Differences in patient outcomes after conventional versus real time perfusion stress echocardiography in men versus women:A prospective randomised trial

Heart

Volumn 101, Issue 7, 2015, Pages 559-564

  Laiq, Zenab ^a   Smith, Lynette M ^b   Xie, Feng ^a   Chamsi Pasha, Mohammed ^a   Porter, Thomas R ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATROPINE; DOBUTAMINE; PERFLUTREN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTINUOUS INFUSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVENTIONAL STRESS ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DEATH; DRUG DOSE INCREASE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GENDER; HEART INFARCTION; HEART PERFUSION; HEART VENTRICLE WALL MOTION; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SELECTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REAL TIME MYOCARDIAL CONTRAST ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; REVASCULARIZATION; SEX DIFFERENCE; STRESS ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ECHOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES;

CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, STRESS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEX FACTORS;

EID: 84927597750     PISSN: 13556037     EISSN: 1468201X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-306869     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, et al. American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics-2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2013;127:143-52.
2. Maas AH, van der Schouw YT, Regitz-Zagrosek V, et al. Red alert for women's heart: the urgent need for more research and knowledge on cardiovascular disease in women: proceedings of the workshop held in Brussels on gender differences in cardiovascular disease, 29 September 2010. Eur Heart J 2011;32:1362-8.
3. Shimoni S, Zoghbi WA, Xie F, et al. Real-time assessment of myocardial perfusion and wall motion during bicycle and treadmill exercise echocardiography: comparison with single photon emission computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:741-7.
4. Tsutsui JM, Elhendy A, Anderson JR, et al. Prognostic value of dobutamine stress myocardial contrast perfusion echocardiography. Circulation 2005;112:1444-50.
5. Gaibazzi N, Reverberi C, Lorenzoni V, et al. Prognostic value of high-dose dipyridamole stress myocardial contrast perfusion echocardiography. Circulation 2012;126:1217-24.
6. Miszalski-Jamka T, Kuntz-Hehner S, Schmidt H, et al. Myocardial contrast echocardiography enhances long-term prognostic value of supine bicycle stress two-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009;22:1220-7.
7. Porter TR, Smith LM, Wu J, et al. Patient outcome following 2 different stress imaging approaches: a prospective randomized comparison. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61:2446-55.
8. Dawson D, Kaul S, Peters D, et al. Prognostic value of dipyridamole stress myocardial contrast echocardiography: comparison with single photon emission computed tomography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009;22:954-60.
9. Thomas D, Xie F, Smith LM, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of conventional stress echocardiography and real-time perfusion stress echocardiography in detecting significant coronary artery disease. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2012;25:1207-14.
10. Douglas PS, Khandheria B, Stainback RF, et al.; American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Society of Echocardiography, American College of Emergency Physicians, American Heart Association, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. ACCF/ASE/ ACEP/AHA/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR 2008 appropriateness criteria for stress echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:1127-47.
11. Mulvagh SL, Rakowski H, Vannan MA, et al.; American Society of Echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Consensus Statement on the Clinical Applications of Ultrasonic Contrast Agents in Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2008;21:1179-201.
12. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, et al.; American Society of Echocardiography's Nomenclature and Standards Committee, Task Force on Chamber Quantification, American College of Cardiology Echocardiography Committee, American Heart Association, European Association of Echocardiography, European Society of Cardiology. Recommendations for chamber quantification. Eur J Echocardiogr 2006;7:79-108.
13. Xie F, Dodla S, O'Leary E, et al. Detection of subendocardial ischemia in the left anterior descending territory with real time myocardial contrast echocardiography during dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2008;1: 271-8.
14. Heupler S, Mehta R, Lobo A, et al. Prognostic implications of exercise echocardiography in women with known or suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;30:414-20.
15. Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Kiat H, et al. Effective risk strati fication using exercise myocardial perfusion SPECT in women: gender-related differences in prognostic nuclear testing. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:34-44.
16. Cortigiani L, Sicari R, Bigi R, et al. Impact of gender on risk stratification by stress echocardiography. Am J Med 2009;122:301-9.
17. Shufelt CL, Thomson LE, Goykhman P, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging myocardial perfusion reserve index assessment in women with microvascular coronary dysfunction and reference controls. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2013;3:153-60.