Greenhouse gas emissions from recovery of various North American conventional crudes

Energy

Volumn 74, Issue C, 2014, Pages 607-617

  Rahman, Md Mustafizur ^a   Canter, Christina ^a   Kumar, Amit ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Conventional crude oil; Crude recovery; GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions; Life cycle assessment

Indexed keywords

CRUDE OIL; EXTRACTION; GAS EMISSIONS; GASES; GREENHOUSE GASES; HEAVY OIL PRODUCTION; LAND USE; LIFE CYCLE; OIL FIELD DEVELOPMENT; OIL FIELDS; OIL SHALE; OIL WELL DRILLING; OIL WELLS; RECOVERY; WATER TREATMENT;

DATA INTENSIVE; ENGINEERING MODELS; EXTRACTION TECHNIQUES; LAND-USE CHANGE; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA); OIL PROCESSING; RECOVERY EFFICIENCY; TRANSPORTATION FUELS;

WELL DRILLING;

EID: 84927698956     PISSN: 03605442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.07.026     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. International Energy Agency. [cited 2014 Jan. 26]. Available from:. http://www.iea.org/media/files/WEO2013_factsheets.pdf.
2. Proposed regulation to implement the low carbon fuel standard 2009, Available from:. http://www.arb.ca.gov/fuels/lcfs/030409lcfs_isor_vol1.pdf.
3. Rosenfeld J., Pont J., Law K. Comparison of North American and imported crude oil life cycle GHG emissions 2009, TIAX LLC.
4. Keesom W., Unnasch S., Moretta J. Life cycle assessment comparison of North American and imported crudes July 2009, Jacobs Consultancy Life Cycle Associates.
5. Development of baseline data and analysis of life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of petroleum-based fuels 2008, National Energy Technology Laboratory.
6. Wang M.Q. Greenhouse gas, regulated emissions, and energy use in transportation (GREET) model 2008, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL.
7. (S&T)2 GHGenius model 4.02.Technical report, (S&T)2 consultants, prepared for natural resources Canada 2012.
8. OPGEE v1.1 DRAFT A 2013, Department of Energy Resources Engineering Stanford University.
9. Charpentier A.D., Bergerson J.A., MacLean H.L. Understanding the Canadian oil sands industry's greenhouse gas emissions. Environ Res Lett 2009, 4(1).
10. Brandt A.R. Variability and uncertainty in life cycle assessment models for greenhouse gas emissions from Canadian oil sands production. Environ Sci Technol 2012, 46(2):1253-1261.
11. Bergerson J.A., Kofoworola O., Charpentier A.D., Sleep S., MacLean H.L. Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of current oil sands technologies: surface mining and in situ applications. Environ Sci Technol 2012, 46(14):7865-7874.
12. Garg A., Vishwanathan S., Avashia V. Life cycle greenhouse gas emission assessment of major petroleum oil products for transport and household sectors in India. Energy Policy 2013, 58(0):38-48.
13. Crude oil production. Available from:. http://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/pet_crd_crpdn_adc_mbbl_a.htm.
14. U.S. Energy Information Administration EIA - independent statistics and analysis 2009, Available from:. http://www.eia.gov/state/analysis.cfm?sid=AK.
15. Sheridan M. California crude oil production and imports 2006.
16. Alaska oil and gas report, November 2009 2009, Available from:. http://dog.dnr.alaska.gov/Publications/Documents/AnnualReports/2009_Annual_Report.pdf.
17. Kaltenbach B., Walsh C., Foerster C., Walsh T., MacDonald J., Stokes P., et al. North slope of Alaska facility sharing study May 2004, Petrochemical Resources Alaska.
18. Enhanced oil recovery scoping study 1999, EPRI, Palo Alto, CA, TR-113836.
19. 2006 Annual report of the state oil & gas supervisor 2006, Available from:. ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/oil/annual_reports/2006/2006AnnualReport.pdf.
20. 2009 Annual report of the state oil & gas supervisor 2009, California Department of Conservation.
21. Environment Canada, Emergencies Science and Technology Division. Available from:. http://www.etc-cte.ec.gc.ca/databases/Oilproperties/pdf/WEB_Mars_Blend.pdf.
22. Weiland J., Azari M., Dorffer D. Case history review of the application ofpressure transient testing and production logging in monitoring the performance of the mars deepwater Gulf of Mexico field. SPE annual technical conference 2008, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Denver, Colorado, USA.
23. Drilling and Seismic Pioneers. Available from:. http://www.richcarriero.com/pdf/Crude%2520Oil%2520Varieties%2520Mexico.pdf.
24. 2-generation plant starts up for Cantarell reservoir pressure maintenance. Oil Gas J 2001, 99(11):41-47.
25. CrudeMonitor.ca. Canadian crude quality monitoring program. Available from:. http://www.crudemonitor.ca/crude.php?acr=BRS.
26. Facts and statistics. [cited 2013 Nov. 02]. Available from:. http://www.energy.alberta.ca/OilSands/791.asp.
27. Water and oil: an overview of the use of water for enhanced oil recovery in Alberta March 2004, Government Of Alberta, Available from:. http://www.waterforlife.gov.ab.ca/docs/water_oil_info_booklet.pdf.
28. Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers. [cited 2013 Nov. 02]. Available from:. http://membernet.capp.ca/SHB/Sheet.asp?SectionID=3%26SheetID=76.
29. TransCanada. 2012 [cited 2013 Nov. 06]. Available from:. http://www.transcanada.com/search_results.html?q=annual+report+2012.
30. Brandt A.R. Oil depletion and the energy efficiency of oil production: the case of California. Sustainability 2011, 3(12):1833-1854.
31. El-Houjeiri H., McNally S., Brandt A.R. Oil production greenhouse gas emissions estimator OPGEE v1.1 DRAFT A 2013, Department of Energy Resources Engineering Stanford University.
32. Offshore oil and gas. [cited 2013 Nov. 09]. Available from:. http://www.whoi.edu/science/MPC/dept/meetings/Luce:presentations/Marine%2520Minerals%25202.pdf.
33. EIA U.S Energy Information Administration. 2013 [cited 2013 Nov. 09]. Available from:. http://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/pet_crd_crpdn_adc_mbbl_a.htm.
34. Aquino J.A., Ruiz J.M., Flores M.A., Garcia J.H. Sihil field: another giant below Cantarell, offshore Campeche, Mexico, July 2001. Leading Edge 2001, 20(7):761-762.
35. 2 equivalent emissions reductions via flare and vent mitigation: a case study for Alberta, Canada. Int J Greenh Gas Control 2012, 8:121-131.
36. CAPP, Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers. [cited 2013 Nov. 09]. Available from:. http://www.capp.ca/library/statistics/handbook/pages/statisticalTables.aspx?sectionNo=3.
37. Yeh S., Jordaan S.M., Brandt A.R., Turetsky M.R., Spatari S., Keith D.W. Landuse greenhouse gas emissions from conventional oil production and oil sands. Environ Sci Technol 2010, 44:8766-8772.
38. Enhanced oil recovery. U.S Department of Energy. [cited 2013 Nov. 10]. Available from:. http://energy.gov/fe/science-innovation/oil-gas/enhanced-oil-recovery.
39. Speight J.G. Enhanced recovery methods for heavy oil and tar sands 2009, Gulf Publishing Company.
40. Wang M.Q. GREET 1.5-Transportation fuel-cycle model 1999, Argonne National Laboratory.
41. Wang M. GREET 1 2012, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL.
42. Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission. [cited 2013 Nov. 11]. Available from:. http://doa.alaska.gov/ogc/orders/co/co300_399/co341d.htm.
43. Production data archives. State of Alaska: Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, Department of Administration. [cited 2013 Nov. 11]. Available from:. http://doa.alaska.gov/ogc/production/ProdArchives/parchiveindex.html.
44. Matthews C.S. Steamflooding. JPetrol Technol 1983, 35(3):465-471.
45. Lach J. IOR for deepwater Gulf of Mexico Dec. 2010, Available from:. http://www.rpsea.org/media/files/project/89184cb4/07121-1701-FR-IOR_Deepwater_Gulf_Mexico-12-15-10_P.pdf.
46. Mars oil and gas field project. Gulf of Mexico: Offshore Technology. [cited 2013 Nov. 11]. Available from:. http://www.offshore-technology.com/projects/mars/.
47. Guzmán A.E., Aquino J.A., Ruiz J.M., Flores M.A., García J.H. Pemex discoveries of new oil beneath the Cantarell field, offshore Campeche, México. 17th world petroleum congress proceedings 2002.
48. Cantarell oilfield. Gulf of Mexico: Offshore Technology. [cited 2013 Nov. 11]. Available from:. http://www.offshore-technology.com/projects/cantarell/.
49. Millard V., Berndtsoon N.G., Bry J.A. Current and required economics in relation to further Alberta enhanced recovery of conventional crude. JCan Petrol 1976, 15:20-31.
50. Hawkins B. Beyond primary and secondary recovery business case for conventional EOR 2005, Available from:. http://www.neb-one.gc.ca/clf-nsi/rnrgynfmtn/nrgyrprt/nrgyftr/cnslttnrnd1/prsnttn/blaine_hawkins.pdf.
51. Griffiths M., Woynillowicz D. Oil and troubled waters: reducing the impact of the oil and gas industry on Alberta's water resources 2003, Pembina Institute, Available from:. http://www.ualberta.ca/%7Eersc/water/links/pembina.pdf.
52. Roughness and surface coefficients for ventilation ducts. [cited 2013 Nov. 11]. Available from:. http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/surface-roughness-ventilation-ducts-d_209.html.
53. Clegg J.D. Volume IV: production operations engineering. Petroleum engineering handbook 2007, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, TX. L.W. Lake (Ed.).
54. California greenhouse gas emissions for 2000 to 2011-trends of emissions and other indicators 2013, Air Resources Board.
55. Johnson M. Flare efficiency & emissions: past & current research. Available from:. http://www.flaringreductionforum.org/downloads/20081205-830/Johnson.pdf.
56. Alaska natural gas gross withdrawals and production 2013, [cited 2013 Nov. 13]. Available from:. http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_prod_sum_dcu_sak_a.htm.
57. Inventory of U.S Greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990-2006 2008, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Available from:. http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/Downloads/ghgemissions/08_CR.pdf.
58. California natural gas gross withdrawals and production 2013, [cited 2013 Nov. 2013]. Available from:. http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_prod_sum_dcu_sca_a.htm.
59. California field production of crude oil 2013, [cited 2013 Nov. 13]. Available from:. http://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=PET%26s=MCRFPCA1%26f=A.
60. Gulf of Mexico natural gas gross withdrawals and production 2013, [cited 2013 Nov. 13]. Available from:. http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_prod_sum_dcu_r3fm_a.htm.
61. Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990-2004 2006, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Available from:. http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/Downloads/ghgemissions/06_Complete_Report.pdf.
62. Federal offshore- Gulf of Mexico field production of crude oil 2013, [cited 2013 Nov. 13]. Available from:. http://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=PET%26s=MCRFP3FM1%26f=A.
63. Global gas flaring estimates. [cited 2013 Dec. 05]. Available from:. http://ngdc.noaa.gov/eog/interest/gas_flares.html.
64. Mexico-U.S Energy Information Administration (EIA). [cited 2013 Dec. 05]. Available from:. http://www.eia.gov/countries/country-data.cfm?fips=MX#pet.
65. Upstream petroleum industry flaring and venting report 2010, Energy Resources Conservation Board, Available from:. http://www.aer.ca/documents/sts/st60B-2010.pdf.
66. Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers. [cited 2013 Dec. 05]. Available from:. http://www.capp.ca/library/statistics/handbook/pages/statisticalTables.aspx?sectionNo=3.
67. Manning F.S., Thompson R. Oilfield processing. Crude oil 1995, vol. 2. Pennwell, Tulsa, Oklahama.
68. Manning F.S., Thompson R. Oilfield processing of petroleum. Natural gas 1991, vol. 1. Pennwell, Tulsa, Oklahama.
69. Vlasopoulos N., Memon F.A., Butler D., Murphy R. Life cycle assessment of wastewater treatment technologies treating petroleum process waters. Sci Total Environ 2006, 367(1):58-70.
70. Greenhouse gas inventory data - 2000 to 2011 2013, [cited 2014 Jan. 29]. Available from:. http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/inventory/data/data.htm.