Staff's views on delivering patient-led therapy during inpatient stroke rehabilitation: A focus group study with lessons for trial fidelity

Trials

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Horne, Maria ^a   Thomas, Nessa ^b   Vail, Andy ^b,c   Selles, Rudd ^d   McCabe, Candy ^e,f   Tyson, Sarah ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRADFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c SALFORD ROYAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^d ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^e ROYAL NATIONAL HOSPITAL FOR RHEUMATIC DISEASES   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Recruitment; Rehabilitation; Stroke; Trial

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATIENT AUTONOMY; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT POSITIONING; PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SKILL; CLINICAL TRIAL; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; SELF CARE; STROKE;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SELF CARE; STROKE;

EID: 84927641675     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17456215     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13063-015-0646-9     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Hasson H, Blomberg S, Dunér A. Fidelity and moderating factors in complex interventions: a case study of a continuum of care program for frail elderly people in health and social care. Implement Sci. 2012;7:23. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-23.
2. Mowbray CT, Holter MC, Teague GB, Bybee D. Fidelity criteria: Development, measurement, and validation. Am J Eval. 2003;24:315-40.
3. Borrelli B. The assessment, monitoring, and enhancement of treatment fidelity in public health clinical trials. J Pub Health Dentist. 2011;71:S52-63.
4. Dusenbury L, Brannigan R, Falco M, Hansen WB. A review of research on fidelity of implementation: implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. Health Educ Res Theor Prac. 2003;18:237-56.
5. Madson MB, Campbell TC. Measures of fidelity in motivational enhancement: a systematic review. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2006;31:67-73.
6. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1655. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1655.
7. Naleppa MJ, Cagle JG. Treatment fidelity in social work intervention research: a review of published studies. Res Soc Work Pract. 2010;20:674.
8. Glasgow RE, Lichtenstein E, Marcus AC. Why don't we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. Am J Publ Health. 2003;93:1261.
9. Noonan RK, Emshoff JG, Mooss A, Armstrong M, Weinberg J, Ball B. Adoption, adaptation, and fidelity of implementation of sexual violence prevention programs. Heal Promot Pract. 2009;10:59S.
10. Tyson SF, Wilkinson J, Thomas N, Selles R, McCabe C, Tyrrell P et al. Phase II randomized controlled trial of patient-led mirror therapy and lower limb exercises in acute stroke. Neurorehab Neural Repair. 2015. doi:1545968314565513.
11. Bernhardt J, Dewey HM, Thrift AG, Donnan GA. Inactive and alone: physical activity in the first 14 days of acute stroke unit care. Stroke. 2004;35:1005-9.
12. Esmonde T, McGinley J, Wittwer J, Goldie P, Martin C. Stroke rehabilitation: patient activity during non-therapy time. Aust J Physiother. 1997;43:43-51.
13. Bernhardt J, Chan J, James NI, Collier JM. Little therapy, little physical activity: rehabilitation within the first 14 days of organized stroke unit care. J Rehab Med. 2007;39:43-8.
14. Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. National Sentinel Stroke Audit 2010 Round 7. London, UK: Royal College of Physicians of London; 2011. https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/sites/default/files/national_sentinel_stroke_clinical_audit_2010_-_generic_report_0.pdf. Accessed September 2014.
15. Kwakkel G, Van Peppen R, Wagenaar RC, Wood Dauphinee S, Richards C, Ashburn A, et al. Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke. 2004;35:2529-39.
16. Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods. 2006;18:59-82.
17. Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus groups. A practical guide for applied research 3. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2000.
18. Ritchie J, Lewis J, Nicholls CM, Ormston R. Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2013.
19. Tyson S, Connell L, Lennon S, Busse M. What do acute stroke physiotherapists do? An exploration of the content of therapy in the UK. Clin Rehab. 2009;23:1051-5.
20. Tyson S, Connell L, Busse M, Lennon S. What is Bobath? A survey of UK stroke physiotherapists' perceptions of the content of the Bobath Concept to treat postural control and mobility problems after stroke. Disab Rehab. 2009;31:448-57.
21. Forster A, Dickerson J, Melbourn A, Steadman J, Wittink M, Young J et al. The development and implementation of the structured training programme for caregivers of inpatients after stroke (TRACS) intervention: The London Stroke Carers Training Course. Clin rehab. 2014. doi:10.1177/0269215514543334.
22. Masterson-Algar P, Burton CR, Rycroft-Malone J, Sackley CM, Walker MF. Towards a programme theory for fidelity in the evaluation of complex interventions. J Eval Clin Prac. 2014;20:445-52.
23. May C, Finch T. Implementing, embedding and integrating practices: an outline of normalization process theory. Sociology. 2009;43:535-54.
24. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, How to change practice; Understand, Identify and Overcome Barriers to Change. 2007. http://www.nice.org.uk/Media/Default/About/what-we-do/Into-practice/Support-for-service-improvement-and-audit/How-to-change-practice-barriers-to-change.pdf. Accessed October 2014.
25. Ramsay CR, Wallace SA, Garthwaite PH, Monk AF, Russell IT, Grant AM. Assessing the learning curve effect in health technologies. Lessons from the nonclinical literature. Int J Tech Asses Health Care. 2002;18:1-10.
26. Cook JA, Ramsay CR, Fayers P. Statistical evaluation of learning curve effects in surgical trials. Clin Trials. 2004;1:421-7.
27. De Silva D. Evidence: Helping people help themselves. Health Found. 2011. http://www.health.org.uk/public/cms/75/76/313/2434/Helping%20people%20help%20themselves%20publication.pdf?realName=03JXkw.pdf. Accessed 29 January 2015.
28. Glasgow RE, Davis CL, Funnell MA, Beck A. Implementing practical interventions to support chronic illness self-management. J Qual Pat Safety. 2003;29:563-74.
29. Blakeman T, Macdonald W, Bower P, Gately C, Chew-Graham C. A qualitative study of GPs' attitudes to self-management of chronic disease. BJ Gen Prac. 2006;56:407-14.
30. Dures E, Hewlett S, Ambler N, Jenkins R, Clarke J, Gooberman-Hill R. Rheumatology clinicians' experiences of brief training and implementation of skills to support patient self-management. BMC Musculoskel Dis. 2014;15:108.
31. Carroll C, Patterson M, Wood S, Booth A, Rick J, Balain S. A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implement Sci. 2007;2:40.
32. Bauman LJ, Stein REK, Ireys HT. Reinventing fidelity: the transfer of social technology among settings. Am J Comm Psychol. 1991;19:619-39.
33. Dusenbury L, Brannigan R, Falco M, Hansen WB. A review of research on fidelity of implementation: implications for drug abuse preventions in school settings. Health Ed Res. 2003;18:237-56.