The public planning of private planning: An analysis of controlled spontaneity in the netherlands

Cities and Private Planning: Property Rights, Entrepreneurship and Transaction Costs

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 248-268

  Buitelaar, Edwin ^a   Galle, Maaike ^a   Sorel, Niels ^a  

^a PBL NETHERLANDS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AGENCY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84927601253     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4337/9781783475063.00020     Document Type: Chapter

References (44)

1. 00:/ (2011), ‘Compendium for the civic economy.’ Available at: Http://issuu.com/architecture00/docs/compendium_for_the_civic_economy_publ.
2. Alexander, E.R. (2005), ‘Institutional transformation and planning: From institutionalization theory to institutional design,’ Planning Theory, 3, 209-23.
3. Ball, M. (1998), ‘Institutions in British property research: A review,’ Urban Studies, 35(9), 1501-17.
4. Benson, J.T. (1977), ‘Organizations: A dialectical view,’ Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(1), 1-21.
5. Boelens, L. (2010), ‘Theorizing practice and practicing theory: Outlines for an actor-relational approach in planning,’ Planning Theory, 9(1), 28-62.
6. Buitelaar, E. (2010), ‘Cracks in the myth: Challenges to land policy in The Netherlands,’ Journal of Economic and Social Geography, 101(3), 349-56.
7. Buitelaar, E., S. Feenstra, M. Galle, J. Lekkerkerker, N. Sorel and J. Tennekes (2012), Vormgeven aan de spontane stad: Belemmeringen en kansen voor organische stedelijke herontwikkeling, Den Haag and Amsterdam, Netherlands: Planbureau voor de Leefomgeving/Urhahn Urban Design.
8. Buitelaar, E., M. Galle and N. Sorel (2011), ‘Plan-led planning systems in development-led practices: An empirical analysis into the (lack of) institutionalisation of planning law,’ Environment and Planning A, 43, 928-41.
9. Buitelaar, E, A. Lagendijk and W. Jacobs (2007), ‘A theory of institutional change: Illustrated by Dutch city-provinces and Dutch land policy,’ Environment and Planning A, 39, 891- 908.
10. CEC (1997), The EU Compendium of Spatial Planning Systems and Policies, Luxembourg: European Commission.
11. ESPON (2006), Governance of Territorial and Urban Policy from EU to Local Level, project 2.3.2, Luxembourg: ESPON.
12. Faludi, A. and A. van der Valk (1994), Rule and Order; Dutch Planning Doctrine in the Twentieth Century, Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
13. Giddens, A. (1984), The Constitution of Modernity, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
14. Gualini, E. (2001), Planning and the Intelligence of Institutions: Interactive Approaches to Territorial Policy-making between Institutional Design and Institution Building, Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
15. Hajer, M.A. (1995), The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy of Process, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
16. Hajer, M.A. (2009), Authoritative Governance: Policy-making in the Age of Mediatisation, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
17. Hajer, M.A. (2011), The Energetic Society, Den Haag, Netherlands: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.
18. Hall, P.A. and R. Taylor (1996), ‘Political science and the three new institutionalisms,’ Political Studies, 64, 936-57.
19. Healey, P. (1997), Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies, Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.
20. Healey, P. (2004), ‘The treatment of space and place in the new strategic spatial planning in Europe,’ International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(1), 45-67.
21. Hodgson, G.M. (2004), The Evolution of Institutional Economics: Agency, Structure and Darwinism in American Institutionalism, London, UK: Routledge.
22. Jacobs, J. (1961), The Death and Life of Great American Cities, New York, NY: Random House.
23. Kingdon, J.W. (1995), Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies, New York, NY: Harper Collins.
24. Klerk, L. de (1998), Particuliere plannen. Denkbeelden en initiatieven van de stedelijke elite inzake de volkswoningbouw en de stedebouw in Rotterdam 1860-1950, Rotterdam, Netherlands: NAi Uitgevers.
25. Klerk, L. de (2008), De modernisering van de stad, 1850-1914. De opkomst van de planmatige stadsontwikkeling in Nederland, Rotterdam, NL: NAi Uitgevers.
26. Krabben, E. van der (1995), Urban Dynamics: A Real Estate Perspective. An Institutional Analysis of the Production of the Built Environment, Amsterdam, Netherlands: Thesis Publishers.
27. Krabben, E. van der (2009), ‘Retail development in the Netherlands: Evaluating the effects of radical changes in planning policy,’ European Planning Studies, 17(7), 1029-48.
28. Lindblom, C.E. (1959), ‘The science of “muddling through,”’ Public Administration Review, 19(2), 79-88.
29. March, J.G. and J.P. Olsen (1989), Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics, New York, NY: The Free Press.
30. Mori, H. (1998), ‘Land conversion at the urban fringe: A comparative study of Japan, Britain and the Netherlands,’ Urban Studies, 25(9), 1541-58.
31. Moroni, S. (2007), ‘Planning, liberty and the rule of law,’ Planning Theory, 6, 146-63.
32. Needham, B. (1997), ‘Land policy in the Netherlands,’ Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 3, 291-96.
33. North, D.C. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34. Oosterlynck, S., J. van den Broeck, L. Albrechts, F. Moulaert and A. Verhetsel (2010), Strategic Spatial Projects: Catalysts for Change? London, UK: Routledge.
35. PBL (2011), Nederland in 2040: Een land van regio’s - Ruimtelijke Verkenning 2011, Den Haag, Netherlands: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.
36. Putnam, R. (1993), Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
37. Schmidt, V. (2008), ‘Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse,’ Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 303-26.
38. Seo, M. and W.E.D. Creed (2002), ‘Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective,’ Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 222-47.
39. Tubío-Sánchez, J.M., F. Ónega-López, W. Timmermans and R. Crecente-Maseda (2012), ‘Institutional change in land planning: Two cases from Galicia,’ European Planning Studies. Available at: Http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09654313.2012.722947#.U2f3OcdM4Vg.
40. Uitermark, J. (2012), ‘Spontane stedenbouw als politiek,’ Stedebouw & Ruimtelijke Ordening.
41. Urhahn Urban Design (2010), The Spontaneous City, Amsterdam, Netherlands: BIS Publishers.
42. Weick, K.E. (1976), ‘Educational organizations as loosely-coupled systems,’ Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1-21.
43. Waterhout, B. (2008), The Institutionalization of European Spatial Planning, Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.
44. Williamson, O.E. (1996), The Mechanisms of Governance, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.