Detecting phylogenetic signal in mutualistic interaction networks using a Markov process model

Oikos

Volumn 123, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 1250-1260

  Minoarivelo, H O ^a   Hui, C ^a   Terblanche, J S ^a   Kosakovsky Pond, S L ^b   Scheffler, K ^a,b  

^a STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY   (South Africa)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84927788314     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/oik.00857     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Almeida Neto M. et al. 2008. A consistent metric for nestedness analysis in ecological systems: reconciling concept and measurement. - Oikos 117: 1227-1239.
2. Anderson B. et al. 2010. Predictable patterns of trait mismatches between interacting plants and insects. - BMC Evol. Biol. 10: 204.
3. Barabási A. L. and Albert R. 1999. Emergence of scaling in random networks. - Science 286: 509-512.
4. Bascompte J. and Jordano P. 2007. Plant-animal mutualistic networks: the architecture of biodiversity. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 38: 567-593.
5. Bascompte J. et al. 2003. The nested assembly of plant- animal mutualistic networks. - Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100: 9383-9387.
6. Bascompte J. et al. 2006. Asymmetric coevolutionary networks facilitate biodiversity maintenance. - Science 312: 431-433.
7. Benjamini Y. and Hochberg Y. 1995, Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. - J. R. Stat. Soc. 57: 289-300.
8. Bohonak A. J. and van der Linde K. 2004. RMA: Software for reduced major axis regression, Java version. - .
9. Burnham K. P. and Anderson D. R. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference. - Springer.
10. Churchill G. A. 1989. Stochastic models for heterogeneous DNA sequences. - Bull. Math. Biol. 51: 79-94.
11. Dicks L. V. et al. 2002. Compartmentalization in plant-insect flower visitor webs. - J. Anim. Ecol. 71: 32-43.
12. Durbin R. et al. 1999. Biological sequence analysis: probabilistic models of proteins and nucleic acids. - Cambridge Univ. Press.
13. Encinas-Viso F. et al. 2012. Phenology drives mutualistic network structure and diversity. - Ecol. Lett. 14: 198-208.
14. Felsenstein J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. - J. Mol. Evol. 17: 368-376.
15. Felsenstein J. 2004. Inferring phylogenies. - Sinauer.
16. Grafen A. 1989. The phylogenetic regression. - Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 326: 119-157.
17. Guimarães Jr., P. R. and Guimarães P. 2006. Improving the analyses of nestedness for large sets of matrices. - Environ. Model. Software 21: 1512-1513.
18. Guimarães Jr., P. R. et al. 2007. Build-up mechanisms determining the topology of mutualistic networks. - J. Theor. Biol. 249: 181-189.
19. Guimarães Jr., P. R. et al. 2011. Evolution and coevolution in mutualistic networks. - Ecol. Lett. 14: 877-885.
20. Guimera R., and Amaral L. A. N. 2005. Cartography of complex networks: modules and universal roles. - J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp.P02001.372.
21. Handcock M. S. and Jones J. H. 2004. Likelihood-based inference for stochastic models of sexual network formation. - Theor. Popul. Biol. 65: 413-422.
22. Holland J. N. and DeAngelis D. L. 2010. A consumer-resource approach to the density-dependent population dynamics of mutualism. - Ecology 91: 1286-1295.
23. Hui C. et al. 2013. Increasing functional modularity with residence time in the co-distribution of native and introduced vascular plants. - Nat. Commun. 4: 2454.
24. Jordano P. et al. 2003. Invariant properties in coevolutionary networks of plant animal interactions. - Ecol. Lett. 6: 69-81.
25. Kaiser-Bunbury C. N. et al. 2010. The robustness of pollination networks to the loss of species and interactions: a quantitative approach incorporating pollinator behaviour. - Ecol. Lett. 13: 442-452.
26. Kosakovsky Pond S. L. et al. 2005. HyPhy: hypothesis testing using phylogenies. - Bioinformatics 21: 676-679.
27. Kosakovsky Pond S. L. et al. 2011. A random effects branch- site model for detecting episodic diversifying selection. - Mol. Biol. Evol. 28: 3033-3043.
28. Krishna A. et al. 2008. A neutral-niche theory of nestedness in mutualistic networks. - Oikos 117: 1609-1618.
29. Lemey P.et al.(eds) 2009. The phylogenetic handbook, 2d edn. - Cambridge Univ. Press.
30. Medan D. et al. 2007. Analysis and assembling of network struc ture in mutualistic systems. - J. Theor. Biol. 246: 510-521.
31. Morales J. M. and Vázquez D. P. 2008. The effect of space in plant-animal mutualistic networks: insights from a simulation study. - Oikos 117: 1362-1370.
32. Murrell B. et al. 2012. Detecting individual sites subject to episodic diversifying selection. - PloS Genetics 8: e1002764.
33. Nuismer S. L. et al. 1999. Gene flow and geographically structured coevolution. - Proc. R. Soc. B 266: 605-609.
34. Nuismer S. L. et al. 2013. Coevolution and the architecture of mutualistic networks. - Evolution 67: 338-354.
35. Okuyama T. 2008. Do mutualistic networks follow power distributions?- Ecol. Complexity 5: 59-65.
36. Olesen J. M. et al. 2007. The modularity of pollination networks. - Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104: 19891-19896.
37. Olesen J. M. et al. 2008. Temporal dynamics in a pollination network. - Ecology 89: 1573-1582.
38. Rezende E. L. et al. 2007a. Effects of phenotypic complementarity and phylogeny on the nested structure of mutualistic networks. - Oikos 116: 1919-1929.
39. Rezende E. L. et al. 2007b. Non-random coextinctions in phylogenetically structured mutualistic networks. - Nature 448: 925-928.
40. Rodríguez-Gironés M. A. and Llandres A. L. 2008. Resource competition triggers the coevolution of long tongues and deep corolla tubes. - PLoS ONE 3: e2992.
41. Santamaría L. and Rodríguez-Gironés M A. 2007. Linkage rules for plant-pollinator networks: trait complementarity or exploitation barriers?- PLoS Biol. 5: e31.
42. Stroock D. W. 2005. An introduction to Markov processes. - Springer.
43. Suweis S. et al. 2013. Emergence of structural and dynamical properties of ecological mutualistic networks. - Nature 500: 449-452.
44. Takemoto K. and Arita M. 2010. Nested structure acquired through simple evolutionary process. - J. Theor. Biol. 264: 782-786.
45. Vázquez D. P. 2005. Degree distribution in plant-animal mutualistic networks: forbidden links or random interactions?- Oikos 108: 421-426.
46. Vázquez D. P. and Aizen M. A. 2003. Null model analyses of specialization in plant-pollinator interactions. - Ecol. Lett. 84: 2493-2501.
47. Vázquez D. P. et al. 2005. Interaction frequency as a surrogate for the total effect of animal mutualists on plants. - Ecol. Lett. 8: 1088-1094.
48. Vázquez D. P. et al. 2007. Species abundance and asymmetric interaction strength in ecological networks. - Oikos 116: 1120-1127.
49. Vázquez D. P. et al. 2009. Evaluating multiple determinants of the structure of plant-animal mutualistic networks- Ecology 90: 2039-2046.
50. Waser N. M. et al. 1996. Generalization in pollination system and why it matters. - Ecology 77: 1043-1060.
51. Yang Z. 2006. Computational molecular evolution. - Oxford Univ. Press.
52. Zhang F. et al. 2011. An interaction switch predicts the nested architecture of mutualistic networks. - Ecol. Lett. 14: 797-803.
53. Zhang F. et al. 2013. Adaptive divergence in Darwin's race: how coevolution can generate trait diversity in a pollination system. - Evolution 67: 548-560.