Comparison of noninvasive blood pressure measurements in patients with atrial fibrillation

Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 519-524

  Anastas, Zoe M ^a   Jimerson, Elnora ^a   Garolis, Salomeja ^a  

^a PROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Automated BP; BP; Manual BP; Sphygmomanometer; Technology assessment

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIASTOLE; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FEMALE; HEART ATRIUM FIBRILLATION; HEART RATE; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MONITORING; NURSING; NURSING ASSESSMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STANDARD; SYSTOLE; VALIDATION STUDY;

AGED, 80 AND OVER; ATRIAL FIBRILLATION; AUTOMATION; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); BLOOD PRESSURE DETERMINATION; CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH; CONFOUNDING FACTORS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); DIASTOLE; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; MALE; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; NURSING ASSESSMENT; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STROKE VOLUME; SYSTOLE;

EID: 58149359267     PISSN: 08894655     EISSN: 15505049     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.JCN.0000338935.71285.36     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Perloff D, Grim C, Flack J, et al. Human blood pressure determination by sphygmomanometry. Am Heart Assoc. 2001:15-17, 20.
2. Pickering T, Hall J, Appel L, et al. Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals. Hypertension. 2005;45:142-161.
3. van Montfrans F. Oscillometric blood pressure measurement: progress and problems. Blood Pressure Monit. 2001;6:287-290.
4. Giuliano K. Non-invasive blood pressure monitoring. In: Burns SM, ed. AACN Protocols for Practice: Noninvasive Monitoring. 2nd ed. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2005:83-97.
5. Lip G, Zarifis J, Beevers M, Beevers D. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 1996;78:350-353.
6. Stewart M, Gough K, Padfield P. Accuracy of automated blood pressure measuring devices in patients with controlled atrial fibrillation. J Hypertens. 1995;13(3):297-300.
7. Cleland M, Pham B, Miller D. Influence of arrhythmias on accuracy of non-invasive blood pressure monitors. Can J Anesth. 1998;45:699-705.
8. Eckert S, Gleichmann S, Gleichmann U. Automated blood pressure measurement in special situations: patients with chronic atrial fibrillation or chronic aortic regurgitation. Cardiology. 1996;85(suppl 3):92-98.
9. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Revised edition. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1977:313.
10. Lee K, Kleckhefer G. Measuring human responses using visual analogue scales. West J Nurs Res. 1989;11(1):128-133.
11. Bland J, Altman D. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307-310.
12. Chatburn R. Evaluation of instrument error and method of agreement. J Am Assoc Nurse Anesth. 1996;64(3):261-268.
13. Flemon W, Littner M. Measuring agreement between diagnostic devices. Chest. 2003;124:1535-1542.
14. Braam R, Thien T. The influence of data analysis on the reported accuracy of automated blood pressure measuring devices. J Hyperten. 2001;19:1765-1767.
15. Szaflarski N, Slaughter R. Technology assessment in critical care: understanding statistical analyses used to assess agreement between methods of clinical measurement. Am J Crit Care. 1996;5:207-216.
16. Bur A, Herkner H, Vicek M, et al. Factors influencing the accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure measurement in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:793-799.
17. Bur A, Hirschl M, Herkner H, et al. Accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure measurement according to the relation between cuff size and upper-arm circumference in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2000;28: 371-376.
18. Braam R, Thien T. Is the accuracy of blood pressure measuring devices underestimated at increasing blood pressure levels? Blood Pressure Monit. 2005;10:283-289.
19. Chang J, Rabinowitz D, Shea S. Sources of variability in blood pressure measurement using the Dinamap PRO 100 automated oscillometric device. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;158: 1218-1226.
20. Coe TR, Houghton K. Comparison of the automated Dinamap blood pressure monitor with the mercury sphygmomanometer for detecting hypertension in the day case pre-assessment clinic. J Ambul Surg. 2002;10:9-15.
21. Davis J, Davis I, Bennink L, et al. Are automatic blood pressure measurements accurate in trauma patients? J Trauma. 2003;55:860-863.
22. Parker S, Steigerwalt S. The Dinamap dilemma: inaccuracy of the commonly used Dinamap 8100 compared to simultaneous mercury manometer measurement in hospitalized patients at different levels of blood pressure. Am J Hypertens. 2004;17(suppl 1):S52.
23. Raptis A, Spring M, Viberti G. Comparison of blood pressure measurement methods in adult diabetics. Lancet. 1997;349:648-649.
24. Shahriari M, Rotenberg D, Nielsen J, et al. Measurement of arm blood pressure using different oscillometry manometers compared to auscultatory readings. Blood Pressure. 2003;12:155-159.
25. Terra S, Blum R, Wei G, et al. Concordance and variability of blood pressure measurement between automated and manual readings in subjects receiving phenyl-ephrine. Clin Pharm Ther. 2003;73:71.
26. van Ittersum F, Wijering R, Lambert J, et al. Determinants of the limits of agreement between the sphygmomanometer and the SpaceLabs 90297 device for blood pressure measurement in healthy volunteers and insulin-dependent diabetic patients. J Hypertens. 1998;16:1125-1130.
27. Bern L, Brandt M, Mbelu N, et al. Differences in blood pressure values obtained with automated and manual methods in medical patients. Medsurg Nurs. 2007;16: 356-362.
28. Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI). Clinical Investigation of Medical Devices for Human Subjects. Publication # 14155-1. Annapolis Junction, MDL: AAMI; 2003.