 1999. Parental investment and egg yolk lipid composition in gulls. Funct. Ecol. 13:298-306.
42. Spottiswoode, C., and A. P. Møller . 2004. Genetic similarity and hatching success in birds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 271:267-272.
43. Stenning, M. J. 1996. Hatching asynchrony, brood reduction and other rapidly reproducing hypotheses. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:243-246.
44. Stoleson, S. H., and S. R. Beissinger . 1997. Hatching asynchrony, brood reduction, and food limitation in a Neotropical parrot. Ecol. Monogr. 67:131-154.
45. Szulkin, M., and B. C. Sheldon . 2007. The environmental dependence of inbreeding depression in a wild bird population. PLoS One 2:e1027. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001027
46. Valtonen, T. M., D. A. Roff, and M. J. Rantala . 2014. The deleterious effects of high inbreeding on male Drosophila melanogaster attractiveness are observed under competitive but not under non-competitive conditions. Behav. Genet. 44:144-154.
47. Viñuela, J. 1999. Sibling aggression, hatching asynchrony, and nestling mortality in the black kite (Milvus migrans). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 45:33-45.
48. Williams, J. D. 1994. Intraspecific variation in egg size and egg composition in birds: effects on offspring fitness. Biol. Rev. 69:35-59.